A new double right border binary vector for producing marker-free transgenic plants
© Matheka et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 6 May 2013
Accepted: 5 November 2013
Published: 8 November 2013
Once a transgenic plant is developed, the selectable marker gene (SMG) becomes unnecessary in the plant. In fact, the continued presence of the SMG in the transgenic plant may cause unexpected pleiotropic effects as well as environmental or biosafety issues. Several methods for removal of SMGs that have been reported remain inaccessible due to protection by patents, while development of new ones is expensive and cost prohibitive. Here, we describe the development of a new vector for producing marker-free plants by simply adapting an ordinary binary vector to the double right border (DRB) vector design using conventional cloning procedures.
We developed the DRB vector pMarkfree5.0 by placing the bar gene (representing genes of interest) between two copies of T-DNA right border sequences. The β-glucuronidase (gus) and nptII genes (representing the selectable marker gene) were cloned next followed by one copy of the left border sequence. When tested in a model species (tobacco), this vector system enabled the generation of 55.6% kanamycin-resistant plants by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. The frequency of cotransformation of the nptII and bar transgenes using the vector was 66.7%. Using the leaf bleach and Basta assays, we confirmed that the nptII and bar transgenes were coexpressed and segregated independently in the transgenic plants. This enable separation of the transgenes in plants cotransformed using pMarkfree5.0.
The results suggest that the DRB system developed here is a practical and effective approach for separation of gene(s) of interest from a SMG and production of SMG-free plants. Therefore this system could be instrumental in production of “clean” plants containing genes of agronomic importance.
KeywordsCotransformation Double right border Selectable marker gene free Removal of SMG
Removal of selectable marker genes (SMGs) from transgenic plants is increasingly becoming an important objective for the plant biotechnology research community and is viewed as a good laboratory practice. Elimination of SMGs from transgenic plants can be beneficial for the following reasons: (1) it enables the reuse of the selectable marker for identification of transformants during retransformation of a transgenic plant with a gene for the same or a different trait. (2) It allows greater probability of acceptance of transgenic plants by consumers. (3) It obviates the need to assess the SMG in the transgenic plant for environmental or toxicological safety in compliance with regulatory requirements .
Different techniques for elimination of selectable marker genes have been developed including some based on site-specific recombination  and transposition . However, cotransformation stands out as a conceptually simple and cheap system to develop. Cotransformation involves introduction of a gene of interest (GOI) and SMG, harboured between separate T-DNA regions, into the plant cells. If the two transgenes integrate in unlinked genomic loci, they can be separated from each other in subsequent generation of the cotransformants through genetic segregation. Cotransformation of plants with a GOI and SMG has been achieved successfully by particle bombardment or by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. With particle bombardment-mediated cotransformation, the transgenes are integrated in the genome in a complex manner and rarely segregate . However cotransformation mediated by Agrobacterium has the advantage of being capable of efficiently segregating transgenes due to the ability to integrate transgenes in a simple pattern and in few copies.
There are three main approaches used in the development of Agrobacterium based cotransformation systems. The most popular approach is to construct two T-DNA regions, one having the GOI and the other the SMG, on one binary vector. When introduced into Agrobacterium, this binary vector has exhibited high efficiency in generation of SMG-free plants very effectively [5–12]. The other common approach involves cloning the two T-DNA regions on separate binary vectors and inserting them in either one [5, 13–16] or two [5, 9, 17–19]A. tumefaciens cells for use in plant transformation.
A recently developed cotransformation technique is the DRB binary vector system. This vector is a single T-DNA plasmid in which an extra copy of the RB sequence is cloned between the SMG and the GOI . The general design of the DRB vector is LB-GOI-RB2-SMG-RB1. This implies that two distinct inserts may be independently transferred and integrated into the plant genome, starting either from RB1 to LB, or RB2 to LB. There exists a high possibility of a RB1 to RB2 insertion, which may significantly reduce or prevent generation of marker-free plants. Once integrated into the plant genome at unlinked locations, the second insert (RB2 to LB) which carries the GOI only can be selected for in progenies of cotransformants, while plants having the RB1 to RB2 insertion are eliminated. This DRB vector system was demonstrated to result in high cotransformation, coexpression and segregation of two transgenes in rice plants [20–22].
Over the past few years, different techniques for removal of SMGs have been developed. However, many remain inaccessible because they are protected by patents [23–26]. In addition, development of marker-removal techniques is cost prohibitive and difficult due to the large size and complexity of the vector systems. On the other hand, cotransformation vectors are, in concept, simple to develop. Most require adapting available binary vectors to the desired cotransformation vector design. Here, we report the development of a new pilot DRB vector pMarkfree5.0. It contains a selectable maker gene between RB1 and RB2. The nptII and gus gene were placed between RB2 and the LB and can be replaced with any gene(s) of interest. This binary vector was introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 which was used for leaf disc transformation. In addition, we report the efficient cotransfer and coexpression of transgenes contained in the different T-DNA regions in primary transformants. We also report identification of plants free of the T-DNA region containing the selectable marker gene.
Frequency of regeneration of plants from tobacco explants putatively transformed with pMarkfree5.0 and cultured on medium containing kanamycin (100 mg/L)
Total number of explants
Number of regenerating explants
Expression of gus gene was assessed in leaf tissues obtained from plant establishing in the glasshouse (Figure 2C) to help in rapid identification of transgenic plants. A total of 73 Kanamycin-resistant plants were screened using the histochemical assay. Figure 2D shows the gus staining results for a few of the regenerated T0 plants. Accumulation of the blue stain was observed in 47.95% (35/73) of the tested kanamycin resistant T0 plants. Although nptII/gus transgene was detected in 60 primary transformants by PCR, 35 of the T0 plants was the gus gene activity detectable. This phenomenon whereby a big proportion of transgenic plants possessing the gus transgene don’t show any gus activity by Histochemical staining has been reported elsewhere . Truncation of Agrobacterium T-DNA region during integration in the plant genome has been used to explain this observation. We positioned the gus gene expression cassette closest to the T-DNA LB of pMarkfree5.0. This may have exposed it to truncation which occurs mostly at the LB .
Functional analysis of bar and nptII genes in transformed T0 plants
Number of plants assayed
Number of tolerant plants
Basta leaf paint
Kanamycin/paromomycin Leaf bleach
Using the Kanamycin leaf bleach assay, over 94% of the primary regenerants showed no bleached spots on their leaves and were therefore kanamycin resistant (Table 2). Resistance to Kanamycin is an indication of the presence of an active nptII gene. Two primary transformed lines (TV2 and TAA1) had bleached spots on their leaves indicating Kanamycin sensitivity and implying absence of an active nptII gene. These two lines were confirmed negative for the presence of the nptII gene by the multiplex PCR analysis. These non-resistant plants were possibly escapes, transgenic-chimeras or could not express enough NPTII protein in their leaves to confer resistance. On the basis of the leaf bleach assay the frequency of transformation of tobacco with the nptII gene using the DRB pMarkfree5.0 vector was found to be 94.12%. Similar frequencies have been reported for transformation of tobacco using vectors that contain only one T-DNA region. For example a TF of 85% (Komari et al., 1996) was reported for vector pGA482. This indicates that the DRB vector is efficient in delivering transgenes into the plant genome.
Segregation of Basta and kanamycin resistance in T1 plants derived from cotransformed plants
Number of T1 plants assessed by Basta leaf painting
Number of T1 plants analysed by paromomycin Leaf bleach assay
Number of T1 plants
Frequency of generation of marker-free plants
Our results indicate that the frequency of removal of marker gene from transgenic T1 plants was between 0 and 40%. Similarly, Hong-Yan et al. (2003), using a DRB system, observed that 19.5% of T1 plants derived from tobacco plants cotransformed with nptII and bar transgenes were free of the nptII gene. Therefore recovery of SMF T1 plants from T0 plants cotransformed using pmarkfree5.0 is highly efficient.
PCR analyses also revealed that all T1 progeny plants derived from line TD56 were either negative or positive for both the bar and nptII T-DNA insertions. This indicates absence of genetic separation between the bar and nptII T-DNAs regions. This means that the integration of the two T-DNA regions was in the same genomic location in the cotransformants making the two inserts segregate together. Therefore no marker-free progeny plants were produced by the parental line TD56.
Successful genetic separation of two T-DNA is dependent on various factors. One of the most important factor seems to be strain of A. tumefaciens used to deliver the multiple T-DNAs. Nopaline-derived A. tumefaciens strains may favour insertion of multiple T-DNA in linked genomic loci. Initially, when two distinct T-DNAs were separately inserted in two nopaline-derived Agrobacterium, marker-free Arabidopsis thaliana or Brassica napus were produced at a very low frequency [28–30]. Recently, the frequency of generation of maker-free plants increased when the same strain (EHA101) or its derivative (EHA105) was used in combination with a two T-DNA vector [8, 12]. This implies that differences in the plant species and strain/vector used could alter genetic linkage relationship.
Currently cotransformation systems are mainly based on octopine-derived Agrobacterium strains possibly because they may favour unlinked transfer of independent T-DNAs . Among the octopine-derived Agrobacterium strains, LBA4404 is the most popular. Using this strain high efficiencies of marker-free plants have been obtained from different species including barley [5, 10], maize [9, 31], rice  and tobacco [11, 15, 17–19]. Apart from the Agrobacterium strain used, the type of the T-DNA borders regions on the cotransformation vector may affect unlinked transfer of multiple T-DNAs.
We have developed a new DRB binary vector, pMarkfree3.0 and inserted the gus and nptII genes to create the model vector pMarkfree5.0. Using the model vector we have demonstrated the functionality of the new system in that: 1) we have generated over 70 independent transgenic tobacco plants. 2) Over 66% of our transgenic plants contained two transgenes (nptII and bar) originating from different T-DNA regions. Over 89% of these plants co-expressed the two genes. 3) The transgenes in 50% of the plants were inherited as Mendelian traits, making it possible to recover marker-free plants through segregation. This demonstrates that the newly developed DRB system is an effective way to remove undesirable genes from the plant genome. In ongoing research projects at the Plant Transformation Laboratory, Kenyatta University, genes of agronomic interest including those conferring tolerance to drought are being inserted into pMarkfree3.0 for transformation of crops such as maize and sweetpotato. We are also developing and using two T-DNA binary vectors that, in principle and design, are similar to the pMarkfree3.0 to engineer maize for enhanced tolerance to drought.
Construction of DRB binary vectors
The DRB vectors were constructed in the backbone of the binary vector pSCV1.6 . The pSCV1.6 plasmid was digested with Hind III to delete the gus and npt II gene cassettes from the T-DNA region. The resultant vector (pSCV∆NPTIIGUS) was then self-ligated using T4 DNA ligase. The T-DNA region of the plasmid pSCV∆NPTIIGUS was amplified and subcloned into the Not I/Cla I sites of pBluescript(SK-) (Stratagene, Cambridge, UK) to produce the new vector pBlu2SK::EmptyTDNA. PTF101.1  was digested by Bgl II and Hind III to excise the P35SBar fragment. The fragment was then ligated with pBlu2SK::EmptyTDNA vector pre-digested with Bgl II and Hind III to produce the new vector pBluTDNA::P35SBar. PBluTDNA::P35SBar was digested by Bgl II and purified. Purified DNA was end-filled using DNA polymerase I, large (klenow) fragment. The blunted DNA was dephosphorylated with Alkaline phosphatase, calf intestinal (CIP). CIP’d DNA was ligated with a T35S termination sequence amplified by PCR on pXBb7-SI-UBIL plasmid . Ligation mixture was then used to transform competent E. coli cells. DNA extracted from selected colonies was screened using a vector-specific and an insert-specific primer to ascertain the orientation of the T35S insert. The vector with the correct T35S insertion was named pBluBarTDNA. PSCV∆NPTIIGUS vector, digested with Xho I, was end-filled and CIP’d. The bar expression cassette flanked by a copy of the right border sequence was removed from pBlubarTDNA as an Asc I/Hind III fragment. The fragment was end-filled and ligated onto the CIP’d and blunted pSCV∆NPTIIGUS vector. Ligation products were transformed into competent E. coli cells. DNA from emerging colonies were screened by digesting with Kpn I to determine the orientation of the fragment inserted in the pSCV∆NPTIIGUS vector. The correct vector was named pMarkerfree3 and underwent sequencing to confirm the directionality of the T-DNA border sequences. The Sal I/Bgl I fragment haboring the gus and npt II gene cassettes was removed from pSCV1.6 and end-filled. The fragment was then subcloned into pMarkfree3 predigested with Hind III to produce pMarkfree5.0. PMarkfree5.0 was mobilized into the A. tumefaciens strain LBA4404  using the freeze thaw technique . The new Agrobacterium strain was cultured on yeast extract-mannitol (YM) medium  containing rifampicin (1 mg L-1) and kanamycin (50 mg L-1).
Transformation of tobacco with pMarkfree5
Leaf discs of Nicotiana tabacum were transformed using the cocultivation method . Transformed shoots were regenerated on MS medium  containing B5 vitamins . The medium also contained 100 mg/l kanamycin for transgenic plant selection and 200 mg/l timentin for suppression of A. tumefaciens growth. Regenerated shoots were separated from leaf tissues and were rooted on hormone-free MS basal medium containing 3% sucrose and 200 mg/l timentin. Plants were maintained in culture at a 16 h/8 h light/dark photoperiod at 27°C. Rooted shoots were transfered to soil for seed set.
Screening of tobacco cotransformants by multiplex PCR
Genomic DNA was extracted from tobacco leaf tissues using the CTAB method . 250–20 ng of the DNA was used in PCR to detect the presence of bar and nptII genes. Each 50 ul reaction contained 1X PCR reaction buffer containing 3 mM MgSO4, 0.5 μM each primer, 1 mM of dNTP mixture and 2U Taq DNA polymerase. The primers used for amplification of the bar gene were Bar-fwd: 5’ gatctcggtgacgggcagga 3’ and Bar-rev: 5’ ggtcaacttccgtaccgagc 3’. Primers for amplification of npII gene were NPTII-forward: 5’ ggattgcacgcaggttctc 3’, NPTII-reverse: 5’ ctcttcagcaatatcacgggt 3’. The PCR profile involved initial denaturation at 94°C for 10 minutes, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 3 minute, annealing at 63°C for 1 minute and extension at 72°C for 1 minute with a final extention at 72°C for 8 min. Amplicons were visualised in a 1.5% agarose gel and results documented using a digital camera.
Basta leaf paint assay
To assess functionality of the bar gene, Basta® leaf paint assay  was applied on cotransformed plants. The plants were swabbed with Basta (0.02%) applied using a piece of cotton wool to a small section of a tobacco leaf. The section of leaf to be painted with Basta was first marked using a permanent marker pen. After seven days, putative transgenic tobacco plants were scored for response to the applied herbicide. Plants that showed no leaf damage were classified as Basta resistant (BR) while those that were damaged were classified as Basta sensitive (BS).
Leaf bleach and histochemical assays
The leaf bleach assay was performed on plants growing in soil to identify those containing a functional nptII gene. The assay was performed by applying assay solution containing paromomycin (Duchefa Biochemie B.V., Haarlem, The Netherlands) and kanamycin (Phytotechnology) each at 1,000 mg/l and 0.06% of Silwet L-77 (Lehle Seeds, Texas, USA) on a small section of a leaf using a piece of cotton wool. Results were recorded on the 7th day post application. Plants that showed no bleaching were categorized as kanamycin resistant (KmR) while those that bleached were categorized as kanamycin sensitive (KmS). Histochemical assay for β-glucuronidase (GUS) activity were performed on leaf tissues as described previously .
Phenotypic and molecular assays of T1 seedlings
To identify cotransformed lines that were segregating the bar gene, T1 seedlings were screened for resistance to PPT. About 100 T1 seeds were sown on MS medium containing 10 mg/l PPT. 14 days later, survival of tobacco seedlings to PPT was examined. Plants that were green and growing vigorously were categorized as PPT-resistant (PPTR) while those that were small and bleached were classified as PPT-sensitive (PPTS).
To identify plant free of the bar gene, T0 events with single-copy of bar gene were selected for T1 segregation analysis. T1 seedlings were germinated on MS medium and transplanted to soil. Once established, the plants were assayed for resistance to Basta (0.02%) as described previously. The leaf bleach assay was performed on T1 seedlings previously assayed for Basta resistance to identify plants expressing the nptII gene. The marker-free plants identified based on phenotypic assays (Basta and kanamycin resistance) were advanced for confirmation through PCR as described previously.
Chi-square goodness-of-fit tests were performed on data from the T1 populations derived from self pollinated cotransformed tobacco plants to determine if the observed segregation ratios of PPT, Basta or NPTII resistant plants to PPT, Basta or NPTII sensitive plants fit the expected mendelian 3:1 or 1:1 phenotypic ratios, respectively.
Availability of supporting data
All the supporting data are included as additional files.
Double right border
Selectable marker gene
Gene of interest
Polymerase chain reaction.
This research was funded by Association for strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and central Africa (ASARECA). The authors are grateful Prof. Mieke Van Lijsebettens (Ghent University) and all members of the Plant transformation laboratory (Kenyatta University) for their useful contributions.
- Rosellini D: Selectable Markers and Reporter Genes: A Well Furnished Toolbox for Plant Science and Genetic Engineering. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2012, 31: 401-453. 10.1080/07352689.2012.683373.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- AP Mitra DS, Mudge SR, Morris BA: Selectable marker-free transgenic plants without sexual crossing: transient expression of cre recombinase and use of a conditional lethal dominant gene. Plant molecular biology. 1999, 40: 223-235. 10.1023/A:1006184221051.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cotsaftis O, Sallaud C, Breitler JC, Meynard D, Greco R, Pereira A, Guiderdoni E: Transposon-mediated generation of T-DNA- and marker-free rice plants expressing a Bt endotoxin gene. Mol Breed. 2002, 10: 165-180. 10.1023/A:1020380305904.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wakita Y, Otani M, Iba K, Shimada T: Co-integration, co-expression and co-segregation of an unlinked selectable marker gene and NtFAD3 gene in transgenic rice plants produced by particle bombardment. Genes & genetic systems. 1998, 73: 219-226. 10.1266/ggs.73.219.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kapusi E, Hensel G, Coronado MJ, Broeders S, Marthe C, Otto I, Kumlehn J: The elimination of a selectable marker gene in the doubled haploid progeny of co-transformed barley plants. Plant molecular biology. 2013, 81: 149-160. 10.1007/s11103-012-9988-9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ching-yi L, Ku H, Tan C, Yeh S, Jan F: Construction of the binary vector with bi-selectable markers for generating marker-free transgenic plants. Bot Stud. 2011, 52: 239-248.Google Scholar
- Chen S, Li X, Liu X, Xu H, Meng K, Xiao G, Wei X, Wang F, Zhu Z: Green fluorescent protein as a vital elimination marker to easily screen marker-free transgenic progeny derived from plants co-transformed with a double T-DNA binary vector system. Plant Cell Rep. 2005, 23: 625-631. 10.1007/s00299-004-0853-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Breitler JC, Meynard D, Van Boxtel J, Royer M, Bonnot F, Cambillau L, Guiderdoni E: A novel two T-DNA binary vector allows efficient generation of marker-free transgenic plants in three elite cultivars of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Transgenic research. 2004, 13: 271-287.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miller M, Tagliani L, Wang N, Berka B, Bidney D, Zhao ZY: High efficiency transgene segregation in co-transformed maize plants using an Agrobacterium tumefaciens 2 T-DNA binary system. Transgenic research. 2002, 11: 381-396. 10.1023/A:1016390621482.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Matthews PR, Wang MB, Waterhouse PM, Thornton S, Fieg SJ, Gubler F, Jacobsen JV: Marker gene elimination from transgenic barley, using co-transformation with adjacent “twin T-DNAs” on a standard Agrobacterium transformation vector. Mol Breed. 2001, 7: 195-202. 10.1023/A:1011333321893.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McCormac AC, Fowler MR, Chen DF, Elliott MC: Efficient co-transformation of Nicotiana tabacum by two independent T-DNAs, the effect of T-DNA size and implications for genetic separation. Transgenic research. 2001, 10: 143-155. 10.1023/A:1008909203852.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xing A, Zhang Z, Sato S, Staswick P, Clemente TOM: The Use Of The Two T-Dna Binary System To Derive Marker-Free Transgenic Soybeans. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol - Plant. 2000, 36: 456-463. 10.1007/s11627-000-0082-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- RamanaRao MV, Veluthambi K: Selectable marker elimination in the T0 generation by Agrobacterium-mediated co-transformation involving Mungbean yellow mosaic virus TrAP as a non-conditional negative selectable marker and bar for transient positive selection. Plant cell reports. 2010, 29: 473-483. 10.1007/s00299-010-0836-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Parkhi V, Rai M, Tan J, Oliva N, Rehana S, Bandyopadhyay A, Torrizo L, Ghole V, Datta K, Datta SK: Molecular characterization of marker-free transgenic lines of indica rice that accumulate carotenoids in seed endosperm. Mol Genet Genomics. 2005, 274: 325-336. 10.1007/s00438-005-0030-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Daley M, Knauf VC, Summerfelt KR, Turner JC: Co-transformation with one Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain containing two binary plasmids as a method for producing marker-free transgenic plants. Plant Cell Rep. 1998, 1998 (17): 489-496.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sripriya R, Sangeetha M, Parameswari C, Veluthambi B, Veluthambi K: Improved Agrobacterium-mediated co-transformation and selectable marker elimination in transgenic rice by using a high copy number pBin19-derived binary vector. Plant science. 2011, 180: 7667-7674.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park J, Lee YK, Kang BK, Chung W: Co-transformation using a negative selectable marker gene for the production of selectable marker gene-free transgenic plants. Theor Appl Genet. 2004, 109: 1562-1567. 10.1007/s00122-004-1790-x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Komari T, Hiei Y, Saito Y, Murai N, Kumashiro T: Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higher plants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers. Plant J. 1996, 10: 165-174. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.10010165.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hong-Yan Z, Song-Biao C, Xu-Gang L, Gui-Fang X, Xiao-Li W, Zhen Z: Generating marker-free transgenic tobacco plants by agrobacterium-mediated transformation with double tdna binary vector. Acta Bot Sin. 2003, 45: 1103-1108.Google Scholar
- Lu H, Zhou X, Gong Z, Upadhyaya NM: Generation of selectable marker-free transgenic rice using double right-border ( DRB ) binary vectors. Aust J Plant Physiol. 2001, 28: 241-248.Google Scholar
- Li X, Weng HB, Han SY, Xi Y, Yong KL: A novel binary vector to get marker-free transgenic plant. Chin J Biotechnol. 2006, 22: 550-554.Google Scholar
- Xu MR, Xia ZH, Zhai WX, Xu JL, Zhou YL, Li ZK: Construction of Double Right-Border Binary Vector Carrying Non-Host Gene Rxo1 Resistant to Bacterial Leaf Streak of Rice. Rice Sci. 2008, 15: 243-246. 10.1016/S1672-6308(08)60048-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Komari T, Saito Y, Hiei Y: Method for introducing Two T-DNAs into plants and vectors therefor. U.S. Patent No. 5,731,179. 1998, Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark OfficeGoogle Scholar
- Baszczynski CL, Bowen BA, Peterson DJ, Tagliani LA: Compositions and methods for the targeted removal of a nucleotide sequence from the genome of a plant. U.S. Patent No. 6,458,594. 2002, Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark OfficeGoogle Scholar
- Richael C: Generation of marker-free and backbone-free transgenic plants using a single binary approach. WIPO Patent No.200709230. 2011, Geneva, Switzerland: World Intellectual Property OrganizationGoogle Scholar
- Ye X: Methods and compositions for obtaining marker-free transgenic plants. WIPO Patent No. 2007134234. 2012, Geneva, Switzerland: World Intellectual Property OrganizationGoogle Scholar
- Rossi L, Hohn B, Tinland B: Integration of complete transferred DNA units is dependent on the activity of virulence E2 protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996, 93: 126-130. 10.1073/pnas.93.1.126.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Block M, Debrouwer D: Two T-DNA’s co-transformed intoBrassica napus by a doubleAgrobacterium tumefaciens infection are mainly integrated at the same locus. Theor Appl Genet. 1991, 82: 257-263. 10.1007/BF02190610.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Poirier Y, Ventre G, Nawrath C: High-frequency linkage of co-expressing T-DNA in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana transformed by vacuum-infiltration of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. TAG Theor Appl Genet. 2000, 100: 487-493. 10.1007/s001220050063.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Radchuk VV, Van DT, Klocke E: Multiple gene co-integration in Arabidopsis thaliana predominantly occurs in the same genetic locus after simultaneous in planta transformation with distinct Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains. Plant Sci. 2005, 168: 1515-1523. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.02.021.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ishida Y, Murai N, Kuraya Y, Ohta S, Saito H, Hiei Y, Komari T: Improved co-transformation of maize with vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Biotechnol. 2004, 21: 57-63. 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.21.57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vaughan SP, James DJ, Lindsey K, Massiah AJ: Characterization of FaRB7 , a near root-specific gene from strawberry ( Fragaria3ananassa Duch.) and promoter activity analysis in homologous and heterologous hosts. Access. 2006, 57: 3901-3910.Google Scholar
- Paz MM, Shou H, Guo Z, Zhang Z, Banerjee AK, Wang K: Assessment of conditions affecting Agrobacterium-mediated soybean transformation using the cotyledonary node explant. Euphytica. 2004, 136: 167-179.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anami SE, Mgutu AJ, Taracha C, Coussens G, Karimi M, Hilson P, Lijsebettens M, Machuka J: Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration of tropical maize genotypes. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult. 2010, 102: 285-295. 10.1007/s11240-010-9731-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hoekema A, Hirsch PR, Hooykaas PJJ, Schilperoort RAA: Binary plant vector strategy based on separation of vir- and T-region of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti-plasmid. Nature. 1983, 303: 179-180. 10.1038/303179a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Raviraja S, Sridhar K: A modified freeze – thaw method for efficient transformation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Current science. 2007, 93: 10-12.Google Scholar
- Lin JJ: Optimization of the transformation efficiency of Agrobacterium tumefaciens cells using electroporation. Plant Sci. 1994, 101: 11-15. 10.1016/0168-9452(94)90160-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Horsch RB, Fry JE, Hoffmann NL, Eichholtz D, Rogers SA, Fraley RTA: Simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science. 1985, 227: 1229-1231.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murashige T, Skoog F: A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia plantarum. 1962, 15: 473-497. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K: Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res. 1968, 50: 151-158. 10.1016/0014-4827(68)90403-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Saghai-Maroof M, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW: Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984, 81: 8014-8018. 10.1073/pnas.81.24.8014.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kutty PC, Parveez GKA, Huyop F: Agrobacterium tumefaciens-infection Strategies for Greater Transgenic Recovery in Nicotiana tabacum cv. TAPM26. Int J Agric Res. 2011, 6: 119-133.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan M: W: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO. 1987, 6: 3901-3907.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.