BMC Research Notes

Table 3 Result of experiment two: comparison of different feature sets

From: Towards classifying species in systems biology papers using text mining

		F1			F1+TS			F1+OF
		P	R	F	P	R	F	P	R	F
	fly	0.78	0.929	0.848	0.97	0.97	0.97	0.792	0.931	0.856
NB	mouse	0.81	0.68	0.739	0.826	0.95	0.884	0.821	0.685	0.747
	yeast	0.75	0.727	0.738	0.929	0.788	0.852	0.762	0.731	0.746
	fly	0.762	0.868	0.802	0.965	0.952	0.958	0.771	0.87	0.818
CRF	mouse	0.789	0.7	0.73	0.814	0.878	0.845	0.791	0.71	0.748
	yeast	0.734	0.725	0.723	0.902	0.786	0.84	0.739	0.73	0.734
		F1+NT			F1+ADN			F1+TS+OF+NT+ADN
		P	R	F	P	R	F	P	R	F
	fly	0.775	0.825	0.799	0.812	0.931	0.867	0.971	0.972	0.971
NB	mouse	0.823	0.621	0.708	0.823	0.712	0.763	0.827	0.953	0.886
	yeast	0.752	0.723	0.737	0.786	0.987	0.875	0.931	0.791	0.855
	fly	0.753	0.877	0.81	0.773	0.887	0.826	0.966	0.954	0.96
CRF	mouse	0.865	0.698	0.773	0.792	0.714	0.751	0.817	0.878	0.846
	yeast	0.729	0.727	0.728	0.762	0.751	0.756	0.901	0.788	0.841

F1: basic features used to train the model were GN, MH, DT, JN.

Back to article page

ISSN: 1756-0500

Contact us

Submission enquiries: bmcresearchnotes@biomedcentral.com
General enquiries: ORSupport@springernature.com