Skip to main content

Table 2 Associates of heath care professionals’ appreciation of and adherence to the Care Standard (N = 1081)

From: Perceptions of Dutch health care professionals regarding the Care Standard for diabetes

 

Working in accordance with CS (%)

CS as norm (mean(SD))

Guidelines for professional group as norm (mean(SD))

Feasibility (mean(SD))

Quality assurance (%)

 

Completely

   

Major contribution

All participants

15.5

2.9 (1.0)

4.0 (0.4)

3.9 (0.7)

83.9

Age

OR = 1.03*

β = -0.02

β = -0.36

β = 0.05

OR = 1.00 (0.98-1.02)

Gender

     

Men (1)

18.0

3.3 (1.0)

4.0 (0.3)

4.0 (0.7)

83.0

Women (2)

14.1

2.7 (1.0)

4.0 (0.5)

3.9 (0.7)

84.3

Significant contrasts

 

2 < 1

   

Professional group

     

General practitioners (1)

27.8

3.0 (1.0)

4.0 (0.2)

4.1 (0.7)

82.1

Practice nurses (2)

12.7

2.7 (0.7)

4.0 (0.3)

3.9 (0.5)

90.0

Diabetes nurses (3)

15.1

2.3 (0.9)

4.1 (0.4)

3.8 (0.7)

89.7

Dieticians (4)

3.4

2.1 (0.7)

4.0 (0.7)

3.6 (0.7)

78.6

Physiotherapists (5)

1.4

2.7 (0.9)

3.8 (0.9)

3.5 (0.9)

75.7

Internal medicine physicians (6)

7.8

3.2 (1.2)

3.8 (0.8)

3.7 (0.9)

64.0

Pediatricians (7)

19.6

3.4 (1.1)

4.0 (0.0)

3.7 (0.9)

73.9

Significant contrasts

2 < 1,7

2,3,4,5 < 1,6,7;

5 < 1,2,3,4,7

2,3,4,5,6,7 < 1

6 < 1,4

4,5 < 1,2,3,7

3,4 < 2,5

6 < 3

4,5 < 2,3

1,4,5,6,7 < 2,3

5 < 6

   

5 < 1

Health care division

     

Primary care (1)

17.2

3.0 (1.0)

4.0 (0.4)

4.0 (0.7)

85.4

Secondary care (2)

9.3

2.5 (1.1)

4.0 (0.6)

3.7 (0.8)

78.9

Significant contrasts

2 < 1

2 < 1

   
  1. *p < 0.05, Note: significant contrasts were identified by comparisons made between the subgroups by repeating the logistic or linear regression analysis using a different reference group for each independent variable each time.