Skip to main content

Table 3 Feedback regarding perception of the course (conduct of the course, instructor etc.)

From: Randomized control trial of high fidelity vs low fidelity simulation for training undergraduate students in neonatal resuscitation

  

Low fidelity (N = 46), frequency (%)

High fidelity (N = 47), frequency (%)

Did you get enough time to practice?

No

2 (4.35)

9 (19.15)

Yes

44 (95.65)

38 (80.85)

Would you have preferred to be in another group?

No

24 (52.17)

35 (74.47)

Yes

22 (47.83)

12 (25.53)

Were the instructors helpful?

No

2 (4.35)

1 (2.13)

Yes

44 (95.65)

46 (97.87)

Do you think that you will be able to independently take care of a newborn with difficulty of breathing at birth?

May be

0 (0)

1 (2.13)

No

11 (23.91)

9 (19.15)

Yes

35 (76.09)

37 (78.72)

Do you think that this course improves your ability to help a more skilled person during the resuscitation of a newborn with breathing difficulty?

No

2 (4.35)

3 (6.38)

Yes

44 (95.65)

44 (93.62)

Would you be interested in doing the course again?

No

18 (39.13)

22 (46.81)

Yes

28 (60.87)

25 (53.19)

Would you recommend this course to your juniors?

No

2 (4.35)

2 (4.26)

Yes

44 (95.65)

45 (95.74)

In terms of learning neonatal resuscitation how useful would it be to you in your medical career (in terms of helping babies)?

<5 %

0 (0)

1 (2.13)

>85 %

14 (30.43)

8 (17.02)

05–20 %

2 (4.35)

2 (4.26)

20–50 %

12 (26.09)

17 (36.17)

50–70 %

11 (23.91)

8 (17.02)

70–85 %

7 (15.22)

11 (23.40)

  1. Italic values indicate statistically significant associations