Skip to main content

Table 2 p values of six morphological variables for each pair of the four groups using ANOVA

From: Quantitative morphological analysis of 2D images of complex-shaped branching biological growth forms: the example of branching thalli of liverworts

Morphological variable

p value

R.a.AF vs R.a.SA

R.a. AF vs R.ob

R.a.AF vs R.co

R.a.SA vs R.ob

R.a.SA vs R.co

R.ob vs R.co

da

0.00039 (**)

<0.0001 (***)

<0.0001 (***)

<0.0001 (***)

<0.0001 (***)

<0.0001 (***)

db

0.00078 (***)

<0.0001 (***)

0.00077 (***)

<0.0001 (***)

<0.0001 (***)

<0.0001 (***)

dc

0.00087 (**)

<0.0001 (***)

0.0146 (*)

0.00069 (***)

<0.0001 (***)

<0.0001 (***)

bl

0.00031 (***)

<0.0001 (***)

<0.0001 (***)

0.69 (ns)

0.18(ns)

0.036 (*)

bs

<0.0001 (***)

0.0062 (**)

0.00051 (***)

0.042 (*)

0.99(ns)

0.8 (.)

ba

0.973 (ns)

0.059 (.)

0.0257 (*)

0.112 (ns)

0.049 (*)

<0.0001 (***)

  1. R.a.AF Riccardia amazonica collected from Africa, R.a.SA Riccardia amazonica collected from South America, R.ob Riccardia obtusa, R.co Riccardia compacta, ns non-significance
  2. Significant codes *** 0.001, ** 0.01, * 0.05, . 0.1
Back to article page

BMC Research Notes

ISSN: 1756-0500

Contact us