Skip to main content

Table 3 Association between recruitment strategy and response rate: comparing exposed and non-exposed districts, to different strategies

From: Involving hard-to-reach ethnic minorities in low-budget health research: lessons from a health survey among Moluccans in the Netherlands

 

Number of districts (N)

Response rate (%)

Exposed

Non-exposed

Exposed

Non-exposed

Indirect recruitment strategy

 Announcement letter

14

5

25.5

19.8

 Information meeting

7

12

24.1

24.1

 Local media

6

13

23.0

24.6

 Social media

10

9

20.6

28.5

Direct recruitment strategy

 Door-to-door collection

5

14

31.8

21.2

 Involvement of community organizations

3

16

21.8

24.5

Other strategies

 “Active” key informantsa

9

10

30.0

18.1

  1. Response rates with more than 5 % increase between exposed and non-exposed communities are presented in italics
  2. aKey informants were considered to be ‘active’ if they made major effort during the recruitment process (see text for the details)