Skip to main content

Table 5 Contingency table comparing MIP with MIP + source data for assessable segments above the knee demonstrating no significant difference in proportions

From: Impact of source data on the interpretation of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the lower limbs

  MIP and source data Total
MIP Assessable NSVC
Assessable 599 0 599
NSVC 6 3 9
Total 605 3 608
Difference in proportions (95% confidence intervals) -0.010 (-0.010 to -0.001)
Two-tailed p (McNemar) 0.031
\