Skip to main content

Table 5 Survival analysis on all case by Log-rank analysis (n = 121)

From: Expressions and clinical significances of c-MET, p-MET and E2f-1 in human gastric carcinoma

Parameters

Grouping

Case number (n/%)

χ2value

df

P value

Tumor diameter (cm)

<5

48/(39.7)

9.190

1

0.002

≥5

73/(60.3)

Tumor location

Cardia, fundus

20/(16.5)

8.122

2

0.017

Body

37/(30.6)

Pylorus, antrum

64/(52.9)

Invasion depth

T1

18/(14.9)

11.712

3

0.008

T2

32/(26.4)

T3

30/(24.8)

T4

41/(33.9)

Involving lymph node station

N0

43/(35.5)

24.017

3

<0.001

N1

41/(33.9)

N2

26/(21.5)

N3

11/(9.1)

Metastatic lymph node ratio

<35%

60/(49.6)

8.596

1

0.003

≥35%

61/(50.4)

TNM stage

Ia

16/(13.2)

25.405

5

<0.001

Ib

17/(14.0)

II

20/(16.5)

IIIa

20/(16.5)

IIIb

22/(18.2)

IV

26/(21.5)

c-MET expression

Positive

80/(66.1)

12.084

1

0.001

Negative

41/(33.9)

p-MET expression

Positive

72(59.5)

5.687

1

<0.001

Negative

49(40.5)

e2f-1 expression

Positive

47/(38.8)

3.217

1

0.036

Negative

74/(61.2)

Ki-67 expression

Positive

88/(72.7)

9.348

1

0.002

Negative

33/(27.3)