Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of study characteristics including demographics and outcome measures

From: Does a PBL-based medical curriculum predispose training in specific career paths? A systematic review of the literature

Reference (year)

Country and school

Study design

Total number of participants

Programs compared (number in each group)

Level of training (graduation years)

Other relevant demographics/adjustment for confounding

Outcome measures

Ford et al. [4]

Canada. All English-language schools

Retrospective cohort

14,370

PBL vs non-PBLa (6391/7979)

Graduates (1993–2004)

None

Pathology residency choice

Kaufman et al. [14]

USA. University of New Mexico School of Medicine

Retrospective cohort

511

Primary care (PBL) vs traditional curriculum (140/379)

Final year medical students

None

Future specialty choice

Matsui et al. [9]

Japan. Tokyo Women’s Medical University

Retrospective cohort

468

PBL vs Non-PBL curriculum (248/220)

Graduates (1989–2003)

All female, aged between 25–53

Specialty choice

Mennin et al. [17]

USA. University of New Mexico School of Medicine

Retrospective Cohort

120

Conventional vs primary care (PBL) curriculum (87/33)

Graduates (1983–1986)

None

Family practice specialty

Moore et al. [15]

USA. Harvard Medical School

Randomised controlled trial

297

New pathway (PBL) vs traditional curriculum (62/235)

Graduates (1989–1990)

No significant difference between groups in terms of age or gender

Residency choice

Moore-west et al. [16]

USA. University of New Mexico School of Medicine

Cohort study

38

New pathway (PBL) vs traditional curriculum (19/19)

Graduates (1983–1984)

None

Residency choice

Pearson et al. [18]

Australia. University of Newcastle and University of Sydney

Retrospective cohort

2469

PBL vs Non-PBLb (538/1931)

Graduates (1983–1998)

Matched for graduation year, age and gender

Specialty choice

Peters et al. [10]

USA. Harvard Medical School

Randomised Controlled Trial

100

New Pathway (PBL) vs traditional curriculum (50/50)

Graduates (1989–1990)

Matched for age & gender

Specialty choice

Tolnai et al. [20]

Canada. McMaster University and University of Ottawa

Retrospective Cohort

342

PBL vs Non-PBLb (156/186)

Graduates (1974–1980)

None

Family practice specialty

Wesnes et al. [11]

Norway. all Norwegian Medical Schools

Cross-sectional

1770

PBL vs Non-PBLb

Graduates (2002–2005)

None

General practice specialty

Woodward et al. [19]

Canada. McMaster University and other Canadian Universities

Retrospective cohort

2028

PBL vs Non-PBLb (408/1620)

Graduates (1972–1979)

Group 1: matched on year of graduation. Group 2: matched on year of graduation, sex and age

Specialty choice

  1. aPBL schools were defined as such following interviews with representatives from each of Canada’s 13 english-language medical schools
  2. bGraduates from schools with a mainly PBL based curriculum were compared with those from schools with a traditional non-PBL based curriculum