Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Acceptability of voice-based ecological momentary assessment methods

From: Acceptability of smartphone text- and voice-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods among low income housing residents in New York City

  Yes (% [n]) No (% [n]) p value
Age    .01
 Less than 25 years old 60.7 (17) 39.3 (11)  
 25 to 44 years old 81.6 (31) 18.4 (7)  
 45 years old and older 91.1 (41) 8.9 (4)  
Gender    .09
 Male 72.3 (34) 27.7 (13)  
 Female 85.5 (53) 14.5 (9)  
Race/ethnicity    .91
 White/Caucasian 100.0 (1)  
 Black/African American 79.7 (59) 20.3 (15)  
 Hispanic/Latino 80.0 (4) 20.0 (1)  
 Asian/Pacific Islander 100.0 (3)  
 Multiracial/other 80.8 (21) 19.2 (5)  
Educational attainment    .88
 Less than 12th grade 80.6 (25) 19.4 (6)  
 High school or equivalent 79.5 (35) 20.5 (9)  
 Some college 81.5 (22) 18.5 (5)  
 Bachelor’s degree or higher 75.0 (6) 25.0 (2)  
Household income    .26
 Less than $25,000 81.0 (64) 19.0 (15)  
 $25,000–$49,999 80.0 (20) 20.0 (5)  
 $50,000 or greater 66.7 (4) 33.3 (2)  
Employment status    .00
 Working full time 94.1 (16) 5.9 (1)  
 Working part time 77.3 (17) 22.7 (5)  
 Not working 80.7 (46) 19.3 (11)  
 Retired 100.0 (6)  
 Student 28.6 (2) 71.4 (5)  
Body mass index classification    .28
 Underweight 50.0 (1) 50.0 (1)  
 Normal weight 71.0 (22) 29.0 (9)  
 Overweight 83.9 (26) 16.1 (5)  
 Obese 85.1 (40) 14.9 (7)  
Blood pressure classification    .43
 Normal blood pressure 72.7 (24) 27.3 (24)  
 Pre-hypertension 82.4 (28) 17.6 (6)  
 Hypertension 84.1 (37) 15.9 (7)  
Cell Phone ownership    .29
 Yes 81.4 (83) 18.6 (19)  
 No 66.7 (6) 33.3 (3)  
Smartphone ownership    .35
 Yes 84.2 (48) 15.8 (9)  
 No 76.7 (33) 23.3 (10)