Table 1 Face validity content validity evaluation of decision-making aid trial version (N = 22)
items | Mean | ±SD | |
|---|---|---|---|
n | % | ||
Viewing time (minutes) | 22.8 | ± 12.4 | |
Range of viewing time | (7~60) | ||
Appropriateness of information volume | too much | 4 | 18.2 |
the amount is too small | 1 | 4.5 | |
It’s just the right amount | 17 | 77.3 | |
Easy-to-read degree of charts | Strongly agree | 2 | 9.1 |
Agree | 16 | 72.7 | |
Neither | 2 | 9.1 | |
Disagree | 2 | 9.1 | |
Strongly disagree | 0 | 0.0 | |
Appropriateness of number of pages | too many | 0 | 0.0 |
slightly more | 12 | 54.5 | |
just the right amount | 10 | 45.5 | |
slightly less | 0 | 0.0 | |
too few | 0 | 0.0 | |
Ease of understanding content | Strongly agree | 5 | 22.7 |
Agree | 13 | 59.1 | |
Neither | 4 | 18.2 | |
Disagree | 0 | 0.0 | |
Strongly disagree | 0 | 0.0 | |
Usefulness when selecting ART | Agree | 20 | 90.9 |
Disagree | 0 | 0.0 | |
I don’t know | 2 | 9.1 | |
Availability at the end of treatment | Agree | 20 | 90.9 |
Disagree | 0 | 0.0 | |
I don’t know | 2 | 9.1 | |
Degree of recommendation to patients | Agree | 18 | 81.8 |
Disagree | 0 | 0.0 | |
I don’t know | 1 | 4.5 | |
No response | 3 | 13.6 | |
Balance of contents | |||
Information is biased towards specific options | 3 | 13.6 | |
Information is well-balanced | 19 | 86.4 | |
Overall performance | Very good | 2 | 9.1 |
Good | 18 | 81.8 | |
Normal | 2 | 9.1 | |
Bad | 0 | 0.0 | |
Very bad | 0 | 0.0 | |