Skip to main content

Table 2 Associations between the provision of EOL care and agency characteristics

From: Factors related to the provision of home-based end-of-life care among home-care nursing, home help, and care management agencies in Japan

 

Homecare nurse, n = 371

Home helper, n = 274

Care manager, n = 452

Provision of EOL Care

Provision of EOL Care

Provision of EOL Care

No (n = 140)

Yes (n = 231)

p-value

No (n = 152)

Yes (n = 122)

p-value

No (n = 198)

Yes (n = 54)

p-value

Agency characteristics

 Number of staff (FTE)

3.1 (2.6–4.0)

4.5 (3.2–6.5)

<0.001a

4.8 (3.0–9.7)

8.4 (4.0–14.6)

0.001a

2.0 (1.0–3.0)

2.6 (2.0–4.0)

<0.001a

 Nursing staff

  Yes

      

70 (35.4)

114 (44.7)

0.044b

  No

      

128 (64.7)

141 (55.3)

 

 Number of clients/1 month

36.0 (20.0–56.0)

52.0 (34.0–88.0)

<0.001a

35.0 (21.0–64.0)

53.0 (31.0–80.0)

0.001a

42.0 (23.0–74.0)

68.5 (39.0–108.5)

<0.001a

Agency ownership

 Social welfare corporation

19 (13.8)

20 (8.7)

0.079b

42 (27.6)

30 (24.8)

0.574b

53 (26.8)

80 (31.8)

0.303b

 Profit corporation

38 (27.5)

64 (27.8)

 

77 (50.7)

67 (55.4)

 

81(40.9)

85 (33.7)

 

 Healthcare corporation

56 (40.6)

80 (34.8)

 

19 (12.5)

10 (8.3)

 

33 (16.7)

52 (20.6)

 

 Others

25 (18.1)

66 (28.7)

 

14 (9.2)

14 (11.6)

 

31 (15.7)

35 (13.9)

 

Other healthcare faclity owned by the same organization

 Care management agency

  Yes

84 (60.0)

151 (65.4)

0.298b

101 (72.7)

95 (81.2)

0.108b

   

  No

56 (40.0)

80 (34.6)

 

38 (27.3)

22 (18.8)

    

 Homecare nursing agency

  Yes

   

21 (15.1)

24 (20.5)

0.258b

24 (13.7)

47 (21.3)

0.052b

  No

   

118 (84.9)

93 (79.5)

 

151 (86.3)

174 (78.7)

 

 Home help agency

  Yes

43 (30.7)

72 (31.2)

0.927b

   

86 (49.1)

115 (52.0)

0.567b

  No

97 (69.3)

159 (68.8)

    

89 (50.9)

106 (48.0)

 

 Hospital

  Yes

36 (25.7)

61 (26.4)

0.883b

8 (5.8)

5 (4.3)

0.591b

23 (13.1)

30 (13.6)

0.900b

  No

104 (74.3)

170 (73.6)

 

131 (94.2)

112 (95.7)

 

152 (86.9)

191 (86.4)

 

 Non-bed clinic

  Yes

19 (13.6)

25 (10.8)

0.427b

6 (4.3)

4 (3.4)

0.712b

7 (4.0)

15 (6.8)

0.229b

  No

121 (86.4)

206 (89.2)

 

133 (95.7)

113 (96.6)

 

168 (96.0)

206 (93.2)

 

 Number of collaborating HN agencies

      

2.0 (0.0–3.0)

2.0 (1.0–4.0)

<0.001a

 Number of collaborating HH agencies

      

4.0 (2.0–7.0)

6.0 (4.0–10.0)

<0.001a

 Number of collaborating CM agencies

7.0 (3.0–12.0)

13.0 (7.0–20.0)

<0.001a

6.0 (3.0–10.0)

6.0 (4.0–12.0)

0.105a

   

 Number of collaborating healthcare faclities

11.0 (6.0–20.0)

16.0 (9.0–28.0)

<0.001a

      

Additional reimbursement for intensive service

 By LTCI

  Yes

127 (92.0)

227 (99.1)

<0.001b

29 (19.7)

36 (30.8)

0.039b

3 (1.6)

11 (4.5)

0.087b

  No

11 (8.0)

2 (0.9)

 

118 (80.3)

81 (69.2)

 

189 (98.4)

236 (95.6)

 

 By healthcare insurance

  Yes

109 (80.7)

217 (94.4)

<0.001b

      

  No

26 (19.3)

13 (5.7)

       

Accepting end-of-life clients

   

59 (39.1)

82 (68.3)

<0.001b

   
   

92 (60.9)

38 (31.7)

    

 Homecare nurse and home helper could visit client together

  Yes

93 (67.9)

171 (76.7)

0.067b

86 (58.9)

69 (57.0)

0.757b

97 (52.7)

170 (67.5)

0.002b

  No

44 (32.1)

52 (23.3)

 

60 (41.1)

52 (43.0)

 

87 (47.3)

82 (32.5)

 
  1. The figures of each item were not equal to the total number of the participants due to missing values; percentages for each item were calculated after excluding missing values
  2. aMann–Whitney U test
  3. bChi square tests