Skip to main content

Table 2 Awareness of mobilisation activities among intervention and control households (n = 807)

From: Promoting latrine construction and use in rural villages practicing open defecation: process evaluation in connection with a randomised controlled trial in Orissa, India

 

Intervention (n = 408)

Control (n = 399)

Difference

p-value

 

N

%

N

%

%

 

Mean age of respondent (sd)

45 (15)

41 (14)

  

Respondent is female

249

61

222

56

5

 

Perceived benefits of having a toilet

      

 Convenient when it rains or during floods

187

46

193

48

−2

0.61

 Time saving from walking to OD sites

241

59

189

47

12

0.02

 Health benefits

141

35

114

29

6

0.18

 Safety

128

31

131

33

−2

0.82

 Prevent contaminating the environment

70

17

87

22

−5

0.15

 Convenient at night

118

29

138

35

−6

0.47

 Convenient for elderly

46

11

48

12

−1

0.73

 Convenient for children

47

12

75

19

−7

0.01

 Convenient when sick

19

5

55

14

−9

0.02

 Convenient for disabled person

4

1

6

2

−1

0.51

 Safer for women

71

17

92

23

−6

0.04

 Give privacy to women

82

20

84

21

−1

0.98

 Cost saving

2

0

15

4

−4

<0.01

 Status improved

8

2

16

4

−2

0.04

 Shame

16

4

0

0

4

<0.01

 Good for married women

17

4

1

0

4

<0.01

Heard about sanitation campaign

373

91

194

49

42

<0.001

Heard about campaign from (n = 567)

      

 NGO

238

64

38

20

44

<0.001

 VWSC

63

17

0

0

17

<0.001

 Ward member

21

6

30

15

−9

<0.01

 Anganwadi worker

12

3

16

8

−5

0.09

 ASHA

23

6

0

0

6

0.02

 School teacher

3

1

0

0

1

0.09

 Adolescent girls committee

3

1

0

0

1

0.19

 Self-help group

5

1

9

5

−4

0.06

 Neighbours

34

9

59

30

−21

<0.001

 Family

10

3

23

12

−9

<0.01

 Friends

1

0

19

10

−10

<0.001

Heard or seen village walk or mapping exercise

26

6

38

10

−4

0.04

Heard of wealth ranking exercise

1

0

5

1

−1

0.09

Heard of village water and sanitation committee

207

51

37

9

42

<0.001

 Can cite name of at least one VWSC member

169

41

26

7

34

<0.001

 Can explain what VWSC members do

138

34

8

2

32

<0.001

Heard of adolescent girls group

93

23

33

8

15

<0.01

Heard or seen school children rally

147

36

173

43

−7

0.10

Seen wall paintings

178

44

28

7

37

<0.001

Remember content of wall painting (n = 206)

      

 Transmission of diarrhoea

103

57

6

21

36

<0.01

 Latrine cost breakdown

104

57

2

8

49

0.01

 Village map

68

38

3

11

27

0.24

Received home visit about sanitation in past 3 mo

242

65

12

3

230

<0.001

Person who came at last visit

      

 NGO staff

257

63

11

3

60

<0.001

 VWSC member

13

3

0

0

3

0.21

 Ward member

4

1

7

2

−1

<0.01

 Anganwadi worker

4

1

1

0

1

0.46

 ASHA

12

3

0

0

3

0.36

 SHG member

25

6

2

1

5

0.97

Remember being discussed during last visit

      

 Contribution amount

285

70

4

1

69

0.001

 Latrine construction logistics

211

52

10

3

49

0.04

 How to use and maintain latrine

108

26

2

1

25

0.91

 Benefits of having a latrine

80

20

1

0

20

0.88

 Inform about meetings

37

9

0

0

9

0.66

 Kumari committee

2

0

0

0

0

0.12

  1. *p-values calculated using the t-test on village-level percent awareness of or participation in intervention activities.