Open Access

A sequencing strategy for identifying variation throughout the prion gene of BSE-affected cattle

  • Michael L Clawson1Email author,
  • Michael P Heaton1,
  • John W Keele1,
  • Timothy PL Smith1,
  • Gregory P Harhay1,
  • Juergen A Richt2 and
  • William W Laegreid1, 3
BMC Research Notes20081:32

DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-1-32

Received: 18 March 2008

Accepted: 23 June 2008

Published: 23 June 2008

Abstract

Background

Classical and atypical bovine spongiform encephalopathies (BSEs) are cattle prion diseases. Distinct bovine prion gene (PRNP) alleles have been associated with classical and atypical BSE susceptibility. However, the full extent of PRNP allele association with BSE susceptibility is not known. A systematic sequence-based genotyping method that detects variation throughout PRNP would be useful for: 1) detecting rare PRNP alleles that may be present in BSE-affected animals and 2) testing PRNP alleles for an association with either classical or atypical BSE susceptibility.

Findings

We improved a Sanger-based sequencing strategy for detecting bovine PRNP variation through all exons, introns, and part of the promoter (25.2 kb). Our current method can detect 389 known and other potentially unknown PRNP polymorphisms that may be present in BSE-affected cattle. We determined PRNP genotypes for the first U.S. BSE case and her sire. Previously unknown PRNP polymorphisms were not detected in either animal and all PRNP genotypes support the sire-daughter relationship.

Conclusion

The methodologies described here characterize variation throughout PRNP. Consequently, rare PRNP alleles that may be present in BSE-affected cattle can be detected.

Introduction

Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), also known as prion diseases, are a class of neurodegenerative disorders that occur in humans, ruminants, cats, and mink [1]. Three distinct TSEs afflict cattle: classical bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), atypical H-type BSE, and atypical L-type BSE [24]. Bovine prion gene (PRNP) alleles are associated with classical and atypical BSE susceptibility [58]. However, the extent of bovine PRNP alleles that predict BSE susceptibility has not yet been determined.

Classical BSE is acquired by cattle through the consumption of meat and bone meal contaminated with the infectious prion agent [9]. Classical BSE susceptibility is associated with the deletion alleles of two bovine PRNP insertion/deletion polymorphisms, one within the promoter region and the other in intron 1 [57]. Both of these polymorphisms have alleles in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with the alleles of at least 43 other PRNP polymorphisms in Bos taurus cattle [10]. Thus, additional PRNP alleles are likely to associate with classical BSE susceptibility with comparable if not greater significance than the indel alleles.

Atypical BSEs have recently been identified in Asian, North American, and European cattle [11]. Two PRNP alleles are implicated with atypical BSE susceptibility. A non-synonymous polymorphism (E211K) was found by one of us (J.A.R.) within the prion coding region of an H-type atypical BSE case identified in the U.S. (2006). The E211K polymorphism is homologous to the human E200K polymorphism, a risk factor for genetic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease [12], and is the suspected cause of the atypical BSE case. The 211 K allele is exceedingly rare and has not been found in other atypical BSE cases or healthy cattle [10, 13, 14]. However, a PRNP haplotype that is associated with atypical BSE susceptibility was found in H- and L-type atypical cases from Canada, France, and the U.S., and may have widespread involvement with atypical BSE [8]. The haplotype spans part of PRNP intron 2, the entire coding region of exon 3, and part of the three prime untranslated region of exon 3 (13 kb) [8, 10]. Alleles that may be causative for atypical BSE susceptibility, including those that may be within PRNP, are thought to be linked with the implicated haplotype in atypical BSE cases [8].

Efforts to identify PRNP alleles that predict classical or atypical BSE susceptibility require improved methods to: 1) efficiently extract DNA from available tissue samples and 2) identify variation throughout PRNP. The brainstem obex is the specified sample for BSE testing [15]. If an obex sample is BSE positive and the carcass from which it originated is destroyed before additional samples are collected, the obex becomes the sole source of transmissible material and DNA from the BSE-afflicted animal. Thus, the ability to obtain DNA from obex tissue is a critical prerequisite for PRNP genotyping. The ability to accurately genotype known PRNP polymorphisms and identify additional PRNP polymorphisms that may be present in BSE-afflicted animals is also important. Here, we provide an efficient method of DNA extraction from bovine obex and report a Sanger-based sequencing strategy that comprehensively identifies variation throughout PRNP (25.2 kb). We determined the PRNP sequence and haplotypes of the U.S. case of classical BSE (2003) and her sire, show that both animals do not have previously unrecognized PRNP variation, and that their parent-offspring relationship is supported throughout PRNP.

DNA isolation method

For DNA isolation, ten cattle obexes (0.7 – 1.9 grams) were individually homogenized in PBS (weight per volume = 25%). Three hundred and fifty microliters of the homogenate, containing 87.5 mg of obex, was digested overnight in proteinase K. One half of the digestion was frozen while the other half was subjected to standard Tris-saturated phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1, pH 8) and chloroform extractions, followed by salt precipitation, ethanol washing, and re-suspension in TE (see additional file 1 for supplementary methods on DNA isolation from cattle obex tissue and quantification). The procedure yielded a mean of 12.1 μg DNA (high = 17.34 μg, low = 7.64 μg, Table 1). Each extraction yielded more than 3× the 2.4 μg of DNA typically used to comprehensively amplify and sequence PRNP. The DNAs were obtained from the equivalent of 43.75 mg of obex, or less than 7% of each obex. Thus, DNA sufficient for PRNP genotyping can be obtained from a small portion of the obex tissue.
Table 1

Cattle obex DNA yield and quality

Samplea

DNA Yield (μg)

DNA concentration (μg/mL)b

260/280 nm

1

15.55

155.54

1.87

2

17.34

173.39

1.87

3

10.78

107.82

1.87

4

13.34

133.39

1.84

5

7.80

77.97

1.83

6

7.64

76.40

1.83

7

17.81

178.07

1.86

8

9.76

97.55

1.80

9

10.09

100.86

1.83

10

10.70

106.98

1.84

aTen cattle obex tissues (44 mg each).

b0.1 mL suspension.

Mean yield = 12.1 μg, SD = 3.7, 95% CI = ± 2.3.

Development of oligonucleotides for PRNPamplification and sequence genotyping

We improved a set of oligonucleotides that can be used to: 1) collectively amplify PRNP (25.2 kb) on 24 overlapping amplicons (Figure 1b) and 2) genotype PRNP variation by sequence [10]. This new set is comprised of 189 oligonucleotides, of which 168 have been previously described [10]. All of the oligonucleotides are designed around 389 known PRNP polymorphisms (48 amplification/sequencing, 141 sequencing; see additional file 2 for a table of oligonucleotides for PRNP amplification and sequencing). Ten PRNP amplicons described previously [10] have been modified with redesigned oligonucleotides due to unsatisfactory performance, including one that covers the InDel within intron 1 that is associated with classical BSE susceptibility and another that covers the entire coding region of exon 3. Strict PCR conditions and/or reagents for many of these amplicons are required (see additional file #3 for supplementary PCR information). All 189 oligonucleotides of the set have been tested for amplification and/or sequencing performance on 192 cattle DNAs representing 21 breeds (see additional file #3 for breed information) [10, 16]. Three hundred and eighty-eight PRNP polymorphisms have been observed in these cattle DNAs [10]. None of the oligonucleotides hybridize to genomic sites containing the 388 polymorphisms or E211K (Figure 2).
Figure 1

PRNP coverage. (a) Sequence-based physical map of bovine PRNP. Orange and yellow arrows represent untranslated and protein coding regions, respectively. (b) PRNP amplicons. Grey rectangles represent 24 overlapping amplicons. Numbers assigned to the amplicons are above the rectangles. Numbers of polymorphisms observed in U.S. cattle in genomic regions spanned by the amplicons are shown inside the rectangles.

Figure 2

Physical maps of the 24 BTAPRNP amplicons that collectively span bovine PRNP (25.2 kb). Alternate spicing of Exon 1 is annotated on DS13a2 and DS13b. Amplicon sizes may vary by the presence or absence of Insertion/Deletion alleles.

Additional PRNP variation is predicted to exist in cattle and some of it could affect the hybridization of oligonucleotides within the set. This likelihood is accounted for by overlapping PRNP amplicons coupled with overlapping PRNP nucleotide coverage by sequencing oligonucleotides (Figure 2). Thus, the set will facilitate the detection of both known and unknown PRNP polymorphisms, including those within primer hybridization sites.

Complete PCR coverage of PRNP (25.2 kb) from a BSE-positive animal can be conducted in a single 96-well plate using a thermocycler capable of zoned heating cycles (see additional file #4 for a 96-well PCR design). Two 55-μL PCRs for each of the 24 PRNP amplicons yield enough template to sequence PRNP at least twice with each of the 189 oligonucleotides on an ABI capillary 3730 sequencer. This coverage can yield approximately eight-fold coverage of each PRNP nucleotide base throughout the 25.2-kb region, except for several small problematic regions (Figure 2). Each amplification reaction requires 50 ng of DNA. Consequently, thorough coverage of PRNP can be achieved with 2.4 μg of genomic DNA. All of the sequencing reactions required for duplicate coverage of PRNP can fit on a single 384-well plate.

Complete PRNPsequences of the U.S. classical BSE case of 2003 and her sire

The oligonucleotide set was used to amplify and sequence PRNP from: 1) the U.S. case of classical BSE (2003), a Holstein cow imported from Canada, and 2) her Holstein sire. All sequence nucleotides were scored with Phred, aligned with Phrap, edited in Consed, and genotyped with Polyphred software [17]. Unambiguous genotypes for 388 PRNP polymorphisms were scored for the U.S. BSE case and her sire (see additional file #5 for a complete list of genotypes and GenBank files EU130450 and EU130451). Sequences from both animals did not reveal any previously unknown PRNP polymorphisms. Both animals are homozygous for the deletion alleles of the two InDels previously associated with classical BSE susceptibility. All of the PRNP polymorphism genotypes support the sire-offspring relationship.

PRNPhaplotypes of the BSE case and her sire

Nineteen haplotype tagging polymorphisms (htSNPs) [10] were used to phase PRNP haplotypes of the classical BSE case and her sire (see additional file #6 for a description of the phasing method [18, 19]). The htSNPs define PRNP haplotypes within two independent Median-Joining networks that account for high and low LD regions observed in Bos taurus cattle populations [10] (Figure 3, see additional file #7 for haplotype sequences). Nine htSNPs define haplotypes within a region of high LD that spans the PRNP promoter through a small portion of intron 2 (network one). Ten other htSNPs define haplotypes within a PRNP region of low LD that span most of intron 2 through the 3'UTR (network two). The htSNPs collectively define haplotype diversity within and across PRNP and have been previously used to test PRNP variation for an association with atypical BSE susceptibility [8].
Figure 3

PRNP haplotypes of the U.S. classical BSE case and her sire. (a) Physical map of haplotype networks one and two that span PRNP regions of high and low LD, respectively. (b) PRNP haplotype relationships. Circles represent PRNP haplotypes observed in a group of 86 U.S. Holsteins. Circle areas are proportional to haplotype frequencies. Rectangles represent haplotypes with a frequency of less than 2.5% in the Holstein group. Vertical brackets denote haplotypes with deletion alleles from a 23-bp and/or 12-bp InDel previously associated with classical BSE susceptibility. (c) PRNP diplotypes of the U.S. classical BSE case and her sire. The frequencies of diplotypes "Ab" and "Ae" in the Holstein group are 0.264 and 0.030, respectively.

PRNP haplotypes of the classical BSE case and her sire were compared to each other and to those from 86 U.S. Holsteins, of which 82 were part of the USMARC Dairy Cattle Panel (MDCP1.5) [10] and 4 were part of the USMARC Beef Cattle Discovery Panel 2.1 (MBCDP2.1) [16]. The classical BSE case and her sire were both homozygous for a haplotype in network one that is common in U.S. Holstein (haplotype A, Figure 3). The two InDel deletion alleles that associate with BSE susceptibility are present on this haplotype. However, while the sire was homozygous for a common PRNP haplotype in network two (haplotype b), the classical BSE case was heterozygous for the same haplotype and one much less common (haplotype e). The frequencies of haplotype combinations "Ab" and "Ae" in the Holstein DNAs are 0.264 and 0.030, respectively. The significance of these haplotype combinations and classical BSE susceptibility is unknown. PRNP haplotype combinations such as those described here can be tested for association with either classical or atypical BSEs in larger studies.

Conclusion

BSE has grown in complexity with the identification of classical and atypical types. PRNP alleles associate with classical and atypical BSE susceptibility. The methodologies described here characterize variation throughout PRNP. Consequently, rare PRNP alleles that may be present in BSE-affected cattle can be detected.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Gennie Schuller-Chavez for outstanding technical support; Dr. Mohammad Koohmaraie for coordinating the collection of cattle obex samples at a Nebraska slaughter plant; Drs. Shuna Jones and Dee Griffin for collecting the obex samples; Tammy Sorensen and Jacky Carnahan for technical support; Drs. Jeff Gawronski and Dan Nonneman for critically reviewing the manuscript; and Joan Rosch for secretarial support. This research was supported by the USDA National Research Initiative, Competitive Grant No. 2005-35212-15890 (MLC, MPH, WWL) and the Agricultural Research Service (all authors).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS), US Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC), Clay Center
(2)
USDA, ARS, National Animal Disease Center
(3)
Department of Pathobiology, University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana

References

  1. Prusiner SB: Prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95: 13363-13383. 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13363.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Wells GA, Scott AC, Johnson CT, Gunning RF, Hancock RD, Jeffrey M, Dawson M, Bradley R: A novel progressive spongiform encephalopathy in cattle. Vet Rec. 1987, 121: 419-420.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Biacabe AG, Laplanche JL, Ryder S, Baron T: Distinct molecular phenotypes in bovine prion diseases. EMBO Rep. 2004, 5 (1): 110-114. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400054.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Casalone C, Zanusso G, Acutis P, Ferrari S, Capucci L, Tagliavini F, Monaco S, Caramelli M: Identification of a second bovine amyloidotic spongiform encephalopathy: molecular similarities with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101 (9): 3065-3070. 10.1073/pnas.0305777101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Sander P, Hamann H, Pfeiffer I, Wemheuer W, Brenig B, Groschup MH, Ziegler U, Distl O, Leeb T: Analysis of sequence variability of the bovine prion protein gene (PRNP) in German cattle breeds. Neurogenetics. 2004, 5 (1): 19-25. 10.1007/s10048-003-0171-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Juling K, Schwarzenbacher H, Williams JL, Fries R: A major genetic component of BSE susceptibility. BMC Biol. 2006, 4: 33-10.1186/1741-7007-4-33.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Haase B, Doherr MG, Seuberlich T, Drogemuller C, Dolf G, Nicken P, Schiebel K, Ziegler U, Groschup MH, Zurbriggen A, Leeb T: PRNP promoter polymorphisms are associated with BSE susceptibility in Swiss and German cattle. BMC Genet. 2007, 8: 15-10.1186/1471-2156-8-15.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Clawson ML, Richt JA, Baron T, Biacabe AG, Czub S, Heaton MP, Smith TPL, Laegreid WW: Association of a bovine prion gene haplotype with atypical BSE. PLoS ONE. 2008, 3(3): e1830-10.1371/journal.pone.0001830.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Wilesmith JW, Ryan JB, Atkinson MJ: Bovine spongiform encephalopathy: epidemiological studies on the origin. Vet Rec. 1991, 128: 199-203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Clawson ML, Heaton MP, Keele JW, Smith TPL, Harhay GP, Laegreid WW: Prion gene haplotypes of U.S. cattle. BMC Genet. 2006, 7: 51-10.1186/1471-2156-7-51.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ducrot C, Arnold M, de Koeijer A, Heim D, Calavas D: Review on the epidemiology and dynamics of BSE epidemics. Vet Res. 2008, 39: 15-10.1051/vetres:2007053.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kovacs GG, Puopolo M, Ladogana A, Pocchiari M, Budka H, van Duijn C, Collins SJ, Boyd A, Giulivi A, Coulthart M, Delasnerie-Laupretre N, Brandel JP, Zerr I, Kretzschmar HA, de Pedro-Cuesta J, Calero-Lara M, Glatzel M, Aguzzi A, Bishop M, Knight R, Belay G, Will R, Mitrova E: Genetic prion disease: the EUROCJD experience. Hum Genet. 2005, 118 (2): 166-174. 10.1007/s00439-005-0020-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Heaton MP, Leymaster KA, Freking BA, Hawk DA, Smith TPL, Keele JW, Snelling WM, Fox JM, Chitko-McKown CG, Laegreid WW: Prion gene sequence variation within diverse groups of U.S. sheep, beef cattle, and deer. Mamm Genome. 2003, 14 (11): 765-777. 10.1007/s00335-003-2283-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Heaton MP, Keele JW, Harhay GP, Richt JA, Koohmaraie M, Wheeler TL, Shackelford SD, Casas E, King DA, Sonstegard TS, Van Tassell CP, Neibergs HL, Chase CC, Kalbfleisch TS, Smith TP, Clawson ML, Laegreid WW: Prevalence of the prion protein gene E211K variant in U.S. cattle. BMC Vet Res. 2008, 4: 25-10.1186/1746-6148-4-25.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. USDA: Procedures Manual Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Ongoing Surveillance Plan. 2006, U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Veterinary ServicesGoogle Scholar
  16. Heaton MP, Chitko-McKown CG, Grosse WM, Keele JW, Keen JE, Laegreid WW: Interleukin-8 haplotype structure from nucleotide sequence variation in commercial populations of U.S. beef cattle. Mamm Genome. 2001, 12: 219-226. 10.1007/s003350010269.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Stephens M, Sloan JS, Robertson PD, Scheet P, Nickerson DA: Automating sequence-based detection and genotyping of SNPs from diploid samples. Nat Genet. 2006, 38 (3): 375-381. 10.1038/ng1746.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P: A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Hum Genet. 2001, 68: 978-989. 10.1086/319501.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Stephens M, Scheet P: Accounting for decay of linkage disequilibrium in haplotype inference and missing-data imputation. Am J Hum Genet. 2005, 76: 448-462. 10.1086/428594.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Clawson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement