Interactions of the CpxA sensor kinase and cognate CpxR response regulator from Yersinia pseudotuberculosis
© Thanikkal et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 10 February 2012
Accepted: 22 September 2012
Published: 27 September 2012
The CpxA sensor kinase-CpxR response regulator two-component regulatory system is a sentinel of bacterial envelope integrity. Integrating diverse signals, it can alter the expression of a wide array of components that serve to shield the envelope from damage and to promote bacterial survival. In bacterial pathogens such as Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, this also extends to pathogenesis. CpxR is thought to dimerize upon phosphorylation by the sensor kinase CpxA. This phosphorylation enables CpxR binding to specific DNA sequences where it acts on gene transcription. As Cpx pathway activation is dependent on protein-protein interactions, we performed an interaction analysis of CpxR and CpxA from Y. pseudotuberculosis.
CpxR full-length and truncated versions that either contained or lacked a putative internal linker were all assessed for their ability to homodimerize and interact with CpxA. Using an adenylate cyclase-based bacterial two hybrid approach, full-length CpxR readily engaged with CpxA. The CpxR N-terminus could also homodimerize with itself and with a full-length CpxR. A second homodimerization assay based upon the λcI repressor also demonstrated that the CpxR C-terminus could homodimerize. While the linker was not specifically required, it enhanced CpxR homodimerization. Mutagenesis of cpxR identified the aspartate at residue 51, putative N-terminal coiled-coil and C-terminal winged-helix-turn-helix domains as mediators of CpxR homodimerization. Scrutiny of CpxA full-length and truncated versions revealed that dimerization involved the N-terminus and an internal dimerization and histidine phosphotransfer domain.
This interaction analysis mapped regions of CpxR and CpxA that were responsible for interactions with self or with each other. When combined with other physiological and biochemical tests both hybrid-based assays can be useful in dissecting molecular contacts that may underpin Cpx pathway activation and repression.
KeywordsBACTH assay λCI homodimerization assay Homodimer Heterodimer Linker Coiled-coil Winged helix-turn-helix Phosphorylation
Conditions that threaten the integrity of the bacterial envelope are collectively termed extracytoplasmic stresses (ECS). Bacteria employ a series of ECS-responsive regulatory pathways to control the expression of ‘survival’ genes whose products act in the periplasm to maintain membrane integrity. This ensures continued bacterial growth even in environments poisoned by harmful ECS. A notable ECS-responsive pathway is the CpxA-CpxR two-component regulatory system (TCRS)[1, 2]. Belonging to the class I histidine kinases, CpxA is the integral inner-membrane sensor kinase (SK). Upon activation by ECS sensing – presumably in the form of misfolded proteins – it becomes auto-phosphorylated. Through a phospho-transfer reaction, CpxA transduces this signal through the membrane to activate the cytoplasmic CpxR response regulator (RR). CpxR belongs to the OmpR/PhoB family of winged-helix-turn-helix (wHTH) transcriptional RRs. Phosphorylated CpxR (CpxR ~ P) then binds to the promoters of genes coding for several protein folding and degradation factors that operate in the periplasm. An important function of the Cpx pathway is therefore in protein quality control in the bacterial envelope with an emphasis on maintaining outer membrane structural integrity[1, 2]. However, as the CpxR regulon may include hundreds of genes[5, 6], playing sentinel to the cell envelope must incorporate diverse signals and safeguarding mechanisms.
In Gram negative enteropathogenic Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, activation of the Cpx pathway also regulates periplasmic protein folding and degradation factors[7–10]. Additionally, accumulation of CpxR ~ P down-regulates several prominent Yersinia virulence determinants. Most notable is the Ysc-Yop type III secretion system[7, 10], the cellular adhesin known as invasin and its transcriptional activator RovA[8, 9]. RovA is a global regulator in pathogenic Yersinia and is capable of influencing the expression of at least 60 genes[11–13]. Hence, the regulatory influence of CpxR ~ P – either direct or indirect via effects on rovA expression – has potential to be quite widespread in these bacteria.
An activated Cpx pathway may therefore function to restrict Y. pseudotuberculosis virulence factor expression during times of ECS when all resources must be dedicated to the expression of survival genes. In the absence of ECS, virulence factor expression can be de-repressed to permit Y. pseudotuberculosis to mount a successful host infection. In fact, accumulating evidence in a few Gram-negative pathogens suggests that the Cpx pathway might possess a universal role in virulence factor regulation and bacterial pathogen fitness either by aiding in the establishment of an environmental reservoir or during host infections[2, 15–17].
Significantly, TCRS are a potential target for the development of novel anti-bacterial therapeutics, which are urgently needed to overcome the current public health crisis associated with common antibiotic resistances among prominent bacterial pathogens. Given the emerging theme of CpxA-CpxR-dependent virulence gene regulation in clinically important bacteria[2, 15–17], this pathway might well be an attractive target for chemical modulation. With this in mind, the present study is primarily aimed at establishing practical and reliable assays to identify the molecular interactions of CpxA and CpxR from pathogenic Y. pseudotuberculosis. Not only would this guide further in vivo mutagenesis studies to explore the molecular determinants involved in CpxA-CpxR signal transduction and virulence gene control in Y. pseudotuberculosis, this knowledge should also benefit studies aimed at targeting the Cpx pathway using chemical manipulation.
Bacterial strains, plasmids and growth conditions
Bacterial strains and plasmids are listed in Supplementary Table S1 and available for online download as Additional file1. Unless indicated, all bacteria were routinely cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth or agar at 37°C for E. coli or 26°C for Y. pseudotuberculosis. When required, antibiotics at the following final concentrations were used: ampicillin (Ap; 100 μg/ml), kanamycin (Km; 25 μg/ml), chloramphenicol (Cm; 25 μg/ml), tetracycline (Tc; 10 μg/ml).
DNA fragments were PCR amplified from YPIII/pIB102 (parental Y. pseudotuberculosis) using Easy-A High Fidelity PCR cloning enzyme (Agilent technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA) and the oligonucleotides pairs synthesized by Sigma-Aldrich Sweden AB (Stockholm, Sweden) and are listed in Supplementary Table S2 (available for online download as Additional file2). Amplified DNA fragments were cloned into pTZ57T/R (Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania) and correct sequence were verified by Eurofins MWG Operon (Ebersberg, Germany). Confirmed sequences were then re-cloned as a translational fusion into the XbaI/EcoRI site of the pKT25, pKNT25, pUT18, or pUT18C vectors for BACTH analysis or the BglII/KpnI site of the pKWY2428 vector for λcl homodimerization analysis. Routine maintenance of individual clones was performed in E. coli DH5.
BACTH and the β-galactosidase assay
Pairs of BACTH vectors expressing CyaA T18 and T25 fusions to ‘bait’ and ‘prey’ proteins were sequentially transformed into E. coli BTH101 using the chemical transformation method. Transformants were selected at 37°C by overnight growth on LB agar with appropriate antibiotics and supplemented with 0.5 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and 40 μg/ml 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside (X-Gal). Well isolated single colonies were then selected for inoculation of bacterial cultures that were grown overnight at 30°C in LB broth supplemented appropriate antibiotics. Then 0.025 volumes were sub-cultured in the same fresh media with 0.5 mM IPTG and grown for a further 2 h at 30°C. The remainder of the β-galactosidase assay followed descriptions outlined in the BACTH manual and associated literature (Euromedex, Souffelweyersheim, France). β-galactosidase activity was represented in Units/mg dry weight bacteria according to the manufacturer’s direction. Data are a representative of at least four independent experiments performed in triplicate. Guided by previous analyses, we considered a positive interaction only if the β-galactosidase activity level was at least three-fold higher than that measured for the negative control plasmids (expressing T18 and T25 alone).
For western blotting, similarly grown cultures were harvested after late-logarythmic growth. Pellets were solubilized in loading buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 10% Glycerol, 1% β-Mercaptoethanol and 0.02% Bromophenol blue) and fractionated by SDS-PAGE with 12% acrylamide. Protein was then transferred to Immobilon®-P PDVF transfer membrane (Millipore Corporation) using a Hoefer semi-dry transfer apparatus (GE Healthcare). Membranes were exposed to rabbit polyclonal antibodies that were a gift from Thomas Silhavy (anti-CpxA), produced by Agrisera AB (Vännäs, Sweden) from purified antigen (anti-CpxR) or purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc [(anti-CyaA (b-300)]. These were then detected with an anti-rabbit monoclonal antibody conjugated with horse radish peroxidase (GE Healthcare) and Pierce ECL 2 western blotting substrate (Thermo Scientific).
λcI Homodimerization assays
As performed previously, assays were carried-out in the E. coli JM109 background. In brief, freshly transformed bacteria were grown overnight at 37°C in LB broth with chloramphenicol selection in the presence of 0.1 mM IPTG. Next, 0.01 volumes were sub-cultured in fresh media and grown to mid-logarithmic phase of growth. All cultures were standardized according to an optical density of 600 nm (OD600) and 5 μl suspensions of 10-fold serial dilutions were spotted onto LB agar with chloramphenicol, tetracycline and 0.1 mM IPTG. The ability to grow in the presence of tetracycline was scored following overnight incubation at 37°C for at least four independent experiments.
Additionally, λcl-CpxR fusions contained within these pelleted bacterial E. coli cells were fractionated by SDS-PAGE with 12% acrylamide. Protein was then transferred to Protran® nitrocellulose transfer membrane (Whatman GmbH) using a Hoefer semi-dry transfer assembly (GE Healthcare). Proteins of interest were bound with specific rabbit polyclonal anti-CpxR antibodies and then detected with an anti-rabbit monoclonal antibody conjugated with horse radish peroxidase and a homemade chemiluminescent solution. As a loading control, we utilized specific rabbit polyclonal anti-CAT antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich) to detect levels of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase encoded by the cat gene located on the vector pKWY2428.
Dimerization of the CpxA sensor kinase using the BACTH assay
This study had the goal to identify a cost-effective, reliable and convenient protein-protein interaction assay for the characterization of regulatory deficient mutants of CpxA and CpxR from Y. pseudotuberculosis. The BACTH system – involving reconstitution of Bordetella pertussis adenylate cyclase (CyaA) T18 and T25 domains – is reported to be ideal for analyzing the interactions among membrane-anchored bacterial proteins in their natural environment[34, 35], including diverse SKs[37–41]. Since CpxA is expected to dimerize[1, 42], we first analyzed the ability of CpxA from Y. pseudotuberculosis to interact with itself in the BACTH assay. A series of constructs composed of N-and C-terminal T18 and T25 translational fusions with CpxA were established. Pairs of plasmids expressing a ‘bait’ and ‘prey’ hybrid were transformed into E. coli BTH101. This strain contains a lacZ reporter gene under CAP-cAMP control; an interaction between bait and prey will reconstitute CyaA activity leading to accumulation of cAMP that, together with CAP, will stimulate transcription of the lacZ reporter gene that is indirectly measurable via an elevation in β-galactosidase activity. Serving as bait, full-length CpxA translationally fused to the N-terminus of T25 (CpxA1-458-T25) could clearly bind to the prey hybrids CpxA1-458-T18 and C-terminal truncated CpxA1-310-T18, as a result producing β-galactosidase activity that was ~20.2 and ~16.3 fold higher than the negative control (Figure1). Modest increases in β-galactosidase activity of ~3.6 and ~3.2 fold were also indicative of a slight interaction between bait and the respective prey hybrids CpxA157-310-T18 and CpxA187-458-T18 (Figure1). Since the DHp domain (residues 241–310) is a common feature of all four interacting hybrids, these data demonstrate its importance to CpxA homodimerization. Corroborating this, the remaining three hybrids (CpxA1-156-T18, CpxA1-240-T18 and CpxA311-458-T18) all lacking the DHp domain produced low reporter activity indicative of poor homodimerization capacity (Figure1). Although CpxA homodimerization was easily measurable via BACTH analysis, production of β-galactosidase activity was notably lesser than that achieved by a strain having the T25-Zip/T18-Zip positive control plasmids, where accumulated activity was ~83.8 fold more than background (data not shown).
It is possible that low reporter activity might also be due to unstable fusion product. To investigate this, we made numerous attempts to measure protein levels in each fusion bearing strain using western blotting with either anti-CyaA (b-300) or anti-CpxA antibodies. However, neither antibody was successful in detecting accumulated steady state levels of any specific T25 or T18 fusion, even for those fusion-bearing strains that displayed high levels of reporter activity and the positive control (data not shown). Hence, for those three strains where low reporter activity was recorded, we cannot definitively conclude that this was due to genuinely poor interactions.
An N-terminal region of CpxR interacts with CpxA
Our next goal was to examine if the BACTH assay could support CpxR-CpxA interaction studies. In this analysis, we used the full-length CpxA1-458-T18 hybrid as bait that in Figure1 resulted in high reporter activity and must therefore be stably produced. A corresponding prey construct that is composed of T25 C-terminally fused to full-length CpxR (T25-CpxR1-232) was co-transformed into E. coli BTH101. An interaction between bait and prey yielded β-galactosidase activity that was ~21.4 fold higher than the negative control and equivalent to the positive control (~20.2 fold increase) (Figure2, data not shown).
To identify the region of CpxR engaging with CpxA, we were guided by a recent study by Tapparel and colleagues. It was suggested that the C-terminal domain effector activity of E. coli CpxR can become constitutive by removing the N-terminal regulatory domain appended via an internal flexible linker. We therefore established a series of prey constructs with T25 that were C-terminally fused to truncated CpxR derivatives composed of only the N-terminus without internal linker (T25-CpxR1-117) or with internal linker (T25-CpxR1-132) and the C-terminus without internal linker (T25-CpxR132-232) or with internal linker (T25-CpxR117-232). No interaction between any of these prey hybrids and the CpxA1-458-T18 bait was observed (Figure2). Attempts to detect any accumulated T25-CpxR variant in cell lysates by western blotting with either anti-CyaA (b-300) or anti-CpxR antibodies were again unsuccessful, even for the full-length CpxR fusion that did interact with CpxA (data not shown). On the other hand, altering the orientation of the T25 fusion by creating an alternative prey hybrid of CpxR1-132-T25 did permit modest reporter activity (~4.5 fold) indicative of an interaction with the CpxA1-458-T18 bait (Figure2). Thus, this suggested that the CpxR N-terminus might be more important for CpxA binding.
To explore this further, we utilized a CpxRD51A variant that is non-phosphorylatable and is therefore essentially inactive (‘locked off’). Additionally, another non-phosphorylatable variant, CpxRD51E, was generated on the basis that it may cause a constitutively ‘locked-on’ CpxR phenotype, as is often the case for related RRs[44–46]. In parallel, we deleted in silico predicted structural elements of CpxR including the putative N-terminal-located coiled-coil domain (CpxRΔ11–24), a C-terminal-located wHTH domain (CpxRΔ188–209) as well as the flexible internal linker that separates the N- and C-terminal CpxR domains (CpxRΔ117–132). Again, the same CpxA1-458-T18 bait construct was used in combination with the newly generated prey constructs T25-CpxRD51A, T25-CpxRD51E, T25-CpxRΔ11–24, T25-CpxRΔ117–132 and T25-CpxRΔ188–209. Enzymatic assays revealed that CpxR could interact well with CpxA, but only if its N-terminus remained intact, such as with the fully functional CpxRD51E variant (~14.7 fold increase in reporter activity) or the CpxRΔ188–209 variant (~16.8 fold) (Figure2). Conversely, disruption of CpxR N-terminus, as occurred with the CpxRD51A, CpxRΔ11–24 and CpxRΔ117–132 variants, only permitted low reporter activity in these fusion-bearing strains (Figure2). Although western blotting could not determine whether any of these T25-CpxR fusions were actually produced and stable, these data corroborate earlier in silico predictions that the CpxR N-terminus is probably involved in crosstalk with CpxA[47, 48]. They also suggest that BACTH is a valid approach to further investigate this aspect of Cpx pathway activation.
The extreme C-terminus of CpxA is dispensable for interactions with CpxR
BACTH analysis of CpxR-CpxR interactions
Given a report that the C-terminal domain effector activity of E. coli CpxR can be unlocked by physically removing the N-terminal regulatory domain, we entertained the notion that our full-length CpxR fusions might be locked in a static structural confirmation that prevents measurable dimerization. To investigate this, we employed a series of prey constructs with T18 N-terminally fused to truncated CpxR derivatives composed of only the N-terminus without (CpxR1-117-T18) or with internal linker (CpxR1-132-T18) and the C-terminus without internal linker (CpxR132-232-T18) or with internal linker (CpxR117-232-T18). These constructs were related to those already described in Figure2 and are also utilized in subsequent aspects of this study. These truncated CpxR-T18 prey constructs were transformed into E. coli BTH101 containing the full-length T25-CpxR1-232 bait construct. On the basis of a ~10.7 fold elevation from baseline β-galactosidase activity, T25-CpxR1-232 formed a strong interaction with CpxR1-132-T18 (Figure4). On this occasion, the strength of this union mirrored the well established dimerization of the Zip protein used as a control (~14.6 fold elevation from baseline β-galactosidase activity) (Figure4, data not shown). In contrast, no other interaction of truncated CpxR with full-length CpxR could be detected, even after the orientation (N-terminus vs C-terminus) or combination (‘bait’ vs ‘prey’) of T18 and T25 domains were altered (Figure4, data not shown). This also means that full-length CpxR-CpxR1-132 interaction observed in the BACTH assay is conditional, being heavily influenced by the orientation and combination of the T18 and T25 fusions.
N-terminal mediated CpxR dimerization
Key structural features of CpxR mediates homodimerization
Homodimerization of CpxR as determined by reconstitution of the λcI repressor
To further explore λcI1-131-CpxR homodimerization, we analyzed essentially full-length CpxR derivatives carrying the specific deletions of the N-terminal coiled-coil (λcI1-131-CpxRΔ11–24), internal linker (λcI1-131-CpxRΔ117–132) and C-terminal wHTH domain (λcI1-131-CpxRΔ188–209). In addition, we examined fusions harboring site-directed mutations in the N-terminal phosphorylation site (λcI1-131-CpxRD51A and λcI1-131-CpxRD51E). Importantly, we could confirm that all of these fusion proteins accumulated in the cytoplasm of JM109 cells (Figure7B). Clearly however, CpxR188-209 exhibits a major defect in dimerization capacity (Figure7A); a finding also observed in the BACTH assay (see Figure6). This dimerization defect was also conferred to the fusion expressing only the C-terminus (λcI1-131-CpxR117-232, Δ188–209) (Figure7A), although this is less conclusive because this fusion was poorly expressed (Figure7B). On the other hand, non-phosphorylated CpxR or CpxR lacking the N-terminal coiled-coil domain or internal linker, could all still homodimerize (Figure7A). Once again, this data is at odds with our BACTH analysis, where a CpxRD51A, CpxRΔ11–24 or a CpxRΔ117–132 mutation inhibited subsequent CpxR interactions (see Figure6).
TCRSs play a significant role in the regulation of physiological processes in the bacterial cell ranging from the control of single genes to diverse multi-cellular behavior. This occurs by means of transcriptional, post transcriptional and post translational regulation whereby TCRSs exploit a variety of protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions[3, 42, 52]. In this study, we attempted to gain some insight into the protein-protein interactions that are the hallmark of CpxA-CpxR signal transduction.
BACTH analysis revealed that full-length CpxR and the truncated N-terminal derivatives were able to interact together, albeit in a manner conditionally dependent upon the direction and orientation of the T18 and T25 fusions. Interactions of full-length CpxR were also observed in our λcI homodimerization analysis, but we were unable to validate dimerization of N-terminal truncates via this method. Interactions dependent upon the positioning of the fused CyaA domains might well indicate that the CpxR-CpxR interaction occurs as a head-to-head symmetrical dimer mediated by a N-terminal α4-β5-α5 interface highly conserved among OmpR-PhoB RR family members[30, 42]. Indeed, structural studies of full-length and isolated N-terminal receiver domains of various RRs belonging to this OmpR-PhoB family suggest head-to-head dimerization is common and functionally important[53–56]. Hence, further studies are required to better understand how the α4-β5-α5 interface of CpxR determines CpxR dimerization orientation and contributes to subsequent DNA binding and gene transcription control.
Use of the λcI assay indicated that the CpxR C-terminus could readily dimerize; a finding not observed during our BACTH analysis. Nevertheless, a previous study has demonstrated that solitary trans- expression of C-terminal CpxR is constitutively active and capable of transcriptional control of an array of target genes in E. coli. Moreover, the degree of CpxR activation was independent of the internal linker. This data was explained through an expectation that the C-terminal effector domain can alone dimerize to activate its target genes; a notion we can now experimentally verify via λcI homodimerization analysis. Incidentally, this analysis also demonstrated that the linker was not required for this dimerization process as was previously assumed. In addition to the ability to interact with itself, constitutive activation of the CpxR C-terminus implies that this region must engage one of the six subunits of the RNA polymerase holoenzyme in order to specifically modify its transcription output from targeted genes. Direct interaction with the RNA polymerase through the C-terminus is well established for other RRs of the wHTH family; prototype OmpR interacts with the α subunit[57–63] and PhoB the σ70 subunit[64–66]. Hence, it is of considerable interest to determine how the C terminus of CpxR coordinates dimerization, DNA binding and modulation of RNA polymerase activity in the pathogenic Yersiniae.
The studies performed to elucidate the role of the phospho-modified residue (D51) were intriguing. The non-phosphorylated and functionally inactive CpxRD51A variant could not interact with CpxA or other CpxR variants via BACTH analysis. The caveat here concerns our inability to confirm stable production of CpxRD51A fused to either T18 or T25. Where production was confirmed in the λcI homodimerization assay, λcI1-131-CpxRD51A did dimerize. Clearly therefore, this aspect requires more investigation, especially given the suggestion that phosphorylation promotes homodimer formation within the OmpR/PhoB subfamily. Intriguingly, the potentially ‘locked-on’ CpxRD51E always maintained the ability to interact. This suggests that CpxRD51A and CpxRD51E are functionally distinct, the glutamate having the ability to mimic phosphorylation at residue 51 to maintain transcriptional activity. We have confirmed that CpxRD51E does maintain function in Y. pseudotuberculosis (EJT et al., unpublished), while purified CpxRD51A is not phosphorylated in vitro by small phospho donors that in turn dramatically lessons target DNA binding ability. It is evident therefore that conformational change induced by phosphorylation at D51 permits certain inter- and intra-molecular interactions. Based on these data, we anticipate that performing a thorough pair-wise molecular and biochemical characterization of the CpxRD51A and CpxRD51E variants will benefit our understanding of the complexities of CpxR-mediated transcriptional output mechanisms.
Our investigation into the role of the CpxR linker region (residues 117–132) in inter- and intra-molecular interactions was inconclusive. Both BACTH and λcI homodimerization studies revealed the linker to be non-essential for homodimerization of any CpxR truncated variant. However, the near full-length CpxRΔ117–132 variant lost the ability to engage with the CpxR N-terminus and with full-length CpxA via BACTH analysis, although it still efficiently dimerized in λcI-based studies. Hence, it seems that the linker has a function in facilitating protein-protein interactions, but this ability is context dependent. Recent studies of other members of the OmpR/PhoB subfamily are starting to shed some light on internal linker function[67–69]. Collectively, these demonstrate how linker sequence composition and length can influence RR interdomain interactions, DNA binding and subsequent transcriptional output. Presumably, the linker optimizes N- and C-terminal domain function by imparting physical separation as well as offering inherent flexibility that assists in domain conformational changes as a consequence of phosphorylation and/or DNA binding. Given this potential for influencing RR function, a detailed investigation of the CpxR linker is warranted.
The C-terminal wHTH DNA binding domain is also likely to contribute to CpxR homodimerization. While we and others have shown that truncated CpxR can dimerize even in the complete absence of the C-terminus (this study), restricted removal of only residues 188 to 209 encompassing the wHTH prevents subsequent dimerization of CpxRΔ188–209 in both BACTH and λcI homodimerization assays. While not tested here, the role of the wHTH domain in CpxR dimer formation might well relate to the effects of binding to target DNA. After all, it is established that DNA binding by non-phosphorylated OmpR is a mechanism to enhance phosphorylation and dimerization capacity[70, 71]. Hence, the wHTH motif may play a dual role in both RR target DNA binding and dimerization. On the basis of our own DNA binding assays, where non-phosphorylated native CpxR, but not the non-phosphorylated CpxRD51A mutant only very weakly bound to target DNA, it is conceivable that initial binding can dramatically enhance phosphorylation and then dimerization.
Although both the BACTH and λcI homodimerization assay were highly reproducible, they were often contradictory in their ability to predict interactions. This should not mean that these assays are unreliable or not physiologically relevant. However, it does highlight the need to perform in parallel other complementing experimental analyses to ensure relevancy of the phenotypic data. No doubt, creation of hybrid proteins fused with structurally distinct CyaA or λcI tags could diminish inherent protein flexibility or stability, curbing the subsequent ability to measure authentic protein-protein interactions. Indeed, a good correlation between protein instability and the absence of interactions in a BACTH assay has already been stated. Despite our numerous attempts, we could not detect any T18 or T25 fusions, including those reliably inducing high reporter activities, such as the positive control. However, we could infer from numerous positive interaction data sets involving various T18 and T25 fusion combinations that the majority of our fusions must, to some extent, be stably produced. The notable exceptions to this deduction are the fusions involving CpxRD51A and it’s C-terminal domain when in isolation. We are therefore confident that BACTH analysis is useful for CpxR N-terminal interaction studies, but it may have limited use for similar studies of the C-terminus. Critically, the majority of our λcI fusions were produced and stable. Hence, product instability cannot account for the failure of λcI1-131-CpxR2-116 and λcI1-131-CpxR2-132 fusions to homodimerize. Moreover, as homodimerization of similar CpxR N-terminal fusions occurred via BACTH analysis, poor production alone cannot explain the contradictory results using the two reporter systems. This can be further illustrated by observations with the stably produced full-length CpxR; it could dimerize to itself only when fused to λcI, but via BACTH analysis could only interact with CpxA or the CpxR N-terminus. Thus, it is apparent that individual domains appended to either CpxAn or CpxRn variants can alter their structural context in unique ways that significantly influence protein-protein interactions, making no one assay fully self-sufficient. By necessity therefore, future work will analyze the significance of these CpxR and CpxA interaction motifs by means of other sensitive interaction techniques in concert with analysis of pertinent in vivo phenotypes.
We have shown here that the BACTH and λcI assays are two simple and complementary approaches amenable to identify the independent modular homo- and hetero-interactions of CpxA and CpxR. Notably, the former is ideally suited to analyze the molecular context of CpxR interactions involving the N-terminus, while the latter can aid in dissecting interactions of the CpxR C-terminus. Moreover, when combined with in vivo assays designed to assess bacterial survival and virulence, a better understanding of the roles of the CpxA-CpxR TCRS in Y. pseudotuberculosis will ensue.
Conjugative pilus expression
Two-component regulatory system
Tetracycline, BACTH, bacterial adenylate cyclase two-hybrid
Catabolite activator protein
Cyclic adenosine monophosphate.
This work, performed within the framework of the Umeå Centre for Microbial Research (UCMR) Linnaeus Program (LP), was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council and Foundation for Medical Research at Umeå University.
We thank Ryutaro Utsumi for the generous gift of λcI homodimerization plasmids, Victoria Schingler for E. coli DH5, Hans Wolf-Watz for parental Y. pseudotuberculosis YPIII/pIB102 and Thomas Silhavy for antibody against CpxA from E. coli. Ikenna Obi, Junfa Liu and Frédéric Login are also thanked for their critical review of the manuscript.
- Hunke S, Keller R, Muller VS: Signal integration by the Cpx-envelope stress system. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2012, 326: 12-22. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02436.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vogt SL, Raivio TL: Just scratching the surface: an expanding view of the Cpx envelope stress response. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2012, 326: 2-11. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02406.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Krell T, Lacal J, Busch A, Silva-Jimenez H, Guazzaroni ME, Ramos JL: Bacterial sensor kinases: diversity in the recognition of environmental signals. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2010, 64: 539-59. 10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134054.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Itou H, Tanaka I: The OmpR-family of proteins: insight into the tertiary structure and functions of two-component regulator proteins. J Biochem. 2001, 129: 343-50. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a002863.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Labandeira-Rey M, Brautigam CA, Hansen EJ: Characterization of the CpxRA regulon in Haemophilus ducreyi. Infect Immun. 2010, 78: 4779-91. 10.1128/IAI.00678-10.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bury-Mone S, Nomane Y, Reymond N, Barbet R, Jacquet E, Imbeaud S, Jacq A, Bouloc P: Global analysis of extracytoplasmic stress signaling in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5: e1000651-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000651.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carlsson KE, Liu J, Edqvist PJ, Francis MS: Extracytoplasmic-stress-responsive pathways modulate type III secretion in Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Infect Immun. 2007, 75: 3913-24. 10.1128/IAI.01346-06.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carlsson KE, Liu J, Edqvist PJ, Francis MS: Influence of the Cpx extracytoplasmic-stress-responsive pathway on Yersinia sp.-eukaryotic cell contact. Infect Immun. 2007, 75: 4386-4399. 10.1128/IAI.01450-06.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu J, Obi IR, Thanikkal EJ, Kieselbach T, Francis MS: Phosphorylated CpxR restricts production of the RovA global regulator in Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e23314-10.1371/journal.pone.0023314.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu J, Thanikkal EJ, Obi IR, Francis MS: Elevated CpxR approximately P levels repress the Ysc-Yop type III secretion system of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Res Microbiol. 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2012.07.010.Google Scholar
- Cathelyn JS, Crosby SD, Lathem WW, Goldman WE, Miller VL: RovA, a global regulator of Yersinia pestis, specifically required for bubonic plague. 2006, 103: 13514-9.Google Scholar
- Yang F, Ke Y, Tan Y, Bi Y, Shi Q, Yang H, Qiu J, Wang X, Guo Z, Ling H, et al: Cell membrane is impaired, accompanied by enhanced type III secretion system expression in Yersinia pestis deficient in RovA regulator. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e12840-10.1371/journal.pone.0012840.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cathelyn JS, Ellison DW, Hinchliffe SJ, Wren BW, Miller VL: The RovA regulons of Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pestis are distinct: evidence that many RovA-regulated genes were acquired more recently than the core genome. Mol Microbiol. 2007, 66: 189-205. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05907.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Francis MS: Secretion systems and metabolism in the pathogenic Yersiniae. Stress response in pathogenic bacteria. Edited by: Kidd PP. 2011, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, 185-220.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dorel C, Lejeune P, Rodrigue A: The Cpx system of Escherichia coli, a strategic signaling pathway for confronting adverse conditions and for settling biofilm communities?. Res Microbiol. 2006, 157: 306-14. 10.1016/j.resmic.2005.12.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Raivio TL: Envelope stress responses and Gram-negative bacterial pathogenesis. Mol Microbiol. 2005, 56: 1119-28. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04625.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rowley G, Spector M, Kormanec J, Roberts M: Pushing the envelope: extracytoplasmic stress responses in bacterial pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006, 4: 383-94. 10.1038/nrmicro1394.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kwon E, Kim DY, Ngo TD, Gross CA, Gross JD, Kim KK: The crystal structure of the periplasmic domain of Vibrio parahaemolyticus CpxA. Protein Sci. 2012, 21: 1334-43. 10.1002/pro.2120.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Casino P, Rubio V, Marina A: The mechanism of signal transduction by two-component systems. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2010, 20: 763-71. 10.1016/j.sbi.2010.09.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aravind L, Ponting CP: The cytoplasmic helical linker domain of receptor histidine kinase and methyl-accepting proteins is common to many prokaryotic signalling proteins. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999, 176: 111-6. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13650.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Williams SB, Stewart V: Functional similarities among two-component sensors and methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins suggest a role for linker region amphipathic helices in transmembrane signal transduction. Mol Microbiol. 1999, 33: 1093-102.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wolanin PM, Thomason PA, Stock JB: Histidine protein kinases: key signal transducers outside the animal kingdom. Genome Biol. 2002, 3: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-10-reviews3013. reviews3013.1–3013.8Google Scholar
- Stewart RC: Protein histidine kinases: assembly of active sites and their regulation in signaling pathways. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010, 13: 133-41. 10.1016/j.mib.2009.12.013.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dutta R, Qin L, Inouye M: Histidine kinases: diversity of domain organization. Mol Microbiol. 1999, 34: 633-40. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01646.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Perego M, Hoch JA: Protein aspartate phosphatases control the output of two-component signal transduction systems. Trends Genet. 1996, 12: 97-101. 10.1016/0168-9525(96)81420-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kenney LJ: How important is the phosphatase activity of sensor kinases?. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010, 13: 168-76. 10.1016/j.mib.2010.01.013.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marina A, Mott C, Auyzenberg A, Hendrickson WA, Waldburger CD: Structural and mutational analysis of the PhoQ histidine kinase catalytic domain. Insight into the reaction mechanism. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 41182-41190. 10.1074/jbc.M106080200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bilwes AM, Quezada CM, Croal LR, Crane BR, Simon MI: Nucleotide binding by the histidine kinase CheA. Nat Struct Biol. 2001, 8: 353-60. 10.1038/86243.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gao R, Stock AM: Molecular strategies for phosphorylation-mediated regulation of response regulator activity. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010, 13: 160-7. 10.1016/j.mib.2009.12.009.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bourret RB: Receiver domain structure and function in response regulator proteins. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010, 13: 142-9. 10.1016/j.mib.2010.01.015.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gotoh Y, Eguchi Y, Watanabe T, Okamoto S, Doi A, Utsumi R: Two-component signal transduction as potential drug targets in pathogenic bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010, 13: 232-239. 10.1016/j.mib.2010.01.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- French GL: The continuing crisis in antibiotic resistance. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010, 36 (Suppl 3): S3-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hanahan D: Techniques for transformation of E. coli. DNA Cloning. A practical approach. Edited by: Glover DM. 1985, IRL Press Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom, 109-136.Google Scholar
- Karimova G, Pidoux J, Ullmann A, Ladant D: A bacterial two-hybrid system based on a reconstituted signal transduction pathway. 1998, 95: 5752-6.Google Scholar
- Karimova G, Dautin N, Ladant D: Interaction network among Escherichia coli membrane proteins involved in cell division as revealed by bacterial two-hybrid analysis. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187: 2233-43. 10.1128/JB.187.7.2233-2243.2005.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Watanabe T, Hashimoto Y, Umemoto Y, Tatebe D, Furuta E, Fukamizo T, Yamamoto K, Utsumi R: Molecular characterization of the essential response regulator protein YycF in Bacillus subtilis. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003, 6: 155-63. 10.1159/000077246.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Workentine ML, Chang L, Ceri H, Turner RJ: The GacS-GacA two-component regulatory system ofPseudomonas fluorescens: a bacterial two-hybrid analysis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009, 292: 50-6. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01445.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scheu PD, Witan J, Rauschmeier M, Graf S, Liao YF, Ebert-Jung A, Basche T, Erker W, Unden G: The CitA/CitB two-component system regulating citrate fermentation in Escherichia coli and its relation to the DcuS/DcuR system in vivo. J Bacteriol. 2012, 194: 636-645. 10.1128/JB.06345-11.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jovanovic G, Engl C, Buck M: Physical, functional and conditional interactions between ArcAB and phage shock proteins upon secretin-induced stress in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2009, 74: 16-28. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06809.x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Luttmann D, Heermann R, Zimmer B, Hillmann A, Rampp IS, Jung K, Gorke B: Stimulation of the potassium sensor KdpD kinase activity by interaction with the phosphotransferase protein IIA(Ntr) in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2009, 72: 978-94. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06704.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gerken H, Charlson ES, Cicirelli EM, Kenney LJ, Misra R: MzrA: a novel modulator of the EnvZ/OmpR two-component regulon. Mol Microbiol. 2009, 72: 1408-22. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06728.x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gao R, Stock AM: Biological insights from structures of two-component proteins. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2009, 63: 133-54. 10.1146/annurev.micro.091208.073214.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tapparel C, Monod A, Kelley WL: The DNA-binding domain of the Escherichia coli CpxR two-component response regulator is constitutively active and cannot be fully attenuated by fused adjacent heterologous regulatory domains. Microbiology. 2006, 152: 431-41. 10.1099/mic.0.28538-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Klose KE, Weiss DS, Kustu S: Glutamate at the site of phosphorylation of nitrogen-regulatory protein NTRC mimics aspartyl-phosphate and activates the protein. J Mol Biol. 1993, 232: 67-78. 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1370.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lan CY, Igo MM: Differential expression of the OmpF and OmpC porin proteins in Escherichia coli K-12 depends upon the level of active OmpR. J Bacteriol. 1998, 180: 171-4.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Domian IJ, Quon KC, Shapiro L: Cell type-specific phosphorylation and proteolysis of a transcriptional regulator controls the G1-to-S transition in a bacterial cell cycle. Cell. 1997, 90: 415-24. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80502-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Skerker JM, Perchuk BS, Siryaporn A, Lubin EA, Ashenberg O, Goulian M, Laub MT: Rewiring the specificity of two-component signal transduction systems. Cell. 2008, 133: 1043-54. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.040.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Szurmant H, Hoch JA: Interaction fidelity in two-component signaling. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010, 13: 190-7. 10.1016/j.mib.2010.01.007.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Siryaporn A, Perchuk BS, Laub MT, Goulian M: Evolving a robust signal transduction pathway from weak cross-talk. Mol Syst Biol. 2010, 6: 452-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gao R, Tao Y, Stock AM: System-level mapping of Escherichia coli response regulator dimerization with FRET hybrids. Mol Microbiol. 2008, 69: 1358-72. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06355.x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Furuta E, Yamamoto K, Tatebe D, Watabe K, Kitayama T, Utsumi R: Targeting protein homodimerization: a novel drug discovery system. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579: 2065-70. 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.02.056.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Galperin MY: Diversity of structure and function of response regulator output domains. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010, 13: 150-9. 10.1016/j.mib.2010.01.005.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maris AE, Walthers D, Mattison K, Byers N, Kenney LJ: The response regulator OmpR oligomerizes via beta-sheets to form head-to-head dimers. J Mol Biol. 2005, 350: 843-56. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.05.057.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Toro-Roman A, Mack TR, Stock AM: Structural analysis and solution studies of the activated regulatory domain of the response regulator ArcA: a symmetric dimer mediated by the alpha4-beta5-alpha5 face. J Mol Biol. 2005, 349: 11-26. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.03.059.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Toro-Roman A, Wu T, Stock AM: A common dimerization interface in bacterial response regulators KdpE and TorR. Protein Sci. 2005, 14: 3077-88. 10.1110/ps.051722805.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gupta S, Pathak A, Sinha A, Sarkar D: Mycobacterium tuberculosis PhoP recognizes two adjacent direct-repeat sequences to form head-to-head dimers. J Bacteriol. 2009, 191: 7466-76. 10.1128/JB.00669-09.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Igarashi K, Hanamura A, Makino K, Aiba H, Mizuno T, Nakata A, Ishihama A: Functional map of the alpha subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: two modes of transcription activation by positive factors. 1991, 88: 8958-62.Google Scholar
- Kondo H, Nakagawa A, Nishihira J, Nishimura Y, Mizuno T, Tanaka I: Escherichia coli positive regulator OmpR has a large loop structure at the putative RNA polymerase interaction site. Nat Struct Biol. 1997, 4: 28-31. 10.1038/nsb0197-28.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martinez-Hackert E, Stock AM: The DNA-binding domain of OmpR: crystal structures of a winged helix transcription factor. Structure. 1997, 5: 109-24. 10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00170-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pratt LA, Silhavy TJ: OmpR mutants specifically defective for transcriptional activation. J Mol Biol. 1994, 243: 579-94. 10.1016/0022-2836(94)90033-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Russo FD, Slauch JM, Silhavy TJ: Mutations that affect separate functions of OmpR the phosphorylated regulator of porin transcription in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1993, 231: 261-73. 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1281.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sharif TR, Igo MM: Mutations in the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase that affect the regulation of porin gene transcription in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1993, 175: 5460-8.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Slauch JM, Russo FD, Silhavy TJ: Suppressor mutations in rpoA suggest that OmpR controls transcription by direct interaction with the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase. J Bacteriol. 1991, 173: 7501-10.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Makino K, Amemura M, Kawamoto T, Kimura S, Shinagawa H, Nakata A, Suzuki M: DNA binding of PhoB and its interaction with RNA polymerase. J Mol Biol. 1996, 259: 15-26. 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0298.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim SK, Makino K, Amemura M, Nakata A, Shinagawa H: Mutational analysis of the role of the first helix of region 4.2 of the sigma 70 subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase in transcriptional activation by activator protein PhoB. Mol Gen Genet. 1995, 248: 1-8. 10.1007/BF02456607.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Makino K, Amemura M, Kim SK, Nakata A, Shinagawa H: Role of the sigma 70 subunit of RNA polymerase in transcriptional activation by activator protein PhoB in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 1993, 7: 149-60. 10.1101/gad.7.1.149.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mattison K, Oropeza R, Kenney LJ: The linker region plays an important role in the interdomain communication of the response regulator OmpR. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 32714-21. 10.1074/jbc.M204122200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Walthers D, Tran VK, Kenney LJ: Interdomain linkers of homologous response regulators determine their mechanism of action. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185: 317-24. 10.1128/JB.185.1.317-324.2003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pathak A, Goyal R, Sinha A, Sarkar D: Domain structure of virulence-associated response regulator PhoP of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: role of the linker region in regulator-promoter interaction(s). J Biol Chem. 2010, 285: 34309-18. 10.1074/jbc.M110.135822.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rhee JE, Sheng W, Morgan LK, Nolet R, Liao X, Kenney LJ: Amino acids important for DNA recognition by the response regulator OmpR. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283: 8664-77. 10.1074/jbc.M705550200.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Head CG, Tardy A, Kenney LJ: Relative binding affinities of OmpR and OmpR-phosphate at the ompF and ompC regulatory sites. J Mol Biol. 1998, 281: 857-70. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1985.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar