Skip to main content

Table 2 Baseline characteristics of study sample (n = 119)

From: High rates of International Code violations: a cross-sectional study in a region of Canada with low breastfeeding rates

Characteristic*

Total sample

Exposed to Unethical

Marketing Practices

n (%)

n (%)

Total Sample

119

104 (87%)

Marital Status

  

 Partnered

109 (91%)

97 (94%)

Education

  

 Secondary or less

7 (6%)

7 (7%)

 College/Trades

37 (31%)

35 (34%)

 Postsecondary or above

75 (63%)

62 (60%)

Household Income

  

 Under $70 000

32 (27%)

30 (29%)

 $70 000 or above

82 (69%)

70 (67%)

 Prefer not to say

5 (4%)

4 (4%)

Community Size

  

 Rural (Less than 1000 residents in community)

10 (8%)

10 (10%)

 Small Urban (1000 to 29,999 residents in community)

30 (25%)

26 (25%)

 Medium Urban (30,000 to 99, 000 residents in community)

18 (15%)

17 (16%)

 Large Urban (Greater than 100,000 residents in community

61 (51%)

51 (49%)

Employment

  

 Employed but currently on maternity leave

61 (51%)

54 (52%)

 Full time

37 (31%)

31 (30%)

 Unemployed

21 (18%)

19 (18%)

Infant Feeding Method*

  

 EBF

71 (60%)

64 (62%)

 Mostly breastfed

23 (19%)

20 (19%)

Mixed feeding

8 (7%)

7 (7%)

Commercial milk formula only

16 (14%)

13 (13%)

  1. *EBF (no other liquid or solid from any other source entered the infant’s mouth); Mostly breastfed (human milk being the infant’s predominant source of nourishment, the infant may have received water, water-based drinks (sweetened and flavored water, teas, infusions, etc.), fruit juice, oral rehydration salts solution, drop and syrup forms of vitamins, minerals, and medicines, and ritual fluids (in limited quantities), but no food-based fluid) [10]; mixed feeding (feeding an infant breastmilk and commercial-milk-formula); formula feeding (feeding an infant only commercial-milk-formula)