Open Access

Establishing reference intervals for electrolytes in newborns and infants using direct ISE analyzer

  • Mulugeta Melkie1Email author,
  • Mahilet Yigeremu2,
  • Paulos Nigussie3,
  • Tilahun Teka2 and
  • Samuel Kinde2
BMC Research Notes20136:199

DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-199

Received: 25 September 2012

Accepted: 15 May 2013

Published: 20 May 2013

Abstract

Background

To generate clinically applicable reference intervals (RIs) for commonly requested electrolytes in Ethiopian newborns and infants that can help in early detection, close monitoring and correction of electrolyte abnormalities. Cord blood (from newborns, n = 60) and venous blood samples (from infants, n = 57) were collected and analyzed using direct ISE analyzer, AVL (9181). MedCalc® software was applied to determine the robust upper and lower end points covering 95% of the reference values of each electrolyte with respective 90% CIs.

Findings

This is an extension report of our recent study; and hence is resulted from the same data source. The level of Na+ and K+ showed difference in newborns and infants even though combined RIs were suggested by the Haris and Boyd rule as 126–143 mmol/l and 4.0-7.9 mmol/l respectively. However, Cl- values failed to show such a difference and thus a combined RI was determined to be 100–111 mmol/l. Almost all maternal, neonatal and infantile factors were not able to affect the values of the electrolytes.

Conclusion

Combined RIs are suggested for the interpretation of electrolyte values in newborns and infants without taking the effect of maternal, neonatal and infantile factors into account. Since the RIs were different from previously reported values, it will be appropriate to apply such RIs for the interpretation of electrolyte values in Ethiopian pediatric population.

Keywords

Reference intervals Electrolytes Robust method Newborns Infants Cord blood Direct ISE

Background

This work is an extension of the study that we have recently published [1]. A test for electrolytes mostly includes the measurement of sodium (Na+), potassium (K+) and chloride (Cl-) ions. Disturbance on the level of these electrolytes like hyponatremia, hypokalemia and metabolic acidosis are common in children with or without diarrhea and dehydration, especially in those with diarrhea superimposed up on malnutrition [24].

Hyponatremia is associated with an increased risk of mortality and prolonged hospitalization in sick children [5]. It is also the common cause of seizures in infants and is the leading cause of afebrile seizures in this population. In the treatment of hyponatremic seizures, correction of the electrolyte disturbance is more effective than using anticonvulsants [6]. Hypokalemia also occur frequently among pediatric patients in ICUs, in sick children especially in those with diarrhea and pneumonia [7, 8].

Mostly, electrolyte abnormalities remain unrecognized resulting in mortality and morbidity in pediatric population [3, 4]. Since the specific symptoms of electrolyte abnormality often merged with the underlying disease, close monitoring and correction of electrolyte abnormalities is important to reduce morbidity and mortality [9]. Hence, the aim of this study was to generate clinically applicable reference intervals (RIs) for commonly requested electrolytes (Na+, K+ and Cl-) in Ethiopian newborns and infants (≤ 1 year) so that timely recognition of disturbance in these analytes would be possible.

Method and materials

A total of 117 newborns and infants in Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH) and Teklehaymanot Health Center (THC) respectively were included for this cross sectional study from November 2010 to April 2011. The inclusion and exclusion criteria and data collection and analysis were described in our recent publication [1]. Cord blood (from newborns) and venous blood samples (from infants) were collected and analyzed using direct ISE analyzer (AVL 9181, Roche diagnostics GmbH, Germany). Standard operating procedure was prepared and strictly adhered to during sample collection to avoid preanalytical errors (e.g. hemolysis). Samples with gross hemolysis were not included in this study.

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences research review committee and from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Addis Ababa University, Faculty of Medicine. Informed (written) consent was also obtained from mothers before specimen and data collection.

Findings

Analytical performance of the methods

Intra-assay coefficients of variations (CVs) for the three electrolytes were ≤ 2.30% in the three levels of the control sera (ISETROL Level 1, 2 and 3). Similarly, the inter-assay CVs were ≤ 2.24% for the three levels of the control sera (Table 1). Commercial quality control sera (ISETROL Level 1, 2 and 3) were included in every session of analyses. LJ charts were then plotted and all the quality control results were in the acceptable limits.
Table 1

Intra- and inter assay CVs determined from duplicate analysis of QC materials ISETROL (LOT 9168 , 9279 * and 9391) for Na + , K + and Cl -

Analytes

Intra assay CVs

Inter assay CVs

 

Level 1

Level 2*

Level 3§

Level 1

Level 2*

Level 3§

Sodium

1.22%

1.16%

1.09%

2.11%

1.66%

1.54%

Potassium

1.04%

1.03%

2.06%

2.24%

2.01%

2.12%

Chloride

2.30%

1.36%

1.35%

1.18%

1.48%

2.00%

Effect of neonatal, infantile and maternal factors on electrolytes

The demographic data about the mothers, infants and newborns has been stated in our recent report [1]. Except for Cl- (p = 0.052), Na+ and K+ concentrations showed statistically significant difference in newborns and infants (Figure 1a and 1b). The effect of maternal and neonatal factors on the values of electrolytes is presented in Table 2. Similarly, the effect of infantile and maternal factors on the values of electrolytes is presented in Table 3.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-0500-6-199/MediaObjects/13104_2012_Article_2245_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Box and Whisker plots indicating the difference among newborns and infants in values of sodium (a) and potassium (b); [The box is 1 st and 3 rd quartiles while whiskers are lowest value, median and highest value].

Table 2

Effect of maternal and neonatal factors on the values of electrolytes in newborns

 

Variables

 

Sex

Mode of delivery

Maternal parity

Maternal education

Maternal occupation

Maternal alcohol consumption

Na +

0.857*

0.633*

0.362*

0.836

0.450

0.687*

K +

0.412*

0.282*

0.909*

0.490

0.442

0.283*

Cl -

0.662*

0.490*

0.0006*

0.330

0.148

0.09*

* Independent sample t-test.

† ANOVA test.

Table 3

Effect of maternal and neonatal factors on the values of electrolytes in infants

 

Variables

 

Age group

Sex

Feeding practice

Maternal occupation

Maternal education

Maternal parity

Na +

0.06*

0.73*

0.664

0.935

0.968

0.674*

K +

0.27*

0.78*

0.709

0.546

0.482

0.706*

Cl -

0.28*

0.51*

0.494

0.380

0.320

0.445*

* Independent sample t-test.

† ANOVA test.

RI Calculations for the electrolytes

As clearly depicted in Table 4, there were no outlier values detected in the three electrolytes. Similarly, the distributions were all Gaussian/normal. The RIs were then determined in newborns and infants. Harris and Boyd analysis suggested that partitioning should not be done and combined RIs should be used as the two RIs are in close proximity to each other.
Table 4

Summary of RI determinations of electrolytes (mmol/l) in newborns and infants

  

N

Outlier (Tukey)

Min. value

Max. value

Mean (95% CI)

DAP test

Lower limit (90% CI)

Upper limit (90% CI)

RI

Harris and Boyd

Na +

Newborns

60

No

126

143

133.2

P = 0.157

124.3

141.4

124-141

Combined RIs are suggested

      

(132.1-134.2)

 

(123.1-125.9)

(139.4-142.8)

  
 

Infants

57

No

127

143

136

P = 0.129

129

144.2

129-144

 
      

(135–137)

 

(127.1-130.5)

(142.6-145.5)

  
 

Combined

117

No

126

143

134.5

P = 0.327

126

143

126-143

 
      

(134–135)

 

(126–127)

(142–143)

  

K +

Newborns

60

No

4.7

8.0

6.20

P = 0.108

3.99

8.26

4.0-8.3

Combined RIs are suggested

      

(5.94-6.46)

 

(3.63-4.33)

(7.72-8.63)

  
 

Infants

57

No

4.0

7.0

5.32

P = 0.090

3.66

6.72

3.7-6.7

 
      

(5.12-5.52)

 

(3.37-3.98)

(6.39-7.07)

  
 

Combined

117

No

4.0

8.0

5.69

P = 0.118

4.01

7.9

4.0-7.9

 
      

(5.52-5.87)

 

(3.95-4.1)

(7.52-8.04)

  

Cl -

Newborns

60

No

100

115

105.9

P = 0.748

99.6

112.2

100-112

Combined RIs are suggested

      

(105.1-106.7)

 

(98.4-100.8)

(111–113.3)

  
 

Infants

57

No

100

110

104.9

P = 0.536

99.4

110.2

99-110

 
      

(104.2-105.6)

 

(98.5-100.3)

(109.2-111.2)

  
 

Combined

117

No

100

111

105.3

P = 0.39

99.7

111

100-111

 
      

(104.8-105.8)

 

(99.4-100)

(110.2-111.3)

  

Discussion

According to this study, Na+ showed statistically significant increment in infants than in newborns. However, according to the Harris and Boyd rule, the RIs in newborns and infants were not far apart enough to be used independently. So that, combined RI are suggested for interpretation of Na+ levels in both groups (RI = 126-143 mmol/l). The decreased level of Na+ in newborns can be explained by continuous Na+ excretion as a result of decrement in the amount of total body water in the fetus with advancing gestational age [10]. The excretion of Na+ also continues immediately after birth through urine, sweat and feces as a result of the mandatory water loss during transition from in-utero to ex-utero environment. But, several days after birth, fluid and electrolyte requirements increase as the infant starts to grow [11].

On the contrary, K+ level was higher in newborns than in infants without requiring for a separated RI (RI = 4.0-7.9 mmol/l). Our finding is supported by a previous study which indicated that K+ has age dependent variability showing high results in the newborns and then declining to reach adult level by the age of 3 [12]. But, Cl- values failed to show such a difference and thus a combined RI was determined to be 100–111 mmol/l.

Generally, both the upper and lower limits of the RIs of electrolytes determined in this study were different from previously published values, text book values and kit insert values for other target populations of similar age group [1316] and from adult values [17]. Especially, the upper limit of K+ was higher and the lower limit of Na+ was lower (Table 5). These findings strengthened our recent report on the deviation of previously established RIs for Liver Function Test (LFT) analytes from the ones established for Ethiopian pediatric population [1].
Table 5

Comparing the RIs of electrolytes in newborns and infants with values for the same age group and for adults in previous studies, text books and kit inserts

 

Na+(mmol/l)

K+(mmol/l)

Cl-(mmol/l)

Current study

Combined = 126-143

Combined = 4.0-7.9

Combined = 100-111

Perkins et al.[13]

venous cord blood = 135-143

venous cord blood = 3.8-6.8

venous cord blood = 102-112

Text books

Newborns = 133–146 [14]

Newborns = 4.5-7.2 [15]

<1 year = 96–111 [15]

 

Children

Children = 3.5-5.8 [15]

1-17 years = 102–112 [14]

 

and adults = 135–148 [14]

Adults = 3.5-5.5 [15]

Adults = 100–108 [14]

Kit inserts

136-145 [16]

3.5-5.1 [16]

97-111 [16]

Adult values

141.4-152.5 [17]

3.9-5.8 [17]

100.5-111.7 [17]

This study revealed that except maternal parity, the remaining neonatal and maternal factors failed to affect the values of electrolytes in newborns. The chloride level in newborns from primiparous mothers was significantly higher than newborns from multiparous mothers (p = 0.0006). But, the increment was not enough to dictate establishment of separated RIs. Our finding is in contradiction with a previous study that reported no association in between maternal parity and maternal electrolyte levels [18]. Thus, we recommend further investigation concerning the impact of parity on fetal electrolytes levels particularly of Cl- levels.

In our study, we did not found any effect imposed by maternal and infantile factors on the three electrolyte levels in infants.

Conclusion

From this study, we can conclude that combined RIs are suggested for the interpretation of electrolyte values in newborns and infants without taking the effect of maternal, neonatal and infantile factors into account. Moreover, the RIs were different from previously reported values for other target population of similar age group, kit insert values and adult values. Hence, it will be better to apply such RIs for the interpretation of electrolyte values in Ethiopian pediatric population.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Addis Ababa University for the financial support, Mesroy international plc and International clinical laboratories for their reagent and sample collection material supply, and Medcalc Software Company for their support in providing us statistical software for free.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Arbaminch University
(2)
Faculty of Medicine, Addis Ababa University
(3)
Ethiopian Health and Nutrition Research Institute

References

  1. Melkie M, Yigeremu M, Nigussie P, Asrat S, Gebreegziabher T, Teka T, Kinde S: Robust reference intervals for Liver function test (LFT) analytes in newborns and infants. BMC Res Notes. 2012, 5: 493-10.1186/1756-0500-5-493.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Memon Y, Majeed R, Ghani MH, Shaikh S: Serum electrolytes changes in malnourished children with diarrhea. Pakistan J Med Sci. 2007, 23 (5): 760-764.Google Scholar
  3. Shah GS, Das BK, Kumar S, Singh MK, Bhandari GP: Electrolyte Disturbances in Diarrhea. Pediatric Oncall [serial online] 2006 [cited 2006 November 1]. Available from: http://www.pediatriconcall.com/fordoctor/Medical_original_articles/electrolyte_disturbances_diarrhea.asp accessed on May 1, 2010
  4. Shaoul R, Okev N, Tamir A, Lanir A, Jaffe M: Value of laboratory studies in assessment of dehydration in children. Ann Clin Biochem. 2004, 41: 192-196. 10.1258/000456304323019541.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Singhi S, Prasad SVSS, Chugh KS: Hyponatremia in Sick Children: A Marker of Serious Illness. Indian Pediatr. 1994, 31: 19-25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Perkin RM, Novotny WE, Harris GD, Fiordalisi I: Pediatric Emergency Medicine Reports. Common electrolyte problems in pediatric patients presenting to the ED. 2001, available on line at http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-80305262.html, accessed on May 3, 2010Google Scholar
  7. Singhi S, Marudkar A: Hypokalemia in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Indian Pediatr. 1996, 33: 9-14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Singhi S, Gulati S, Prasad SVSS: Frequency and Significance of Potassium Disturbances in Sick Children. Indian Pediatr. 1994, 31: 460-463.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Subba Rao SD, Thoma B: Electrolyte Abnormality in Children Admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Indian Pediatr. 2000, 37: 1348-1353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Guidelines on Paediatric Parenteral Nutrition: Fluid and Electrolytes (Na, Cl and K). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005, 41 (S2): S33-S38.Google Scholar
  11. Chawla D, Agarwal R, Deorari A, Paul VK: AIIMS- NICU protocols: Fluid and electrolyte management in term and preterm neonates. 2008Google Scholar
  12. Gómez P, Coca C, Vargas C, Acebillo J, Martinez A: Normal Reference-Intervals for 20 Biochemical Variables in Healthy Infants, Children, and Adolescents. Clin Chem. 1984, 30 (3): 407-412.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Perkins SL, Livesey JF, Beicher J: Reference Intervals for 21 Clinical Chemistry Analytes in Arterial and Venous Umbilical Cord Blood. Clin Chem. 1993, 39 (6): 1041-1044.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Soldin SJ, Brugnara C, Hicks JM: Pediatric reference ranges. 1999, Washington, DC: AACC Press, 3Google Scholar
  15. Hay WW, Hayward AR, Levin MJ, Sondheimer JM: Current pediatric diagnosis and treatment. 2000, New York: Lange Medical Books/McGraw Hill, 15Google Scholar
  16. Medical Instruments: AVL 9120, 9130, 9140, 9180, 9181 Electrolyte Analyzers Service Manual. 1997, USA: AVL Scientific Corporation, TenGoogle Scholar
  17. Karita E, Ketter N, Price MA, Kayitenkore K, Kaleebu P, Nanvubya A, Anzala O, Jaoko W, Mutua G, Ruzagira E, Mulenga J, Sanders EJ, Mwangome M, Allen S, Bwanika A, Bahemuka U, Awuondo K, Omosa G, Farah B, Amornkul P, Birungi J, Yates S, Stoll-Johnson L, Gilmour J, Stevens G, Shutes E, Manigart O, Hughes P, Dally L, Scott J, Stevens W, Fast P, Kamali A: CLSI-Derived Hematology and Biochemistry Reference Intervals for Healthy Adults in Eastern and Southern Africa. PLoS One. 2009, 4 (2): e4401-10.1371/journal.pone.0004401.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Obembe AO, Antai AB: Effect of multiparity on electrolyte composition and blood pressure. Niger J Physiol Sci. 2008, 23 (1–2): 19-22.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Melkie et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.