Open Access

A set of vectors for introduction of antibiotic resistance genes by in vitro Cre-mediated recombination

BMC Research Notes20081:135

DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-1-135

Received: 19 November 2008

Accepted: 23 December 2008

Published: 23 December 2008

Abstract

Background

Introduction of new antibiotic resistance genes in the plasmids of interest is a frequent task in molecular cloning practice. Classical approaches involving digestion with restriction endonucleases and ligation are time-consuming.

Findings

We have created a set of insertion vectors (pINS) carrying genes that provide resistance to various antibiotics (puromycin, blasticidin and G418) and containing a loxP site. Each vector (pINS-Puro, pINS-Blast or pINS-Neo) contains either a chloramphenicol or a kanamycin resistance gene and is unable to replicate in most E. coli strains as it contains a conditional R6Kγ replication origin. Introduction of the antibiotic resistance genes into the vector of interest is achieved by Cre-mediated recombination between the replication-incompetent pINS and a replication-competent target vector. The recombination mix is then transformed into E. coli and selected by the resistance marker (kanamycin or chloramphenicol) present in pINS, which allows to recover the recombinant plasmids with 100% efficiency.

Conclusion

Here we propose a simple strategy that allows to introduce various antibiotic-resistance genes into any plasmid containing a replication origin, an ampicillin resistance gene and a loxP site.

Background

Antibiotics blasticidin S, puromycin and G418 are frequently used for selection of stably transfected mammalian cell lines [1]. For this purpose plasmid expressing a gene of interest may be cotransfected with a plasmid containing a convenient antibiotic resistance gene [2, 3]. Alternatively the antibiotic resistance gene and the gene of interest can be combined in one plasmid [4].

Unfortunately, the choice of several antibiotic resistance markers is available only for few types of expression vectors (for example, pcDNA3.1 vector series, Invitrogen) [5]. That is why usually researchers have to introduce new antibiotic resistance genes into the original vector. In this case, the cloning strategy may be complicated by the absence of the unique and convenient restriction sites in the plasmids containing long inserts.

Here we propose to introduce the antibiotic resistance genes using recombination (Fig. 1). We have created several insertion vectors (pINS-Puro, pINS-Neo, pINS-Blast) containing the pac (puromycin-N-acetyl transferase) [6, 7], aph (aminoglycoside phosphotransferase) [8, 9] and bsd (blasticidin S deaminase) [10] genes that provide resistance to puromycin, G418 (G418 is an aminoglycoside, similar in structure to neomycin) and blasticidin S respectively (Fig 2). pINS vectors can be introduced via Cre-recombination [11] into several commercially available target vectors containing the LoxP sites, for example phrGFP vector (Stratagene). In addition we created several new target vectors: pT-FLAG, pT-BS and pT-TK (Fig. 2).
Figure 1

General outline of the antibiotic genes introduction via recombination. pINS plasmids (pINS-Blast, pINS-Puro and pINS-Neo) produced in the pir+ E. coli strains can be integrated via Cre-mediated recombination into any of the target vectors (phrGFP, pT-FLAG, pT-TK and pT-BS) produced in the pir- E. coli strains. The recombination mix is transformed into the pir- E. coli strain and the recombinant plasmid is selected by Kan or Cam markers provided by pINS vector.

Figure 2

Maps of Target (phRGFP, pT-FLAG, pT-TK and pT-BS) and Insertion (pINS-Blast, pINS-Puro and pINS-Neo) vectors. pUNI-10 vector used as a backbone for cloning of the antibiotic resistance genes (Blast, Puro and Neo) is also shown. Only relevant restriction sites are shown. Detailed maps are available upon request.

Construction of the insertion vectors pINS

We have used the backbone of the pUNI-10 plasmid [12, 13] (Fig 1, 2) for construction of the insertion vectors pINS-Puro, pINS-Neo and pINS-Blast. pUNI-10 contains the R6Kγ origin of replication [14, 15] and the LoxP site [11] recognized by Cre recombinase [16]. R6Kγ origin is active only in E. coli strains expressing the π-protein encoded by the pir gene. Cloning and production of the pINS plasmids was performed in the pir+ E. coli strain BW23474 expressing the mutant form of the π-protein (pir-116) that allows to maintain a plasmid with the R6Kγ origin at a high copy number [17, 13].

Thus the pINS vectors contain four principal elements:

- R6Kγ origin of replication;

- LoxP site required for Cre-mediated recombination with target vector;

- Genes coding for either chloramphenicol acetyl transferase [18] or aminophosphotransferase [19] providing the resistance to the antibiotics chloramphenicol (Cam) or kanamycin (Kan), respectively. These genes are required for the selection of the recombinant constructs in E. coli;

- Genes coding for either pac (puromycin-N-acetyl transferase), aph (aminoglycoside phosphotransferase) or bsd (blasticidin S deaminase) controlled by the SV40 promoter. These genes provide mammalian cells with the resistance to puromycin, G418, or blasticidin S.

Conventional E. coli strains (XL-1 Blue, DH5α, JM-109 etc.) are pir- and cannot maintain the pINS plasmid. In contrast, the products of in vitro recombination between the pINS plasmid and the target vector can successfully replicate in the pir- strains due to the presence of the active origin of replication provided by the target vector. The selection of the recombinant plasmids is achieved by the markers Kan or Cam provided by pINS plasmid. This selection procedure allows to achieve 100% yield of recombinant plasmids (Fig. 1).

Construction of the target vectors

Target vectors compatible with our pINS plasmids must contain only three necessary elements (Fig. 1):

- the LoxP site;

- An origin of replication active in the pir- E. coli strain, for example, pUC-origin [20];

- An appropriate antibiotic resistance gene, for example beta-lactamase (bla) [21] providing resistance to ampicillin (Amp).

We have modified several commercially available plasmids (phRL-TK (Promega) and pBluescriptII (Stratagene) by introduction of the LoxP sites resulting in the target vectors pT-TK and pT-BS respectively (Fig 2).

pT-TK vector contains the Renilla luciferase gene under control of the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase promoter (TK) [22]. pT-TK vector can be used for the expression of a gene of interest at the levels that are 10-20 times lower than produced by the CMV promoter at least in some types of mammalian cells (HeLa, NIH 3T3 [23] and MEF [23]). For this purpose, the luciferase gene has to be cut out by NheI and XbaI and replaced by the gene of interest. Alternatively, any other vector can be used as a target vector in our system if upgraded by insertion of the LoxP sites as described [12].

pT-BS vector contains the convenient pBluescriptII polylinker [24] suitable for cloning of the expression modules containing a gene of interest under the control of appropriate promoter.

We have also used the commercially available target vector phrGFP (Stratagene) already containing the LoxP site. We have also created a pT-FLAG vector by replacing the GFP via FLAG-tag in the phrGFP vector (Fig 2).

pT-FLAG vector is coding for the FLAG-tag (DYKDDDDK) [25] and the cytomegalovirus promoter (CMV) [26]. It is suitable for cloning and expression of proteins with the N-terminal FLAG-tag.

All target vectors were cloned and produced in the XL-1 Blue strain (pir-).

Introduction of an antibiotic resistance gene in the target vectors by in vitro recombination

We have performed in vitro recombination between the pINS and the target vectors using Cre-recombinase. We have transformed the pir- and pir+ E. coli strains (XL-1 Blue and BW23474 respectively) with the reaction mixture in order to test the efficiency of the reaction and selected the transformants using either kanamycin, chloramphenicol or ampicillin.

Recombination mix contains the product of recombination (pINS × target vector) as well as the initial pINS and target vectors that did not take part in the reaction (Fig. 3). Recombination mix produced ampicillin-resistant colonies in cases of pir- and pir+ strains due to the presence of the initial target vector (Amp). The pir+ strain transformed by the recombination mix also produced kanamycin or chloramphenicol-resistant colonies due to the presence of the initial pINS vector (Can or Kan). In contrast, we have observed much fewer kanamycin- or chloramphenicol-resistant colonies in the pir- strain transformed by the recombination mix. These colonies only appear if the cells receive replication-competent product of recombination containing the kanamycin/chloramphenicol resistance gene (pINS × target vector). Alternatively, these colonies could appear from the contaminants of the initial plasmids.
Figure 3

Upper part. Schematic representation of the Cre-mediated recombination between Insertion vector pINS-Neo and Target vector phrGFP. Lower part. XL1 Blue (pir+) and BW23474 (pir-) E. coli strains were transformed by the pINS-Puro, phrGFP vectors (50 ng each) and the recombination mix (Neo × GFP). 1/10th of the transformed cells was selected on the LB plates containing either ampicillin or kanamycin. Insertion vector pINS-Neo containing R6Kγ can transform pir+ but not pir- strain and produces kanamycin-resistant colonies. Target vector phrGFP containing pUC-origin can transform pir+ as well as pir- strain and produces ampicillin-resistant colonies. Recombination mix contains initial vectors as well as the product of recombination and thus can transform both pir- and pir+ strains and produce ampicillin and kanamycin-resistant colonies. Only the recombination product containing both pUC-origin and Kan-marker can produce kanamycin-resistant colonies of the pir- strain.

In order to test the purity of our plasmid preparations, we have also transformed the pINS vectors and the target vectors into both pir- and pir+ strains and selected the transformants using either kanamycin/chloramphenicol or ampicillin (Fig. 3 and data not shown). As expected, the pINS vectors did not transform the pir- strain. In contrast, the pir+ strain transformed by the pINS vector can grow on either kanamycin or chloramphenicol, but not on ampicillin. The target vector transformed both XL1-Blue (pir-) and BW23474 (pir+) strains since the activity of the pUC origin of replication did not depend on the presence of the pir gene and produced the ampicillin-resistant, but neither kanamycin- nor chloramphenicol-resistant colonies. This confirmed the purity of the initial plasmids.

We calculated the yield of recombination (0.02%) by counting the kanamycin-resistant colonies of the pir- strain transformed by the recombination mix and taking into account the transformation efficiency (2.2 × 10^8 colonies/mkg DNA) (Fig. 3, and data not shown).

In order to test the integrity of the recombination product, we have picked either kanamycin- or chloramphenicol-resistant colonies, isolated plasmid DNA and digested it with an appropriate restriction enzyme. We used EcoRI in case of recombination between pINS-Puro and phrGFP. All colonies gave the restriction pattern expected for the product of recombination, thus efficiency of the resistance marker introduction is close to 100% (Fig 4 and data not shown). Moreover, due to the directional nature of the LoxP sites, integration occurs in only one orientation depending on the orientation of the LoxP sites. This feature makes the population of recombinant vectors highly homogenous (Fig. 4 and data not shown).
Figure 4

pINS plasmids are introduced always in the same orientation. Upper part. Schematic representation of the Cre-mediated recombination between Insertion vector pINS-Puro and Target vector phrGFP. Recombination intermediate and the sizes of the plasmids are shown. Lower part. Orientation of the pINS-Puro insert in the product of recombination (Puro × GFP) was analyzed by EcoRI. The sizes of the digestion products were analyzed on the agarose gel. We observed the fragments specific to only one orientation of the pINS-Puro in the product of recombination. This orientation is determined by the orientation of loxP sites.

Next we have verified whether the function of Puro-, Blast- or G418-resistance genes from the pINS-plasmids and the gene of interest from the target vector is preserved in the product of recombination. For this purpose we have performed the recombination between each of the three insertion vectors (pINS-Neo, pINS-Puro and pINS-Blast) and the target vector phrGFP. Then we have transformed the recombination mix into the pir- strain and selected the cells containing the product of recombination by growing them on the kanamycin- or chloramphenicol-containing plates. Then we transfected the initial plasmids and the product of recombination (Neo × GFP, Puro × GFP and Blast × GFP) into HeLa cells and analyzed their resistance to either puromycin, blasticidin S or G418. As expected, only pINS vectors and the products of recombination provided the HeLa cells with the resistance against blasticidin S, puromycin and G418 (Fig 5).
Figure 5

Functionality of Blast, Puro and G418-resistance genes from pINS plasmids is preserved in the products of recombination. Left part. Colony forming assay. HeLa cells transfected by 1 mkg of indicated plasmids were selected by either blasticidin S, puromycin or G418. After completion of selection the cells were stained by methylene blue. Insertion vectors pINS-Blast, pINS-Neo and pINS-Puro and the products of their recombination with Target vector phrGFP (Blast × GFP, Neo × GFP and Puro × GFP) provide HeLa cells with the resistance to blasticidin S, G418 or puromycin respectively. Right part. Schematic representation of the Cre-mediated recombination between Insertion vectors pINS-Blast, pINS-Neo and pINS-Puro and Target vector phrGFP.

Then HeLa cells resistant to the antibiotics were inspected under the microscope for the expression of GFP. Only cells transfected by the recombination products were GFP-positive. Moreover, the proportion of the GFP-positive cells was considerably higher than in the case of transient transfection by the phrGFP plasmid (Fig 6). We conclude that our recombination procedure can "safely" merge the antibiotic resistance gene and the gene of interest in one plasmid.
Figure 6

Functionality of GFP gene from phRGFP plasmid is preserved in the products of recombination with pINS-Puro, pINS-Neo or pINS-Blast plasmids. HeLa cells transfected by 1 mkg of either Target vector phrGFP or the products of recombination (Blast × GFP, Neo × GFP and Puro × GFP). Cells transfected by the recombination products were selected by either blasticidin S, G418 or puromycin and stained by DAPI. Expression of the GFP was analyzed under the microscope. In case of transient transfection by phrGFP vector we usually observed 25% GFP positive cells. In contrast we observed that 80–100% of the cells transfected by the products of recombination and selected by the corresponding antibiotics are GFP positive. Scale bar: 20 μm.

Discussion

Researchers working with the vectors suitable for expression in mammalian cells often meet with the puzzle of how to quickly introduce or switch the antibiotic resistance gene in the vector of interest. In this paper we describe the pINS vectors suitable for introduction of antibiotic resistance genes in any plasmid of interest containing the LoxP site by Cre-mediated recombination. We cloned the genes providing resistance to three frequently used antibiotics (puromycin, blasticidin S and G418) in the pUNI-10 plasmid [12]. The plasmid pUNI-10 contains the R6Kγ origin of replication which is inactive in majority of E. coli strains routinely used for cloning (they are pir-). The plasmid resulting from recombination between the pINS and a target vectors acquires a gene of interest (provided by the target vector) and resistance to an antibiotic (puromycin, blasticidin S or G418) (provided by pINS vector). The principle of selection in based on the acquisition of the functional origin of replication (provided by the target vector) as well as the marker providing resistance to kanamycin or chloramphenicol (provided by the pINS vector). Combination of these features makes it possible to select the recombinant plasmids by transforming the recombination mix into a pir- E. coli strain and selecting the kanamycin- or chloramphenicol-positive colonies (Fig. 1). These two features are necessary and sufficient for selection of the recombinant plasmids. Utilization of two antibiotics (chloraphenicol/kanamycin+ampicillin) does not provide any further enhancement to the procedure.

Our method is similar to the procedure used in the existing pExchanger system (Stratagene). pExchanger system relies on integration of the linear fragments coding for the antibiotic resistance genes and selection marker (Kan or Cam) into the target vector using Cre-recombination. Linear fragments can't replicate by themselves and thus can't efficiently transform E. coli. Presumably only the colonies containing the recombinant plasmids can be selected by the markers encoded in the linear fragments. In contrast to pExchanger system, we propose to use the replication-deficient circular pINS plasmids that can be easily produced in the user laboratory and thus allow the user to cut the cost of the cloning.

The Insertion vectors pINS-Puro, pINS-Neo and pINS-Blast are compatible with the numerous target vectors already present on the market (for example, pExchange core or phrGFP vector families, Stratagene). In addition, virtually any vector of interest can be converted into a target vector by simple introduction of the LoxP site.

Methods

pINS plasmids

In order to obtain the pINS-Blast vector, the pcDNA6/TR vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was digested by XmnI and SalI and the fragment containing blasticidin S resistance gene was ligated with the pUNI-10 vector (kindly provided by Dr. Stephen Elledge) digested by EcoRV and SalI (these and other restriction enzymes were purchased from Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania) using T4 ligase (Fermentas). The product of ligation was transformed by electroporation into the strain BW23474 (Δlac-169 rpoS(Am) robA1 creC510 hsdR514 endA recA1 uidA (ΔMluI)::pir-116) that was kindly provided by Dr. Stephen Elledge, and selected using kanamycin. The resulting plasmid was named pINS-Blast.

In order to obtain the pINS-Puro vector, the pPur plasmid (Clontech, Terra Bella, CA, USA) was digested by NdeI, blunt-ended using Klenow fragment (Fermentas), then digested by BamHI and ligated with the fragment of pACYC-184 plasmid [27] containing Cam resistance gene (pACYC-184 was purchased from Fermentas). In order to obtain this fragment we first digested pACYC-184 by BclI, treated it with Klenow fragment, then digested with BamHI. The product of ligation was named pACYC-Puro. pACYC-Puro was digested by Bst1107I, BamHI, then blunt-ended with Klenow fragment. The fragment containing chloramphenicol and puromycin resistance genes was ligated with pUNI-10 vector digested EcoRI and BglII and blunt-ended with Klenow fragment. The product of ligation was transformed via electroporation in BW23474 strain and selected via chloramphenicol. The resulting plasmid was named pINS-Puro.

In order to obtain the pINS-Neo vector, pCINeo plasmid (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was digested by BamHI and the fragment containing pUC-origin, ampicillin and neomycin resistance genes was ligated to BamHI-linearized pUNI-10 resulting in the plasmid "3490". Plasmid "3490" was digested by XbaI and self-ligated in order to remove ampicillin resistance gene and pUC-origin of replication. The product of ligation was transformed into the BW23474 strain via electroporation and selected using kanamycin. The resulting plasmid was named pINS-Neo.

Target vectors

In order to prepare the pT-FLAG vector, we digested phrGFP vector (Stratagene) by NheI and EcoRI and replaced the GFP ORF by the oligonucleotide duplex encoding the FLAG-tag (oligo1: 5'-CTAGCCCATGGATTACAAAGACGATGACGATAAACCTAGCTTCG; oligo2: 5'-AATTCGAAGCTAGGTTTATCGTCATCGTCTTTGTAATCCATGGG) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Then LoxP-site coupled to ampicillin resistance gene was isolated from pT-FLAG plasmid by BspHI digestion and cloned into phRL-TK (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) or pBlueScriptII (Stratagene) digested by BspHI. The resulting plasmids were named pT-TK and pT-BS respectively.

In vitro Cre recombination

500 ng of pINS vector was mixed with 500 ng of target vector, 5 units of Cre recombinase (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA), and a buffer recommended by manufacturer in 10 mkl reaction volume. The reaction was incubated for 30 min at 37°C, then Cre recombinase was heat-inactivated at 65°C for 20 min. The recombination mix was transformed by electroporation into XL1-Blue E. coli strain (recA1 endA1 gyrA96 thi-1 hsdR17 supE44 relA1 lac [F' proAB lacI qZ ΔM15 Tn10 (Tetr)]) purchased from Stratagene and selected using either 34 mkg/ml chloramphenicol (Euromedex) or 50 mkg/ml kanamycin (Euromedex, Mundolsheim, France).

Testing the performance of the constructs in HeLa

Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM #31885 Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated Millerium Fetal Bovine Serum (#BWSTS1810 VWR International, Fontenay-sous-Bois, France), 100 units/ml penicillin G and 100 mkg/ml streptomycin sulfate (Gibco) and 500 ng/ml Fungizone (Invitrogen) in the presence of 5% CO2. Cells were transfected by 1 mkg of plasmid DNA using JetPEI (Polyplus-transfection Inc., New York, NY, USA) according to the protocol provided by supplier. 24 hours after transfection media was replaced and the cells were either grown for another 24 hours (transient transfection) or selected with either 3 mg/ml puromycin (Sigma #P8833) for 3 days, 5 mg/ml blasticidin S (Sigma #15205) for 5 days or 1 mg/ml G418 (Sigma #G8168) for 10 days until the complete death of mock-transfected cells. Transfected cells were either stained by 1% methylene blue (Euromedex #A514) in 50% methanol or mounted on the slides, stained by 100 ng/ml DAPI (Sigma #D9542) and inspected under the fluorescent microscope Olympus AX70.

Availability and requirements

Plasmids and their sequences are available upon request.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to Andrei Petrov for his criticism, ideas and support. This research has been supported by grants from the Institut National de Cancer (INCa), the Association Française contre les Myopathies (AFM) and the Fondation de France.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Université Paris-Sud 11 CNRS UMR 8126 « Interactions moléculaires et cancer, Institut de Cancérologie Gustave-Roussy

References

  1. Makrides SC: Components of vectors for gene transfer and expression in mammalian cells. Protein Expr Purif. 1999, 17 (2): 183-202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Wigler M, Sweet R, Sim GK, Wold B, Pellicer A, Lacy E, Maniatis T, Silverstein S, Axel R: Transformation of mammalian cells with genes from procaryotes and eucaryotes. Cell. 1979, 16 (4): 777-785.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. de la Luna S, Soria I, Pulido D, Ortin J, Jimenez A: Efficient transformation of mammalian cells with constructs containing a puromycin-resistance marker. Gene. 1988, 62 (1): 121-126.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Morgenstern JP, Land H: Advanced mammalian gene transfer: high titre retroviral vectors with multiple drug selection markers and a complementary helper-free packaging cell line. Nucleic acids research. 1990, 18 (12): 3587-3596.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Asada M, Honda E, Imamura T: Construction of pcDNA3.1-based vectors with blasticidin and puromycin resistance markers. Analytical biochemistry. 2006, 352 (2): 305-307.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Vara JA, Portela A, Ortin J, Jimenez A: Expression in mammalian cells of a gene from Streptomyces alboniger conferring puromycin resistance. Nucleic acids research. 1986, 14 (11): 4617-4624.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. de la Luna S, Ortin J: pac gene as efficient dominant marker and reporter gene in mammalian cells. Methods in enzymology. 1992, 216: 376-385.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Colbere-Garapin F, Horodniceanu F, Kourilsky P, Garapin AC: A new dominant hybrid selective marker for higher eukaryotic cells. Journal of molecular biology. 1981, 150 (1): 1-14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Southern PJ, Berg P: Transformation of mammalian cells to antibiotic resistance with a bacterial gene under control of the SV40 early region promoter. J Mol Appl Genet. 1982, 1 (4): 327-341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kimura M, Takatsuki A, Yamaguchi I: Blasticidin S deaminase gene from Aspergillus terreus (BSD): a new drug resistance gene for transfection of mammalian cells. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 1994, 1219 (3): 653-659.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Sternberg N, Hamilton D: Bacteriophage P1 site-specific recombination. I. Recombination between loxP sites. Journal of molecular biology. 1981, 150 (4): 467-486.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu Q, Li MZ, Leibham D, Cortez D, Elledge SJ: The univector plasmid-fusion system, a method for rapid construction of recombinant DNA without restriction enzymes. Curr Biol. 1998, 8 (24): 1300-1309.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu Q, Li MZ, Liu D, Elledge SJ: Rapid construction of recombinant DNA by the univector plasmid-fusion system. Methods in enzymology. 2000, 328: 530-549.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kolter R, Helinski DR: Construction of plasmid R6K derivatives in vitro: characterization of the R6K replication region. Plasmid. 1978, 1 (4): 571-580.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kolter R: Replication properties of plasmic R6K. Plasmid. 1981, 5 (1): 2-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoess RH, Abremski K: Interaction of the bacteriophage P1 recombinase Cre with the recombining site loxP. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1984, 81 (4): 1026-1029.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Greener A, Filutowicz MS, McEachern MJ, Helinski DR: N-terminal truncated forms of the bifunctional pi initiation protein express negative activity on plasmid R6K replication. Mol Gen Genet. 1990, 224 (1): 24-32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Shaw WV: Chloramphenicol acetyltransferase: enzymology and molecular biology. CRC critical reviews in biochemistry. 1983, 14 (1): 1-46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Umezawa H: Studies on aminoglycoside antibiotics: enzymic mechanism of resistance and genetics. The Japanese journal of antibiotics. 1979, 32 (Suppl): S1-14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kues U, Stahl U: Replication of plasmids in gram-negative bacteria. Microbiological reviews. 1989, 53 (4): 491-516.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sutcliffe JG: Nucleotide sequence of the ampicillin resistance gene of Escherichia coli plasmid pBR322. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1978, 75 (8): 3737-3741.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. McKnight SL, Kingsbury R: Transcriptional control signals of a eukaryotic protein-coding gene. Science. 1982, 217 (4557): 316-324.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pastoriza-Gallego M, Armier J, Sarasin A: Transcription through 8-oxoguanine in DNA repair-proficient and Csb(-)/Ogg1(-) DNA repair-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts is dependent upon promoter strength and sequence context. Mutagenesis. 2007, 22 (5): 343-351.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Alting-Mees MA, Short JM: pBluescript II: gene mapping vectors. Nucleic acids research. 1989, 17 (22): 9494-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Chubet RG, Brizzard BL: Vectors for expression and secretion of FLAG epitope-tagged proteins in mammalian cells. BioTechniques. 1996, 20 (1): 136-141.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Foecking MK, Hofstetter H: Powerful and versatile enhancer-promoter unit for mammalian expression vectors. Gene. 1986, 45 (1): 101-105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Chang AC, Cohen SN: Construction and characterization of amplifiable multicopy DNA cloning vehicles derived from the P15A cryptic miniplasmid. Journal of bacteriology. 1978, 134 (3): 1141-1156.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Vassetzky et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.