Skip to main content

Advertisement

TableĀ 2 p values of six morphological variables for each pair of the four groups using ANOVA

From: Quantitative morphological analysis of 2D images of complex-shaped branching biological growth forms: the example of branching thalli of liverworts

Morphological variable p value
R.a.AF vs R.a.SA R.a. AF vs R.ob R.a.AF vs R.co R.a.SA vs R.ob R.a.SA vs R.co R.ob vs R.co
da 0.00039 (**) <0.0001 (***) <0.0001 (***) <0.0001 (***) <0.0001 (***) <0.0001 (***)
db 0.00078 (***) <0.0001 (***) 0.00077 (***) <0.0001 (***) <0.0001 (***) <0.0001 (***)
dc 0.00087 (**) <0.0001 (***) 0.0146 (*) 0.00069 (***) <0.0001 (***) <0.0001 (***)
bl 0.00031 (***) <0.0001 (***) <0.0001 (***) 0.69 (ns) 0.18(ns) 0.036 (*)
bs <0.0001 (***) 0.0062 (**) 0.00051 (***) 0.042 (*) 0.99(ns) 0.8 (.)
ba 0.973 (ns) 0.059 (.) 0.0257 (*) 0.112 (ns) 0.049 (*) <0.0001 (***)
  1. R.a.AF Riccardia amazonica collected from Africa, R.a.SA Riccardia amazonica collected from South America, R.ob Riccardia obtusa, R.co Riccardia compacta, ns non-significance
  2. Significant codes *** 0.001, ** 0.01, * 0.05, . 0.1