Open Access

Identification of the likely translational start of Mycobacterium tuberculosis GyrB

  • Shantanu Karkare1, 3,
  • Amanda C Brown2, 4,
  • Tanya Parish2 and
  • Anthony Maxwell1Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Research Notes20136:274

DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-274

Received: 14 February 2013

Accepted: 8 July 2013

Published: 15 July 2013



Bacterial DNA gyrase is a validated target for antibacterial chemotherapy. It consists of two subunits, GyrA and GyrB, which form an A2B2 complex in the active enzyme. Sequence alignment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis GyrB with other bacterial GyrBs predicts the presence of 40 potential additional amino acids at the GyrB N-terminus. There are discrepancies between the M. tuberculosis GyrB sequences retrieved from different databases, including sequences annotated with or without the additional 40 amino acids. This has resulted in differences in the GyrB sequence numbering that has led to the reporting of previously known fluoroquinolone-resistance mutations as novel mutations.


We have expressed M. tuberculosis GyrB with and without the extra 40 amino acids in Escherichia coli and shown that both can be produced as soluble, active proteins. Supercoiling and other assays of the two proteins show no differences, suggesting that the additional 40 amino acids have no effect on the enzyme in vitro. RT-PCR analysis of M. tuberculosis mRNA shows that transcripts that could yield both the longer and shorter protein are present. However, promoter analysis showed that only the promoter elements leading to the shorter GyrB (lacking the additional 40 amino acids) had significant activity.


We conclude that the most probable translational start codon for M. tuberculosis GyrB is GTG (Val) which results in translation of a protein of 674 amino acids (74 kDa).


Gyrase Topoisomerase Mycobacterium tuberculosis



Bacterial DNA gyrase is a validated target for antibacterial chemotherapy [1]. It is a member of the DNA topoisomerase family of enzymes, which are responsible for maintaining and manipulating the topological state of DNA [2, 3]. These enzymes are required for vital processes such as DNA replication, transcription, recombination and chromatin remodelling. Topoisomerases can be classified into two types, I and II, dependent on whether their reactions involve transient cleavage of one (I) or both (II) strands of DNA. Due to the important role played by topoisomerases in maintaining cell viability, they are attractive clinical targets for chemotherapeutics [1, 4, 5].

DNA gyrase is a type II topoisomerase that consists of two subunits, GyrA and GyrB, which form an A2B2 complex in the active enzyme [1, 6]. Gyrase introduces negative supercoils into DNA, in addition to catalysing relaxation and decatenation. The supercoiling and decatenation reactions require ATP hydrolysis, which occurs in the GyrB subunits. The absence of gyrase in most eukaryotes and its essentiality in bacteria have made it an ideal target for antimicrobial agents [1].

Tuberculosis (TB) is the world’s most deadly bacterial disease with around a third of the world’s population infected and over 1 million deaths every year [7]. Although treatments are available, drug-resistant strains, MDR (multi-drug resistant) and XDR (extensively drug resistant) TB, pose serious problems. Moxifloxacin, a fluoroquinolone that targets DNA gyrase, has been successfully used against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, particularly MDR strains [8]. The search for new anti-TB agents involves the further exploitation of M. tuberculosis gyrase as a target for TB therapy and a need to achieve a greater understanding of this enzyme.

Most of our current information about gyrase concerns the enzyme from Escherichia coli, a Gram-negative bacterium, with limited information about gyrase from M. tuberculosis[9], which is generally described as a Gram-positive bacterium. In M. tuberculosis the two genes encoding DNA gyrase, gyrB and gyrA, are located adjacent to each other, and although there is a separate promoter for gyrA (PA), the primary transcript appears to be dicistronic [10]. Analysis of the region upstream of gyrB suggests there are multiple promoters, but it appears that most of the transcripts originate from PB1 with the others potentially involved in the fine-tuning of transcription [10].

There are significant discrepancies in the M. tuberculosis GyrB sequences retrieved from different databases. For example, in the case of NCBI code CAB02426 for M. tuberculosis H37Rv GyrB, 40 additional amino acids are present in the sequence starting with amino acids MGKNEARRSA. While the same protein cross-referenced in UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot as P0C5C5 lacks these additional amino acids; it is 674 amino acids and starts with the amino acid sequence: MAAQKKKAQD. This is not uniform across UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot as in other M. tuberculosis strains, such as M. tuberculosis T92, the GyrB sequence (UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot: D5XPA3) also has the 40 additional amino acids and starts with MGKNEARRSA. Similarly, in the case of M. bovis AF2122/97 both the NCBI (CAD92867) and UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q7U312) databases indicate the presence of an additional 40 amino acids at the GyrB N-terminus. Re-annotation of the M. tuberculosis H37Rv gene sequence [11] suggested that GyrB is a protein of 714 amino acids and MW 78.4 kDa, These various discrepancies in GyrB sequence annotation have led to differences in sequence numbering, which in turn has resulted in the reporting of previously known fluoroquinolone resistance mutations as novel mutations [12].

In this paper we investigate the start codon for M. tuberculosis GyrB sequence by promoter and transcript analysis, and studies on the expressed protein.

Materials and methods

Preparation and purification of proteins

M. tuberculosis gyrB sequences were amplified from M. tuberculosis genomic DNA and cloned into TOPO® cloning vectors followed by sub-cloning into pET20 using the ClonableTM Ligation kit (Novagen). Expression and purification of the GyrB and GyrA proteins were as previously described [13].

Enzyme assays

M. tuberculosis DNA gyrase assays (supercoiling, relaxation and decatenation) were performed as described previously [13]. Peptide mass fingerprinting and mass spectrometry analyses were carried out by Gerhard Saalbach (John Innes Centre Proteomics Shared Facility).


Total RNA was extracted from standing cultures of M. tuberculosis H37Rv, as previously described [14], and DNase treated prior to cDNA synthesis [15]. cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using SuperScript II RT (Invitrogen) and random primers (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions; an RT-minus control for each sample was also included and processed in tandem. To identify which transcripts were present, four forward primers were designed: F1 (5′-CAC GGC GCG GTT AGA TGG GTA A-3’), which binds near the start of the region corresponding to the additional 40 amino acids at nucleotide positions 5109–5130 [16]; F2 (5′-TGG GTA AAA ACG AGG CCA GAA GAT C-3′) corresponds to the start of the region encoding the additional 40 amino acids at positions 5124–5148; F3 (5′-CGA CTC AAC CGC ATG CAC GCA-3′), which corresponds to the middle of the region comprising the 40 amino acids at position 5195–5215; F4 (5′-CCA GAA AAA GAA GGC CCA AG-3′), which corresponds to 5 nucleotides after the end of the 40 amino acids at positions 5248–5267; these were used in combination with a single reverse primer R (5′-ATA ACC GGC CAT CGC CTC GT-3′), as shown in Figure 1A. RT-PCR reaction mixes contained GoTaq PCR Mastermix (Promega), 10 pmol forward primer, 10 pmol reverse primer R, and 100 ng cDNA. Cycling conditions were: 25 cycles of 94°C for 30“, 56°C for 30”, and 72°C for 1’, followed by 72°C for 5’ final extension. The amplified products were run on a 1% agarose gel and visualized with ethidium bromide staining.
Figure 1

Identification of mRNA transcripts for M. tuberculosis gyrB . (A) Schematic showing the position of primers (F1, F2, F3, F4, and R) used for RT-PCR. (B) Products from RT-PCR reactions were analysed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Left primers used are indicated above the lanes and correspond to Figure 1A; M – markers (1 kb ladder); cDNA+RT: plus reverse transcriptase; cDNA-RT: no reverse transcriptase; gDNA: genomic DNA; blank: no template control.

Promoter analysis

Primer pairs Met-F: 5′-AGT ACT CAC GTC GAT CGG CCC AGA ACA AGG CGC- 3′ and Met-R: 5′-CCC GGG CAT CTA ACC GCG CCG TGC-3′ or Val-F: 5′-AGT ACT CAC GTC GAT CGG CCC AGA ACA AGG CGC-3′ and Val-R: 5′-CCC GGG CAC GAT CCG AAT ACT CTC CTC AGG G-3′ were used to amplify the upstream regions. The thermocycler program used was: 2 min denaturation at 94°C, 25 cycles of 94°C for 15’, 55°C for 1’, and 72°C for 2’, with a final extension at 72°C for 10’. PCR products were cloned into the pGEM-T easy vector (Promega), sequence verified, and sub-cloned as Sca I fragments into pSM128 [17] to construct the plasmids, which were called: pSM128-Met, carrying 128 bp upstream of the predicted transcriptional start site (nucleotides 4998–5125, ending with Met); and pSM128-Val (4998–5242) carrying a larger 245 bp upstream region ending with Val (GTG). Plasmids were introduced into M. tuberculosis H37Rv by electroporation and selected on streptomycin. Three individual transformants were inoculated into 10 ml of standing cultures (7H9-Tw medium Middlebrook 7H9 liquid medium supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) OADC (oleic acid, bovine serum albumin, d-glucose, catalase; Becton Dickinson) and 0.05% (wt/vol) Tween 80). Cell-free extracts were prepared and β-galactosidase assays were performed, as previously described [18].


Sequence alignment of M. tuberculosis GyrB

As established previously [12] there have been several numbering systems reported for M. tuberculosis GyrB, which has led to considerable confusion in relation to the location of quinolone-resistance mutations. Figure 2 shows a sequence alignment of M. tuberculosis GyrB with other bacterial GyrBs, highlighting a stretch of 40 amino acids at the N-terminus, the presence of which has contributed to the confusion in amino acid numbering. We set out to establish the significance of these additional amino acids and whether the protein produced in M. tuberculosis includes this sequence.
Figure 2

Multiple sequence alignment of bacterial GyrBs. Amino acid sequence alignment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis GyrB (NCBI sequence) with other bacterial GyrBs using ClustalW 1.83 [19]. S. coelicolor = Streptomyces coelicolor; St. aureus = Staphylococcus aureus; B. subtilis = Bacillus subtilis; Bo. burgdorferi = Borrelia burgdorferi; C. jejuni = Campylobacter jejuni; N. gonorrhoeae = Neisseria gonorrhoeae; E. coli = Escherichia coli.

Enzyme activity of GyrBs with and without the additional 40 amino acids

Expression plasmids (based on pET20) were constructed for production of GyrBs with and without the additional 40 amino acids, and the resulting proteins were purified by affinity chromatography and by gel filtration. The presence of the additional 40 amino acids in the longer GyrB was verified by peptide mass fingerprinting and mass spectrometry analysis (data not shown).

The two GyrB proteins were complexed with M. tuberculosis GyrA and the supercoiling, relaxation and decatenation activities were measured as previously described [13]. We found that there was no significant effect of the additional amino acids on these activities, for example the supercoiling activities of the two enzymes are nearly identical (Additional file 1: Figure S1), and no effect on the sensitivity of the enzyme to novobiocin (data not shown); the binding site for novobiocin lies in the N-terminal domain of GyrB [1]. This strongly suggests, in vitro at least, that the additional 40 amino acids are of no functional significance.

Identification of the M. tuberculosis gyrB transcript

We wanted to determine whether GyrB was produced as the longer or shorter protein; as a first step we analysed the transcripts. RT-PCR was performed to determine which GyrB mRNA transcripts are produced in M. tuberculosis under normal aerobic growth. Primers were designed to distinguish between longer and shorter transcripts which could encode for longer or shorter proteins respectively (Figure 1A). As shown in Figure 1B, PCR products were obtained with all primer sets (F1, F2, F3, F4) indicating that mRNA was being produced that could potentially encode the longer protein. The identity of the products obtained was confirmed by sequencing. This RT-PCR experiment indicates that the nucleotide sequence that could encode the 40 amino acids is transcribed.

Promoter analysis

From the enzyme activity assays above it appears that the additional 40 amino acids at the N-terminus of GyrB have no functional significance, but the mRNA analysis suggests the possibility that there are RNA species that can encode these 40 amino acids. In order to identify the translational start site, we analysed expression of the LacZ reporter gene in M. tuberculosis. Two plasmids were tested for activity: pSM128-Met contained the region upstream of the additional 40 amino acids terminating at ATG (5125), and pSM128-Val carrying the region upstream of the shorter GyrB terminating at GTG (5242) (Figure 3). Plasmid pSM128-Met showed no significant promoter activity (Figure 3B), while pSM128-Val demonstrated high level promoter activity (740 MU ± 63). (A comparable series of experiments involving the introduction of these plasmids into M. smegmatis gave very similar results; data not shown). These data suggest that, under these growth conditions, the expression of GyrB is from a promoter located upstream of the valine start codon and that the shorter protein is produced, i.e. without the additional 40 amino acids.
Figure 3

Promoter activity determined in M. tuberculosis . (A) Upstream regions of GyrB ending in Met and Val were cloned into pSM128 to give pSM128-Met and pSM128-Val respectively. (B) M. tuberculosis recombinants were grown as described in Materials and Methods, and β-galactosidase activity measured. Transformants were obtained for pSM128 (empty vector control); pSM128-Val (containing M. tuberculosis nucleotides 4998–5125, upstream of the ORF for GyrB) and pSM128-Met (containing nucleotides 4998–5242). Data are mean +/- standard deviation from three independent transformants tested in duplicate. (C) M. tuberculosis genome sequence 4981–5280 that includes the start of gyrB and its upstream sequence. The predicted ribosome binding site is in bold and underlined; the predicted promoter elements are in bold; the gyrB coding sequence is in italics with the Val start codon underlined. The annotations are consistent with earlier work [10].


Sequence alignments of GyrBs from different bacterial species suggest that 40 additional amino acids could potentially be present at the M. tuberculosis GyrB N-terminus (Figure 2). In order to study the effect of these 40 amino acids on enzyme activity, we expressed and purified GyrB proteins in which the 40 amino acids were present or absent and found that there is no apparent effect of the additional amino acids on gyrase activity, as judged by supercoiling, relaxation and decatenation assays in vitro.

RT-PCR experiments were performed, which showed that the RNA sequence corresponding to the additional 40 amino acids at the GyrB N-terminus is present at the transcript level (Figure 1). However, promoter assays (Figure 3B) showed that only the shorter GyrB would be expressed at a significant level in vivo. These experiments suggest that the promoter elements are present in the region corresponding to the predicted 40 amino acids at the GyrB N-terminus (Figure 3C). The presence of transcripts containing the 40 amino acid region indicates possible post-transcriptional events occurring before the mature GyrB is formed.


Taken together our results support M. tuberculosis GyrB being a protein of 74,058.7 Da (674 amino acids) that begins with the codon GTG (Val) at position 5240–5242 in the M. tuberculosis genome sequence [16]. A recent paper also supports this conclusion [12].




This work was supported by an EST early stage research scholarship, EU FP7 (to SK) and by grant BB/J004561/1 from BBSRC and the John Innes Foundation to AM, and by European Union Project LSHP-CT-2005-018923. We thank Fred Collin for comments on the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Biological Chemistry, John Innes Centre Norwich Research Park
Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London
Novartis Institute of Biomedical Research
Oxford Gene Technology, Begbroke Science Park, Begbroke Hill


  1. Collin F, Karkare S, Maxwell A: Exploiting bacterial DNA gyrase as a drug target: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011, 92 (3): 479-497. 10.1007/s00253-011-3557-z.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates AD, Maxwell A: DNA Topology. 2005, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Schoeffler AJ, Berger JM: DNA topoisomerases: harnessing and constraining energy to govern chromosome topology. Q Rev Biophys. 2008, 41 (1): 41-101.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Pommier Y, Leo E, Zhang H, Marchand C: DNA topoisomerases and their poisoning by anticancer and antibacterial drugs. Chem Biol. 2010, 17 (5): 421-433. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.04.012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Tse-Dinh YC: Exploring DNA topoisomerases as targets of novel therapeutic agents in the treatment of infectious diseases. Infect Disord Drug Targets. 2007, 7 (1): 3-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Nollmann M, Crisona NJ, Arimondo PB: Thirty years of Escherichia coli DNA gyrase: from in vivo function to single-molecule mechanism. Biochimie. 2007, 89 (4): 490-499. 10.1016/j.biochi.2007.02.012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Young D, Stark J, Kirschner D: Systems biology of persistent infection: tuberculosis as a case study. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008, 6 (7): 520-528. 10.1038/nrmicro1919.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Takiff H, Guerrero E: Current prospects for the fluoroquinolones as first-line tuberculosis therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011, 55 (12): 5421-5429. 10.1128/AAC.00695-11.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Aubry A, Fisher LM, Jarlier V, Cambau E: First functional characterization of a singly expressed bacterial type II topoisomerase: the enzyme from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006, 348 (1): 158-165. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.07.017.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Unniraman S, Chatterji M, Nagaraja V: DNA gyrase genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a single operon driven by multiple promoters. J Bacteriol. 2002, 184 (19): 5449-5456. 10.1128/JB.184.19.5449-5456.2002.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Camus JC, Pryor MJ, Medigue C, Cole ST: Re-annotation of the genome sequence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. Microbiology. 2002, 148 (Pt 10): 2967-2973.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Maruri F, Sterling TR, Kaiga AW, Blackman A, van der Heijden YF, Mayer C, Cambau E, Aubry A: A systematic review of gyrase mutations associated with fluoroquinolone-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis and a proposed gyrase numbering system. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012, 67 (4): 819-831. 10.1093/jac/dkr566.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Karkare S, Yousafzai F, Mitchenall LA, Maxwell A: The role of Ca2+ in the activity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA gyrase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40 (19): 9774-9787. 10.1093/nar/gks704.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Rustad TR, Harrell MI, Liao R, Sherman DR: The enduring hypoxic response of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2008, 3 (1): e1502-10.1371/journal.pone.0001502.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown AC, Eberl M, Crick DC, Jomaa H, Parish T: The nonmevalonate pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is essential and transcriptionally regulated by Dxs. J Bacteriol. 2010, 192 (9): 2424-2433. 10.1128/JB.01402-09.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Cole ST, Brosch R, Parkhill J, Garnier T, Churcher C, Harris D, Gordon SV, Eiglmeier K, Gas S, Barry CE, et al: Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature. 1998, 393 (6685): 537-544. 10.1038/31159.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Dussurget O, Timm J, Gomez M, Gold B, Yu S, Sabol SZ, Holmes RK, Jacobs WR, Smith I: Transcriptional control of the iron-responsivefxbA gene by the mycobacterial regulator IdeR. J Bacteriol. 1999, 181 (11): 3402-3408.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Carroll P, James J: Assaying promoter activity using LacZ and GFP as reporters. Methods Mol Biol. 2009, 465: 265-277. 10.1007/978-1-59745-207-6_18.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, et al: Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007, 23 (21): 2947-2948. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Karkare et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.