Open Access

Anxiety-depressive disorders among irritable bowel syndrome patients in Guilan, Iran

  • Mohamad-Jafar Modabbernia1,
  • Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei2Email author,
  • Ali Imani1,
  • Seyed-Alireza Mirsafa-Moghaddam1,
  • Massih Sedigh-Rahimabadi2,
  • Mahmoud Yousefi-Mashhour2,
  • Farahnaz Joukar2,
  • Zahra Atrkar-Roushan2 and
  • Siamak Bidel3, 4
BMC Research Notes20125:112

DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-112

Received: 21 July 2011

Accepted: 21 February 2012

Published: 21 February 2012

Abstract

Background

Psychiatric disorders are common in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients. The prevalence of psychiatric disorders in IBS patients varies in different cultures. We conducted this study to determine the prevalence of psychiatric disorders

Methods

In a cross-sectional study, 256 IBS patients were selected (using the criteria of Rome III) and evaluated for psychiatric disorders. In the first phase, subjects were screened using the General Health Questionnaire 28 (GHQ28). In the second phase, those who had scores ≥ 23 were assessed through semi-structured psychiatric interviews.

Results

Thirty out of 256 subjects had no significant psychiatric symptoms after performing GHQ28. In further psychiatric evaluation of the remaining subjects (226) who suffered from some degree of a psychiatric problem, 36 were diagnosed without Anxiety/Depressive disorder. Thus 66 subjects (25.8%) were known as a group without any significant psychiatric problem. A total of 190 subjects (74.2%) with anxiety-depressive problems were diagnosed; 89 were suffering from pure anxiety disorders, 41 were suffering from depressive disorders and 60 had co-morbid anxiety-depressive disorders. When comparing anxiety-depressive patients (n = 190) with normal subjects (n = 66), gender (P = 0.016), occupation (P = 0.002) and intensity of IBS (P < 0.001) showed statistically significant differences.

Conclusion

The high prevalence of anxiety-depressive disorders in this study indicates the necessity of psychiatric assessment, early diagnosis and treatment of the patients with IBS. It may improve management of the patients suffering from IBS.

Keywords

IBS Psychiatric disorders Depression Anxiety

Background

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a malfunction of the intestine that is characterized by abdominal pain and/or abdominal discomfort and changes in bowel habits without any detected structural disorders. Ten to twenty percent of adults and teenagers worldwide have some signs of IBS. It is more common in females and less common in the elderly (more than 60 years old). Less than one-third of these patients visit practitioners, which accounts for about 12% of primary care visits. The severity of symptoms is varied and it may have some effects on patient quality of life and increases healthcare costs [1]. The pathophysiology of IBS is still poorly understood, thus the treatment of IBS is mainly directed toward symptoms.

It has been shown that patients with the most intense symptoms have the worst quality of life, and the morbidity of IBS is equal to severe organic gastrointestinal diseases. IBS is the second cause of absence from work (after the common cold) and it is almost 3 times more than other workers [2]. In a survey of 8 European countries, a randomized cluster sampling of 41,984 individuals, patients with IBS were identified. After psychiatric evaluation, 78 percent of them believed that IBS had some effect on their health state and quality of life which in 24% these effects estimated as very significant [3].

Several studies have evaluated the relation between IBS and psychiatric disorders [46]. It has been reported that neurosis, anxiety, depression, and dysfunctional cognition are more prevalent in patients with IBS [711]. In a large randomized controlled trial Guthrie et al. found that 44% of IBS patients had psychiatric comorbidity which depressive and anxiety disorders were the most common conditions [12]. In a study by Yates, six major gastrointestinal features including: abdominal pain, diarrhea, bloating, constipation, loss of appetite and vomiting were considered along with the psychiatric state of the patients. Major depression (13.4%), panic disorder (12.5%) and agoraphobia (17.8%) were found to be more common in patients with 2 or more GI symptoms [13]. A most recent study provided further evidence that GI specific anxiety is an important mediating factor affecting the GI symptom severity and quality of life in IBS patients. This study concluded that reduction of gastrointestinal specific anxiety in IBS could be a relevant treatment goal to achieve general improvement in patients with IBS [14]. The prevalence of anxiety-depressive disorders in IBS patients differs according to the studied population, study type, sample size and methodology of the research. In northern part of Iran, there was no available data on the psychiatric evaluation of the patients with IBS. Therefore this study was designed to determine the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in the IBS patients of the Guilan province.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study we included patients diagnosed as IBS cases. In a preliminary pilot study on 24 IBS patients, the prevalence of phobia, major depression, generalized anxiety and dysthymia were 29.4%, 29.4%, 41.2% and 41.2%, respectively. Therefore, considering α = 0.05, d = 0.056 and prevalence = 29.4%, (N = P.(1-P).Z2/d2), we enrolled 256 IBS patients in this study. These patients were recruited from gastroenterology private clinics, and then were referred to the "Psychiatrics" who worked in Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease Research Center (GLDRC), Rasht the capital city of Guilan province in northern Iran. The gastroenterologists chose them randomly from IBS patients who had been referred to their private clinics during January 2009 to June 2009. They referred the first one then omitted the second and referred the third one and so on. Therefore, 256 subjects out of 512 IBS patients were included in this study. The inclusion criteria were: diagnosed with IBS by physician according to the Roma III criteria, age between 15-80 and willing to enroll in the research.

This study was performed in two phases. In the first phase, the probable cases of depression or anxiety were detected with the self-reporting General Health Questionnaire 28 (GHQ28). In the second phase, the patients who scored > 23 of GHQ28, underwent a semi-structured clinical interview using the DSM IV-TR to evaluate anxiety-depressive disorders.

The standardized GHQ28 test in Iran was shown to have a sensitivity and specificity of 84 - 88% and 78 - 93%, respectively, validity of 85 - 90%, an overall classified error of 8.2 - 19%, best scoring of 0, 1, 2 and 3 and best cut off point of 23 [15]. The questionnaire had four scales (somatic, anxiety and sleeping disorders, major depression, and social dysfunction). Each scale consisted of 7 questions and each question had four choices with a score of 0 to 3. Two residents of psychiatry, who were qualified on using the semi-structural Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM IV-TR) interview and after reaching an acceptable correlation rate, initiated the survey. The IBS cases that had previously been diagnosed using the Rome III criteria [16] were randomly selected from the gastroenterology private clinics. Demographic information (e.g., age, sex, occupational and marital status and educational level) was obtained and the GHQ28 was given to them to be filled out in 20 min. In the case of illiterate participants, the interviewer assisted them with filling out the forms.

From 256 patients, who referred by the gastroenterologists, 30 had a GHQ 28 < 23 so they considered normal and from the remaining (226); 36 were without Anxiety/Depressive disorder, although, they had some psychiatric signs, they did not have any psychiatric disorders. Thus we had 190 IBS patients with Anxiety-Depressive disorders compare with 66 IBS patients without any psychiatric disorders.

Psychiatric assessment

Judgment on the psychiatric state of studied IBS patients was carried out using the GHQ28 and semi-structured psychiatric interviews and patients were subsequently divided into 4 groups as presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Psychiatric state assessment of the IBS patients [17]

Normal

Patients with a GHQ28 score < 23.

Depression

The presence of at least one of the following disorders: major depressive disorder (MDD), minor depressive disorder or dysthymic disorder.

Anxiety

The presence of at least one of the following disorders: phobia, panic attacks, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Co-morbid

Having both anxiety and depression criteria simultaneously.

Diagnostic criteria for IBS [11] were defined as having recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort at least 3 days per month in the last 3 months associated with 2 or more of the following:
  1. 1.

    Improvement with defecation

     
  2. 2.

    Onset associated with a change in frequency of stools

     
  3. 3.

    Onset associated with a change in form (appearance) of stools

     

These criteria were fulfilled for the previous 3 months with symptom onset at least 6 months prior to diagnosis.

Subtyping IBS by predominant stool pattern

Subtyping IBS using the predominant stool pattern [16] was carried out using the criteria presented in Table 2.
Table 2

Subtyping IBS using the predominant stool pattern [17]

IBS with constipation (IBS-C)

Hard or lumpy stools for ≥ 25% of bowel movements and loose (mushy) or watery stools for < 25% of bowel movements.

IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D)

Loose (mushy) or watery stools for ≥ 25% of bowel movements and hard or lumpy stool for < 25% of bowel movements.

Mixed IBS (IBS-M)

Hard or lumpy stools for ≥ 25% of bowel movements and loose (mushy) or watery stools for ≥ 25% of bowel movements.

Unsubtyped IBS

Insufficient abnormality of stool consistency to meet criteria for IBSC, IBS-D or IBS-M.

Although the above sub-classifications may be used to subtype patients according to bowel habits, the validity and stability of such subtypes over time is unknown. IBS severity scores were based on five visual analogue scales: severity of pain, duration of pain, abdominal bloating, bowel satisfaction and quality of life. Overall IBS severity scores were expressed as a score from 0 (least severe) to 500 (most severe). Mild, moderate and severe cases were indicated by scores of 75 to 175, 175 to 300 and > 300, respectively [18]. The participants were asked about the occupational and educational status as well.

Statistics analysis

We used descriptive tools for prevalence analysis, chi-square tests for comparing qualitative variables (e.g., IBS and depression), T-tests for quantitative variables and kappa tests (> .75) for detecting the agreement coefficient between interviewers. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the ethic committees of Guilan Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease Research Center (GLDRC). We fully explained the study to the participants (IBS patient with or without anxiety/depressive disorder) and written consents were obtained. All private information remained confidential and, when needed, patients were referred to a psychiatrist for appropriate treatment.

Results

Of 256 patients participated in this study, 156 (60.9%) were females and 100 (39.1%) were males and 226 subjects (83 males and 143 females) suffered from a degree of psychiatric problems (GHQ28 ≥ 23). After performing semi-structured psychiatric interviews, 190 subjects (74.2%) had anxiety-depressive disorders (89 were suffering from anxiety disorders, 41 depressive disorder and 60 had co-morbid anxiety-depressive disorders; Figures 1, 2).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-0500-5-112/MediaObjects/13104_2011_Article_1487_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Study action plan.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-0500-5-112/MediaObjects/13104_2011_Article_1487_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Distribution of psychiatric disorders and severity of IBS between females and males.

The demographic variables of gender (P = 0.016), occupation (P = 0.002) and intensity of IBS (P < 0.001), in comparison with other subjects (66), showed statistically significant differences (Table 3).
Table 3

Different variables among IBS patient with or without anxiety/depressive disorder

Variable

Group

Presence of Anxiety/Depressive isorder(256)

P-value*

  

Negative(66)

Positive(190)

 

Gender

Male

34 (34%)

66 (66%)

0.016

 

Female

32 (20.5%)

124 (79.5%)

 

Marital Status

Single

16 (34.8%)

30 (65.2%)

0.445

 

Married

49 (23.9%)

156 (76.1%)

 
 

Widow or

1 (20%)

4 (80%)

 
 

Divorce

   

Occupational Status

Jobless

27 (18.4%)

120 (81.6%)

0.002

 

Has a job

39 (35.8%)

70 (64.2%)

 

Type of IBS

Diarrhea

24 (21.4%)

88 (78.6%)

0.11

 

Constipation

34 (32.7%)

70 (67.3%)

 
 

Mixed

8 (20%)

32 (80%)

 

Severity of disease

Mild

32 (47.8%)

35 (52.2%)

0.001

 

Moderate

34 (20.4%)

133 (79.6%)

 
 

Severe

0

22 (100%)

 

Educational Status

Under diploma

25 (21%)

94 (79%)

0.104

 

Diploma or higher

41 (29.9%)

96 (70.1%)

 

Age group

< 21

3 (25%)

9 (75%)

0.971

 

21-39

39 (26.4%)

109 (73.6%)

 
 

≥ 40

24 (25%)

72 (75%)

 

*P-values > 0.05 are considered non-significant (NS)

In anxiety disorder cases, GAD was the most frequent, and in depressive disorder cases, dysthymia was the most frequent. There were statistically significant differences in age [mean age of 42.7 (s.d. = 13.4) vs. 37.1 (s.d. = 12.4), P = 0.033], severity of disease (P < 0.001), educational level (P = 0.016) and marital status (P = 0.014) between patients with depressive disorders (n = 41) compared with psychiatrically normal cases (n = 66). Comparing IBS patients that had anxiety disorders and psychiatrically normal cases, there were significant differences in the severity of disease (P < 0.001) and occupational status (P = 0.002). Also, comparing patients with anxiety and those with depressive disorders, IBS patients with anxiety were younger [mean age of 33.0 (s.d. = 10.6) vs. 42.7 (s.d. = 13.4) and P = 0. 01], more frequently single (P = 0.01), had a higher educational status (P = 0.024) and suffered more from IBS-D (P = 0.01; Table 4).
Table 4

Distribution of different variables among IBS patient with anxiety-depressive disorders

Variable

Group

Anxiety-depressive disorders(190)

P-value*

P-value**

  

Anxiety(89)

Depression(41)

Co- morbid(60)

  

Gender

Male

35(53.1%)

15 (22.7%)

16 (24.2%)

0.765***

0.271

 

Female

54(43.5%)

26 (21%)

44 (35.5%)

  

Marital Status

Single

19(63.3%)

3 (10%)

8 (26.7%)

< 0.01

0.104

 

Married

70(44.9%)

36 (23.1%)

50 (32%)

  
 

Widow or divorce

0

2 (50%)

2 (50%)

  

Occupational Status

Jobless

56(46.7%)

23 (19.2%)

41 (34.2%)

0.459

0.456

 

Has a job

33(47.1%)

18 (25.7%)

19 (27.2%)

  

Type of IBS

Diarrhea

50(56.8%)

12 (13.7%)

26 (29.5%)

< 0.01

0.02

 

Constipation

25(35.7%)

18 (35.7%)

27 (38.5%)

  
 

Mixed

14(43.7%)

11 (34.4%)

7 (21.9%)

  

Severity of disease

Mild

17(48.5%)

4 (11.4%)

14 (40.1%)

0.39

0.189

 

Moderate

59(44.3%)

31 (23.3%)

43 (32.3%)

  
 

Severe

13(59.1%)

6 (27.3%)

3 (13.7%)

  

Educational Status

Under diploma

37(39.4%)

26 (27.7%)

31 (33%)

0.02

< 0.05

 

Diploma or higher

52(54.2%)

15 (15.6%)

29 (30.3%)

  

Age group

< 21

6 (64.7%)

0

3 (33.3%)

< 0.01

< 0.01

 

21-39

62(56.9%)

16 (14.6%)

31 (28.5%)

  
 

≥ 40

21(29.3%)

25 (34.8%)

26 (36%)

  

* P-values represent differences between anxiety and depression

** P-values represent differences in anxiety-depressive disorders

*** P-values > 0.05 are considered non-significant (NS)

Discussion

Several authors have emphasized the need for psychological assessment in patients with functional bowel disorders [10, 1921]. Different studies have shown that almost two-thirds of all patients with self-reported depressive symptoms were not identified by the attending physician as suffering from psychiatric problems [22, 23]. Similarly, physicians were shown to detect only one-third of all cases in somatoform disorders [24]. Therefore, psychological assessment should be mandatory in patients with functional bowel disorders. The screening of patients for anxiety and depression can be performed easily through patient questionnaires and is the basis and justification for additional therapeutic interventions, which have been shown to be effective in the GI symptom severity and quality of life of the IBS patients [14, 2527]. At the present time, the treatment of IBS patients in clinical practices focuses on physical symptom relief. The efficacy of various medical and dietary treatments has not been established [21, 28] in contrast to the efficacy of various psychological interventions. Recently, Zijdenbos et al. [27] suggested that psychological interventions are superior to "care as usual" for improvement of symptoms. In a systematic review and meta- analysis Ford et al. demonstrated a significant benefit of antidepressants over the placebo, and psychological therapies over control therapy or a physician's "usual management", for the treatment of IBS [25].

In our study, the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in IBS patients was evaluated in Guilan, a northern province of Iran. Among 256 IBS patients that participated in this survey, 190 (74.2%) had one of the anxiety-depressive disorders. Approximately 3 of 5 IBS patients in our study had at least one kind of anxiety disorder and 2 showed some degree of depression. The main findings of our study were the importance of psychiatric disorders, and especially anxiety, in the severity of IBS. Most IBS patients with anxiety were married, had a higher level of education, were unemployed, suffered from IBS-D and had severe symptoms. The high prevalence of anxiety and depression in the local general population (20.8% and 21%, respectively) [15] must be considered as an important factor in the higher prevalence of these diseases in our studied IBS patient group (35.5% and 16%, respectively). Studies with an adequate number of patients and a standardized psychiatric interview indicated that 50% to 60% of IBS patients in gastroenterology clinics have psychiatric disorders. The proportion is similar in patients entering treatment trials for IBS symptoms [29]. North American studies have found that anxiety disorders are highly prevalent in IBS outpatients (39.7-52.4%) [30]. However, we cannot exclude those patients recruited via advertisement and have consulted a physician due to their IBS symptoms previously. In this study, the prevalence of anxiety-depressive disorders in IBS patients was higher in females, which is similar to Blanchard et al. study [31, 32]. This difference may explain by the higher prevalence of anxiety and depression in the female normal population [17, 33, 34]. Also, the prevalence of IBS in general population has been reported higher in women [35]. However, a previously published paper, which examined gender differences among IBS patients in degree of psychological distress, concluded that it might be a function of the method of measurement. This means that by employing some validated tests, such as the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), or Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), female IBS patients showed more psychological distress. However, by using the categorical approach of the DSMs, it seems that male and female IBS patients do not differ [30].

In our study the presence of possible depression, as well as a higher mean level of depression symptoms, was more frequent in females than males, but was not statistically significant. This was similar to Cain et al. study, [36] in which no sex differences were found with regard to depression symptoms in IBS patients. Possible anxiety disorders showed a trend to be more prevalent in female patients in our study. Also, the mean level of anxiety symptoms was not different between males and females. The most frequent type of anxiety disorder in our study was GAD, which is consistent with previously reported data [31, 37]. In our analysis, comparing IBS patients with and without psychiatric disorders, a significant association with the severity of the disease has been observed (P < 0.001). This might be considered as clear evidence that all IBS patients who suffer from a severe type of disease could have some degrees of anxiety-depressive disorder.

Recent published results by Thijssen et al. showed the importance of anxiety and depression on quality of life and symptom severity in IBS patients. IBS patients with anxiety disorder or depression had more severe symptoms, a worse physical and mental quality of life score, and higher levels of dysfunctional cognition [38]. It has also been suggested that anxiety about gastrointestinal symptoms, not general anxiety or depression, may be more relevant for symptom severity and health outcomes in IBS and other functional GI disorders [39].

Comparing IBS patients with depression (41 cases) to IBS patient without anxiety-depressive disorders (66 cases), depressed patients were older (P = 0.033), more frequently married (P = 0.014), suffered more from a severe type of IBS (P < 0.001) and had a lower educational level (P = 0.016). It seems that there is a high prevalence of depressive disorder in our society [15] and the relation between depression and age, educational level, marital and job status have some confounding effects on observed results in our study.

Psychosocial stress and psychopathology are increased in functional disorders, but not in all individuals, and is generally thought of as being a cause rather than the consequence of functional disorders [40]. This study may provide indicative evidence for IBS as a disorder with a psychosomatic aspect.

Although research methodology, study population, measuring tools, sampling and sample sizes are some factors that may influence the outputs of surveys, we may suggest that the severity of IBS has a significant relation with the presence of anxiety-depressive disorders. Patients who suffer from possible anxiety disorders or depression had more severe symptoms. Suffering from a possible anxiety disorder independently influences IBS patients and may have a significant impact on symptom severity. The distribution of these psychiatric problems among our patients had some relation with their age, educational level and type of IBS.

A possible limitation of this study is the recruitment of patient data from a two-step examination. However, this is unlikely to have any effects on the outcome. We believe that GHQ28is a legitimate test, however in patients with scores < 23 performing DSM IV-TR would be more effective. Different commodity variables could increase the prevalence of mood disorders but these results should be interpreted with a great caution and would need more researches in the future.

Conclusion

There was a high prevalence of anxiety-depressive disorders in our subjects. Age, educational level and type and severity of IBS had remarkable distributional differences among the studied groups. Also, psychological factors influence symptom severity in IBS patients. This data emphasize the importance of the psychological evaluation of the patients with IBS to identify those who might be suffering from psychological disorders in order to better management of the patients and may also help to reduce the burden of health care costs.

Further studies will be needed to assess the outcome of the psychiatric evaluation and treatment in symptom relief of the IBS patients.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was carried out under the financial support of the Guilan Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease Research Center (GLDRC). The authors also thank Dr. Missa Naghdipour for her help with this manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Psychiatry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences
(2)
Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences
(3)
Hijelt Institute, University of Helsinki
(4)
National Institute for Health and Welfare

References

  1. Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Kasper DL, et al: Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Harrison's Principle's of internal medicine. Edited by: Chung O. 2008, New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, 3: 1899-1903. 17Google Scholar
  2. Yamada T, Alpers DH, Kaplowitz N, et al: Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Gastroenterology. Edited by: Hasler WL, Chung O. 2003, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2: 1817-42. 4Google Scholar
  3. Hungin APS, Whorwell PJ, Tack J, Mearrins F: The privalence, patterns and impact of irritable bowel syndrome: and international survey of 40000 subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003, 17: 643-50. 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01456.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Whorwell PJ, Vatn MH, Stockbrügger RW, Smout AJ, Pace F, Müller-Lissner SA, Dapoigny M, Coremans G, Brazier J, Simré NM: Quality of life and illness costs in irritable bowel syndrome. Digestion. 2004, 69: 254-61. 10.1159/000079846.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Koloski NA, Talley NJ, Boyce PM: Does psychological distress modulate functional gastrointestinal symptoms and health care seeking? A prospective, community Cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003, 98: 789-97. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07388.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Simré NM, Abrahamsson H, Svedlund J, Björnsson ES: Quality of life in patients with irritable bowel syndrome seen in referral centers versus primary care: the impact of gender and predominant bowel pattern. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2001, 36: 545-552.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Whitehead WE, Burnett CK, Cook EW: Taub E: Impact of irritable bowel syndrome on quality of life. Dig Dis Sci. 1996, 41: 2248-2253. 10.1007/BF02071408.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Gonsalkorale WM, Perrey C, Pravica V, Whorwell PJ, Hutchinson IV: Interleukin 10 genotypes in irritable bowel syndrome: evidence for an inflammatory component?. Gut. 2003, 52: 91-93. 10.1136/gut.52.1.91.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Budavari AI, Olden KW: Psychosocial aspects of functional astrointestinal disorders. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2003, 32: 477-506. 10.1016/S0889-8553(03)00030-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Levy RL, Olden KW, Naliboff BD, Bradley LA, Francisconi C, Drossman DA, Creed F: Psychosocial aspects of the functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006, 130: 1447-1458. 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.057.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Chitkara DK, van Tilburg MA, Blois-Martin N, Whitehead WE: Early life risk factors that contribute to irritable bowel syndrome in adults: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008, 103: 765-774. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01722.x. quiz 775PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Guthrie E, Creed F, Fernandes L, Ratcliffe J, Van Der Jagt J, Martin J, Howlett S, Read N, Barlow J, Thompson D, Tomenson B: Cluster analysis of symptoms and health seeking behaviour differentiates subgroups of patients with severe irritable bowel syndrome. Gut. 2003, 52: 1616-1622. 10.1136/gut.52.11.1616.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Yates WR: Gastrointestinal Disorders. Kaplan & Sadoek's Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry. Edited by: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. 2005, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2117-2118. 8Google Scholar
  14. Jerndal P, Ringström G, Agerforz P, Karpefors M, Akkermans LM, Bayati A, Simrén M: Gastrointestinal-specific anxiety: an important factor for severity of GI symptoms and quality of life in IBS. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010, 22: 646-e179. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01493.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Noorbala AA: Bagheri Yazdi SA, Yasami MT, Mohammad K: Mental health survey of the adult population in Iran. Br J Psychol. 2004, 184: 70-73. 10.1192/bjp.184.1.70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, Houghton LA, Mearin F, Spiller RC: Functional Bowel Disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006, 130: 1480-1491. 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.061.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Sadock BJ, Sadock VA: Synopsis of psychiatry. 2007, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Willkins, 527-633.Google Scholar
  18. Francis CY, Morris J, Whorwell PJ: The irritable bowel severity scoring system: a simple method of monitoring irritable bowel syndrome and its progress. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997, 11: 395-402. 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.142318000.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, Houghton LA, Mearin F, Spiller RC: Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006, 130: 1480-1491. 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.061.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Budavari AI, Olden KW: Psychosocial aspects of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2003, 32: 477-506. 10.1016/S0889-8553(03)00030-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Spiller R, Aziz Q, Creed F, Emmanuel A, Houghton L, Hungin P, Jones R, Kumar D, Rubin G, Trudgill N: Whorwell P; Clinical Services Committee of The British Society of Gastroenterology: Guidelines on the irritable bowel syndrome: mechanisms and practical management. Gut. 2007, 56: 1770-1798. 10.1136/gut.2007.119446.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Meyer T, Klemme H, Herrmann C: Depression but not anxiety is a significant predictor of physicians' assessments of medical status in physically ill patients. Psychother Psychosom. 2000, 69: 147-154. 10.1159/000012383.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kroenke K, Jackson JL, Chamberlin J: Depressive and anxiety disorders in patients presenting with physical complaints: clinical predictors and outcome. Am J Med. 1997, 103: 339-347. 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)00241-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Fink P, Hansen MS, Oxhoj ML: The prevalence of somatoform disorders among internal medical inpatients. J Psychosom Res. 2004, 56: 413-418. 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00624-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ford AC, Talley NJ, Schoenfeld PS, Quigley EM, Moayyedi P: Efficacy of antidepressants and psychological therapies in irritable bowel syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. 2008, 58: 367-378.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Pae CU, Masand PS, Ajwani N, Lee C, Patkar AA: Irritable bowel syndrome in psychiatric perspectives: a comprehensive review. Int J Clin Pract. 2007, 61: 1708-1718. 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01409.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Zijdenbos IL, de Wit NJ, van der Heijden GJ, Rubin G, Quartero AO: Psychological treatments for the management of irritable bowel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009, 1: 006442-Google Scholar
  28. Tack J, Fried M, Houghton LA, Spicak J, Fisher G: Systematic review: the efficacy of treatments for irritable bowel syndrome--a European perspective. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006, 24: 183-205. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02938.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Creed F: The relationship between psychosocial parameters and outcome in the irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Med. 1999, 107 (5): 745-805.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Blanchard EB, Keefer L, Galovski TE, Taylor AE, Turner SM: Gender differences in psychological distress among patients with irritable bowel syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 2001, 50: 271-275. 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00207-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Baniasad JS, M H: A study of anxiety and depression in patients referred to the Lavasani Hospital, with irritable bowel Syndrome diagnosis. Anatolian J Psychiatry. 2009, 10: 212-21.Google Scholar
  32. Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao S, Nelson CB, Hughes M, Eshleman S, Wittchen HU, Kendler KS: Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994, 51: 8-19. 10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950010008002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Blanchard E, Scharff LB, Schwar SP, Suls JM, Barlow DH: The role of anxiety and depression in the irritable bowel syndrome. Behav Res Ther. 1990, 28: 401-405. 10.1016/0005-7967(90)90159-G.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Modabbernia MJ, Shodjai Tehrani H, Fallahi M, Shirazi M, Modabbernia AH: Prevalence of depressive disorders in Rasht-Iran: A community based study. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2008, 4: 20-10.1186/1745-0179-4-20.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Toner BB, Whitehead WE, Drossman DA, Creed FH, Olden Kw, Svedlund J: Psychosocial aspects of the functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gut. 1999, 45 (2): 1125-1130.Google Scholar
  36. Cain KC, Jarrett ME, Burr RL, Rosen S, Hertig VL, Heitkemper MM: Gender differences in gastrointestinal, psychological, and somatic symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome. Dig Dis Sci. 2009, 54: 1542-1549. 10.1007/s10620-008-0516-3.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Creed FH: Psychopatology of functional disorders of the gut. In functional disorders of the gut: A Handbook for Clinicians. Edited by: phillips SF, Wingate DL. 1998, london:WB Saunders COGoogle Scholar
  38. Thijssen AY, Jonkers DM, Leue C, van der Veek PP, Vidakovic-Vukic M, van Rood YR, Clemens CH, Masclee AA: Dysfunctional cognitions, anxiety and depression in irritable bowel syndrome. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010, 44: e236-241. 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181eed5d8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Mayer EA, Naliboff BD, Chang L, Coutinho SVV: Stress and irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001, 280: G519-24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Barsky AJ, Borus JF: Functional somatic syndromes. Annals Intern Med. 1999, 130: 910-921.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Modabbernia et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement