Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of an average network of the two groups with oscillatory pattern (group III vs. group IV).

From: Inferring Drosophila gap gene regulatory network: pattern analysis of simulated gene expression profiles and stability analysis

Network Differences

θ

m 1

m 2

dm

t

hb → cad

-0.0479759

-0.0239867

0.0239891

0.000701299

Tll → cad

-0.0197665

-0.0261618

-0.00639534

0.00334701

hb → hb

0.0202833

0.0133955

-0.00688781

1.11532e - 005

gt → hb

0.0131477

-0.00553095

-0.0186786

4.33042e - 011

kni → hb

-0.148545

-0.0728052

0.0757399

7.19654e - 005

hb → gt

-0.00730634

0.00505889

0.0123652

3.60571e - 006

Kr → gt

-0.103984

-0.0585162

0.0454676

0.000300942

Tll → gt

-0.0107778

-0.0464788

-0.035701

6.88338e - 014

gt → Tll

-0.036005

-0.00193247

0.0340725

0.000156841

bcd → cad

-0.014402

-0.0389897

-0.0245877

7.47514e - 005

bcd → Kr

0.0576209

0.0287058

-0.0289151

0.000306426

bcd → gt

0.0957429

0.0223168

-0.0734261

6.08573e - 005

bcd → kni

-0.000129675

0.0630306

0.0631603

0.000139936

  1. The table summarizes the list of parameters that are significantly different. All the parameters in the two groups have the predict the same regulatory interactions (but, with some extent, [see Tab. S3 in Additional file S11, where networks diagrams are shown.]