Child- and family impacts of infants’ oral conditions in Tanzania and Uganda– a cross sectional study

BMC Research Notes

Table 4 Discriminative validity Child impact and Family impact scores by self- reported oral health and health status

Manyara Child impact		% (n)	Mean (sd) [ES]^a	Adjusted OR (95% CI)^b	Adjusted RR (95% CI)^c
Reported oral health	Bad	21.4 (18)	0.5 (1.3) [0.1]	1	2.0 (1.5-2.8)
Reported oral health	Good	12.8 (145)*	0.3 (0.9)*	0.5 (0.2-0.9)
Reported health	Bad	14.7 (139)	0.3 (1.0) [0.1]	1	2.0 (1.5-2.8)
Reported health	Good	8.7 (24)**	0.2 (0.7)**	0.5 (0.3-0.8)
Kampala Child impact
Reported oral health	Bad	57.4 (101)	1.8 (1.8) [0.3]	1	1.8 (1.6-2.19
Reported oral health	Good	34.5 (213)**	0.9 (1.4)**	0.4 (0.3-0.6)
Reported health	Bad	47.4 (120)	1.5 (1.7)[0.2]	1	1.4 (1.2-1.6)
	Good	35.9 (194)**	1.0 (1.5)**	0.7 (0.4-0.8)
KampalaFamily impact
Reported oral health	Bad	55.4 (143)	1.6 (1.4) [0.3]	1	1.7 (1.5-2.0)c
Reported oral health	Good	39.7 (217)**	0.8 (1.2)**	0.4 (0.2-0.5)
Reported health	Bad	55.4 (143)	1.3 (1.4)[0.2]	1	1.3 (1.1-1.5)c
Reported health	Good	39.7 (217)**	0.9 (1.3)**	0.5 (0.4-0.7)

ISSN: 1756-0500