Open Access

Fas and FasL gene polymorphisms are not associated with cervical cancer but differ among Black and Mixed-ancestry South Africans

  • Koushik Chatterjee1,
  • Malin Engelmark2,
  • Ulf Gyllensten2,
  • Collet Dandara3,
  • Lize van der Merwe4, 5,
  • Ushma Galal4,
  • Margaret Hoffman6 and
  • Anna-Lise Williamson1Email author
BMC Research Notes20092:238

DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-2-238

Received: 29 September 2009

Accepted: 26 November 2009

Published: 26 November 2009

Abstract

Background

Cervical cancer is one of the most important cancers in African women. Polymorphisms in the Fas (FasR) and Fas ligand (FasL) genes have been reported to be associated with cervical cancer in certain populations. This study investigated whether these polymorphisms are associated with cervical cancer or human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in South African women.

Findings

Participants were 447 women with invasive cervical cancer (106 black African and 341 women of mixed-ancestry) and 424 healthy women controls, matched by age, (101 black African and 323 women of mixed-ancestry) and domicile (rural or urban). Two polymorphisms in Fas gene (FasR-1377G/A, FasR-670A/G) and one in FasL gene (FasL844T/C) were genotyped by TaqMan. None of the polymorphisms, or the Fas haplotypes, showed a significant association with cervical cancer. There was also no association with HPV infection in the control group. However, on analysis of the control group, highly significant allele, genotype and haplotype differences were found between the two ethnic groups. There were generally low frequencies of FasR-1377A alleles, FasR-670A alleles and FasL-844C alleles in black women compared to the women of mixed-ancestry.

Conclusion

This is the first study on the role of Fas and FasL polymorphisms in cervical cancer in African populations. Our results suggest that these SNPs are not associated with cervical cancer in these populations. The allele frequencies of the three SNPs differed markedly between the indigenous African black and mixed-ancestry populations.

Background

Cervical cancer is caused by persistent infection with specific types of human papillomavirus (HPV). During their life-time, many women become infected with HPV but most are able to clear the infection and only a small fraction develop cervical cancer. This indicates that additional risk factors play an important role in the development of cervical cancer. These risk factors include host and viral genetic factors as well as environmental and life style factors [1].

One of the most important mechanisms of the human immune system to control viral infection is to induce apoptosis of viral-infected cells [2]. Apoptosis is a highly regulated process of cell suicide and depends on signals from the cell surface death receptor Fas/CD95, which together with Fas ligand (FasL), triggers programmed cell death [3]. In this paper two polymorphisms in Fas (FasR-1377G/A, FasR-670A/G) and one in FasL (FasL844T/C) were studied in South African women with cervical cancer compared to controls without cancer of the cervix. The signals produced by the DNA binding of transcription factors SP1 (stimulatory protein 1) and STAT1 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 1) are associated with transcriptional activation and expression of the FasR gene. FasR-1377 and FasR-670 are located in SP1 and STAT1 binding sites, respectively. It has been shown that the FasR-1377A in the FasR promoter considerably reduces SP1 binding compared to -1377G, resulting in a decrease of Fas gene expression [4, 5]. An A→G change at Fas-670 reduces the expression of the FasR, by abolishing the Gamma interferon activation signal binding site which results in decreased activation of induced cell death [46]. It has also been shown that the FasL-844C allele is associated with higher basal expression than the -844T allele and that reduced expression of FasL inhibits the apoptotic activity of the FasR-FasL pathway [7].

Six studies in different populations have been published on the association of these SNPs with cervical cancer. One investigated the FasR-670A/G polymorphism in a case-control study in the Chinese population and reported an association of the A allele and A/A genotype with higher risk of developing cervical cancer [8]. The same group showed an association of FasR-670A/A with cervical cancer in another case-control study [9] but did not find an association of the FasR-1377G/A or FasL-844T/C polymorphisms with disease severity. Two studies, one a case control study in a Polish group [10] the second an affected sib-pair (ASP) study in a Swedish group [11], did not detect an association with FasR-670A/G. Two case-control studies, one in the Chinese [12] and the other Swedish [13] populations, investigated the FasL-844T/C polymorphism. While the FasL-844C allele and C/C genotype were associated with cervical cancer in the Chinese study, no such effect was found in the Swedish women.

The importance of host genetic susceptibility factors for cervical cancer development has been demonstrated by epidemiological studies. A hereditary component of cervical tumors was detected in twin studies [14] and in a mother-daughter family study [15]. Biological first-degree relatives of women with cervical cancer have an increased risk of developing cancer of the cervix compared to non-biological relatives of women with cervical cancer [16]. Several studies addressing the association of cervical cancer with Fas and FasL have been published [813], but no studies have been performed in African populations. We therefore studied the association of polymorphisms in Fas and FasL with cancer of the cervix in South African women of black and mixed-ancestry origin.

Methods

Participants

Participants were 447 women with invasive cervical cancer (106 black African and 341 women of mixed-ancestry) and 424 controls (101 black African and 323 women of mixed-ancestry) without cancer of the cervix recruited from hospitals or clinics in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. The control women were selected to be representative of the population from which the cases were selected, specifically similar to the cases with respect to age, ethnicity and domicile status (urban/rural), so that case-control status would not be associated with either of those. There were 264 (59%) urban cases and 183 (41%) rural cases compared to 247 (58%) urban controls and 177 (42%) rural controls. The cases and controls formed part of a study to investigate the association of oral contraceptives with cervical cancer [17, 18].

Clinical specimens

Blood was collected from cases and controls, following written informed consent and stored at -80°C. The study was approved by the University of Cape Town Research Ethics Committee (REC REF: 075/2009). The subject identifiers were permanently unlinked from the specimens. The HIV infection status was known for 98% (n = 437) of the cases and 94% (n = 398) of the controls and 5% of the cases and 4% of the controls were positive for HIV infections. 13% of the controls were positive for HPV by Digene Hybrid Capture II. 14.5% of the controls in our study had abnormal cervical cytology.

Extraction of genomic DNA

The genomic DNA was extracted using TotalNucleicAcid Extraction kit for MagNA Pure Compact nucleic acid extractor (Roche Diagnostics, Germany).

Determination of FasR/FasL polymorphisms

Reactions were conducted in 5 μl volumes and contained 10 ng DNA, 1.75 μl PCR MasterMix (Applied Biosystems), 0.087 μl TaqMan assay mix (FasR-1377 (rs2234767, assay id, C_12123966_10), FasR-670 (rs1800682, assay id, C_9578811_10), FasL844 (rs763110, custom-designed)) (Applied Biosystems) and 1.16 μl distilled water. Cycling conditions on the ABI prism 7900 HT (Applied Biosystems) were 2 minutes at 50°C, 10 minutes at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 15 seconds at 92°C and one minute at 60°C. End point fluorescence was measured immediately after cycling. Alleles were assigned using SDS 2.0 software (Applied Biosystems) [19]. The genotyping was cross-checked by sequencing 4 samples for each polymorphism.

Statistical Analysis

The genotype distributions were tested for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and linkage disequilibrium in cases and controls. Logistic regression was used to test for genotype, allelic and haplotype associations with cervix cancer status as well as baseline characteristics (age, ethnicity and smoking status) and secondary outcomes such as HIV status, abnormal cytology (Pap smear) and high risk HPV according to Hybrid Capture II HPV Test in the control group.

We inferred haplotypes from the two polymorphisms in FasR, and tested their association with cervix cancer status and between ethnicities in the controls.

Statistical analyses were done with R, the freely available environment for graphics and statistics http://www.r-project.org, and R packages dgc-genetics http://www-gene.cimr.cam.ac.uk/clayton/software/ and haplo.stats http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=haplo.stats. Broadly, haplo.stats uses the expectation maximisation (EM) algorithm, to calculate maximum likelihood estimates of probabilities, of haplotype pairs (one paternal, one maternal) for each subject, as described in Schaid et al. [20].

Results

The mean age for black cases was 43.8 yrs (SD 9.2) and for mixed-ancestry cases it was 45.9 yrs (SD 8.1). The mean age for black controls was 42.9 yrs (SD 9.0) and for mixed-ancestry controls it was 45.6 yrs (SD 8.2). No significant differences in age or HIV status were observed between cases and controls.

The observed genotype frequencies of FasR-1377G/A, FasR-670A/G and FasL-844T/C in the controls were all in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (FasR-1377: P = 0.20, FasR-670: P = 0.58, FasL-844: P = 0.12). The two FasR polymorphisms were in tight linkage disequilibrium (LD) (P < 0.05), except in the black controls (P = 0.078).

Neither the allelic, nor the genotype frequencies showed a significant association (global P-values, 0.55, 0.12 and 0.77 for FasR-1377A, FasR-670A and FasL-844T respectively) with cervical cancer status (Table 1). The haplotype analysis for FasR-1377/-670 also did not reveal any association with cervical cancer in either the African black (global P = 0.1130) (Black) or the mixed-ancestry (global P = 0.7043) population (Table 2). The frequency of -1377A was 12% in black cases and 9% in the black controls, 21% in mixed-ancestry cases and 19% in mixed-ancestry controls. -670A was 18% in black cases and 24% in black controls, 36% in mixed-ancestry cases and 35% in mixed-ancestry controls. -844C was 17% in black cases and 14% in black controls, 34% in both mixed-ancestry cases and controls (Table 1).
Table 1

Counts (n), frequencies (%) and association statistics for genotypes and minor-alleles (FasR-1377G/A, FasR-670A/G, FasL-844T/C).

 

Black

Mixed-ancestry

Genotype-cervical cancer association, adjusted for ethnicity

Genotype-ethnic association, in controls only

 

Cases

Controls

Cases

Controls

    

Genotypes

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

P-value

OR (95% CI)

P-value

OR (95% CI)

FASR-1377 G→A

GG

74 (77)

75 (83)

186 (64)

196 (66)

-

1

-

1

AG

21 (22)

14 (16)

87 (30)

86 (29)

0.428

1.14 (0.83-1.58)

0.007

0.43 (0.22-0.77)

AA

1 (1)

1 (1)

17 (6)

13 (4)

0.391

1.37 (0.67-2.87)

0.130

0.20 (0.01-1.04)

A allele

23 (12)

16 (9)

121 (21)

112 (19)

0.275

1.15 (0.89-1.49)

0.003

0.43 (0.24-0.72)

FASR-670 A→G

GG

67 (65)

54 (55)

147 (44)

136 (42)

-

1

-

1

AG

35 (34)

43 (43)

132 (40)

146 (45)

0.099

0.79 (0.59-1.05)

0.207

0.74 (0.46-1.18)

AA

1 (1)

2 (2)

53 (16)

39 (12)

0.492

1.17 (0.74-1.87)

0.006

0.13 (0.02-0.44)

A allele

37 (18)

47 (24)

238 (36)

224 (35)

0.778

0.97 (0.79-1.19)

0.003

0.57 (0.39-0.82)

FASL -844 T→C

TT

70 (68)

74 (74)

143 (44)

139 (44)

-

1

-

1

CT

31 (30)

23 (23)

144 (44)

136 (43)

0.515

1.1 (0.82-1.48)

< 0.001

0.32 (0.18-0.53)

CC

2 (2)

3 (3)

40 (12)

40 (13)

0.929

0.98 (0.61-1.57)

0.001

0.14 (0.03-0.41)

C allele

35 (17)

29 (14)

224 (34)

216 (34)

0.797

1.03 (0.83-1.27)

< 0.001

0.34 (0.22-0.51)

P-values and OR (95% confidence intervals) are for test of genotype or additive allelic association with cervix cancer risk, adjusted for ethnicity, and for genotype/additive association with ethnicity in controls. For genotypes, P-values next to genotype names are for joint model, others are for ORs of specific genotype compared to reference genotype, indicated with OR = 1. ORs for alleles are the odds for an additional copy of that allele. ORs for genotype-ethnicity association (in controls only) are odds of genotype/allele in black compared to odds of genotype/allele in individuals of mixed-ancestry.

Cases = Women with cancer of the cervix, Controls = Women without cancer of the cervix.

Table 2

Inferred frequencies, %, for FasR-1377 and FasR 670 haplotypes and odds ratios for risk of cervix cancer.

 

Black

Mixed-ancestry

Haplotype

Cases

Controls

OR (95% CI)

Cases

Controls

OR (95% CI)

GG

70

71

1

44

46

1

GA

18

20

0.8 (0.45-1.43)

36

35

1.08 (0.85-1.38)

AG

12

5

2.07 (0.87-4.93)

20

19

1.12 (0.83-1.52)

AA

0

4

-

0

0

-

Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) are for testing FasR-1377 and FasR-670 haplotype association with risk of cervix cancer versus reference haplotype GG, stratified by ethnicity. Global P = 0.1130 (Black) and 0.7043 (Mixed ancestry).

The association of three SNPs with ethnicity was investigated only in the control group as the controls represent the larger South-African population. In the control group, all three SNPs showed significant allelic and genotype differences (global P-values, 0.004, 0.001, < 0.001 for FasR-1377A, FasR-670A and FasL-844T respectively) between ethnic groups (Table 1). The FasR haplotypes (FasR-1377/-670) also showed a significant difference (global P-value < 0.001) between the two ethnic groups among controls (Table 3). In the control group, both the GA and AG (FasR-1377 and FasR-670) haplotypes were more frequent in the mixed-ancestry group relative to African black group (AG: 19% compared to 5%; GA: 35% compared to 20%), while the GG haplotype was more common in blacks (71%) as compared to the mixed-ancestry group (46%).
Table 3

Inferred frequencies, %, for FasR-1377 and FasR-670 haplotypes and odds ratios for comparing ethnicity in the control group.

Haplotype

Black

Mixed-ancestry

OR (95% CI)

GG

71

46

1

GA

20

35

0.45 (0.31-0.67)

AG

5

19

0.33 (0.19-0.58)

AA

4

0

-

Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) are odds of being black compared to mixed-ancestry, for FasR-1377 and FasR 670 haplotypes versus reference haplotype GG, in the control group. Global P-value < 0.001.

No significant association was found between any of the secondary outcomes (HIV infection, abnormal cytology (Pap smear) and hybrid capture high risk HPV) and any of the three SNPs in the control group, adjusted for ethnicity (results not shown here).

Discussion

Polymorphisms in the Fas or FasL genes that impair the apoptotic signals have been associated with susceptibility to a number of different cancers [2127] including cervical cancer [813]. We are the first to study the frequency of the FasR-1377G/A, FasR-670A/G and FasL844T/C polymorphisms in an indigenous black African as well as in a mixed-ancestry population and found no association with cancer of the cervix. The tendencies of the odds ratios (ORs) (FasR-1377A/A 1.37, FasR-670A/A 1.17) point towards an increasing susceptible effect and a need for a larger study. Although the result was not statistically significant, there were more cases with FasR-1377A variant compared to controls in both black African (12% vs. 9%) and mixed-ancestry (21% vs. 19%) women. Our results agree with the lack of association of Fas SNPs with cervical cancer shown by three other reports [10, 11, 13]. The differing results between studies might be due to one or several factors, including the difference in ethnic origin of populations studied and the difference in sample size. The presence of another causative mutation in tight LD with any of these three polymorphisms can also not be ruled out.

We observed statistically significant allele frequency differences for all the three Fas SNPs between ethnic groups in the control women. For FasR-1377G/A, the A allele frequency was 9% in the black Africans and 19% in women of mixed-ancestry, which were both markedly lower than the frequency in other populations, such as the 43% and 31% in Taiwanese and Chinese populations, respectively [8, 12]. The FasR-670A allele frequency was 24% in black Africans and 35% in women of mixed-ancestry. This is again lower than the average of 53% for populations from Europe, Australasia and Asia [4, 8, 10, 28, 29]. The frequency of the FasL-844C alleles was 14% in black women and 34% in women of mixed-ancestry, which are very low compared to the 69% and 71% in the Chinese and Swedish populations respectively [12, 13]. The unusually low frequency of the Fas and FasL alleles in the African population could contribute to a lower power to detect an association in the present study.

The FasR-1377G/A and FasR-670A/G SNPs are in tight LD in our population. Both the AG and GA haplotypes were significantly more frequent in women of mixed-ancestry compared to GG, the most common haplotype, which was observed at a higher frequency in black women (Table 3).

Conclusion

Our study did not show a significant association of the FasR-1377G/A, FasR-670A/G and FasL-844T/C polymorphisms with cervical cancer. A statistically significant difference was found in the allele and genotypes frequencies of the three SNPs between women of black African and mixed-ancestry in the control population.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the patients and controls who participated in this study. We would also like to thank Emma Ivansson for her technical help, Deborah Constant for helping with database handling and a special thanks to Dianne Marais for editing the manuscript. This work is based upon research supported by the South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation. It was also supported by the NRF South Africa/Sweden Science and Technology Agreement's Fund.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Medical Virology and Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine (IIDMM), University of Cape Town
(2)
Departments of Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University
(3)
Division of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town
(4)
Biostatistics Unit, Medical Research Council
(5)
Department of Statistics, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Western Cape
(6)
School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town

References

  1. Martin CM, Kehoe L, Spillane CO, O'Leary JJ: Gene discovery in cervical cancer : towards diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers. Mol Diagn Ther. 2007, 11: 277-290.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Dockrell DH: Apoptotic cell death in the pathogenesis of infectious diseases. J Infect. 2001, 42: 227-234. 10.1053/jinf.2001.0836.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Zhang J, Xu X, Liu Y: Activation-induced cell death in T cells and autoimmunity. Cell Mol Immunol. 2004, 1: 186-192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Huang QR, Morris D, Manolios N: Identification and characterization of polymorphisms in the promoter region of the human Apo-1/Fas (CD95) gene. Mol Immunol. 1997, 34: 577-582. 10.1016/S0161-5890(97)00081-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Sibley K, Rollinson S, Allan JM, Smith AG, Law GR, Roddam PL, et al: Functional FAS promoter polymorphisms are associated with increased risk of acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 4327-4330.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kanemitsu S, Ihara K, Saifddin A, Otsuka T, Takeuchi T, Nagayama J, et al: A functional polymorphism in fas (CD95/APO-1) gene promoter associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2002, 29: 1183-1188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Wu J, Metz C, Xu X, Abe R, Gibson AW, Edberg JC, et al: A novel polymorphic CAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta element in the FasL gene promoter alters Fas ligand expression: a candidate background gene in African American systemic lupus erythematosus patients. J Immunol. 2003, 170: 132-138.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lai HC, Sytwu HK, Sun CA, Yu MH, Yu CP, Liu HS, et al: Single nucleotide polymorphism at Fas promoter is associated with cervical carcinogenesis. Int J Cancer. 2003, 103: 221-225. 10.1002/ijc.10800.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lai HC, Lin WY, Lin YW, Chang CC, Yu MH, Chen CC, et al: Genetic polymorphisms of FAS and FASL (CD95/CD95L) genes in cervical carcinogenesis: An analysis of haplotype and gene-gene interaction. Gynecol Oncol. 2005, 99: 113-118. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.05.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dybikowska A, Sliwinski W, Emerich J, Podhajska AJ: Evaluation of Fas gene promoter polymorphism in cervical cancer patients. Int J Mol Med. 2004, 14: 475-478.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Engelmark MT, Renkema KY, Gyllensten UB: No evidence of the involvement of the Fas -670 promoter polymorphism in cervical cancer in situ. Int J Cancer. 2004, 112: 1084-1085. 10.1002/ijc.20515.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sun T, Zhou Y, Li H, Han X, Shi Y, Wang L, et al: FASL -844C polymorphism is associated with increased activation-induced T cell death and risk of cervical cancer. J Exp Med. 2005, 202: 967-974. 10.1084/jem.20050707.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ivansson EL, Gustavsson IM, Magnusson JJ, Steiner LL, Magnusson PK, Erlich HA, et al: Variants of chemokine receptor 2 and interleukin 4 receptor, but not interleukin 10 or Fas ligand, increase risk of cervical cancer. Int J Cancer. 2007, 121: 2451-2457. 10.1002/ijc.22989.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ahlbom A, Lichtenstein P, Malmstrom H, Feychting M, Hemminki K, Pedersen NL: Cancer in twins: genetic and nongenetic familial risk factors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997, 89: 287-293. 10.1093/jnci/89.4.287.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hemminki K, Dong C, Vaittinen P: Familial risks in cervical cancer: is there a hereditary component?. Int J Cancer. 1999, 82: 775-781. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990909)82:6<775::AID-IJC1>3.0.CO;2-V.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Magnusson PK, Sparen P, Gyllensten UB: Genetic link to cervical tumours. Nature. 1999, 400: 29-30. 10.1038/21801.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Shapiro S, Rosenberg L, Hoffman M, Kelly JP, Cooper DD, Carrara H, et al: Risk of invasive cancer of the cervix in relation to the use of injectable progestogen contraceptives and combined estrogen/progestogen oral contraceptives (South Africa). Cancer Causes Control. 2003, 14: 485-495. 10.1023/A:1024910808307.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoffman M, Cooper D, Carrara H, Rosenberg L, Kelly J, Stander I, et al: Limited Pap screening associated with reduced risk of cervical cancer in South Africa. Int J Epidemiol. 2003, 32: 573-577. 10.1093/ije/dyg081.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Zoodsma M, Nolte IM, Schipper M, Oosterom E, van der SG, de Vries EG, et al: Analysis of the entire HLA region in susceptibility for cervical cancer: a comprehensive study. J Med Genet. 2005, 42: e49-10.1136/jmg.2005.031351.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Schaid DJ, Rowland CM, Tines DE, Jacobson RM, Poland GA: Score tests for association between traits and haplotypes when linkage phase is ambiguous. Am J Hum Genet. 2002, 70: 425-434. 10.1086/338688.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Davidson WF, Giese T, Fredrickson TN: Spontaneous development of plasmacytoid tumors in mice with defective Fas-Fas ligand interactions. J Exp Med. 1998, 187: 1825-1838. 10.1084/jem.187.11.1825.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Peters AM, Kohfink B, Martin H, Griesinger F, Wormann B, Gahr M, et al: Defective apoptosis due to a point mutation in the death domain of CD95 associated with autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome, T-cell lymphoma, and Hodgkin's disease. Exp Hematol. 1999, 27: 868-874. 10.1016/S0301-472X(99)00033-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee SH, Shin MS, Park WS, Kim SY, Dong SM, Pi JH, et al: Alterations of Fas (APO-1/CD95) gene in transitional cell carcinomas of urinary bladder. Cancer Res. 1999, 59: 3068-3072.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee SH, Shin MS, Park WS, Kim SY, Kim HS, Han JY, et al: Alterations of Fas (Apo-1/CD95) gene in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene. 1999, 18: 3754-3760. 10.1038/sj.onc.1202769.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Takahashi T, Tanaka M, Brannan CI, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Suda T, et al: Generalized lymphoproliferative disease in mice, caused by a point mutation in the Fas ligand. Cell. 1994, 76: 969-976. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90375-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sun T, Miao X, Zhang X, Tan W, Xiong P, Lin D: Polymorphisms of death pathway genes FAS and FASL in esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004, 96: 1030-1036. 10.1093/jnci/djh187.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang X, Miao X, Sun T, Tan W, Qu S, Xiong P, et al: Functional polymorphisms in cell death pathway genes FAS and FASL contribute to risk of lung cancer. J Med Genet. 2005, 42: 479-484. 10.1136/jmg.2004.030106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Niino M, Kikuchi S, Fukazawa T, Miyagishi R, Yabe I, Tashiro K: An examination of the Apo-1/Fas promoter Mva I polymorphism in Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol. 2002, 2: 8-10.1186/1471-2377-2-8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Seo JC, Han SW, Yin CS, Koh HK, Kim CH, Kim EH, et al: Evaluation of a Apo-1/Fas promoter polymorphism in Korean stroke patients. Exp Mol Med. 2002, 34: 294-298.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Williamson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement