Skip to main content

Table 3 Pairwise estimates of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site between GAPDH sequences

From: Holistic screening of collapsing honey bee colonies in Spain: a case study

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

1

              

2

0

             

3

0

0

            

4

1.58

1.58

1.58

           

5

0

0

0

1.58

          

6

1.60

1.60

1.60

0

1.60

         

7

0

0

0

1.58

0

1.60

        

8

1.58

1.58

1.58

0

1.58

0

1.58

       

9

0

0

0

1.58

0

1.60

0

1.58

      

10

1.60

1.60

1.60

0

1.60

0

1.60

0

1.60

     

11

24.66

24.66

24.66

26.77

24.66

26.30

24.66

26.77

24.66

26.30

    

12

21.80

21.80

21.80

23.83

21.80

23.36

21.80

23.83

21.80

23.36

3.23

   

13

23.21

23.21

23.21

25.29

23.21

24.81

23.21

25.29

23.21

24.81

4.34

1.06

  

14

23.21

23.21

23.21

25.29

23.21

24.81

23.21

25.29

23.21

24.81

1.06

2.14

3.23

 
  1. 1: AB745489.1, 2: AB716357.1, 3: JF423199.1, 4: KJ704252 – 3, 5: KJ704254, 6: KJ704255, 7: KJ704256 – 63, 8: KJ704264, 9: KJ704265 – 69, KJ704271 – 72,10: KJ704270, 11: KJ704273, KJ704275, 12: KJ704274, KJ704281 – 82, 13: KJ704276 – 77, KJ704279, 14: KJ704278, KJ704280. Analyses were conducted in MEGA5 using the Nei-Gojobori model. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. Comparisons involving ATCC30254 and presumed C. mellificae sequences are highlighted in bold.
Back to article page

BMC Research Notes

ISSN: 1756-0500

Contact us