Open Access

Bipotential mouse embryonic liver (BMEL) cells spontaneously express Pdx1 and Ngn3 but do not undergo further pancreatic differentiation upon Hes1 down-regulation

  • Juliette Cuvelier Delisle1, 2, 3,
  • Lionel Martignat1, 2, 3,
  • Jean-Marie Bach1, 2, 3,
  • Steffi Bösch1, 2, 3, 4Email author and
  • Vanessa Louzier1, 2, 3
Contributed equally
BMC Research Notes20081:136

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-1-136

Received: 07 May 2008

Accepted: 24 December 2008

Published: 24 December 2008

Abstract

Background

Liver-to-pancreas conversion offers new possibilities for β-cell engineering for type 1 diabetes therapy. Among conceivable sources of liver cells, we focused on BMEL cells. These untransformed mouse embryonic liver cells have been reproducibly isolated from different inbred mice strains and have the potential to differentiate into hepatocytes and cholangiocytes in vitro and in vivo.

Findings

Strikingly, we find here that adherent BMEL cells display functional similarities with multipotent pancreatic precursor cells, namely Pdx1 and Ngn3 expression, and further express Hnf6 in floating aggregate culture. Hes1, a direct repressor of Ngn3 and pancreatic endocrine commitment, is expressed in adherent BMEL cells and decreases with time in aggregate culture. However, Hes1 decrease fails to initiate activation of late-stage pancreatic endocrine transcription factors.

Conclusion

Here we report that BMEL cells present features of pancreatic endocrine progenitor cells. In the field of diabetes research, BMEL cells are of potential interest for the study of inductive signals critical for in vitro β-cell maturation in-liver-to-pancreas conversion.

Background

Diabetes results from the autoimmune destruction of pancreatic β-cells. The last years have witnessed major advances in engineering renewable supplies of β-cells through a combination of extrinsic cues and intrinsic reprogramming of hepatic stem cells. During embryogenesis, liver and pancreas arise from adjacent regions of the anterior foregut endoderm [1] and mutual plasticity between the liver and pancreas in the adult occurs in various pathological and experimental settings [2]. Lineage tracing studies have defined pancreatic master genes determining specification and maturation of the pancreatic endocrine cell lineage, namely pancreatic and duodenal homeobox-1 protein (Pdx1), bHLH proteins pancreatic transcription factor 1a (Ptf1a/P48) and neurogenin 3 (Ngn3) [3, 4]. Conversely, loss of function and misexpression experiments demonstrate that the Notch pathway plays a pivotal role in pancreatogenesis as it maintains an undifferentiated progenitor population. Hairy enhancer and split 1 (Hes1) acts as a key downstream effector of the Notch pathway by repressing pancreatic endocrine cell specification via direct Ngn3 down-regulation [5]. Hes1 repression promotes conversion of biliary cells to pancreatic cells in developing tissues [6]. Although earlier findings demonstrate the feasibility of in vitro and in vivo liver-to-pancreas conversion [7], appropriate allo- or autologuous cell sources need to be characterised. Bipotential mouse embryonic liver cells have been reproducibly isolated from mouse embryos of different strains. BMEL cells have the potential to differentiate into hepatocytes and cholangiocytes in specific 3-D culture systems in vitro or after engraftment in damaged livers in Alb-uPA/SCID mice in vivo [8]. In the present study, we seek for the expression of pancreatic progenitor markers and Hes1 expression in BMEL stem cells in different culture modes.

Methods

Adherent BMEL cell culture

BMEL 9A1 cells, kindly provided by M. Weiss [8], were grown in RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen, Cergy-Potoise, France) supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum (Eurobio, Les Ulis, France), 50 ng/ml Epidermal Growth Factor (PeproTech, Levallois Perret, France), 30 ng/ml Insulin-like Growth Factor II (PeproTech), and 10 μg/ml human insulin (Roche, Meylan, France). Cells were cultured on dishes coated with Collagen I (Becton-Dickinson, Le Pont de Claix, France) in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C. Cells were passaged every 3 to 4 days at 70.103 cells for a 100 mm dish, and never let sit at confluence.

Aggregate BMEL cell culture

1,5.103 cells per well were seeded onto 96-well plates coated with Collagen I and cultured for two days as indicated previously. Cells were then dissociated with trypsin-EDTA (Eurobio) and 1.104 cells per well were seeded into 96-wells coated with poly(2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate) (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Quentin Fallavier, France) to which cells do not attach, but form floating aggregates within 24 hours. Aggregates were collected for analysis 4 days after seeding.

mRNA isolation and RT-PCR reactions

mRNA was isolated with the Dynabeads mRNA Direct Kit (Invitrogen). First-strand cDNA was synthesized using M-MuLV reverse transcriptase (Promega, Charbonnières, France) and 400 nM random pentadecamer primers (Eurogentec, Liège, Belgique) [9]. cDNA was amplified by PCR over 35 cycles [94°C for 30 sec, 59 or 60°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 40 sec] with RedTaq DNA Polymerase (Sigma-Aldrich) on a 9700 thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Courtaboeuf, France) using the following primer pairs: β-actin (forward) 5'-AGCCATGTACGTAGCCATCC-3' (reverse) 5'-CTCTCAGCTGTGGTGGTGAA-3'; hnf6 (forward) 5'-CTGTGAAACTCCCCCAGGTA-3' (reverse) 5'-TCATCCCGCATAAGTGTGAA-3'; ngn3 (forward) 5'-GAGTTGGCACTCAGCAAACA-3' (reverse) 5'-TCTGAGTCAGTGCCCAGATG-3'; pdx1 (forward) 5'-CTGCGAGCTTCTGGAAAAAC-3' (reverse) 5'-CTGCTGGTCCGTATTGGAAC-3'; neuroD (forward) 5'-GAAAGCCCCCTAACTGACTGC-3' (reverse) 5'-GCACTTTGCAGCAATCTTAGCAAAA-3'; nkx2.2 (forward) 5'-GGTGGAGCGATTGGATAAGA-3' (reverse) 5'-TGCCATCAACCTTTTCATCA-3'; nkx6.1 (forward) 5'-AGTGATGCAGAGTCCGCCG (reverse) TCCTCATTCTCCGAAGTC-3'; hes1 (forward) 5'-CCTCTGAGCACAGAAAGTCATC-3' (reverse) 5'-TCCAGAATGTCTGCCTTCTC-3'; insulin1 (forward) 5'-CATCAGCAAGCAGGTYATTG-3' (reverse) 5'-CACTTGTGGGTCCTCCACTT-3'; insulin2 (forward) 5'-AGGACCCACAAGTGGCACA-3' (reverse) 5'-GAGGGGTAGGCTGGGTAGTG-3'; ptf1a (forward) 5'-GTAACCAGGCCCAGAAGGT-3' (reverse) 5'-CCTCTGGGGTCCACACTTTA-3'; amylase (forward) 5'-GGCCTTCTGGATCTTGCAC-3' (reverse) 5'-TCCTTGGGAGAACCATTTTG-3'.

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR was performed on 1 μl of cDNA with Prism 5700 sequence-detection system (Applied Biosystems). Cycling parameters were initiation at 50°C for 2 min and denaturation at 95°C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of denaturation 95°C for 15 sec and annealing at 60°C for 1 min. Mouse hes1 (D16464) and β-actin (NM_007393) expression were amplified using 300 nM hes1 (forward) CCTCTGAGCACAGAAAGTCATC (reverse) GCATCCAAAATCAGTGTTTTCA, and β-actin (forward) CTCTTCCAGCCTTCCTTCCT (reverse) GGGCAGTGATCTCTTTCTGC primers in Power Sybr Green Master Mixture (Applied Biosystems), Relative real time PCR data were processed according to a standard curve based method [10] generating reference gene normalized expression values. Statistical comparisons between groups of treated versus untreated samples were performed using a non parametric Mann-Withney test.

Immunocytochemistry

Ngn3, Pdx1, and Hes1 immunostaining was carried out on cytospins of 40,000 BMEL cells after 4 days of adherent or suspension culture. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized in PBS-Triton X-100 0,2%, and blocked in BPS, 1%BSA, 10% goat serum before incubation with primary antibodies in PBS -1% BSA. Primary antibodies used were: rabbit anti-Pdx1(1:3000), a gift from C. Wright, rabbit anti-Ngn3 (1:3000), a gift from M. German, and rabbit anti-Hes1 (1:60), a gift from T. Sudo. Secondary biotinylated goat anti-rabbit Ig antibody (Dako E0432) was used at 1:300 and detected with streptavidine-conjugated HRP (Dako, P397) and DAB substrate (Dako, SK-4100).

Western blotting

After harvest with trypsin-EDTA, cells were washed with D-PBS and lysed in RIPA lysis buffer (Upstate, Euromedex, Mundolsheim, France) supplemented with protease inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich, P8340). 50 μg of protein extract were fractionated by 8% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membrane (BioRAD, Marnes la Coquette, France). After blocking at room temperature for 2 h in TBS with 5% nonfat dry milk, the membranes were incubated for 1 h in TTBS containing 0,6 μg/ml polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse Hes1 antibody (kindly provided by T. Sudo) or polyclonal goat anti-mouse Pdx1 antibody (1:10000, kindly provided by C.V.E. Wright), and then for 1 h with TTBS containing secondary anti-rabbit (1:10000, Pierce, Perbio, Brebières, France) or anti-goat (1:10000, Dako) conjugates coupled to HRP. Antibody binding was visualized by ECL using Supersignal West Pico substrate (Pierce). Blots were stripped by 5 min incubation in 0,2 M NaOH, blocked for 1 h in TBS with 5% nonfat dry milk, and re-probed for 2 h in TTBS with primary anti-β-actin antibody (1:200, TEBU, Santa-Cruz) coupled to HRP. Anti-β-actin antibody binding was detected using ECL substrate as stated before. Band intensities were measured on a Chemidoc XRS system (BioRAD) and relative abundance of Hes1 protein normalized to β-actin was assessed by densitometry using Quantity One software (BioRAD).

Results

Characteristics of BMEL cells

BMEL cells can be propagated in an undifferentiated state in adherent culture on collagen-coated dishes. Here, we investigated pancreatic gene expression in BMEL cells after 4 days of culture. Adherent BMEL cells spontaneously expressed transcripts and protein of Pdx1 (Fig. 1), a regional endodermal marker found in pancreatic buds, at the origin of all pancreatic lineages [11, 12]. Immunostaining also revealed a subpopulation of cells expressing Ngn3, which is considered to be the earliest marker specific to the endocrine lineage [4]. However, RT-PCR failed to detect ngn3 at the transcript level. At this stage, BMEL cells were devoid of Ptf1a and other markers of more advanced pancreatic commitment or mature β-cells. Suspension culture induced formation of floating aggregates and concurrent expression of hepatocyte nuclear factor 6 (hnf6), a factor known to activate ngn3 expression and to control the timing of the pancreas specification upstream of Pdx1 [13]. Ngn3 became detectable in 3 out of 5 samples at the transcript level and Ngn3 protein was present in a great majority of cells analysed by immuncytochemistry. Hairy enhancer and split 1 (hes1), a direct repressor of the ngn3 promoter, was detected by qualitative end-point RT-PCR in all samples regardless of culture mode even though immunocytochemistry experiments yielded less intense staining in cells of aggregate cultures.
Figure 1

BMEL characteristics in adherent vs aggregate culture. (A) Morphology of BMEL cells grown for 4 days in (i) adherent or (ii) floating aggregate culture. (B) Western blot analysis of BMEL cells after four days of adherent or aggregate culture showing the expression of a 46kDa Pdx1 protein (n = 3). (C) RT-PCR profiles of adherent (Adh.) or aggregate (Agg) BMEL cells (n = 5). * Three out of five aggregate samples yielded positive ngn3 RT-PCR signals. cDNA from adult mouse pancreas (Panc) served as positive control for all genes except for Ngn3 for which a plasmid containing the ngn3 open reading frame was used as positive control. (D) Spontaneous Pdx1, Ngn3, and Hes1 expression located predominantly in the nuclei of adherent (top row) or aggregate (bottom row) BMEL cells. Scale bars = 40 μm.

Hes1 expression decreased with time in BMEL aggregates

BMEL cells were grown for 1 or 4 days in aggregate culture and analyzed by Western blotting and real-time RT-qPCR. Sustained Hes1 expression at day 1 was nearly abolished at day 4 in aggregate culture with a good correspondence between the level of suppression at the protein and RNA levels (Fig. 2).
Figure 2

Hes1 expression decreases with time in BMEL aggregates. A/Hes1 western blotting (n = 4) on BMEL cells on day 1 and day 4 of aggregate culture. B/Real-time RT-qPCR analysis of Hes1 expression in BMEL cells on day 1 (n = 4) and day 4 (n = 3) of aggregate culture (p < 0,05). Each dot represents an independent experimental determination. Bars correspond to medians.

Discussion

Liver-to-pancreas conversion offers new possibilities for β-cell engineering for cell therapy of diabetes [14]. Here we focus on untransformed BMEL cells, a new model of bipotential liver progenitor cells that have been reproducibly isolated from different inbred mice strains at 14 dpc. In adherent culture, these cells propagate with a high proliferation index in an undifferentiated state [8]. Strikingly, adherent BMEL cells in our hands also display functional similarities with multipotent pancreatic precursor cells, namely Pdx1 and Ngn3 expression, which does not occur in embryonic liver development. Indeed, Pdx1 is thought to act as a master regulatory gene, sufficient per se to distinguish liver and pancreas in normal development. No spontaneous Pdx1 expression in the hepatic lineage has been described yet during embryogenesis or in the adult liver in the absence of high glucose concentrations [15]. Western blot analysis reveals a 46 kDa endogenous Pdx1 protein, which is in accordance with the apparent weight of the active phosphorylated form of Pdx1 in earlier findings [16]. Ngn3, a true marker of endocrine commitment [4, 17] is detected at the protein, but not at the transcript level in adherent cells. This apparent discrepancy may stem either from differences in the sensitivity of the techniques used here or from a greater stability of the protein. Following aggregate formation, BMEL cells further express Hnf6, and Ngn3 becomes detectable at the transcript as well as the protein level. These results fit with the idea that BMEL cells do not closely phenocopy bipotential hepatoblasts in vivo, and may present an enlarged differentiation potential. Immunocytochemistry results presented in Fig. 1 show that most BMEL cells evenly express Pdx1 and Ngn3 ruling out the idea that pancreatic progenitor-like cells form a sparse subpopulation. It is noteworthy that Ngn3-positive cells have a limited mitotic potential [18], opening the possibility for rapid overgrowth by less differentiated cells in culture. Apart from Pdx1, Hnf6, and Ngn3, BMEL cells do not express any of the downstream effectors of more advanced pancreatic commitment. Moreover, expression of pancreatic markers in aggregates remains unchanged following culture in high glucose medium, which is known to stimulate maturation of pancreatic progenitors (25 mM glucose, data not shown) [19]. Hes1, a direct repressor of Ngn3, is expressed in BMEL cells regardless of culture conditions, albeit quantitative real-time PCR shows a decrease with time in aggregate culture. Although Hes1 is expressed in intrahepatic bile duct cells at the neonatal stage, it is usually absent in hepatoblasts [20]. On the other hand, Hes1 is present in pancreatic progenitor cells where it acts as a dominant factor promoting self-renewal at the expense of β-cell differentiation [21]. Previous microarray data suggest that Notch signalling pathway is operative in maintaining BMEL cells in an undifferentiated state [22]. However, notch signalling disruption experiments failed to initiate activation of late-stage pancreatic transcription factors in BMEL aggregates (Additional_data_1). These results support the idea that factors beyond Hes1 expression, presumably the absence of Ptf1a, impede the extent of expression of Ngn3 and other factors of more advanced β-cell differentiation [2325]. Indeed, lineage-tracing experiments have shown that endocrine i.e. Ngn3-positive cells derive from progenitors that express Ptf1a and, henceforth, Ngn3 and Ptf1a are usually co-expressed in pancreatic multipotent progenitors [3, 23]. To summarize, here we report that BMEL cells display two stage-specific features of multipotent pancreatic progenitor cells, namely Pdx1 and Ngn3 expression. In the field of β-cell replacement research, BMEL cells are of potential interest for the study of inductive signals critical for β-cell maturation including positive selection of cells, trophic factors, or ectopic expression of pancreatic transcription factors like Ptf1a in complement to endogenous Pdx1 and Ngn3 expression.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Mary Weiss for the BMEL 9A1 cell line, C.V.E. Wright for anti-mouse Pdx1 antibody, M.S. German for anti-mouse Ngn3 antibody, and T. Sudo for anti-mouse Hes1 antibody. We also thank the Plateau Fédératif de Biologie Moléculaire (PFBM) of the National Veterinary School of Nantes for methods and facilities and Ms Sonia Bécavin for technical assistance. This work was funded in part by a grant form the French society of diabetics.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Immuno-endocrinology Unit 707, National Veterinary School
(2)
Immuno-endocrinology Unit 707, French National Institute for Agricultural Research
(3)
Immuno-endocrinology Unit 707, University
(4)
ENVN, UMR 707 IECM, Atlanpôle La Chantrerie

References

  1. Deutsch G, Jung J, Zheng M, Lora J, Zaret KS: A bipotential precursor population for pancreas and liver within the embryonic endoderm. Development. 2001, 128 (6): 871-881.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Grompe M: Pancreatic-hepatic switches in vivo. Mech Dev. 2003, 120 (1): 99-106. 10.1016/S0925-4773(02)00336-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kawaguchi Y, Cooper B, Gannon M, Ray M, MacDonald RJ, Wright CV: The role of the transcriptional regulator Ptf1a in converting intestinal to pancreatic progenitors. Nat Genet. 2002, 32 (1): 128-134. 10.1038/ng959.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gradwohl G, Dierich A, LeMeur M, Guillemot F: neurogenin3 is required for the development of the four endocrine cell lineages of the pancreas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97 (4): 1607-1611. 10.1073/pnas.97.4.1607.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jensen J, Pedersen EE, Galante P, Hald J, Heller RS, Ishibashi M, Kageyama R, Guillemot F, Serup P, Madsen OD: Control of endodermal endocrine development by Hes-1. Nat Genet. 2000, 24 (1): 36-44. 10.1038/71657.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Sumazaki R, Shiojiri N, Isoyama S, Masu M, Keino-Masu K, Osawa M, Nakauchi H, Kageyama R, Matsui A: Conversion of biliary system to pancreatic tissue in Hes1-deficient mice. Nat Genet. 2004, 36 (1): 83-87. 10.1038/ng1273.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Meivar-Levy I, Ferber S: New organs from our own tissues: liver-to-pancreas transdifferentiation. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2003, 14 (10): 460-466. 10.1016/j.tem.2003.10.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Strick-Marchand H, Weiss MC: Inducible differentiation and morphogenesis of bipotential liver cell lines from wild-type mouse embryos. Hepatology. 2002, 36 (4 Pt 1): 794-804.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Stangegaard M, Dufva IH, Dufva M: Reverse transcription using random pentadecamer primers increases yield and quality of resulting cDNA. Biotechniques. 2006, 40 (5): 649-657. 10.2144/000112153.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Larionov A, Krause A, Miller W: A standard curve based method for relative real time PCR data processing. 2005, 6: 62-Google Scholar
  11. Offield MF, Jetton TL, Labosky PA, Ray M, Stein RW, Magnuson MA, Hogan BL, Wright CV: PDX-1 is required for pancreatic outgrowth and differentiation of the rostral duodenum. Development. 1996, 122 (3): 983-995.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Guz Y, Montminy MR, Stein R, Leonard J, Gamer LW, Wright CV, Teitelman G: Expression of murine STF-1, a putative insulin gene transcription factor, in beta cells of pancreas, duodenal epithelium and pancreatic exocrine and endocrine progenitors during ontogeny. Development. 1995, 121 (1): 11-18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacquemin P, Lemaigre FP, Rousseau GG: The Onecut transcription factor HNF-6 (OC-1) is required for timely specification of the pancreas and acts upstream of Pdx-1 in the specification cascade. Dev Biol. 2003, 258 (1): 105-116. 10.1016/S0012-1606(03)00115-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Slack JM: Metaplasia and transdifferentiation: from pure biology to the clinic. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007, 8 (5): 369-378. 10.1038/nrm2146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Yang L, Li S, Hatch H, Ahrens K, Cornelius JG, Petersen BE, Peck AB: In vitro trans-differentiation of adult hepatic stem cells into pancreatic endocrine hormone-producing cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99 (12): 8078-8083. 10.1073/pnas.122210699.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang X, Zhou J, Doyle ME, Egan JM: Glucagon-like peptide-1 causes pancreatic duodenal homeobox-1 protein translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus of pancreatic beta-cells by a cyclic adenosine monophosphate/protein kinase A-dependent mechanism. Endocrinology. 2001, 142 (5): 1820-1827. 10.1210/en.142.5.1820.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Heremans Y, Casteele Van De M, in't Veld P, Gradwohl G, Serup P, Madsen O, Pipeleers D, Heimberg H: Recapitulation of embryonic neuroendocrine differentiation in adult human pancreatic duct cells expressing neurogenin 3. J Cell Biol. 2002, 159 (2): 303-312. 10.1083/jcb.200203074.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gu G, Dubauskaite J, Melton DA: Direct evidence for the pancreatic lineage: NGN3+ cells are islet progenitors and are distinct from duct progenitors. Development. 2002, 129 (10): 2447-2457.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cao LZ, Tang DQ, Horb ME, Li SW, Yang LJ: High glucose is necessary for complete maturation of Pdx1-VP16-expressing hepatic cells into functional insulin-producing cells. Diabetes. 2004, 53 (12): 3168-3178. 10.2337/diabetes.53.12.3168.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kodama Y, Hijikata M, Kageyama R, Shimotohno K, Chiba T: The role of notch signaling in the development of intrahepatic bile ducts. Gastroenterology. 2004, 127 (6): 1775-1786. 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Murtaugh LC, Stanger BZ, Kwan KM, Melton DA: Notch signaling controls multiple steps of pancreatic differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100 (25): 14920-14925. 10.1073/pnas.2436557100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ochsner S, Strick-Marchand H, Qiu Q, Venable S, Dean A, Wilde M, Weiss M, Darlington G: Transcriptional Profiling Of Bipotential Embryonic Liver Cells To Identify Liver Progenitor Cell Surface Markers. Stem Cells. 2007Google Scholar
  23. Chiang MK, Melton DA: Single-cell transcript analysis of pancreas development. 2003, 4 (3): 383-393.Google Scholar
  24. Fukuda A, Kawaguchi Y, Furuyama K, Kodama S, Horiguchi M, Kuhara T, Koizumi M, Boyer DF, Fujimoto K, Doi R: Ectopic pancreas formation in Hes1-knockout mice reveals plasticity of endodermal progenitors of the gut, bile duct, and pancreas. J Clin Invest. 2006, 116 (6): 1484-1493. 10.1172/JCI27704.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Burlison JS, Long Q, Fujitani Y, Wright CV, Magnuson MA: Pdx-1 and Ptf1a concurrently determine fate specification of pancreatic multipotent progenitor cells. Dev Biol. 2008, 316 (1): 74-86. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.01.011.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Bösch et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement