Genetic Polymorphisms of CYP2E1, GSTP1, NQO1 and MPO and the Risk of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in a Han Chinese Population of Southern China
© Guo and O'Brien licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 8 April 2010
Accepted: 27 July 2010
Published: 27 July 2010
Southern China is a major area for endemic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Genetic factors as well as environmental factors play a role in development of NPC. To investigate the roles of previously described carcinogen metabolism gene variants for NPC susceptibility in a Han Chinese population, we conducted a case-control study in two independent study population groups afflicted with NPC in Guangdong and Guangxi Provinces of southern China.
Five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of CYP2E1-rs2031920, CYP2E1-rs6413432, GSTP1-rs947894, MPO-rs2333227 and NQO1-rs1800566 were genotyped by PCR-based RFLP, sequencing and TaqMan assay in 358 NPC cases and 629 controls (phase I cohort). Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). To confirm our results, sixteen tag SNPs for GSTP1, MPO, NQO1 (which 100% covered these genes), and 4 functional SNPs of CYP2E1 were genotyped in another cohort of 213 NPC cases and 230 controls (phase II cohort).
No significant associations in NPC risk were observed for the five polymorphisms tested in the phase I cohort. In an additional stratified analysis for phase I, there was no significant association between cases and controls in NPC high risk population (EBV/IgA/VCA positive population). Analysis of 14 tagging SNPs within the same genes in an independent phase II cohort were in agreement with no SNPs significantly associated with NPC.
Our results suggest that polymorphism of CYP2E1, GSTP1, MPO and NQO1 genes does not contribute to overall NPC risk in a Han Chinese in southern China.
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is rare in most regions of the world; however it is a common cancer in southern China, especially in Guangdong and Guangxi Provinces. The incidence rate of NPC for males is more than 20 per 100,000 and up to 25-40 per 100,000 in some areas bordering the Xijiang River and Pearl River drainages in these two provinces[1, 2]. Both environmental and genetic factors have been associated with the risk of developing NPC. Epidemiologic studies have indicated a strong influence for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, consumption of salt-preserved fish, exposure to domestic wood cooking fires, and exposure to occupational solvents in the risk for NPC[3, 4]. Accumulating data have shown that genetic polymorphisms of the genes responsible for the xenobiotic enzymes which metabolize carcinogenic compounds underlie individual variations in cancer risk. Most carcinogens undergo activation by Phase I enzymes, often as an oxidation reaction, and detoxification by Phase II enzymes.
CYP2E1 is a Phase I enzyme included in the cytochrome P450 superfamily. CYP2E1 plays a major role in the metabolic activation of nitrosamines. The RsaI polymorphism of CYP2E1 (rs2031920) in the promoter region has been reported to be associated with increased risk of lung cancer and lymphomas[6, 7]. Two studies have associated this polymorphism with NPC development[8, 9]. Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are a group of enzymes involved in Phase II detoxification of carcinogens. GSTP1 is a major GST isoform. The Ile to Val substitution at codon 105 of exon 5 variant in GSTP1 (rs947894) has been investigated for associations with breast and lung cancer in several studies[10, 11]. Four of 22 studies showed a significantly higher risk for head and neck cancers in persons with the Ile/Val and/or Val/Val genotypes than in those with the Ile/Ile genotypes.
NQO1 is an enzyme previously shown to detoxify a number of natural and synthetic compounds and, conversely, to activate certain anticancer agents. A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) C to T at position 609 (rs1800566) in the NQO1 coding region (replacing proline with serine at codon 187) leads to lower enzyme activity and has been shown to be associated with increased risk of myeloid leukemia and bladder carcinoma[12, 13]. Myeloperoxidase (MPO) is an endogenous oxidant enzyme that generates reactive oxygen species (ROS). A single G-463A base transition in the MPO promoter region was identified at the SP1 binding site, which might modify carcinogen metabolism. The 463A allele has been associated with reduced mRNA expression and its transcription activity is approximately 25 times lower than the 463G allele in vitro due to reduced binding of SP1[14, 15]. This polymorphism has also been reported to be associated with risk for several human cancers including liver, ovarian, bladder and lung cancer [16–23].
We conducted a case-control study with 358 NPC cases and 629 controls from southern China to determine if these previously implicated polymorphisms were associated with NPC development. We also investigated sixteen adjacent tagging SNPs of GSTP1, MPO and NQO1 (which covered 100% haplotype variation within these genes), and four SNPs of CYP2E1 (one of which covered CYP2E1-RsaI polymorphisms) in another independent case-control cohort with 213 NPC cases and 230 controls.
Patients and controls
Characteristics of participants in a study of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in southern China
45 ± 11.4 (SD)
46 ± 9.7 (SD)
45 ± 9.1 (SD)
45 ± 9.7 (SD)
Genomic DNA extraction
Phase I DNA was extracted from whole blood or lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCL) using QIAamp DNA blood maxi kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, catalog # 51194). More than 80% of the genotypes were determined from DNA directly extracted from whole blood. Phase II DNA was extracted from whole blood by traditional phenol/Chloroform method with Phase Lock Gel tube (Qiagen, MaXtract High Density, catalog # 129065).
SNP selection and genotyping
For the phase I cohort, five functional SNPs, which previously were reported associated with NPC or other cancers, were interrogated for four xenobiotic metabolic enzyme genes-- CYP2E1-RsaI (rs2031920), CYP2E1-DraI (rs6413432), GSTP1 Ile105Val (rs947894), MPO G-463A (rs2333227) and NQO1 C609T (rs1800566). For phase I samples, CYP2E1-rs6413432, GSTP1-rs947894 and MPO-rs2333227 were genotyped by using a commercially available TaqMan SNP genotyping assay and GeneAmp PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Sequence detection software was used for allelic discrimination. CYP2E1-rs2031920 was genotyped by sequence according to the method available in the SNP500Cancer Database. NQO1-rs1800566 was genotyped using PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay; the polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were performed in 15 μl volumes containing 10 mM Tris-HCL buffer, 50 mM KCL, 2.0 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTP, 0.25 mM of each of the primers (forward primer: GAGACGCTAGCTCTGAACTGAT, reverse prime: ATTTGAATTCGGGCGTCTGCTG), 40ng genomic DNA and 5 units of Taq polymerase with thermal cycling conditions of 95°C for 8 minutes followed by 35 cycles at 94°C for 30 seconds, 62°C for 30 seconds, 72°C for 45 seconds, and then a final extension of 72°C for 8 minutes. The PCR product was digested by Hinf1 enzyme. The variants (size of bands for each allele) were determined by a 4% agarose gel assay in 0.5× TBE.
For the phase II cohort, sixteen tagging SNPs for the same metabolism enzyme genes were selected, which covered 5,000 base pairs (bp) upstream and 1,000 bp downstream of these genes. Because two tagging SNPs in the CYP2E1 gene had a low design score on Illumina measurements, we selected four other SNPs located in the locus or coding region. One of them, rs3813867, tracked CYP2E1-RsaI (rs2031920) that was previously reported associated with NPC. For phase II samples, sixteen SNPs including rs7927381, rs6591256 and rs947895 for GSTP1; rs2071409 and rs2243828 for MPO; rs10517, rs1800566, rs4986998, rs689452, rs2917667, rs2917666 and rs1469908 for NQO1; and rs3813867, rs2070673, rs41299426 and rs41299434 for CYP2E1 were genotyped by Illumina GoldenGate assay. Fourteen SNPs (all except rs41299426 and rs41299434 of CYP2E1 which were excluded due to low minimum allele frequency) were analyzed as described below.
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) compliance was independently tested for each polymorphism. For phase I, differences between predicted genotype frequencies based upon binomially distributed allele frequency and observed genotype frequencies were tested using a χ2 goodness of fit test of co-dominant model. Odd ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed by logistic regression. In order to investigate the influence of EBV/IgA/VCA antibody status, we also analyzed the associations between polymorphisms and the occurrence of NPC in an EBV/IgA/VCA positive subpopulation. The results of the phase I analysis were adjusted for age and gender. For the phase II cohort, the linear trend chi-square tests were used to test for additive allele effects on the disease penetrance. Odds ratios are calculated based on the 2 × 2 table of allele-by-trait counts. All statistics were calculated in the statistical package SAS/SAS Genetics version 9.1.3.
Association results in phase I cohort
Odds ratios for the association of five polymorphisms with risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in southern China (Phase I cohort)
(n = 358)
(n = 629)
(n = 341)
(n = 280)
Association results in phase II cohort
Association of CYP2E1, GSTP1, MPO and NQO1 with risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in an IgA+ population in southern China (Phase II cohort)
Five genetic variants of CYP2E1, GSTP1, MPO and NQO1 were genotyped in 358 NPC cases and 629 controls (phase I cohort) from NPC high incidence regions in southern China. No significant association with risk of NPC was observed (Table 2). A previous study found the highest risk population for NPC in southern China is EBV/IgA/VCA antibody positive (IgA+). To investigate potential influence of factors exclusive of EBV/IgA/VCA antibody development, we stratified the analysis in the phase I cohort to compare 341 NPC cases with IgA+ to 280 IgA + controls. Still, no significant association of genotypes examined with NPC risk was noted (Table 2). To attempt replication from a previous report of a 2.6-fold increased risk of NPC among individuals homozygous for TT of CYP2E1-RsaI (rs2031920) variant, the tagging SNPs for GSTP1, MPO, and NQO1 (which 100% covered these genes) and four SNPs of CYP2E1 (which covered CYP2E1-RsaI (rs2031920) variant) were genotyped in a second independent cohort of 213 IgA+ NPC cases and 230 IgA+ controls (phase II cohort). Similarly no significant association was found between polymorphisms tracking common SNP variation across the four genes and risk of NPC (table 3).
Our results did show a trend for slightly increased risk of NPC with T allele of CYP2E1-RsaI (OR = 1.06 for CT and OR = 1.21 for TT), and a slightly greater risk in individuals with IgA antibodies to EBV capsid antigen (OR = 1.10 for CT and OR = 1.39 for TT), but no statistically significant association in either situation (Table 2). The replication result of CYP2E1-rs3813867 which covered CYP2E1-RsaI from the phase II cohort indicated a similar trend (OR = 1.34); again this did not reach the level of statistical significance (Table 3). Although numerous studies have examined the association of the polymorphisms for CYP2E1, GSTP1, MPO and NQO1 genes with various tumors, very few have investigated the associations between variants of these genes and the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Hildesheim et al genotyped 378 NPC cases and 320 controls employing PCR-RFLP assay and reported that CYP2E1 may be a susceptibility gene for NPC development in Taiwan. This study has been cited in the literature over 100 times through the end of 2009. We attempted to replicate this study using the PCR-RFLP assay in our phase I cohort; the bands at agarose gel appeared distinct. However, the analysis results showed that the distribution of genotype was a significant departure from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Since the TaqMan assay is unavailable for rs2031920, we re-genotyped this SNP by direct sequencing. The results shown in our study are sequencing results (Table 2); however, our findings, which had similar statistical power to the Hildesheim et al study, did not confirm the association observed in the Taiwan study. To further expand our results, an adjacent SNP variant (CYP2E1-rs3813867) which tracks the CYP2E1- rs2031920 by linkage disequilibrium was investigated in the phase II cohort. The results obtained from this analysis were shown similarly insignificant. From our experience, sequencing assay should be more accurate than the PCR-RFLP. Differences in technique may be the cause of the discrepancies between the results from our study and the Taiwan study. A study conducted in Thailand also showed a slightly increased risk of NPC for CYP2E1- rs2031920; again, the result was not statistically significant, similar to results of our study.
Over 200 studies have investigated the association between the polymorphism of GSTP1 and different cancers, however only one study analyzed this gene region for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Our results found no significant association between genetic polymorphism of GSTP1 and the risk of NPC, similar to a previous report. Our results also showed that there were no significant associations between polymorphisms of MPO, NQO1 and nasopharyngeal carcinoma in two cohorts (Tables 2, 3).
Our findings are subject to certain limitations. The etiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma is influenced by many factors, both genetic and environmental. The individual genes we examined appear to have only a limited effect on NPC. However, although our had similar statistical power as Hildesheim et al, due to different study populations, geographic locations, and other unknown factors, our study may not be sufficiently robust to refute the previous study. Additional larger population studies are necessary to determine a definitive answer. Another limitation is that no environmental exposure data (such as smoking history, salt-preserved fish or alcohol consumption, exposure to domestic cooking fires, etc.) is available for our phase I cohort. The environmental exposure data is available for the phase II cohort, and we did conduct an analysis adjusted for salt fish consumption, as well as exposure to domestic cooking fire and occupational solvents, for the phase II genotype data. Still, no significant association was found (data not shown).
We could not confirm the previously reported increased risk of NPC among individuals homozygous for TT of CYP2E1-RsaI (rs2031920) variant. This may be in part due to our use of a different assay method; however, the method we used is now considered the most accurate available. Our results suggest that polymorphism of CYP2E1, GSTP1, MPO and NQO1 genes do not contribute appreciably to overall NPC risk in a Han population from southern China. Further studies examining the interaction of genetic and environmental factors on the incidence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma are needed.
single nucleotide polymorphisms
Restriction fragment length polymorphism
IgA antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen
reactive oxygen species
IgA antibodies to EBV early antigen
minor allele frequencies.
We thank all the participants in the cohorts. We thank Randy Johnson for invaluable statistical advice, Michael Campsmith for manuscript review and edit, Beth Binns-Roemer, Yuchun Zhou and Michael Malasky for excellent technical assistance.
This research was supported in whole or in part with Federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, contract #N01-CO-12400. This research was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant #30672377.
- Wu JJ, Guo H, Su R: Analysis and forecast of incidence and mortality of nasopharynx cancer by time series in Zhongshan city. Chinese Journal of Hospital Statistics. 2001, 8 (1): 16-19.Google Scholar
- Jia WH, Huang QH, Liao J, Ye W, Shugart YY, Liu Q, Chen LZ, Li YH, Lin X, Wen FL, et al: Trends in incidence and mortality of nasopharyngeal carcinoma over a 20-25 year period (1978/1983-2002) in Sihui and Cangwu counties in southern China. BMC cancer. 2006, 6: 178-10.1186/1471-2407-6-178.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guo XC, Scott K, Liu Y, Dean M, David V, Nelson GW, Johnson RC, Dilks HH, Lautenberger J, Kessing B, et al: Genetic factors leading to chronic Epstein-Barr virus infection and nasopharyngeal carcinoma in South East China: study design, methods and feasibility. Hum Genomics. 2006, 2 (6): 365-375.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guo X, Johnson RC, Deng H, Liao J, Guan L, Nelson GW, Tang M, Zheng Y, de The G, O'Brien SJ, et al: Evaluation of nonviral risk factors for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a high-risk population of Southern China. International journal of cancer. 2009, 124 (12): 2942-2947. 10.1002/ijc.24293.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hiyama T, Yoshihara M, Tanaka S, Chayama K: Genetic polymorphisms and head and neck cancer risk (Review). Int J Oncol. 2008, 32 (5): 945-973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oyama T, Kawamoto T, Mizoue T, Sugio K, Kodama Y, Mitsudomi T, Yasumoto K: Cytochrome P450 2E1 polymorphism as a risk factor for lung cancer: in relation to p53 gene mutation. Anticancer research. 1997, 17 (1B): 583-587.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarmanova J, Benesova K, Gut I, Nedelcheva-Kristensen V, Tynkova L, Soucek P: Genetic polymorphisms of biotransformation enzymes in patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Hum Mol Genet. 2001, 10 (12): 1265-1273. 10.1093/hmg/10.12.1265.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hildesheim A, Anderson LM, Chen CJ, Cheng YJ, Brinton LA, Daly AK, Reed CD, Chen IH, Caporaso NE, Hsu MM, et al: CYP2E1 genetic polymorphisms and risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwan. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1997, 89 (16): 1207-1212. 10.1093/jnci/89.16.1207.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kongruttanachok N, Sukdikul S, Setavarin S, Kerekhjanarong V, Supiyaphun P, Voravud N, Poovorawan Y, Mutirangura A: Cytochrome P450 2E1 polymorphism and nasopharyngeal carcinoma development in Thailand: a correlative study. BMC cancer. 2001, 1: 4-10.1186/1471-2407-1-4.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ryberg D, Skaug V, Hewer A, Phillips DH, Harries LW, Wolf CR, Ogreid D, Ulvik A, Vu P, Haugen A: Genotypes of glutathione transferase M1 and P1 and their significance for lung DNA adduct levels and cancer risk. Carcinogenesis. 1997, 18 (7): 1285-1289. 10.1093/carcin/18.7.1285.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Egan KM, Cai Q, Shu XO, Jin F, Zhu TL, Dai Q, Gao YT, Zheng W: Genetic polymorphisms in GSTM1, GSTP1, and GSTT1 and the risk for breast cancer: results from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004, 13 (2): 197-204. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-03-0294.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Larson RA, Wang Y, Banerjee M, Wiemels J, Hartford C, Le Beau MM, Smith MT: Prevalence of the inactivating 609C-->T polymorphism in the NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase (NQO1) gene in patients with primary and therapy-related myeloid leukemia. Blood. 1999, 94 (2): 803-807.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schulz WA, Krummeck A, Rosinger I, Schmitz-Drager BJ, Sies H: Predisposition towards urolithiasis associated with the NQO1 null-allele. Pharmacogenetics. 1998, 8 (5): 453-454. 10.1097/00008571-199810000-00011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Piedrafita FJ, Molander RB, Vansant G, Orlova EA, Pfahl M, Reynolds WF: An Alu element in the myeloperoxidase promoter contains a composite SP1-thyroid hormone-retinoic acid response element. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271 (24): 14412-14420. 10.1074/jbc.271.24.14412.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hansson M, Olsson I, Nauseef WM: Biosynthesis, processing, and sorting of human myeloperoxidase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2006, 445 (2): 214-224. 10.1016/j.abb.2005.08.009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feyler A, Voho A, Bouchardy C, Kuokkanen K, Dayer P, Hirvonen A, Benhamou S: Point: myeloperoxidase -463G --> a polymorphism and lung cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002, 11 (12): 1550-1554.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pakakasama S, Chen TT, Frawley W, Muller C, Douglass EC, Tomlinson GE: Myeloperoxidase promotor polymorphism and risk of hepatoblastoma. International journal of cancer. 2003, 106 (2): 205-207. 10.1002/ijc.11191.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Olson SH, Carlson MD, Ostrer H, Harlap S, Stone A, Winters M, Ambrosone CB: Genetic variants in SOD2, MPO, and NQO1, and risk of ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004, 93 (3): 615-620. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.03.027.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hung RJ, Boffetta P, Brennan P, Malaveille C, Gelatti U, Placidi D, Carta A, Hautefeuille A, Porru S: Genetic polymorphisms of MPO, COMT, MnSOD, NQO1, interactions with environmental exposures and bladder cancer risk. Carcinogenesis. 2004, 25 (6): 973-978. 10.1093/carcin/bgh080.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dally H, Gassner K, Jager B, Schmezer P, Spiegelhalder B, Edler L, Drings P, Dienemann H, Schulz V, Kayser K, et al: Myeloperoxidase (MPO) genotype and lung cancer histologic types: the MPO -463 A allele is associated with reduced risk for small cell lung cancer in smokers. Int J Cancer. 2002, 102 (5): 530-535. 10.1002/ijc.10756.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schabath MB, Spitz MR, Delclos GL, Gunn GB, Whitehead LW, Wu X: Association between asbestos exposure, cigarette smoking, myeloperoxidase (MPO) genotypes, and lung cancer risk. Am J Ind Med. 2002, 42 (1): 29-37. 10.1002/ajim.10084.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu X, Schabath MB, Spitz MR: Myeloperoxidase promoter region polymorphism and lung cancer risk. Methods Mol Med. 2003, 75: 121-133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schabath MB, Spitz MR, Hong WK, Delclos GL, Reynolds WF, Gunn GB, Whitehead LW, Wu X: A myeloperoxidase polymorphism associated with reduced risk of lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2002, 37 (1): 35-40. 10.1016/S0169-5002(02)00034-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cancer Genome Anatomy Project SNP500Cancer Database. 2008
- Cheng YJ, Chien YC, Hildesheim A, Hsu MM, Chen IH, Chuang J, Chang J, Ma YD, Luo CT, Hsu WL, et al: No association between genetic polymorphisms of CYP1A1, GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1, NAT2, and nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwan. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003, 12 (2): 179-180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.