Male breast cancer: a report of 127 cases at a Moroccan institution
© Bourhafour et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 22 November 2010
Accepted: 29 June 2011
Published: 29 June 2011
Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease representing less than 1% of all malignancies in men and only 1% of all incident breast cancers. Our study details clinico-pathological features, treatments and prognostic factors in a large Moroccan cohort.
One hundred and twenty-seven patients were collected from 1985 to 2007 at the National Institute of Oncology in Rabat, Morocco.
Median age was 62 years and median time for consultation 28 months. The main clinical complaint was a mass beneath the areola in 93, 5% of the cases. Most patients have an advanced disease. Ninety-one percent of tumors were ductal carcinomas.
Management consisted especially of radical mastectomy; followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and hormonal therapy with or without chemotherapy. The median of follow-up was 30 months. The evolution has been characterized by local recurrence; in twenty two cases (17% of all patients). Metastasis occurred in 41 cases (32% of all patients). The site of metastasis was the bone in twenty cases; lung in twelve cases; liver in seven case; liver and skin in one case and pleura and skin in one case.
Male breast cancer has many similarities to breast cancer in women, but there are distinct features that should be appreciated. Future research for better understanding of this disease at national or international level are needed to improve the management and prognosis of male patients.
Male breast cancer is a rare disease that accounts for less than 1% of all cancers in men and less than 1% of all diagnosed breast cancers . The literature regarding male breast cancer consists mainly of retrospective studies, and there are no randomized prospective data for this disease. This is an entity for which optimum management and treatment guidelines are not clearly established. Generally, treatment recommendations have been extrapolated from results of trials in female patients.
In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the clinico-pathological features, treatments and the results obtained in 127 cases of male breast cancer treated at the National Institute of Oncology in Rabat, Morocco, between 1985 and 2007.
Patients and methods
The investigation was a retrospective (the data was collected by chart review), observational, single-centre study.
Inclusion criteria were: male patients > 18 years old with localized, locally Advanced or metastatic breast cancer.
We excluded from the study patients who had not follow up after initial diagnosis.
Breast carcinoma diagnosis was made by biopsy of the breast tumor. Tumor staging was carried out according to the TNM classification 2002 modified in 2003. Histological tumor grading was performed using the Scarff Bloom and Richardson (SBR) histological system.
Immunohistochemical analysis to determine estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status was performed using standard procedures on 4-μm sections of paraffinembedded tissue specimens stained with the monoclonal antibodies 6F11 and 1A6 for ER and PR, respectively.
Nuclear staining 10% was considered a positive result.
Descriptive of clinical data were expressed in percentage or median or mean ± SD. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan Meier method, and compared by the log rank test. The relationship between each of the explanatory variables and outcome (EFS and OS) was assessed in turn using univariate and multivariate Cox's regression analysis. A p value of < 0.05 was considered significant.
Consent and statement of ethical approval
As the treatment of each patient was decided by the medical staff of the centre, oral consent was obtained from the subjects and was approved by the institutional review boards of the National Institute of Oncology, Cancer Centre in Rabat. This study was approved by the institutional review boards of National Institute of Oncology, in Rabat.
One hundred and twenty-seven patients at the National Institute of Oncology in Rabat, Morocco with a diagnosis of breast cancer between January 1985 and December 2007 were analyzed retrospectively and evaluated in terms of general characteristics and survival.
The median age was 62 years (range 32-91 years). A family history of breast cancer was noted in four cases.
The main clinical complaint was a mass beneath the areola in 93, 5% of the cases. The tumor was associated with gynecomastia in 4% of cases. Paget's disease was found in 2, 5% of cases. The median time for consultation was 28 months (range: 3-48 months).
Mass beneath the areola
SBR 2 ou 3
With Paget's disaese
Lymph node status
Ductal infiltrating carcinoma (IDC) corresponded to 122 cases (96%), infiltrating ductal carcinoma with Paget's disease of the nipple in two cases and Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) in one case.
According to the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grading, grade II or III was predominant (82% of the cases). Axillary lymph nodes contained metastasis (N+) in 64, 5% of the cases (54 patients).
Moreover, hormone receptors were evaluable in sixty one cases. Both Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) were positive in 64% (39 patients).
The treatment consisted of radical mastectomy (RM) in 71% (90 cases); modified radical mastectomy (MRM) in seven cases; total mastectomy without axillary node dissection (AD) in seven cases and lumpectomy (L) in one case.
All patients received adjuvant therapy following surgery. Sixty patients of ninty patients received radiotherapy; the median delivered doses were 50 Gy to breast, chest wall and regional lymph nodes. Chemotherapy (an anthracycline-based protocol; AC60 or FEC 100) was given in neoadjuvant situation in five cases, in adjuvant situation in 23 cases. Chemotherapy delivery increased according particularly to advanced stage and axillary nodal involvement. Nine cases receive it in palliative situation.
Treatment modalities according to the TNM stage
(nb = 6)
5 total mastectomy without AD, 1 (L)
Stage II A
(nb = 8)
2 total mastectomy without AD, 6 MRM
(n = 12)
1 MRM, 11 RM
(n = 64)
59 RM immediatly
5 RM after neoadj CMT
(n = 37)
During the median follow-up period of 30 months (3-168 months); the evolution has been characterized by local recurrence in twenty two cases (17% of all patients). Metastasis occurred in 41 cases (32% of all patients). The site of metastasis was the bone in twenty cases; lung in twelve cases; liver in seven case; liver and skin in one case and pleura and skin in one case.
Carcinoma of the male breast has many similarities to breast cancer in women, but there are distinct features that should be appreciated. During the last few years, there has been an increase in the incidence of this disease. Review of Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) data indicate a rise in the incidence of male breast cancer, from 1.0 per 100,000 men in the late 1970s to 1.2 per 100,000 men from 2000 to 2004 [1, 2].
The mean age at diagnosis for men with breast cancer is 67 years, which is approximately 5-10 years older than the average age at diagnosis for women [1, 3]. The mean age in our patients (62 years) is lower than other series.
Male breast cancer is likely to be caused by the concurrent effects of different risk factors, including clinical disorders relating to hormonal imbalances, certain occupational and environmental exposures, and genetic risk factors, for instance a positive family history of breast cancer and mutations in breast cancer predisposing genes, such as BRCA genes, and possibly others .
The most common clinical sign of breast cancer onset in men is a painless palpable retroareolar lump . Other initial symptoms may include nipple involvement, with retraction and/or ulceration and/or bleeding, axillary lymphoadenopathies and gynecomastia [3, 4].
As male breast does not have lobular elements, the most frequently encountered male breast cancer type is invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) (85-95%) [4, 5]. The result in our study was similar with a ratio of 96% for IDC and this was significantly higher than the other histological types. Lobular carcinoma in situ, Paget disease and inflammatory breast cancer have been rarely described in men.
Positivity rate of receptors is more frequent in men with breast cancer, in comparison to women . In different studies, ER and PR positivity was reported as 75 to 93% [7, 8]. In our study, both Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) were positive in 64%.
Breast cancer in men should be treated with the same strategy as in women [9, 10]. The most common surgical procedure is modified radical mastectomy with axillary node dissection . However, recent studies are in favor of modified radical or simple mastectomy combined with radiation therapy. Postoperative radiotherapy does achieve local control but no effect is observed on survival . In men treated with mastectomy, adjuvant radiotherapy has shown to decrease local recurrence .
Tamoxifen has proved to lead to an increase in survival rates in women with hormone-responsive disease and to date is generally considered the standard adjuvant treatment for hormone-dependent male breast cancer . The tolerance of the drug has not been sufficiently studied in men; its main side effects are deep venous thrombosis, reduction of libido, impotence, mood changes and hot flushes .
Chemotherapy should be used in the absence or doubt about endocrine-responsiveness. Frequently used chemotherapy regimens were CMF, FEC and EC . The taxanes may be considered when lymph nodes are involved. Regarding the use of adjuvant trastuzumab, since no specific data exist, its use should be considered according to patients' and tumor characteristics [17, 18].
The overall 5- and 10-year survival rate of male breast cancer patients are around 60 and 40%, respectively . The number of histologically positive axillary nodes and the tumor size are significant prognostic factors. Another negative prognostic factor is the advanced age at the time of diagnosis, since the increased presence of comorbidities may limit the possibility of treatment .
Lifetime in men with breast cancer is worse than in women. While some investigators explain this with more aggressive biologic behavior of male breast cancer, more frequent explanation is the rareness of male breast cancer and achieving its diagnosis at a more advanced stage.
Without a concerted effort, the literature pertaining to male breast cancer will remain a collection of retrospective series and pilot studies. Efforts to develop randomized, prospective studies within cooperative groups and other clinical trial consortia are essential.
Male breast cancer
Scarff Bloom and Richardson
Ductal infiltrating carcinoma
Invasive lobular carcinoma
Modified radical mastectomy
Axillary node dissection
doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2
5-fluorouracile 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2
event free survival
- Cutuli B, Cohen-Solal Le-Nir C, Serin D, Kirova Y, Gaci Z, Lemanski C, Male breast cancer: Evolution of treatment and prognostic factors. Analysis of 489 cases. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 2010, 73: 246-254.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Speirs V, Shaaban AM: The rising incidence of male breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008Google Scholar
- Yoney A, Kucuk A, Unsal M: Male breast cancer: A retrospective analysis. Cancer/Radiothérapie. 2009, 13: 103-107.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fiala L, Coufal O, Fait V, Foretova L: Male breast cancer: our experience. Rozhl Chir. 2010, 89 (10): 612-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ben Dhiab T, Bouzid T, Gamoudi A, Ben Hassouna J, Khomsi F, Boussen H: Male breast cancer: about 123 cases collected at the Institute Salah-Azaiz of Tunis from 1979 to 1999. Bull Cancer. 2005, 92 (3): 281-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- El Omari-Alaoui H, Lahdiri I, Nejjar I, Hadadi K, Ahyoud F, Hachi H, Male breast cancer: A report of 71 cases. Cancer/Radiotherapie. 2002, 349-351. 6
- Yoney A, Kucuk A, Unsal M: Male breast cancer: a retrospective analysis. Cancer/Radiothérapie. 2009, 13: 103-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Comet B, Cutuli B, Penault-Llorca F, Bonneterre J, Belkacemi Y: Male breast cancer: a review. Bull Cancer. 2009, 96 (2): 181-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Contractor KB, Kaur K, Rodrigues GS, Kulkarni DM, Singhal H: Male breast cancer: is the scenario changing?. World J Surg Oncol. 2008, 6: 58-69. 10.1186/1477-7819-6-58.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) Breast Cancer Guidelines. [http://www.nccn.org]
- Onami Susan, Ozaki Melanie, Mortimer Joanne, Pal Sumanta: Male breast cancer: An update in diagnosis, treatment and molecular profiling. Maturitas. 65 (2010): 308-314.
- Yu E, Suzuki H, Younus J, Elfiki T, Stitt L, Yau G: The Impact of post-mastectomy radiation therapy on male breast cancer patients-A case series. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011Google Scholar
- Pant K, Dutta U: Understanding and management of male breast cancer: a critical review. Med Oncol. 2008, 25 (3): 294-8. 10.1007/s12032-007-9034-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fogh S, Hirsch AE, Langmead JP, Goldberg SI, Rosenberg CL, Taghian AG, Powell SN, Kachnic LA: Use of tamoxifen with postsurgical irradiation may improve survival in estrogen and progesterone receptor-positive male breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2011, 11 (1): 39-45.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arnould N, Pouget O, Gharbi M, Brettes J-P: Breast cancer in men: are there similarities with breast cancer in women?. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 2006, 34: 413-419.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tunon de Lara C, Goudy G, MacGrogan G, Durand M, Dilhuydy J-M, Avril A: Male breast cancer: A review of 52 cases collected at the Institute Bergonie (Bordeaux, France) from 1980 to 2004. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 2008, 36: 386-394.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gómez-Raposo C, Zambrana Tévar F, Sereno Moyano M, López Gómez M, Casado E: Male breast cancer. Cancer Treatment Reviews. 2010,Google Scholar
- Ottini Laura, Palli Domenico, Rizzo Sergio, Federico Mario, Bazan Viviana, Antonio Russo: Male breast cancer. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 2010, 73: 141-155. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.04.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar