Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of an average network of the two groups with oscillatory pattern (group III vs. group IV).

From: Inferring Drosophila gap gene regulatory network: pattern analysis of simulated gene expression profiles and stability analysis

Network Differences
θ m 1 m 2 dm t
hbcad -0.0479759 -0.0239867 0.0239891 0.000701299
Tllcad -0.0197665 -0.0261618 -0.00639534 0.00334701
hbhb 0.0202833 0.0133955 -0.00688781 1.11532e - 005
gthb 0.0131477 -0.00553095 -0.0186786 4.33042e - 011
knihb -0.148545 -0.0728052 0.0757399 7.19654e - 005
hbgt -0.00730634 0.00505889 0.0123652 3.60571e - 006
Krgt -0.103984 -0.0585162 0.0454676 0.000300942
Tllgt -0.0107778 -0.0464788 -0.035701 6.88338e - 014
gtTll -0.036005 -0.00193247 0.0340725 0.000156841
bcdcad -0.014402 -0.0389897 -0.0245877 7.47514e - 005
bcdKr 0.0576209 0.0287058 -0.0289151 0.000306426
bcdgt 0.0957429 0.0223168 -0.0734261 6.08573e - 005
bcdkni -0.000129675 0.0630306 0.0631603 0.000139936
  1. The table summarizes the list of parameters that are significantly different. All the parameters in the two groups have the predict the same regulatory interactions (but, with some extent, [see Tab. S3 in Additional file S11, where networks diagrams are shown.]