Table 2 Estimated Kappa agreement between the Lund University Checklist of Incipient Exhaustion (LUCIE) and the Karolinska Exhaustion Disorder Scale (KEDS) at different LUCIE cutoff points and by excluding identifications in the middle range of LUCIE (sensitivity analysis)
2LUCIE | KEDS | Kappa (95% 1CI) [3Reference data] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Normal | Exhaustion | Total | ||||||
N | % | N | % | N | % | |||
Gliding cut-off point | ||||||||
Step 1 GG Vs. Step 2-YG, 3-RG, 4-RR | No | 1242 | 66.0 | 70 | 8.9 | 1312 | 49.1 | 0.47 (0.44–0.50) |
Yes | 640 | 34.0 | 718 | 91.1 | 1358 | 50.9 | [0.36 (0.32–0.42)] | |
Total | 1882 | 100.0 | 788 | 100.0 | 2670 | 100.0 | [N = 1339] | |
Step 1-GG, 2-YG Vs. Step 3-RG, 4-RR | No | 1693 | 90.0 | 298 | 37.8 | 1991 | 74.6 | 0.54 (0.51–0.58) |
Yes | 189 | 10.0 | 490 | 62.2 | 679 | 25.4 | [0.48 (0.41–0.55)] | |
Total | 1882 | 100.0 | 788 | 100.0 | 2670 | 100.0 | [N = 1339] | |
Step 1-GG, 2-YG, 3-RG Vs. Step 4-RR | No | 1840 | 97.8 | 552 | 70.1 | 2392 | 89.6 | 0.34 (0.30–0.38) |
Yes | 42 | 2.2 | 236 | 29.9 | 278 | 10.4 | [0.28 (0.20–0.36)] | |
Total | 1882 | 100.0 | 788 | 100.0 | 2670 | 100.0 | [N = 1339] | |
Excluding steps | ||||||||
Step 1-GG Vs. Step 3-RG, 4-RR | No | 1242 | 86.8 | 70 | 12.5 | 1312 | 65.9 | 0.70 (0.66–0.73) |
Yes | 189 | 13.2 | 490 | 87.5 | 679 | 34.1 | [0.60 (0.52–0.66)] | |
Total | 1431 | 100.0 | 560 | 100.0 | 1991 | 100.0 | [N = 1062] | |
LUCIE Step 1-GG Vs. Step 4-RR | No | 1242 | 96.7 | 70 | 22.9 | 1312 | 82.5 | 0.77(0.72–0.81) |
Yes | 42 | 3.3 | 236 | 77.1 | 278 | 17.5 | [0.60 (0.49–0.70)] | |
Total | 1284 | 100.0 | 306 | 100.0 | 1590 | 100.0 | [N = 945] | |