| | | Real dataset |
|---|
| | | Max info | Score | Ratio | -r gain | Dmax | Dmin | AveD | StD | Markers | 0 markers |
|---|
Basic | Exp1 | 3509.86 | 528.67 | | | 28.6 | 0.4 | 9.2 | 2.2 | 380 | 72 |
| | Exp2 | 5958.31 | 808.76 | | | 28.7 | 0.4 | 9.2 | 2.2 | 380 | 32 |
| | Exp3 | 5685.11 | 680.55 | | | 20.6 | 0.6 | 9.2 | 2 | 380 | 10 |
| | Exp4 | 6503.60 | 785.52 | | | 17.8 | 0.2 | 9.1 | 2.1 | 382 | 7 |
| | Exp5 | 5293.64 | 673.66 | | | 17.5 | 0.2 | 9.1 | 2 | 382 | 26 |
R | Exp1 | | 605.03 | | 14.44% | 90.3 | 0.4 | 9.5 | 5.8 | 366 | 0 |
| | Exp2 | | 887.82 | | 9.78% | 20.6 | 0.3 | 9.2 | 2.5 | 383 | 0 |
| | Exp3 | | 701.85 | | 3.13% | 16.8 | 0.5 | 9.1 | 2.1 | 384 | 0 |
| | Exp4 | | 803.9 | | 2.34% | 16.6 | 0 | 9.1 | 2.1 | 384 | 0 |
| | Exp5 | | 713.43 | | 5.90% | 26.9 | 0.5 | 9.2 | 2.5 | 380 | 0 |
MD | MD | 3581.64 | 979.58 | | | 11.7 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 1461 | 137 |
| | Exp1 | | 801.79 | 0.81 | | | | | | | |
| | Exp2 | | 1512.85 | 0.92 | | | | | | | |
| | Exp3 | | 1282.7 | 0.89 | | | | | | | |
| | Exp4 | | 1494.43 | 0.9 | | | | | | | |
| | Exp5 | | 1229.34 | 0.89 | | | | | | | |
R + MD | MD | | 1114.33 | | 13.76% | 11.3 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 1483 | 0 |
| | Exp1 | | 898.48 | 0.47 | 12.06% | | | | | | |
| | Exp2 | | 1720.82 | 0.6 | 13.75% | | | | | | |
| | Exp3 | | 1446.47 | 0.72 | 12.77% | | | | | | |
| | Exp4 | | 1695.42 | 0.73 | 13.45% | | | | | | |
| | Exp5 | | 1400.07 | 0.63 | 13.89% | | | | | | |
- The data file includes the genotype of 9216 SNPs covering the whole genome for The 26 F1 sires of five real chicken F2 designs (4 in Exp1, 5 in Exp3 and Exp5 and 6 in Exp2 and Exp4). For each markers panel and condition, the maximal available informativity score (max info), the selected set score, the multidesign/monodesign ratio, the score gain obtained by using the resampling (-r gain), the maximal (Dmax), minimal (Dmin), average (AveD) and standard deviation (StD) distances between two markers, the number of selected markers and the number of no informative markers in this set are detailed. R and MD refer at resampling option activation and multidesign option activation, respectively. With the resampling option, the gain is inversely proportional to the maximum informativity, except for Exp2, because of an overrepresentation of markers heterozygous for 0 and 6 animals in this experimental design. The results for multidesign mode (1536 markers) are similar to those obtained with the 5K markers file: the ratio is about 0.90, and the resampling option permits the increase of the number of selected markers (and thus the final score) without significant modifications of the average distance and the standard deviation.
