Open Access

Gremlin in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma complicating chronic hepatitis C: an immunohistochemical and PCR study of human liver biopsies

BMC Research Notes20125:390

DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-390

Received: 6 November 2011

Accepted: 7 June 2012

Published: 29 July 2012

Abstract

Background

The possible role of secretory products of fibrous tissue in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicating chronic hepatitis C was investigated. Our hypothesis was that gremlin, secreted by fibroblasts, inhibited bone morphogenic protein (BMP), which mediates stem cell maturation into adult functioning hepatocytes, and thus, arrest stem cell maturation and promoted their proliferation in an immature state possibly culminating into development of HCCs.

Results

Protein expression of cytokeratin 19 (CK19) and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2), and mRNA expression of gremlin and BMP-7 were studied in 35 cases of chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and HCC complicating chronic hepatitis C. CK19 expression was higher in cases of cirrhosis (0.004), which correlated with the grade (r = 0.64, p = 0.009) and stage (r = 0.71, p = 0.001). All HCCs were negative for CK19. Stem cell niche activation (as indicated as a ductular reaction) was highest in cases of cirrhosis (p = 0.001) and correlated with CK19 expression (r = 0.42, p = 0.012), the grade(r = 0.56, p = 0.024) and stage (0.66, p = 0.006). FGF-2 expression was highest in HCCs and correlated with the grade (r = 0.6, p = 0.013), stage (0.72, p = 0.002), CK19 expression (r = 0.71, p = 002) and ductular reaction (0.68, p = 0.004) in hepatitis cases. Higher numbers of cirrhosis cases and HCCs (p = 0.009) showed gremlin expression, which correlated with the stage (r = 0.7, p = 0.002). Gremlin expression correlated with that of CK19 (r = 0.699, p = 0.003) and FGF2 (r = 0.75, p = 0.001) in hepatitis cases.

Conclusions

Fibrosis promotes carcinogenesis by fibroblast-secreted gremlin that blocks BMP function and promotes stem cell activation and proliferation as well as possibly HCC development.

Keywords

Gremlin Bone morphogenetic protein 7 Hepatocellular carcinoma Hepatic progenitor cells

Background

The variability in the prognosis of individuals with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) suggests that HCC may comprise several distinct biological phenotypes. These phenotypes may result from activation of different oncogenic pathways during tumorigenesis and/or a different cell of origin [1]. Enhanced proliferation and maturation arrest of hepatic progenitor/stem cells have been considered the origin of HCCs [1]. However, the link between cirrhosis and stem cell proliferation has not been fully elucidated. This link is multifaceted and complex with interplay of multiple factors that enhance or inhibit the proliferative rate of hepatic progenitor/stem cells, which culminates in HCC development. The outcome depends on the balance between stimulatory and regulatory signals that reach these stem cells [2, 3]. The fate of hepatic progenitor/stem cells is determined by various growth factors, some of which are promoters of stem cell differentiation, and their exit from the stem cell niche as bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs), whereas other growth factors, such as basic fibroblast growth factor (b- FGF) and activin/nodal (the other arm of action of Transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) maintain their stemness and promote pluripotency [4]. During embryogenesis, BMP-7 mediates sprouting of the liver bud from the central foregut endoderm, which is essential for hepatocytic differentiation [4]. BMP-7 protein has been found in inflamed fibrotic livers [5] and its mRNA has been detected in stellate and Kupffer cells of the adult liver [6]. Several proteins antagonize BMP signaling, such as follistatin, noggin and members of the DAN family including cerberus and gremlin [7]. Gremlin is a protein secreted by fibroblasts and its mRNA is highly expressed under fibrotic conditions such as advanced diabetic nephropathy [8].

In this study, we presumed that gremlin, secreted by hepatic myofibroblasts in cases of fibrosis (cirrhosis), would antagonize the effects of BMP on stem cell differentiation and its anti-fibrogenic property. Antagonism of BMP-7 may arrest stem cell maturation and promote proliferation in an immature state, thereby possibly culminating in HCC development.

We investigated the role of cirrhosis and FGF-2 in the pathogenesis of HCC development complicating chronic HCV by detection of gremlin and BMP-7 mRNA and correlating their presence with hepatic progenitor cell numbers in cases of cirrhosis and HCC complicating chronic HCV in Egyptian patients with HCV type 4.

Results

Patient ages ranged from 23 to 52 (mean ± standard deviation (SD) 36 ± 8.7), and 39 to 70 (mean ± SD 53.67 ± 7.4) for hepatitis, and cirrhosis and HCC cases, respectively (cirrhosis and HCC cases were obtained from the same segmentectomy specimens).

Histopathological studies

Grades of the hepatitis group ranged from 1 to 7 (mean ± SD 2.93 ± 1.6), in which none were grade 0, seven (18.8%) each were grades 1 or 2, 13 (37.5%) were grade 3, two (6.3%) were grade 4, four (12.5%) were grade 5, none were grade 6, and two (6.3%) were grade 7 (Additional file 1: Table S1). While those of the cirrhosis group ranged from 1 to 8 (mean ± SD 4.3 ± 2.5), in which six (17%) were grade 1, two (6.7%) were grade 2, four (13.3%) were grade 3, eight (22%) were grade 4, none were grade 5, and five (14%) each were grades 6, 7 or 8 (Additional file 1: Table S1). Edmondson’s grades of HCCs were three cases of grade 1, 14 cases of grade 2, nine cases of grade 3 and nine cases of grade 4. While no differences were observed between the histological grades of hepatitis and cirrhosis cases (p = 0.09), significant differences in the ductular reaction (p = 0.001) were observed between these two groups (Table 1). The ductular reaction (Additional file 2: Figure S1) correlated with the grade (r = 0.56, p = 0.024) and stage (0.66, p = 0.006) in hepatitis cases.
Table 1

Scores of ductular reactions among groups

Marker

Hepatitis

Cirrhosis

HCC

(n=35)

(n=35)

(n=35)

 

Ductular reaction

n(%)

n(%)

  

0

7(18%)

0(0.0%)

NA

MCp 0.001

1

19(56%)

0(0.0%)

NA

 

2

7(18%)

8(22.9%)

NA

 

3

2(6%)

27(77.1%)

NA

 

NA not assayed.

MCp p value for the Monte Carlo test.

Immunohistochemical results

Positive staining of CK19 in cell membranes was observed in both hepatitis and cirrhosis groups. Positivity was observed in and around portal tracts and along the fibrous septa with few intra-acinar positive cells (Figure 1a, b and c). Values were in the range of 0–10 (× 2.63 ± 2.7) and 0–90 (× 18 ± 23.48) for hepatitis and cirrhosis cases, respectively. Cirrhosis cases (Figure 1b) showed higher levels of positivity (p = 0.004) than hepatitis cases (Figure 1). All HCC cases (Figure 1c) were negative for CK19 (Table 2).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-0500-5-390/MediaObjects/13104_2011_Article_1796_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Cases of hepatitis, cirrhosis and HCC stained for CK19. A case of chronic hepatitis showing (a) single scattered CK19-positive cells in the lobule (arrow) (×100). (b) A case of cirrhosis showing a higher grade of CK19-positive ductular reaction and individual positive cells in the lobule (arrow). (CK19, ×100). (c) A case of HCC showing negativity for CK19 in tumor cells. (Streptavidin-peroxidase technique, anti-CK19 monoclonal antibody, ×200). In right panels: Line graphs show significant correlations between CK19 and each (d) grade, (e) stage and (f) ductular reaction.

Table 2

CK19 positivity among groups

CK 19

Hepatitis

Cirrhosis

HCC

 

(n=35)

(n=35)

(n=35)

Range

0.0 – 10.0

0.0 – 90.0

0.0 – 0.0

Mean ± SD

2.63 ± 2.70

18.0 ± 23.48

0.0 ± 0.0

Median

2.0

9.0

0.0

Z 1 (p)

 

2.866* (0.004)

4.305* (<0.001)

Z 2 (p)

  

4.665* (<0.001)

Z 1 Z for the Mann–Whitney test between hepatitis and other groups.

Z 2 Z for the Mann–Whitney test between cirrhosis and HCC groups.

*Statistically significant.

Among hepatitis cases, positive correlations were observed between each of CK19 expression and each grade (Figure 1d) and stage (Figure 1e) (r = 0.63, p = 0.009 and r = 0.56, p = 0.025, respectively). Correlation with the stage was not found in cirrhosis cases (fixed stage 6 Hepatitis activity index (HAI) by definition). However, correlation with the grade was detected (r = 0.753, p = 0.001). Ductular reactions correlated with CK19 expression in hepatitis cases (r = 0.42, p = 0.012) (Figure 1f).

Hepatitis and cirrhosis groups showed positive FGF-2 expression as granular cytoplasmic staining in periportal (Figure 2a), perivenular (Figure 2b) and intermediate (Figure 2c) hepatocytes as well as bile ductular epithelial cells. In HCCs, malignant hepatocytes also expressed FGF-2 (Figure 2d). FGF-2 positivity was higher in HCCs than in hepatitic and cirrhotic tissues, but was not significant (Table 3).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-0500-5-390/MediaObjects/13104_2011_Article_1796_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Cases of hepatitis, cirrhosis and HCC stained for FGF-2. A case of chronic hepatitis showing a few positive hepatocytes in (a) periportal areas (×200), (b) the pericentral zone (×400) and (c) intermediate hepatocytes (arrow) (×200). In HCC, (d) positivity was also detected in HCC tumor cells (×200). (streptavidin-peroxidase technique, anti-FGF2 monoclonal antibody).

Table 3

Level of FGF-2 positivity among groups

FGF 2

Hepatitis

Cirrhosis

HCC

 

(n=35)

(n=35)

(n=35)

Range

0.060.0 – 16.0.0

0. 0.0 – 16.00 – 16.0

0.0 – 70.0

Mean ± SD

5.06 ± 4.30± 4.30

6.13 ± 5.0.0

14.67 ± 18.67

Median

4.544.50

4.04.0

9.0

Z1 (p)

 

.50.557(0.578)

1.308 (0.191)

Z2 (P)

  

0.937 (0.349)

Z 1 Z for the Mann–Whitney test between HCV and other groups.

Z 2 Z for Mann Whitney test between cirrhosis and HCC.

* Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.

FGF-2 correlated with each of grade (r = 0.603, p = 0.013) (Figure 3a, Table 4), stage (r = 0.721, p = 0.002) (Figure 3b, Table 4) and ductular reaction (r = 0.684, p = 0.004) (Figure 3c, Table 4) in hepatitis cases. In hepatitis and cirrhosis cases, positive correlations were detected between FGF-2 and CK19 positivity (r = 0.703, p = 0.002 (Figure 3d) and r = 0.536, p = 0.048, respectively) (Table 4).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-0500-5-390/MediaObjects/13104_2011_Article_1796_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Line graphs of correlations between FGF-2 positivity and each (a) grade, (b) stage, (c) ductular reaction and (d) CK19 positivity.

Table 4

Correlations between FGF-2 and other parameters among groups

FGF-2

Grade

Stage

Ductular reaction

CK19

HCV r

0.603 *

0.721 *

0.684 *

0.703 *

patients p

0.013

0.002

0.004

0.002

Cirrhotic r

0.446

0.388

0.483

0.536*

patients p

0.096

0.153

0.080

0.048

Rho spearman’s correlation coefficient.

*p < 0.05.

Gremlin expression and its correlations

Gremlin mRNA (198 bp) was expressed in 24/35 (68.7%) hepatitis cases (Figure 4a), 35/35 (100%) cirrhosis cases (Figure 4b), and 35/35 (100%) HCC cases (Figure 4c) (Table 5, Figure 4d). Gremlin mRNA levels were higher in HCCs and cirrhosis cases than in hepatitis cases (p = 0.009) (Table 5, Figure 4d).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-0500-5-390/MediaObjects/13104_2011_Article_1796_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Gremlin expression among the three study groups. (a) Gremlin mRNA expression in HCV cases. PCR products are observed in lanes 2, 3, 4 and 5. PCR products are not observed in lane 1. A 25 bp size marker was used in lane 6. Note: additional bands. (b) cirrhosis specimens. Note: all cases show a positive band at 198 bp. Lane 6 is a 25 bp marker (c) In HCC specimens, all cases show a positive band at 198 bp. Lane 6 is a 25 bp marker (Capillary electrophoresis using e-gene, HAD-GT12). (d) Level of gremlin positivity among study groups. (e) Significant correlation between the stage and gremlin expression.

Table 5

Levels of positivity for gremlin and BMP-7 among groups

Positive cases (%)

Hepatitis

Cirrhosis

HCC

MCp

 

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

 

Gremlin mRNA

24 (68.7%)

35 (100%)

35 (100%)

0.009*

BMP 7 mRNA

16 (43.8%)

27 (78.6%)

25 (73.3%)

0.115

n actual numbers of positive cases.

MCp p value for the Monte Carlo test.

*Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.

In hepatitis cases, gremlin expression correlated with the stage (r = 0.699, p = 0.003) (Figure 4e) and CK19 positivity (r = 0.223, p = 0.04) (Table 6), but not with the stage in the cirrhosis group due to the fixed stage (stage 6 HAI by definition). Gremlin expression did not correlate with the number of FGF-2 positive cells (r = 0.548, p = 0.191) or BMP-7 mRNA level (r = 0.051, p = 0.851) in the hepatitis group. However, it did positively correlate with BMP-7 levels in the cirrhosis group (r = 0.602, p = 0.023) (Table 6).
Table 6

Correlations between gremlin mRNA expression and studied markers in hepatitis and cirrhosis groups

Gremlin

Grade

Stage

Ductular reaction

CK 19

BMP 7

HCV r

0.136

0.699 *

0.276

0.223

0.051

p

0.615

0.003

0.301

0.04

0.851

Cirrhosis

     

r

0.526

 

0.994

 

0.602

p

0.044

NP

0.001

NP

0.023

Rho (r) Spearman coefficient * Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.

NP Not performed because gremlin was expressed in 100% of cases and all 35 cases of this group received a score of 3 for CK19 positivity. Therefore, a correlation was not feasible.

Note: a correlation was not performed with the stage (fixed stage 6 by definition).

BMP-7 expression and its correlations

No significant differences in the level of BMP-7 mRNA expression between the three study groups were detected (Figure 5a–d and i, Table 5). However, BMP-7 mRNA correlated significantly with the levels of ductular reactions (r = 0.576, p = 0.031) in the cirrhosis group (Figure 5ii) (Table 7).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-0500-5-390/MediaObjects/13104_2011_Article_1796_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Gel electrophoreograms of BMP expression among study groups. (a) BMP-7 mRNA expression in liver tissue from patients with chronic hepatitis C. BMP-7 expression is observed in lanes 1, 3, 4 and 5 at 163 bp, whereas no DNA bands are present in lane 2. Note the extra higher band at 250 bp. Lane 6 is a 25 bp size marker. (b): BMP-7 mRNA expression in cirrhotic liver tissue. PCR products are observed at 163 bp in lanes 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6. Lane 5 shows no PCR products. Lane 7 is a 25 bp size marker. (c): BMP-7 mRNA expression in cirrhotic liver tissue. PCR products are observed in lanes 8, 9 and 10, but not in lane 11. Lane 7 contains the marker. (d): BMP-7 mRNA expression in HCC cases. PCR products are observed in lanes 1, 7, 8, 9 and 10. No PCR products are observed in lanes 2, 3, 4 and 6. Lane 5 contains the marker. (Capillary electrophoresis using e-gene, HAD-GT12). (i) Bar graph showing the numbers of cases expressing BMP-7 mRNA among study groups. (ii) Correlations between BMP-7 mRNA expression and ductular reactions in the cirrhosis group.

Table 7

Correlations between BMP-7 mRNA levels and studied markers among groups

BMP 7

Grade

Stage

Ductular reaction

CK 19

FGF 2

Gremlin

HCV

      

r

−0.311

0.217

0.076

0.264

0.136

0.051

p

0.241

0.418

0.780

0.324

0.608

0.851

Cirrhosis

      

r

0.284

0.134

0.576 *

0.065

0.196

0.602*

p

0.326

0.635

0.031

0.825

0.501

0.023

Rho (r): Spearman coefficient.

* Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.

Discussion

The current study aimed to identify a possible link between fibrosis/cirrhosis and HCC development in chronic HCV type 4 cases. Under normal conditions, FGFs, acting via BMP-7, stimulate maturation of stem cells into functional mature hepatocytes or cholangiocytes. However, under fibrotic conditions, gremlin is produced by fibrotic tissue [7, 8] and inhibits BMP function [7, 8]. This production of gremlin may cause maturation arrest of stem cells and their proliferation in an immature state predisposes HCC development.

We found that CK19 was expressed at higher levels in cirrhosis cases, compared with those of hepatitis cases. CK19 expression correlated with the grade and stage of the disease. These findings are consistent with data from Ravazoula et al [9] and Libbrecht et al [10]. The correlation between stem cell niche activation, manifested as significantly increased ductular reactions [11], and increased severity (grade/stage/fibrosis) of the disease, which were observed in the present study, confirms the notion that damage of the epithelial compartment of the liver by chronic disease causes replicative senescence of hepatocytes, which leads to reserve cell compartment activation [12]. Several studies using detailed immunophenotyping of HCCs show that a substantial number of HCCs (28–50%) express progenitor cell markers including CK7, CK19 and OV6 [1315]. In the present study, although significantly higher numbers of CK19-positive cells were observed in cirrhosis cases, HCCs did not show CK19 positivity. This observation can be interpreted in two ways: first, expression of immune markers by stem cells is stage-specific and not lineage-specific [16]; and CK19 represents an early marker of stem cells, which is normally expressed in hepatoblasts [17]. In HCCs and chronic HCV type 4 cases, stem cells are probably at a different stage of maturation/differentiation than that required to express this particular marker. Alternatively, the negativity of our HCC cases for CK19 may be attributed to the clinical setting in which our study was conducted. Other studies have been performed using experimental models of carcinogenesis [18], or a different disease setting (etiologic factors other than HCV type 4) such as the studies by Durnez et al [15], Lyer et al [18] and others [16] where the etiology of liver disease was quite heterogeneous with only very few cases resulting from HCV infection. Our study was conducted exclusively with HCV type 4 induced HCCs; the main predisposing factor of HCC in Egypt [19]. The pathogenetic pathways activated in HCCs complicating HCV may be quite different from those occurring in other settings such as chemical carcinogenesis. In fact, even chemical carcinogenic regimens result in activation of different pathways. Lingala et al [20] show similar results using a different set of stem cell markers (CD44, CD90 and CD133) with few HCCs showing very limited expression of these markers, although they were found in cases of chronic HCV and dysplastic foci. Dunsford et al [21] used monoclonal antibodies to study sequential histopathologic changes that occurred during two regimens of chemical carcinogenesis in the rat. The Solt-Farber regimen caused prominent oval cell proliferation and multiple large dysplastic nodules, while continuous administration of diethylnitrosamine produced minimal oval cell proliferation and a few small nodules. These results demonstrate that different etiologies lead to HCC development via different pathogenetic pathways. Is it possible that different cancer stem cells are activated by different pathogenetic pathways, which results in a tumor (HCC) that is actually not a single entity, but biologically different tumors with a common morphology [22, 23].

Gremlin antagonizes BMP function under several disease conditions including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [24], proliferative vitreoretinopathy [25] and renal fibrosis [26]. It non-covalently binds to BMP family members to prevent interactions with their cognate receptors, thus altering the effective concentration of active signalling molecule [27]. There are also claims that gremlin possesses an oncogenic role. Data from Namkoong et al [28] and Sneddon et al [29] have shown that gremlin is over-expressed in various human malignancies including carcinomas of the cervix, lung, ovary, kidney, breast, colon and pancreas as well as sarcomas. The source of gremlin in highly cellular HCCs is Kupffer cells [30]. In the present study, all three groups of patients expressed gremlin mRNA that was significantly higher in cirrhosis cases than hepatitis cases. Furthermore, gremlin mRNA significantly correlated with the stage. This finding may support the theory that fibroblast-secreted gremlin blocks BMP-mediated stem cell maturation [31], with possible HCC development in cirrhosis patients.

We detected FGF-2 expression in all study groups, with a significant correlation noted between FGF-2 positivity and each grade and stage. FGF-2 is considered as an autocrine repair hormone secreted following injury to promote healing (fibrosis) [32, 33] and neoangiogenesis [34]. In our study, the distribution pattern of FGF-2 positivity in hepatitis cases is consistent with data from Xiaodong et al [35] who recently elucidated the localization of FGF-2 mRNA in these same regions in a mouse fibrotic liver model [35]. Furthermore, FGF-2 expression significantly correlated with CK19 expression, implying that promotion of fibrogenesis by FGF [36] leads to increased gremlin expression that blocks BMP-7-mediated stem cell differentiation, which leads to proliferation in an immature state, as shown by higher CK19 positivity. This explanation is further supported by our finding of a positive correlation between gremlin mRNA expression, FGF-2 and CK19 positivity in the hepatitis group. Thus, FGF-2 may have an oncogenic role in HCC development.

Conclusions

Gremlin participates in the pathogenesis of HCC complicating chronic hepatitis C type 4-related cirrhosis by antagonizing the maturation inducing function of BMP-7 rather than the actual production of BMP-7 in cirrhotic livers. This occurrence promotes the proliferation of stem cells in an immature state, which may contribute to HCC carcinogenesis.

Methods

Patients

The present study was conducted using 35 liver core biopsies from patients with hepatitis (HCV type 4, shown as positive by PCR) and 35 freshly collected segmentectomy specimens from patients with HCC complicating HCV-related cirrhosis (segmentectomy specimens were the source for both cirrhotic and carcinoma tissues). Liver core biopsies were clinically indicated as a part of the treatment strategy for chronic HCV infection (baseline biopsy for grading and staging before combinatorial treatment with Interferon alpha 2 B (IFN-α2b) and ribavirin). The protocol of this study was approved by the Ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria. Informed consent was obtained from patients for use of these specimens for research purposes.

Paraffin blocks of liver biopsies were obtained from the archives of the Pathology Department at the Alexandria Faculty of Medicine. Patients were selected sequentially from our archives for hepatitis cases and cases sequentially obtained from the clinic for cirrhosis and HCC cases (paired specimens). All HCC cases were complicating HCV type 4-related cirrhosis. Inclusion criteria were HCV type 4 (as shown by PCR using Inno-LiPA I and II) patients, and exclusion criteria included anti- hepatitis B virus surface antibody HBV positivity, obesity, history of alcoholism and diabetes mellitus.

Histopathologic study

Hematoxylin-eosin sections were examined to determine the grade and stage of the hepatitis and cirrhosis cases [37], ductular reaction and HCC grade [38]. Scores were the mean determinations. A ductular reaction, a sign of stem cell niche activation, was graded on a scale from 0 to 3, according to the number of points of origin in the perimeter of portal tracts showing a ductular reaction, as follows: 0, none; 1, two or less points; 2, two to four points; and 3, > four points.

Immunohistochemical staining

Antibodies against CK19 (1:100, clone A53-B/A2.26).

Lab Vision Corporation, Fremont, CA, USA), a stem cell marker, and FGF-2 (1:50, clone Ab16828; Abcam, Cambridge, UK were used together with an Ultravision LP detection System, (Thermo scientific, Lab vision, catalog # TL-015HD, Fremont, CA) horse radish peroxidase polymer (HRP) polymer and diaminobenzidine (DAB) plus chromogen (Cat#: TL-015HD; Lab Vision Corporation) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Epitope retrieval was performed by boiling in 2% citrate buffer (10mM, pH 6.0) in a microwave at 700 W for 15 min. Sections were incubated with antibodies overnight at 4°C. Bile ducts served as internal positive controls for CK19 and kidney tubules for FGF-2. A positive reaction was considered only if single cells (not forming part of a ductular reaction) showed membrane staining for CK19 and cytoplasmic staining for FGF-2. Positive cells were counted in 10 random high power fields (×400) for each case by two pathologists, separately. Results were presented as the mean ± SD of both readings.

RNA extraction and reverse transcription PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from fresh snap frozen liver tissue using Trizol (Cat# 15596-026, Invitrogen; Madison, WI, USA). The concentration and purity of extracted RNA were determined using a nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer. Samples were accepted when the A260/A280 ratio (nucleic acid/protein absorbance) was ≥ 1.8. Reverse transcription of extracted RNA was performed using random hexamer primers and a Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Cat#: 04 379 012 001; Roche diagnostics, Switzerland) according to manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was either processed immediately or stored at –20°C. cDNA amplification was performed with a QB-96 thermal cycler using Atlas hotTaq (Lot#: Js20080508; Bioatlas, Tartu, Estonia) under the following conditions: 15 min at 95°C followed by 40 cycles of 45 s at 92°C, 30 s at 55°C and 90 s at 72°C. Primer sequences were those described by Wordinger et al [39]. Gene detection was performed by e-gene capillary electrophoresis, HAD-GT12 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The housekeeping gene, PBGD was used to confirm the integrity of extracted RNA.

BMP-7; F: AGCCCGGGTAGCGCGTAGAG, R: GCGCCGGTGGATGAAGCTCGA; gremlin (DRM); F: ATCAACCGCTTCTGTTACGG, R: ATGCAACGACACTGCTTCAC. (Cat#s. 10336-022; D4063F04, for BMP-7 and D4063F05, D4063F06, D4063F07, for DRM; Invitrogen, Madison, WI, USA).

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Monte Carlo and Mann–Whitney tests were used to calculate the significance of differences between groups. Pearson and Spearman coefficients were used to find correlations between study parameters among patient groups.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Maher Osman and Dr. Mohammad Sharaan for providing liver resection specimens and Eng. Amgad Hamza for performing statistical analyses. This study was supported, in part, by a grant from The Alexandria Faculty of Medicine Research Fund.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departments of Pathology
(2)
Clinical Pathology
(3)
Alexandria Center for Women’s Health
(4)
Internal Medicine (Hepatobiliary unit)
(5)
Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria

References

  1. Wong R, Coley D: Survival differences by race/ethnicity and treatment for localized Hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. Dig Dis Sci. 2009, 54 (9): 2031-2039. 10.1007/s10620-008-0661-8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Shupe T, Petersen B: Evidence regarding a stem cell origin of hepatocellular carcinoma. Stem Cell Rev. 2005, 1 (3): 261-264. 10.1385/SCR:1:3:261.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Villenueva A, Newell P, Chiang D, Friedman S, Llovet J: Genomics and signalling pathways in Hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liv Dis. 2007, 27 (1): 55-76. 10.1055/s-2006-960171.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Xu R, Peck R, Li D, Feng X, Ludwig T, Thompson J: FGF and suppression of BMP sustain undifferentiated proliferation of human ES cells. Nat Meth. 2005, 2: 185-190. 10.1038/nmeth744.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Sugimoto H, Yang C, Lebleu VS, Soubasakos MA, Giraldo M, Zeisberg M: BMP-7 functions as a novel hormone to facilitate liver regeneration. FASEB J. 2007, 21 (1): 256-264.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Boers W, Aarrass S, ElfLinthorst C, Pinzani M, Elferink R, Bosma P: Transcriptional profiling reveals novel markers of liver fibrogenesis: gremlin and insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281 (24): 16289-16295. 10.1074/jbc.M600711200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Khokha MK, Hsu D, Brunet LJ, Dionne MS, Harland RM: Gremlin is the BMP antagonist required for maintenance of Shh and Fgf signals during limb patterning. Nat Gen. 2003, 4 (3): 303-307.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Dolan V, Murphy M, Sadlier D, Lappin D, Doran P, Godson C, Martin F, O'Meara Y, Schmid H, Henger A, Kretzler M, Droguett A, Mezzano S, Brady HR: Expression of Gremlin, a BMP antagonist, in human diabetic nephropathy. Am J Kid Dis. 2005, 45: 1034-1039. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.03.014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Ravazoula P, Tsammandas A, Gogos C: The potential role of oval hepatocytes expression in cases of chronic hepatitis B and C and their relation to the presence of Hepatocellular carcinoma. Mod Path. 2002, 15: 292a-Google Scholar
  10. Libberecht L, Desmet V, Damme B, Roskams T: Deep interlobular extension of human hepatic progenitor cells correlates with parenchymal inflammation in chronic viral hepatitis: can progenitor cells migrate?. J Pathol. 2000, 192: 373-378. 10.1002/1096-9896(2000)9999:9999<::AID-PATH700>3.0.CO;2-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Clouston AD, Jonsson J, Powell E: Hepatic progenitor cell mediated activation and fibrosis: Chicken or egg?. Hepatology. 2009, 49 (5): 1424-1426. 10.1002/hep.22893.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kisseleva T, Uchinami H, Feirt N: Bone marrow-derived fibrocytes participate in pathogenesis of liver fibrosis. J Hepatol. 2006, 45: 429-438. 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.04.014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Uenishi T, Kubo S, Yamamoto M, Shuto T, Ogawa M, Tanaka H: Cytokeratin 19 expression in Hepatocellular carcinoma predicts early postoperative recurrence. Canc Sci. 2003, 94: 851-857. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2003.tb01366.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Koeniga S, Krausea P, Drabent B, Schaeffner I, Christ B, Schwartz P: The expression of mesenchymal, neural and haematopoietic stem cell markers in adult hepatocytes proliferating in vitro. J Hepatol. 2006, 44 (6): 1115-1124. 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.09.016.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Durnez A, Verslype C, Nevens F, Fevery J, Aerts R, Pirenne J, Lesaffre E, Libbrecht L, Desmet V, Roskams T: Clinicopathological and prognostic relevance of cytokeratin 7 and 19 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. A possible progenitor cell origin. Histopathol. 2006, 49 (2): 138-151. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02468.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumar N, Hinduja I, Nagvenkar P, Pillai L, Zaveri K, Mukadam L, Telang J, Desai S, Mangoli V, Mangoli R, Padgaonkar S, Kaur G, Puri C, Bhartiya D: Derivation and characterization of two of two genetically unique human embryonic stem cell lines on in house derived human feeders. Stem Cell Dev. 2009, 18 (3): 435-445. 10.1089/scd.2008.0234.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Lyer A, Robert M-E, Bifilco C, Salem R, Jain D: Different cytokeratin and neural cell adhesion molecule staining patterns in focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma and their significance. Hum Pathol. 2008, 39 (9): 1370-1377. 10.1016/j.humpath.2008.01.015.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Calvisi D, Thorgiersson S: Molecular mechanisms of hepatocarcinogenesis in transgenic mouse models of liver cancer. Toxicol Pathol. 2005, 33: 181-184. 10.1080/01926230590522095.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Madwar M, El-Gindy I, Fahmy H, Shoeb N, Massoud B: Hepatitis C virus transmission in family members of Egyptian patients with HCV related chronic liver disease. J Egypt Pub Health Assoc. 1999, 74 (3–4): 313-322.Google Scholar
  20. Lingala S, Cui YY, Chen X, Ruebner B, Qian X, Zern M, Wu J: Immunohistochemical staining of cancer stem cell markers in Hepatocellular carcinoma. Exp Mol Pathol. 2010, 89 (1): 27-35. 10.1016/j.yexmp.2010.05.005.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Dunsford HA, Sell S, Chisari FV: Hepatocarcinogenesis due to chronic liver cell injury in hepatitis B virus transgenic mice. Cancer Res. 1990, 50: 3400-3407.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Levy L, Renard CA, Wei Y, Buendia MA: Genetic alterations and oncogenic pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2006, 963: 21-36. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04091.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee JS, Heo J, Libbrecht L, Lee JS, Heo J, Libbrecht L, Chu I-S, Kaposi-Novak P, Calvisi D-F, Mikaelyan A, Roberts L-R, Demetris AJ, Sun Z, Nevens F, Roskams T, Thorgeirsson S: A novel prognostic subtype of human hepatocellular carcinoma derived from hepatic progenitor cells. Nat Med. 2006, 12: 410-416. 10.1038/nm1377.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Koli K, Myllamiemi M, Vuorinen K, Salmenkivi K, Rynnanen MJ, Kinnula VL, Keski-Oja K: Bone morphogenetic protein -4 inhibitor Gremlin is overexpressed in Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Pathol. 2006, 169: 61-71. 10.2353/ajpath.2006.051263.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee H, O’Meara SJ, O’Brien C, Kane R: The role of Gremlin, a BMP antagonist, and epithelial to mesenchymal transition in proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007, 48: 4291-4299. 10.1167/iovs.07-0086.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Dolan V, Murphy M, Sadlier D, Lappin D, Doran P, Godson C, Martin F, O'Meara Y, Schmid H, Henger A, Kretzler M, Droguett A, Mezzano S, Brady HR: Expression of gremlin, a bone morphogenetic protein antagonist, in human diabetic nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005, 45 (6): 1034-1039. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.03.014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Costello CM, Cahill E, Martin F, Gaine S, McLoughlin P: Role of Gremlin in the lung. Am J Resp Cell Mol Biol. 2010, 42 (5): 517-523. 10.1165/rcmb.2009-0101TR.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Namkoong H, Shin SM, Kim H-K, Ha SA, Cho G-W, Hur SY, Kim TE, Kim JW: The bone Morphogenic protein antagonist gremlin 1 is overexpressed in human cancers and interacts with YWAHAH protein. BMC Cancer. 2006, 6: 74-10.1186/1471-2407-6-74.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Sneddon J, Zhen HH, Montgomery K, Ha S, Cho G, Hur S, Kim T, Kim JW: Bone Morphogenic protein antagonist gremlin 1 is widely expressed by cancer-associated stromal cells and can promote tumor cell proliferation. PNAS. 2006, 103 (40): 14842-14847. 10.1073/pnas.0606857103.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Friedman S: Hepatic Stellate Cells: Protean, Multifunctional, and Enigmatic Cells of the Liver. Physiol Rev. 2008, 88 (1): 125-172. 10.1152/physrev.00013.2007.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Dragoo JL, Choi JY, Lieberman JR, Huang J, Zuk PA, Zhang J, Hedrick MH, Benhaim P: Bone induction by BMP-2 transduced stem cells derived from human fat. J Ortho Res. 2003, 21 (4): 622-629. 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00238-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Virak J, Rolle M, Reece J, Harduin S, Feigi E, Nurry C: Fibroblast growth factor 2 regulates myocardial infarct repair. Effects of cell proliferation, scar contraction, and ventricular function. Am J Pathol. 2007, 17 ((5): 1431-1440.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Ortega S, Ittmann M, Tsang S, Ehrlich M, Basilico C: Neuronal defects and delayed wound healing in mice lacking fibroblast growth factor 2. PNAS. 1998, 95 (10): 5672-5677. 10.1073/pnas.95.10.5672.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Gauglhofer C, Sagmeister S, Schrottmaier W, Fischer C, Rodgarkia-Dara C, Mohr T, Stättner S, Bichler C, Kandioler D, Wrba F, Schulte-Hermann R, Holzmann K, Grusch M, Marian B, Berger W, Grasl-Kraupp B: Upregulation of fibroblast growth factor 8 subfamily in Hepatocellular carcinoma for cell survival and angiogenesis. Hepatol. 2011, 53 (3): 854-864. 10.1002/hep.24099.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Xiaodong P, Bo W, Tancai W, Qui Z: Expression of basic fibroblast growth factor in rat liver fibrosis and hepatic stellate cells. J Huazhong University Sci. Tech—Med Sci. 2005, 25 (2): 166-169. 10.1007/BF02873567.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Chaudry N, Roth G, Hilberg F, Müller-Quernheim J, Prasse A, Zissel G, Schnapp A, Park J-E: FGF signaling attenuates fibrosis. Eur Respir J. 2007, 29 (5): 976-985. 10.1183/09031936.00152106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L, Callea F, Groote JD, Gudat F, Denk H, Desmet V, Korb G, MacSween R-N-M, Phillips M-J, Portmann B-G, Poulsen H, Scheuer P-J, Schmid M, Thaler H: Histopathological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. J Hepatol. 1995, 22 (6): 696-699. 10.1016/0168-8278(95)80226-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Edmondson H, Steiner PE: Primary carcinoma of the liver: a study of 100 cases among 48900 necropsies. Cancer. 1954, 7: 462-503. 10.1002/1097-0142(195405)7:3<462::AID-CNCR2820070308>3.0.CO;2-E.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Wordinger R, Agarwal R, Talati M, Fuller J, Lambert W, Clark A: Expression of bone Morphogenic proteins, BMP receptors, and BMP associated proteins in human trabecular meshwork and optic nerve head cells and tissues. Mol Vision. 2002, 8: 241-250.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Guimei et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement