Differences in prevalence rates of PTSD in various European countries explained by war exposure, other trauma and cultural value orientation

Table 4 Regression analyses of PTSD prevalence, proxys of trauma exposure and value orientation using different models

	War victims			Crime victims			Natural disaster			Road fatalities
	Beta	p	R²	Beta	p	R²	Beta	p	R²	Beta	p	R²
Model 1			0.79*			-0.39			0.15			-0.39
SVE	1.01	0.003		-.077	0.86		.20	0.67		-.04	0.93
Aggregated Factor “Traditional”	.03	0.92		-.34	0.67		-.11	0.88		-.38	0.64
Aggregated Factor “Modern”	-.35	0.35		.57	0.49		-.49	0.53		.63	0.49
Model 2			0.82 ^†			-0.30			-1.06			0.36
SVE	5.79	0.14		3.35	0.04		-1.26	0.73		-2.5	0.08
Aggregated Factor “Traditional”	.63	0.43		-2.12	0.09		3.31	0.76		.40	0.82
Aggregated Factor “Modern”	-.33	0.59		3.17	0.04		-4.21	0.69		-2.87	0.16
SVE x Aggregated Factor “Traditional”	-3.99	0.59		.98	0.41		-5.59	0.76		-2.02	0.58
SVE x Aggregated Factor “Modern”	.98	0.89		-4.4	0.044		7.62	0.73		6.5	0.17
Model 3			0.79 ^†			0.35			0.32			0.76 ^†
SVE	2.82	0.48		.65	0.41		-2.54	0.28		-2.53	0.02
Conformity	.04	0.87		-.64	0.14		-1.96	0.21		-4.87	0.12
Stimulation	-.20	0.73		.81	0.09		-2.16	0.21		-1.62	0.09
SVE x conformity	.08	0.73		1.28	0.11		1.88	0.21		4.68	0.12
SVE x stimulation	-1.76	0.68		-1.96	0.07		2.80	0.31		4.01	0.02

Note: SVE = specific variable expression of the main variable included in the model (i.e. war victims, crime victims, natural disaster, road fatalities, respectively); R² = variance expressed by the model; beta = standardized betas.
^†p-valuesfor whole model testing= p< .1, *p < 0.05, **p <0.001.

ISSN: 1756-0500