Open Access

Effectiveness of Persea major Kopp (Lauraceae) extract against Enterococcus faecalis: a preliminary in vitro study

  • Lusiane Volpato1,
  • Marilisa Carneiro Leão Gabardo1Email author,
  • Denise Piotto Leonardi1,
  • Paulo Henrique Tomazinho1,
  • Leila Teresinha Maranho1 and
  • Flares Baratto-Filho1
BMC Research Notes201710:119

DOI: 10.1186/s13104-017-2443-x

Received: 21 August 2015

Accepted: 1 March 2017

Published: 6 March 2017

Abstract

Background

Persea major Kopp (Lauraceae) is a plant with wound healing, antibacterial, and analgesic properties. The aim of this study was to assess the in vitro antibacterial activity of the concentrated crude extract (CCE) and ethyl acetate fraction (EAF) of this plant against Enterococcus faecalis and compare it with calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)2] paste and 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX).

Methods

The plant material was collected, and an extract was prepared according to the requirements of the study (CCE and EAF). The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of CCE, EAF, Ca(OH)2, Ca(OH)2 + CCE, and CHX against E. faecalis were determined using the broth microdilution method

Results

The EAF inhibited E. faecalis at concentrations of 166.50, 83.25, and 41.62 mg mL−1, and 1.00, 0.50, and 0.25% of CHX solutions showed antimicrobial activity. The MICs of Ca(OH)2 paste were 166.50 and 83.25 mg mL−1, whereas Ca(OH)2 + CCE showed antimicrobial activity only at a concentration of 166.50 mg mL−1. CCE showed no inhibitory effect at any of the concentrations tested

Conclusions

The CCE did not show any antimicrobial activity against E. faecalis; however, the EAF was the most effective among the three highest concentrations tested.

Keywords

Medicinal plants Antibacterial agents Calcium hydroxide Chlorhexidine

Background

The aim of an endodontic treatment is to eliminate bacteria and their by-products from the root canal system [1]. The indiscriminate use of antibiotics has increased antimicrobial resistance, which results in the persistence infections and a decrease in the effectiveness of drug therapy [2]. In Endodontics, one of the pathogens associated with the development and maintenance of the infectious process and failure of therapy is Enterococcus faecalis [3].

The effect of substances against E. faecalis, as calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)2] [46] and 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) [6] is limited, even when they are used in combination [7]. Alternative antimicrobial products and drugs of plant origin are promising candidates to overcome this problem. Previous studies have examined the effects of natural substances against E. faecalis [814]. Persea major Kopp (Lauraceae) is one with antimicrobial potential. It is native to Brazil, commonly known as “pau-andrade;” and has shown wound healing, antibacterial, and analgesic effects [15]. The species of the genus Persea are characterized by the presence of benzil tetrahydroisoquinolines alkaloids, flavonoids (keampferol and kaempferol-3-rhamnoside, quercetin and quercetin-3-rhamnoside; flavan-3,4-diol: leucocyanidins and flavan-3-ol: (±)-catechin) [16]. Other authors isolated and characterized the leaves of Persea obovatifolia and registered new neolignans including obovatifol [(2S,3S)-2,3-dihydro-2- (3,4-dihydroxy-5-methoxyphenyl)-7-methoxy-3-methyl-5-trans-propenyl benzofuran], obovaten [2-(3,4-dihydroxy-5-methoxyphenyl)-7-methoxy-3- methyl-5-trans-propenyl benzofuran], perseal C [(2S,3R)-2,3-dihydro-2-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-5- formyl-3-hydroxymethyl-7-methoxy benzofuran] and perseal D [2-(3,4-dihydroxy-5-methoxyphenyl)-5-formyl-7- methoxy-3-methyl benzofuran]. These new neolignans, P-388, KB16, A549, and HT-29, showed cytotoxic action against cancer cells [17]. The presence of tannins was found in Persea americana leaves [1719] and in seeds [20, 21]. Phytochemical analysis showed that it has a number of compounds, especially the tannins, that precipitate proteins [22] and have antibacterial, antiseptic, antifungal, and hemostatic properties [23]. In Endodontics the use of derivatives from this plant is still unknown.

Therefore, this study aimed to examine the antimicrobial activity of extracts from the bark of P. major (concentrated crude extract, CCE and ethyl acetate fraction, EAF) against E. faecalis by using the broth microdilution technique followed by determination of the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). In addition, we compared the antimicrobial effect of these extracts with that of Ca(OH)2, Ca(OH)2 + CCE, and 2% CHX.

Methods

Collection and identification of plant material

Samples of the bark of P. major were collected from an adult plant in the rural region of the municipality of Campo Largo, Paraná, Brazil. It was not necessary permission to carry out sampling. For the identification of the plant material, we created herbarium specimens and deposited them in the Herbarium of the Positivo University (Registry Number 100).

The steps for preparation and fractionation of extracts are presented in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Steps used to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of the extracts from the Persea major Kopp (Lauraceae)

The plant material was dried in a forced air oven at 40 °C until the weight stabilized. Then, it was crushed to a powder, and thus, we obtained the pulverized drug for preparation of the crude ethanolic extract.

Obtaining plant extracts

Plant extracts were obtained according to Younes et al. [24]. We blended the material by using an industrial turbine (Rodrimar, São Paulo, SP, Brazil). We used 187.11 g of the dried and pulverized bark and 2000 mL of 70% ethanol (Rioquímica, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil). This material was extracted for 20 min and the liquid obtained was filtered in vacuum, resulting in the crude ethanolic extract (approximately 2050 mL).

The concentration of the extract was performed in a rotary evaporator (Quimis, Diadema, SP, Brazil). Each cycle lasted for approximately 30 min, and the rotation speed was adjusted to six to obtain the CCE.

Fractionation of the CCE (liquid–liquid partition)

Liquid–liquid partition [25] was performed using the CCE and 2000 mL of ethyl acetate (Vetec, Duque de Caxias, RJ, Brazil). We placed 100 mL of the CCE in a separation funnel, and then, an equivalent volume of ethyl acetate (100 mL) was poured on it with gentle agitation. This step was repeated nine times, until the solvent was clear. Thus, we obtained the EAF, which was then concentrated in a rotary evaporator and stored in an amber flask.

Freezing and lyophilization

The extracts were frozen in autoclaved plastic containers and covered with a plastic wrap for 48 h. Microperforations were introduced in the wrap using a sterilized gingival needle to allow the sublimation of the liquid. Then, the samples were placed in a lyophilizer (Ilsinh Lab. Co., Ltd., Korea). Any residual liquid was removed, and the sample was frozen again until the sample dried completely. The lyophilization process was completed in 7 days.

Preparation of the drug for the analysis of antimicrobial activity

The samples were powdered using a glass rod. Visual inspection allowed the granulometric analysis of the preparations, which were weighed in mini Petri dishes in a precision balance. For preparing drug samples, 500 mg lyophilized powders from the CCE, EAF, and Ca(OH)2 P. A. (Biodinâmica, Ibiporã, PR, Brazil), and 0.1 mL of 2% CHX solution (chlorhexidine S 2%—FGM, Joinville, SC, Brazil), were used.

The propylene glycol was the vehicle for treatment of the powder samples and for experiments because of its harmless characteristics and the common use in endodontic treatments.

Two samples from P. major were very viscous, which hampered pipetting. Therefore, 0.05 mL of sterile saline solution were added to them, including the Ca(OH)2 paste. No vehicle was required for the 2% CHX solution.

Determination of the MIC by using the broth microdilution technique

We used the E. faecalis strain (ATCC 19433) and the Mueller–Hinton broth as the culture medium, with a pH between 7.2 and 7.4, at 25 °C. The bacterial inoculum was prepared according to standardized methods [26].

The bacterial strain was transferred from the maintenance medium into a tube containing the brain heart infusion (BHI) and kept at 35 °C for 18 h for strain activation. To isolate young colonies, we transferred aliquots into a Petri dish containing Muller-Hinton agar, and incubated it at 35 °C for 24 h. Then, 4–5 colonies were transferred into a tube containing 5 mL of sterile saline solution (0.85%) followed by homogenization in a vortex mixer for 15 s.

The turbidity of the cell suspension was adjusted to obtain an optical density similar to the 0.5 McFarland standard, which corresponds to a suspension containing approximately 1 to 2 × 108 cells mL−1. Subsequently, this solution was diluted (1:10) to obtain an inoculum containing 107 cells mL−1.

The antimicrobial activity was examined using the broth microdilution technique [26] with modifications. The method comprised preparation of successive dilutions of each treatment to be assessed—CCE, EAF, Ca(OH)2 solution, Ca(OH)2 solution with CCE, and 2% CHX—in a liquid culture medium, inoculation of the bacteria, and after incubation, interpretation of the result for determining the MIC.

The treatments were placed in 96 well microplates (TPP Cultilab; Campinas, SP, Brazil). The treatments were diluted to obtain a final concentration in each well from 166.50 to 2.6 μg mL−1 for the solutions, and from 1 to 0.01% for the CHX. Then, 100 μL (0.1 mL) of the inoculum suspension to the wells was added. The columns were filled with suspensions as follows: microdilutions of the treatments, culture media control (negative control), controls for the treatments, and control for E. faecalis viability (positive control). Five test wells were repeated in each group.

The plates were incubated at 35 °C for 24 h and were read visually to determine the MIC. When bacterial growth was confirmed, suspensions from each well were transferred into Petri dishes identified and containing nutrient agar. After incubation at 35 °C for 48 h, the presence or absence of bacterial growth was evaluated. The MIC was regarded as the lowest concentration in the series of dilutions, which did not permit the growth of the susceptible bacteria [9]. So, to determine the MIC, we compared the bacterial growth in each well with that in the positive control and that observed in the nutrient agar dishes.

The concentration of the powder products tested was determined by calculating the concentration of the stock standard solution, by using the following formula: amount of product (mg)/volume of the vehicle (mL); thus, 550 mg/1.5 mL ≈ 333 mg mL−1.

Calculation of constant concentrations and volumes was used to determine the initial concentration of the products tested (concentration of the stock standard solution). To calculate the concentration of each dilution, we used the equation of constant concentration and volume (C1 × V1 = C2 × V2). We used the same volume in all wells, and thus, the dilution in each subsequent well was half of that in the previous well; we successively filled all wells in this manner (with the lower concentration tested).

Results

The MICs of the treatments are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of treatments against Enterococcus faecalis

Treatments

MIC (mg mL−1)

166.50

83.25

41.62

20.81

10.40

5.20

2.60

CCE

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

EAF

+

+

+

+

Ca(OH)2

+

+

+

+

+

Ca(OH)2 + CCE

+

+

+

+

+

+

 

MIC (%)

1.00

0.50

0.25

0.12

0.06

0.03

0.01

CHX

+

+

+

+

(+) bacterial growth, (−) no bacterial growth, CCE concentrated crude extract, EAF ethyl acetate fraction, Ca(OH) 2 calcium hydroxide, CHX chlorhexidine digluconate

The CCE did not inhibit bacterial growth at any of the concentrations tested. Contrary, all the other acted at various concentrations. The EAF inhibited bacterial growth at three highest concentrations (166.50, 83.25, and 41.62 mg mL−1). The same was observed with 1.00, 0.50, and 0.25% of CHX solutions. Ca(OH)2 + CCE showed antimicrobial activity only at its highest concentration, 166.50 mg mL−1.

Discussion

This study aimed to compare the antibacterial activity of the CCE and EAF from P. major, Ca(OH)2, Ca(OH)2 + CCE, and CHX against E. faecalis. We observed satisfactory antimicrobial activity with the treatments, in particular the EAF, but the same was not observed with CCE.

Extensive research has been performed to identify substances that enable elimination of microorganisms from the root canal. However, therapeutic failure continues to occur in patients with persistence of the infection. Thus, we selected E. faecalis, a highly resistant bacterium, for this study [3].

The antimicrobial activity of substances described in previous studies, such as Ca(OH)2 [46] and CHX [6], including their combinations against this bacterium warrants further clarifications [7]. Ca(OH)2 is one of the most frequently used drugs in microbiological studies and in the field of Endodontics [4]. Some authors suggest that the effect of this drug against E. faecalis is low [6, 27]. Treatment with Ca(OH)2 showed antibacterial activity only at two of its highest concentrations (166.50 and 83.25 mg mL−1). This may be explained by the fact that E. faecalis is not sensitive to alkaline environment [28]. A study showed that the release of hydroxyl ions does not have sufficient antimicrobial activity against microorganisms [29].

The 2% CHX has been considered superior to Ca(OH)2 as an intracanal medication [30]. A recent study showed that the antimicrobial activity of CHX is increased when used in combination with Ca(OH)2 [31]. Our results showed that CHX was effective against E. faecalis at concentrations of 1, 0.5, and 0.25%. Our findings are consistent with those that observed antimicrobial effect at 1 and 0.5% of CHX [32]. Arias-Moliz et al. [33] found low efficacy of 2% CHX in the elimination of E. faecalis, while other authors reported that 2% CHX used as an intracanal drug eliminated E. faecalis from the root canal system [34].

In the recent years, studies are being performed to identify and examine active principles from medicinal plants for use in dentistry against E. faecalis. Morinda citrifolia [8], Triphala [9], berberina [10], Syzygium aromaticum, Ocimum sanctum and Cinnamomum zeylanicum [11], Myrtus communis [12], Ferula gummosa [13], and oregano [14] have shown promising results. We used P. major in this study; the antimicrobial potential of some of the bioactive components present in the different parts of this plant has been examined in a previous study [15]. Among these components, tannins, in particular the condensed tannins, have diverse important biological effects such as antimicrobial, antiseptic, and antifungal effects [23]. Tannins are phenolic compounds soluble in water, with molecular weight about 500–3000 Da, with ability to form insoluble complexes in water with proteins, gelatins and alkaloids [35]. This compound is responsible for the sensation of astringency caused by certain food, due to the interaction with the salivary proline-rich proteins (PRPs) in the oral cavity. The tannin-induced interaction and/or precipitation of proteins occur, probably, by means of hydrogen bridges between the phenolic groups of tannins and attachment sites of proteins [36]. Metals and enzymes easily influence the oxidation of tannins, thus the searching for these plant compounds can be performed by adding, for example, ferric chloride, lead acetate and gelatin, which promote the color change of the solutions and the formation of precipitates [37].

Few studies have evaluated the antimicrobial potential of this plant and its application; therefore, investigations are required to determine the antibacterial activity of P. major extracts against E. faecalis and to detect the concentrations responsible for the inhibition of bacterial growth, including research in dentistry. Our results showed that the CCE had a low potential of inhibiting E. faecalis, such as the combination of Ca(OH)2 + CCE. However, promising results were observed with the EAF.

We used the microdilution technique, because this method was used in studies performed examining the effect of M. citrifolia as an irrigant solution [8], in an analysis of Triphala [9], and berberine [10] against E. faecalis. The MIC has been used in dentistry studies involving the analysis of antimicrobial effect of plant products [9, 10]. In this study, the MIC was determined by observing the growth of E. faecalis in Petri dishes containing nutrient agar.

Although the compounds have been extracted from the same plant, different effects were found on E. faecalis. We suggest that this may have occurred because of the CCE have all the secondary metabolites present, while the EAF was a fraction which aimed the action of phenolic compounds, especially the tannins. Our results showed that the EAF from P. major inhibited the growth of E. faecalis. The extract from this plant may be a promising alternative treatment for fighting microorganisms involved in endodontic infections.

We have registered a patent (BR 10 2012 028509 6) for using this plant for its wound healing, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activities in dental care.

Limitations of this study are due to the fact that we have evaluated the action of different substances on only one microorganism. More studies are required to be verified behavior through the biofilm and tissue effects.

Conclusions

The CCE did not show antimicrobial activity against E. faecalis, and the EAF was the most effective among the three highest concentrations studied.

Abbreviations

CCE: 

concentrated crude extract (CCE)

EAF: 

ethyl acetate fraction (EAF) of CHX: 2% chlorhexidine digluconate

MIC: 

minimum inhibitory concentrations

BHI: 

brain heart infusion

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

LV designed the study and helped to draft the manuscript. MCLG performed the data analysis. DPL contributed to acquisition of data and interpretation. PHT performed the literature review. LTM designed the study and revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. FBF designed the study, revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

None.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All the data supporting the findings is contained within the manuscript.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Health and Biological Sciences, Positivo University

References

  1. Peters L, Wesselink P, Moorer W. The fate and the role of bacteria left in root dentinal tubules. Int Endod J. 1995;28:95–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Beloin C, Renard S, Ghigo JM, et al. Novel approaches to combat bacterial biofilms. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2014;18:61–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, et al. Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;85:86–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Valera MC, Silva KC, Maekawa LE, Carvalho CA, Koga-Ito CY, Camargo CH, Lima RS. Antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite associated with intracanal medication for Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis inoculated in root canals. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17:555–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Mohammadi Z, Shalavi S, Yazdizadeh M. Antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide in endodontics: a review. Chonnam Med J. 2012;48:133–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhandari S, Ashwini TS, Patil CR. An in vitro evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of 2% chlorhexidine gel, propolis and calcium hydroxide against Enterococcus faecalis in human root dentin. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8:ZC60.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Saatchi M, Shokraneh A, Navaei H, Maracy MR, Shojaei H. Antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Appl Oral Sci. 2014;22:356–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Murray PE, Farber RM, Namerow KN, Kuttler S, Garcia-Godoy F. Evaluation of Morinda citrifolia as an endodontic irrigant. J Endod. 2008;34:66–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Prabhakar J, Senthilkumar M, Prya MS, Mahalakshmi K, Sehgal PK, Sukumaran VG. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of herbal alternatives (Triphala and green tea Polyphenols), MTAD, and 5% sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formed on tooth substrate: an in vitro study. J Endod. 2010;36:83–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Xie Q, Johnson BR, Wenckus CS, Fayad MI, Wu CD. Efficacy of berberine, an antimicrobial plant alkaloid, as an endodontic irrigant against a mixed-culture biofilm in an in vitro tooth model. J Endod. 2012;38:1114–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gupta A, Duhan J, Tewari S, Sangwan P, Yadav A, Singh G, Juneja R, Saini H. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of Syzygium aromaticum, Ocimum sanctum and Cinnamomum zeylanicum plant extracts against Enterococcus faecalis: a preliminary study. Int Endod J. 2013;46:775–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Nabavizadeh M, Abbaszadegan A, Gholami A, Sheikhiani R, Shokouhi M, Shams MS, Ghasemi Y. Chemical constituent and antimicrobial effect of essential oil from Myrtus communis leaves on microorganisms involved in persistent endodontic infection compared to two common endodontic irrigants: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17:449–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Abbaszadegan A, Gholami A, Mirhadi H, Saliminasab M, Kazemi A, Moein MR. Antimicrobial and cytotoxic activity of Ferula gummosa plant essential oil compared to NaOCl and CHX: a preliminary in vitro study. Restor Dent Endod. 2015;40:50–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ok E, Adanir N, Ozturk T. Antibacterial and smear layer removal capability of oregano extract solution. Eur J Dent. 2015;9:20–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Maranho LT, Preussler KH, Rocha LD. Structural organization of Persea major Kopp bark (Lauraceae). Acta Bot Bras. 2009;23:509–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Gottlieb OR. Chemosystematics of the lauraceae. Phytochemistry. 1972;1972(11):1537–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Tsai IL, Hsieh CF, Duh CY. Additional cytotoxic neolignans from Persea obovatifolia. Phytochemistry. 1998;48:1371–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Adeyemi OO, Okpo SO, Ogunti OO. Analgesic and antiinflammatory effects of the aqueous extract of leaves of Persea americana Mill (Lauraceae). Fitoterapia. 2002;73:375–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Antia BS, Okokon JE, Okon PA. Hypoglycemic activity of aqueous leaf extract of Persea americana Mill. Indian J Pharmacol. 2005;37:325–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Idris S, Ndukwe GI, Gimba CE. Preliminary phytochemical screening and antimicrobial activity of seed extracts of Persea americana (avocado pear). Bayero J Pure Appl Sci. 2009;2:173–6.Google Scholar
  21. Ogochukwy N, Anaka RIO, Stephen OO. Effect of the aqueous seed extract of Persea americana Mill (Lauraceae) on the blood pressure of sprague-dawley rats. Afr J Pharm Pharmacol. 2009;3:485–90.Google Scholar
  22. Ryszard A. Tannins: the new natural antioxidants? Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. 2007;109:549–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Monteiro JM, Albuquerque UP, Araújo EL. Taninos: uma abordagem da química à ecologia. Quim Nova. 2005;28:892–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Younes RN, Varella AD, Suffredini IB. Extração e rastreamento de novas drogas em plantas brasileiras. Acta Oncol Bras. 2000;20:15–9.Google Scholar
  25. Gu T. Liquid–liquid partitioning methods for bioseparations. In: Ahuja S, editor. The handbook of bioseparations. New York: Academic Press; 2000. p. 329–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard, M7-A6. 6th ed ed. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2003.Google Scholar
  27. Haapasalo HK, Sirén EK, Waltimo TMT, Ørstavik D, Haapasalo MPP. Inactivation of local root canal medicaments by dentine: an in vitro study. Int Endod J. 2000;33:126–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Brandle N, Zehnder M, Weiger R, Waltimo T. Impact of growth conditions on susceptibility of five microbial species to alkaline stress. J Endod. 2008;34:579–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, Minotti PG, Cavenago BC, Garcia RB, Bernardineli N, et al. Antimicrobial activity of triantibiotic paste, 2% chlorhexidine gel, and calcium hydroxide on an intraoral-infected dentin biofilm model. J Endod. 2013;39:115–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gomes BP, Vianna ME, Zaia AA, Almeida JF, Souza-Filho FJ, Ferraz CC. Chlorhexidine in endodontics. Braz Dent J. 2013;24:89–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Mohammadi Z, Giardino L, Palazzi F, Asgary S. Agonistic and antagonistic interactions between chlorhexidine and other endodontic agents: a critical review. Iran Endod J. 2015;10:1–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sassone LM, Fidel RAS, Murad CF, Fidel SR, Hirata JRR. Antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite and clorhexidine by two different tests. Aust Endod J. 2008;34:19–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Arias-Moliz MT, Ferrer-Luque CM, González-Rodríguez MP, Valderrama MJ, Baca P. Eradication of Enterococcus faecalis biofilms by cetrimide and chlorhexidine. J Endod. 2010;36:87–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Silva AR, Pinto SC, Santos EB, Santos FA, Farago PV, Gomes JC, Pina-Vaz I, Carvalho MF. New intracanal formulations containing doxycycline or chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014;15:61–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Santos SC, Mello JCP. Taninos. In: Simões CMO, Schenkel EP, Gosmann G, Mello JCP, Mentz LA, Petrovick PR, orgs. Farmacognosia: da planta ao medicamento. 5 th ed. Florianópolis: Ed. da UFSC; Porto Alegre: Ed. da UFRGS; 2004. p. 615–56.
  36. Cala O, Dufourc EJ, Fouquet E, Manigand C, Laguerre M, Pianet I. The colloidal state of tannins impacts the nature of their interaction with proteins: the case of salivary proline-rich protein/procyanidins binding. Langmuir. 2012;28:17410–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Carneiro Leão LA, Gabardo MCL, Gomara FL. Estudo fitoquímico do guapê, Syzygium cumini (L.) skeels. Acta Biol Par. 2014;43:47–58.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement