Skip to main content

Table 9 Item to outcome analysis for DUNDRUM-1 and DUNDRUM-2 scales

From: DUNDRUM-2: Prospective validation of a structured professional judgment instrument assessing priority for admission from the waiting list for a forensic mental health hospital

  Not admitted Admitted ANOVA, df = 1 X2
df = 4
Item mean S.D. mean S.D. F X2
DUNDRUM-2 triage urgency items
TU1 location 1.1 0.8 2.7 0.9 49.34 41.34
TU2 mental health 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.2 23.14 20.04
TU3 self harm 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.2 2.91 7.91
TU4 humanitarian 0.1 0.4 1.8 1.6 28.64 20.94
TU5 systemic 1.6 1.7 3.5 1.1 31.34 25.64
TU6 legal urgency 0.6 0.5 1.0 1.1 3.61 6.7
DUNDRUM-1 triage security items
TS1 serious violence 1.5 1.1 2.5 1.1 13.24 14.73
TS2 serious self harm 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 0 7.81
TS3 immediacy of violence 1.6 1.0 2.7 1.2 14.94 13.63
TS4 immediacy of self harm 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.4 0.7 7.4
TS5 special forensic need 1.2 0.9 2.2 1.0 15.94 13.53
TS6 absconding 1.6 0.9 2.3 1.0 6.82 10.12
TS7 preventing access 1.9 0.9 2.5 0.8 7.33 7.3
TS8 victim issues 1.7 1.2 2.5 1.0 7.83 14.03
TS9 risk of violence 1.8 1.1 2.6 0.9 12.24 11.52
TS10 institutional behaviour 1.4 0.8 1.9 1.1 3.92 9.11
TS11 legal procedure 1.9 1.5 3.7 0.5 43.94 32.44
  1. .1 p < 0.1; 2 p < 0.05; 3 p < 0.01; 4 p < 0.001.