Rapid research response to the 2009 A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza pandemic (Revised)
© Keitel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 1 August 2012
Accepted: 23 March 2013
Published: 3 May 2013
When novel influenza viruses cause human infections, it is critical to characterize the illnesses, viruses, and immune responses to infection in order to develop diagnostics, treatments, and vaccines. The objective of the study was to collect samples from patients with suspected or confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 infections that could be made available to the scientific community. Respiratory secretions, sera and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected sequentially (when possible) from patients presenting with suspected or previously confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 infections. Clinical manifestations and illness outcomes were assessed. Respiratory secretions were tested for the presence of A(H1N1)pdm09 virus by means of isolation in tissue culture and real time RT-PCR. Sera were tested for the presence and level of HAI and neutralizing antibodies against the A(H1N1)pdm09 virus.
Findings and conclusions
Thirty patients with confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 infection were enrolled at Baylor College of Medicine (BCM). Clinical manifestations of illness were consistent with typical influenza. Twenty-eight of 30 had virological confirmation of illness; all recovered fully. Most patients had serum antibody responses or high levels of antibody in convalescent samples. Virus-positive samples were sent to J. Craig Venter Institute for sequencing and sequences were deposited in GenBank. Large volumes of sera collected from 2 convalescent adults were used to standardize antibody assays; aliquots of these sera are available from the repository. Aliquots of serum, PBMCs and stool collected from BCM subjects and subjects enrolled at other study sites are available for use by the scientific community, upon request.
Keywords2009 H1N1 virus Immune responses Influenza
Influenza is a highly contagious acute respiratory infection that affects all age groups but has significant morbidity and mortality, especially in the very young and elderly populations. Influenza is usually a seasonal disease with high attack rates, short incubation period and rapid transmission. Periodic infections of humans with novel strains of influenza raise concerns that a pandemic of influenza could be unfolding. Novel influenza A viruses, including H5N1, H7N7, and H9N2 viruses, have produced human infections in recent years without evolving into a pandemic. However, in the spring of 2009 a novel influenza A/H1N1 virus [A(H1N1)pdm09] emerged in Mexico, followed by recognition of international spread to the US[1, 2], A pandemic caused by the A(H1N1)pdm09 virus was declared by the World Health Organization on June 11, 2009. When novel viruses cause infections in humans, it is critical to obtain samples as soon as possible to identify and characterize the viruses and the disease they cause, and to understand the host immune response to infection. These samples are necessary to develop diagnostic tests, treatments, and vaccines for prevention of infection.
The purpose of this study was to collect blood and respiratory samples from subjects who were known or suspected to have infection caused by the A(H1N1)pdm09 virus, and to make available to the scientific community new strains of influenza viruses and other immunologic reagents to facilitate influenza research. These samples were used to detect and isolate viruses for further characterization and to study the adaptive immune responses following infection. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe the clinical and laboratory features of infection among 30 subjects enrolled at Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) who had confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 infection, and to inform the research community about the availability of samples collected from subjects enrolled at several study sites, as well as other A(H1N1)pdm09 resources available through the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Male and female subjects of all ages (> 1 day old) who had an influenza-like illness (subjects who had at least one respiratory symptom and at least one of the following: oral temperature ≥ 100°F; feeling feverish; and/or close contact with a confirmed case), or who had current or recent laboratory-confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza virus infection were invited to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria included inability or unwillingness of the subject (or parent/guardian) to provide informed consent; influenza known to be caused by a strain other than the A(H1N1)pdm09 virus; and participation in another blood donation study. Subjects were recruited from local healthcare facilities or referred by their health care providers or through word of mouth. The study was conducted in accordance with protocols approved by the BCM Institutional Review Board.
Adults provided written informed consent; written parental informed consent was obtained for subjects under the age of 18 years. After obtaining informed consent, information regarding the patient’s potential source of infection (exposures) and the illness was collected, along with pertinent medical history and demographic information. Permission was requested to review the subjects’ medical records for additional clinical and laboratory information (e.g., treatment regimen, results of rapid antigen detection tests and other laboratory results, if applicable). A targeted physical examination was performed based on the subject’s history and/or signs and symptoms at the time of enrollment. Samples were collected for virus isolation and for evaluation of immune responses. Subjects (or parents/guardians) were given the option to refuse donation of some of the samples, if desired. Combined nasal wash/throat swab (NW/TS) specimens were collected for detection and isolation of A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza viruses.
Venous blood samples for sera and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected to assess immune responses following infection. The amount of blood collected varied according to the age of the subject and whether the illness was acute or convalescent: 5 – 10 mL from infants; 20 – 60 mL from children; and up to 120 mL was collected from adults. Subjects (and parents/legal guardians) were asked for their permission to be contacted for up to twelve weeks after initial sampling for collection of additional information and samples.
The types and frequencies of subsequent sample collection were based on the time since illness onset and subject consent. NW/TS samples for virus identification were collected up to 2 weeks after illness onset. If any sample was positive by PCR, then respiratory samples were collected again approximately 5 days after the most recent PCR-positive sample until the results were negative. For example, if the initial sample collected 2 days after illness onset was positive, then the subject was re-sampled at 4–9 days, 10–14 days, and 15–19 days after illness onset or until the PCR became negative. Acute blood samples for serum and PBMCs were collected within 2 weeks of illness onset, and convalescent blood samples were collected up to 35 days after illness onset.
Symptoms were graded on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 was absent; 1 was mild (did not interfere with activity); 2 was moderate (interfered somewhat with activity); and 3 was severe (incapacitating). Fever was graded on a scale of 0–3, where 0 was absent; 1 was mild (100°F-101.1°F); 2 was moderate (101.2-102°F); and 3 was severe (≥ 102.1°F). Vomiting was graded as follows: 0 = No vomiting; 1 = 1–2 episodes/24 hrs; 2 = ≥ 2 episodes/24 hrs; and 3 = Requires IV hydration. The severity of diarrhea was graded as follows: 0 = 0–1 loose stools/24 hrs; 1 = 2–3 loose stools/24 hrs; 2 = 4–5 loose stools/24 hrs; and 3 = ≥ 6 loose stools/24 hours or requires IV hydration.
Virus detection and isolation
NW/TS samples collected from subjects presenting within 2 weeks of onset of illness were tested for A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza virus using a real time, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR) platform with CDC published primers. In brief, RNA was extracted from NW/TS specimens with the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen) in the semiautomated QIAcube unit. Specimens were tested by rtRT-PCR using specific primers and fluorescent Taqman probes for the novel 2009 influenza A/H1N1 and for seasonal influenza A and B viruses. In addition, NW/TS samples were inoculated into primary rhesus monkey kidney (RhMK) tubes for virus isolation. Hemadsorption (HA) with guinea pig red blood cells (0.25%) was used to identify the presence of hemadsorbing viruses including the A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza virus. HA-positive harvests were tested by rtRT-PCR to identify the A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza virus.
Serum HAI and neutralizing antibody assays
Assays for A(H1N1)pdm09 -specific serum hemagglutination-inhibiting (HAI) and neutralizing antibodies were performed as described previously. A fourfold or greater rise in HAI and/or neutralizing antibody titers between the acute and convalescent serum samples was considered significant and consistent with a recent infection. Infection was considered confirmed if at least one of the following criteria was met: positive rtRT-PCR or culture on respiratory samples and/or ≥4-fold increase in HAI or neutralizing antibody titer.
Three other subjects without virological confirmation had serological evidence of probable infection: 2 subjects who had high titers of antibody (HAI and/or neutralizing antibody titer ≥ 1280) on a single specimen collected 11 and 16 days after illness onset and had household contact with a confirmed case (the mother and grandmother of subject SUBID032); and one with HAI and neutralizing antibody titers of 28 and 57, respectively, on day 12 of illness. These 3 subjects are not included in the analyses.
Demographic characteristics of subjects with confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 infections
15 (50) *
Asian, Black, or Multiracial
1 (3) each
9.1 (2 months, 53 years)
Virological and serological features of infection
The results of sequential culture and PCR assays of respiratory secretions are shown in Figure 1. A bracketed line indicates the period during which antiviral therapy with oseltamivir was administered. Most subjects were treated: 21/30 received a 5-day course of therapy (dosage based on weight) that was started within 3 days after symptom onset, with the exception of one subject whose treatment was started on day 5 of illness. One additional subject developed culture-positive symptomatic disease while receiving antiviral prophylaxis (SUBID012; 75 mg bid × 5 days). Two other subjects received 10 days of antiviral medication (one prophylaxis dosage and one treatment dosage), and 6 were not treated. Among subjects from whom sequential samples were collected, virus was detected by rtRT-PCR in NW/TS samples for up to 15 days after symptom onset. Fourteen subjects (47%) were culture-positive when initially tested, and approximately one-third of rtRT-PCR-positive samples collected after enrollment yielded virus in tissue culture. One subject with a negative culture on day 2 of illness became culture-positive on day 3 (SUBID009). All culture-positive samples were collected within the first week of illness, and all culture-positive samples were also positive by rtRT-PCR. None of the isolates for which sequence data are available had mutations indicating resistance to oseltamivir or zanamivir, including isolates recovered while on therapy (SUBID002, SUBID005, SUBID009 and SUBID037) and the isolate collected from subject SUBID012 after failed prophylaxis. No sequence data are available from the day 14 and 15 samples collected from subjects SUBID015 and SUBID025, respectively.
Serum antibody responses among subjects with confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 infections
≥4-Fold Rise in Titer (Acute + convalescent sera available)
Acute Titer ≥ 20; No Significant Rise in Titer
Convalescent Titer ≥ 20 (No acute sample)
Titer < 20 in All Sample(s)
Titer ≥ 40 in Acute and/or Convalescent Sample
Clinical features of confirmed infections
Most subjects (N=23) reported close contact with a confirmed or probable case prior to the onset of illness; most of these (N=17) were contact with a classmate in school or daycare. Three were exposed to an infected household member; one each reported exposure to a co-worker, occupational exposure, or contact with multiple cases. Seven subjects could not identify a likely source of their infection. Among the 30 subjects with confirmed infections, two separate clusters were identified. One was an outbreak of A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza in a local elementary school, and the other was an outbreak among students studying and working together at a regional university.
Clinical features of confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 infections
Duration (days) Mean
Duration (days) Median (Min, Max)
Elevated Temperature (Max)
2 (7) *
3.0 (1, 8)
3.0 (1, 6)
4.0 (2, 16)
4.0 (2, 15)
4.0 (2, 10)
3.0 (2, 7)
3.0 (1, 6)
6.0 (1, 23)
3.0 (1, 6)
1.5 (1, 4)
3.0 (1, 10)
3.0 (1, 7)
3.0 (1, 7)
10.0 (4, 32)
Shortness of breath
4.0 (2, 6)
3.0 (1, 6)
7.0 (7, 7)
Sinus fullness/Facial pain
5.0 (1, 15)
3.0 (2, 21)
Clinical outcomes for patients with confirmed A (H1N1)pdm09 infections
Medically Attended Visits
Missed School or Work
Mean number of days
Median (Min, Max)
3 (1, 10)
Febrile acute respiratory disease
Discussion and conclusions
We characterized the clinical, virological and serological responses among 30 ambulatory children and adults, most of whom were previously healthy. The most commonly reported underlying health condition was asthma. Clinical features of illness were similar to those described previously among outpatients who were index cases enrolled in prospective studies of household transmission of A(H1N1)pdm09 infections[6, 7]. Of interest was the observation that rtRT-PCR of respiratory secretions remained positive for up to 2 weeks in 2 subjects, one of whom had received a full course of oseltamivir. As noted by others, PCR was considerably more sensitive than culture, and remained positive for a longer period of time. While isolates with the H275Y mutation have been detected in patients who developed illness while receiving prophylactic oseltamivir, our subjects did not have evidence of this mutation
Availability of supporting data
Numbers of subjects from whom the indicated types of samples were collected during the rapid research response study which are available for use by qualified investigators
H1N1 Infection virologically confirmed?
Type of sample
Acute and convalescent NW, NPS and/or TS, serum and PBMCs
Acute and convalescent serum samples, and NW, NPS and/or TS
Acute and convalescent NW, NPS and/or TS samples
Acute NW, NPS and/or TS; and PBMCs and serum sample
Acute NW, NPS and/or TS; +/− acute serum
Convalescent serum and PBMCs (> 2 weeks after illness onset)
Stool (acute and/or convalescent)
The main sample collection study has been funded with federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services under contract numbers HHSN272200800002C (BCM Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit, including a subcontract to the University of Texas; Houston); HHSN27220080000 1C (subcontract to Chile from the University of Maryland). Sequencing of the viruses has been funded in whole or part with federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services under contract number HHSN272200900007C.
The authors thank the members of the study team at BCM (Janet Wells and Connie Rangel) and others who contributed to the conduct of this trial, including our colleagues at the Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (Linda Lambert, Katherine Muth, Shy Shorer, Andre McBride and Suzanne Murray). The authors also acknowledge technical assistance provided by Yvette Rugeley, Innocent Mbawuike, Alan Jewell, Kirtida Patel, and Sneha Thakar at BCM and Heather Hill at The EMMES Corporation.
- Neumann G, Noda T, Kawaoka Y: Emergence and pandemic potential of swine-origin H1N1 influenza virus. Nature. 2009, 459: 931-939. 10.1038/nature08157.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Swine influenza A (H1N1) infection in two children-Southern California, March-April 2009. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009, 58: 400-402.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization: World now at the start of. 2009,http://who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2009/h1n1_pandemic_phase6_20090611/en/index.html, influenza pandemic,
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: CDC protocol of real time RTPCR for influenza A (H1N1). April 2009.http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/swineflu/realtimeptpcr/en/index.html,
- Jackson LA, Patel SM, Swamy GK: Immunogenicity of an inactivated monovalent 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine in pregnant women. J Infect Dis. 2011, 204: 854-863. 10.1093/infdis/jir440.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Papenburg J, Baz M, Hamelin M-E: Household transmission of the 2009 pandemic A/H1N1 influenza virus: elevated laoratory-confirmed secondary attack rates and evidence of asymptomatic infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2010, 51: 1033-1041. 10.1086/656582.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cauchemez S, Donnellly CA, Reed C: Household transmission of 2009 pandemic influenza a (H1N1) virus in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2009, 361: 2619-2627. 10.1056/NEJMoa0905498.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Faix DJ, Sherman SS, Waterman SH: Rapid-test sensitivity for novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans. N Engl J Med. 2009, 361: 728-729. 10.1056/NEJMc0904264.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Oseltamivir-resistant 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus infection in two summer campers receiving prophylaxis-North Carolina, 2009. MMWR Morbid Mortality Wkly Rep. 2009, 58: 969-972.Google Scholar
- Gaines WJ, Ballou J, Yan C: Utilizing spatiotemporal analysis of influenza-like illness and rapid tests to focus swine-origin influenza virus intervention. Health Place. 2010, 16: 1230-1239. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.08.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McCormick JB, Yan C, Ballou J: Response to H1N1 in a U.S.-Mexico border community. Biosecur Bioterror. 2010, 8: 233-242. 10.1089/bsp.2010.0014.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar