Open Access

Reducing fresh full term intrapartum stillbirths through leadership and accountability in a low-resource setting, Mpilo Central Hospital, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe

BMC Research Notes201710:246

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2567-z

Received: 26 August 2016

Accepted: 26 June 2017

Published: 6 July 2017

Abstract

Background

Stillbirths are distressing to the parents and healthcare workers. Globally large numbers of babies are stillborn. A number of strategies have been implemented to try and reduce stillbirths worldwide. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of leadership and accountability changes on reducing full term intrapartum stillbirths.

Methods

Leadership and accountability changes were implemented in January 2016. This retrospective cohort study was carried out to assess the impact of the changes on fresh full term intrapartum stillbirths covering the period 6 months prior to the implementation date and 12 months after the implementation date. The changes included leadership and accountability. Fresh full term stillbirths (>37 weeks gestation) occurring during the intrapartum stage of labour were analysed to see if there would be any reduction in numbers after the measures were put in place.

Results

There was a reduction in the number of fresh full term intrapartum stillbirths after the introduction of the measures. There was a statistical difference before and after implementation of the changes, 50% vs 0%, P = 0.025. There was a reduction in the time it took to perform an emergency caesarean section from a mean of 30 to 15 min by the end of the study, a 50% reduction.

Conclusions

Clear and consistent clinical leadership and accountability can help in the global attempts to reduce stillbirth figures. Simple measures can contribute to improving perinatal outcomes.

Keywords

Fresh full term intrapartum stillbirths Leadership Accountability Perinatal outcomes Low-resource settings Mpilo Central Hospital

Background

Mpilo Central Hospital is located in Bulawayo and deliveries 9000 deliveries per year. Bulawayo is the second largest city in Zimbabwe after the capital city Harare, with a population of 653,337 as of the 2012 census [1]. It is located in Matabeleland, 439 km southwest of Harare, on the way to Victoria Falls.

Stillbirths remain a global headache. Annually 2.6 million stillbirths occur worldwide, 98% in developing countries [2]. Each year 1.02 million intrapartum stillbirths and 904,000 intrapartum-related neonatal deaths occur [3]. Pregnancy loss leads to long-standing parental depression and related problems [4]. The low proportion of intrapartum stillbirth in high-income countries suggests that intrapartum stillbirth are largely preventable with quality intrapartum care including prompt recognition and management of intrapartum complications [5]. Substandard care contributes 20–30% of cases [6]. The perinatal mortality rate for Zimbabwe as of 2014 was 39 per 1000 live births [7].

There are no similar studies in the literature specifically on reducing stillbirths through leadership and accountability done in low-resource settings. This study aims to document if simple measures could help reduce preventable perinatal deaths especially where resources are limited.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study carried out at Mpilo Central Hospital, a tertiary teaching referral government hospital in a low-resource setting. Information was obtained from the birth registers/case notes in labour ward/theatres covering the period 1 July, 2015 to 31st December, 2016. The changes included redeploying experienced midwives back to labour ward (from other wards where they had been inappropriately deployed), registrars were put on resident on-call and a second theatre was brought back into function. The time of decision for emergency caesarean section to cutting time was monitored. Every case note of fresh full term intrapartum stillbirth was scrutinised. Health workers were made accountable by writing statements. Fresh stillbirths that were already dead at the time of admission were excluded from the study. The stillbirths from congenital abnormalities and preterm deliveries were also excluded from the study. Only fresh full term intrapartum stillbirths (>37 weeks gestation) occurring during the intrapartum stage of labour were analysed. The SPSS Version 21(IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) statistical tool was used to calculate the mean and standard deviation (SD) figures. Simple statistical tests were used on absolute numbers to calculate percentages. Chi-square test was used to calculate P values. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Table 1 shows the results of the study. There were 16 fresh full term intrapartum stillbirths in 6 months prior to the implementation of the changes. During this period (July 2015–December 2016), fresh full term intrapartum stillbirths constituted between 40 and 100% of the fresh full term stillbirths at the unit. In the middle of the study (January 2016–October 2016) they were 0–33%. At the end of the study (December 2016), they constituted 0% of the fresh full term stillbirths. There were 3 fresh full term intrapartum stillbirths for 12 months after the changes were made. The other fresh full term stillbirths were those foetuses whose mothers arrived at the unit with the baby already dead. There was a statistical difference (50% vs 0%, P = 0.025) between the fresh full term intrapartum stillbirths at the beginning and at the end of the study. The mean time from the time of decision for caesarean section to cutting time was 30 min (SD ±10) at the beginning of the study. At the end of the study it was 10 min (SD ±5). This was a 50% reduction.
Table 1

The distribution of total deliveries and fresh stillbirths

Month

Total deliveries

Total FSB

Full term FSB

Other conditions

Before measures

 July 2015

759

4

2 (50%)

2 (50%)

 August

720

5

2 (40%)

3 (60%)

 September

724

2

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

 October

756

3

3 (100%)

0 (0%)

 November

702

6

5 (80%)

0 (0%)

 December

726

2

2 (100%)

1 (20%)

After measures

 January 2016

735

3

1 (33.3%)

2 (66.7%)

 February

763

6

0 (0%)

6 (100%)

 March

784

3

0 (0%)

3 (100%)

 April

735

4

0 (0%)

4 (100%)

 May

767

5

0 (0%)

5 (100%)

 June

783

5

1 (20%)

4 (80%)

 July

735

1

0 (0%)

1 (100%)

 August

798

2

0 (0%)

2 (100%)

 September

760

2

0 (0%)

2 (100%)

 October

735

4

1 (25%)

3 (75%)

 November

711

6

0 (0%)

6 (100%)

 December

694

1

0 (0%)

1 (100%)

Discussion

This study documents the effect of implementation of simple measures in a unit challenged by low resources. There was a reduction in preventable fresh full term intrapartum stillbirths in the unit after the introduction of measures driven by clinical leadership and accountability.

Before the changes were put in place, fresh full term intrapartum stillbirths constituted 40–100% of the cases of fresh full term stillbirths. The changes took some time to show some improvements. By the middle of the study, fresh full term stillbirths constituted 0–33%. Healthcare workers were learning from their mistakes at monthly audit meetings. At the end of the study, fresh full term intrapartum stillbirths were in the figures of 0%. This meant that women arriving at the unit with a live fetus, the chances of a fresh full term stillbirth had significantly reduced (P = 0.025). The use of two operating theatres helped improve waiting times for emergency operations by 50%.

There were 16 fresh full term intrapartum stillbirths for the 6 months prior to the changes and there were only 3 fresh full term intrapartum stillbirths for the entire 12 months after the implementation of the changes. There used to be at least 2 fresh full term intrapartum stillbirths per month prior to the measures being put in place to 1 every 4 months at the end of the study.

Intrapartum-related neonatal deaths can be avoided by interventions that prevent intrapartum complications, detect and manage intrapartum problems [8]. Simple, affordable and effective approaches are available for low-resource settings [9]. Audits are associated with improved quality of care [1012]. Audits provide insight into where systematic deficiencies in clinical care occur and can provide crucial direction for the targeting of interventions [13]. Consistent leadership and accountability can save many lives globally [14]. The five priority areas to change and end preventable deaths by 2030 the stillbirth trend include intentional leadership, increased voice especially of women, implantation of integrated interventions with commensurate investment [15] at local, national and international levels.

This study is very important as it documents simple measures that clinicians can adopt and adapt. These simply measures can help improve perinatal outcomes. Accountability made sure that all staff looking after pregnant women in labour took due care simple they knew that they were being watched and that each poor outcome would be scrutinised.

Conclusions

Good leadership and accountability can help reduce poor perinatal outcomes. Simple measures like staff redeployments, use of extra operating theatres can improve outcomes. These measures do not cost money and would be appropriate in low-resourced settings.

Abbreviations

FSB: 

fresh stillbirth

SD: 

standard deviation

Declarations

Acknowledgements

None.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated and analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Committee at Mpilo Central Hospital gave a waiver for retrospective and non-intervention studies to go ahead in the institution as long as the data remained anonymous. No ethical issues arose during the study as all the data was anonymous. No patient consent was necessary. Minutes of the Committee’s inaugural meeting held on the 13th October 2016 set out the requirements of all the studies at the institution.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Mpilo Central Hospital
(2)
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Royal Women’s Clinic
(3)
National University of Science and Technology, Medical School

References

  1. ZIMDAT: Census Report 2012. www.zimstat.co.zw
  2. Aminu M, Unkels R, Mdegela M, Utz B, Adaji S, van den Broek N. Causes of and factors associated with stillbirth in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review. BJOG. 2014;121(Suppl 4):141–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12995.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lawn JE, Kinney M, Lee AC, Chopra M, Donnay F, Paul VK, Bhutta ZA, Bateman M, Darmstadt GL. Reducing intra-partum-related deaths and disability: can the health system deliver? Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;107(Suppl 1):S123–40, S140–2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.07.021
  4. Hogue CJ. Invited commentary: preventable pregnancy loss is a public health problem. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183(8):709–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kww004 (Epub 2016 Mar 23).View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Darmstadt GL, Yakoob MY, Haws RA, Menezes EV, Soomro T, Bhutta ZA. Reducing stillbirths: interventions during labour. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9(Suppl 1):S6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-SI.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Flenady V, Wojcieszek AM, Middleton P, Ellwood D, Erwich JJ, Coory M, et al. Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries. Lancet. 2016;387(10019):691–702. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01020-X (Epub 2016 Jan 19).View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. WHO: Global maternal, newborn child and adolescent health policy indicator database. 2014. www.who.int/maternal_maternal_child_adolescent
  8. Wall SN, Lee AC, Carlo W, Goldenberg R, Niermeyer S, Darmstadt GL, Keenan W, Bhutta ZA, Perlman J, Lawn JE. Reducing intrapartum-related neonatal deaths in low- and middle-income countries-what works? Semin Perinatol. 2010;34(6):395–407. doi:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2010.09.009..View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Pattinson R, Kerber K, Waiswa P, Day LT, Mussell F, Asiruddin SK, Blencowe H, Lawn JE. Perinatal mortality audit: counting, accountability, and overcoming challenges in scaling up in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;107(Suppl 1):S113–21, S121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.07.011
  10. Bhutta ZA, Darmstadt GL, Haws RA, Yakoob MY, Lawn JE. Delivering interventions to reduce the global burden of stillbirths: improving service supply and community.demand. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9(Suppl 1):S6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-SI-S7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Mancey-Jones M, Brugha RF. Using perinatal audit to promote change: a review. Health Policy Plan. 1997;12(3):183–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Merali HS, Lipsitz S, Hevelone N, Gawande AA, Lashoher A, Agrawal P, Spector J. Audit-identified avoidable factors in maternal and perinatal deaths in low resource settings: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:280. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-280.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. South Africa Every Death Counts Writing Group, Bradshaw D, Chopra M, Kerber K, Lawn JE, Bamford L, Moodley J, Pattinson R, Patrick M, Stephen C, Velaphi S. Every death counts: use of mortality audit data for decision making to save the lives of mothers, babies, and children in South Africa. Lancet. 2008;371(9620):1294–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60564-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kerber KJ, Mathai M, Lewis G, Flenady V, Erwich JJ, Segun T, Aliganyira P, Abdelmegeid A, Allanson E, Roos N, Rhoda N, Lawn JE, Pattinson R. Counting every stillbirth and neonatal death through mortality through mortality audit to improve quality of care for every pregnant woman and her baby. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(Suppl 2):S9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-15-S2-S9 (Epub 2015 Sept 11).View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. de Bernis L, Kinney MV, Stones W, ten Hoope-Bender P, Vivio D, Leisher SH, et al. Stillbirths: ending preventable deaths by 2030. Lancet. 2016;387(10019):703–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00954-X (Epub 2016 Jan 19).View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement