From: Short form version of the Quality of Trauma Care Patient-Reported Experience Measure (SF QTAC-PREM)
Subscales Item numbers and descriptionsa | Sub-scale factor loadings (n = 154)b | Subscale Cronbach’s alpha and corrected item-subscale correlations, (n = 400)c | Item/subscale to global rating item correlationsd, (n = 400)c | Reliability coefficient (95% CI), (n = 78)e |
---|---|---|---|---|
Information and communication | – | 0.55 | 0.50g |  |
1. All injuries explained (10) | 0.83 | 0.50 | 0.34g | 0.51 (0.13–0.88)h |
2. Explained self-care (12) | 0.75 | 0.43 | 0.29g | 0.64 (0.41–0.86)h |
3. Explained recovery timeline (13) | 0.96 | 0.43 | 0.19g | 0.69 (0.45–0.94)h |
4. Consistent information (14) | 0.35 | 0.50 | 0.47g | 0.78 (0.68–0.85) |
Clinical and ancillary care | – | 0.85 | 0.67g |  |
5. Pain well-controlled (18) | 0.68 | 0.84 | 0.50g | 0.72 (0.59–0.81) |
6. Helped with agitation (21) | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.57g | 0.71 (0.55–0.82) |
7. Handled carefully (22) | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.44g | 0.64 (0.48–0.76) |
8. Helped with hygiene (23) | 0.60 | 0.84 | 0.40g | 0.68 (0.52–0.79) |
9. Providers explained their roles (24) | 0.61 | 0.83 | 0.44g | 0.78 (0.67–0.85) |
10. Addressed concerns (25) | 0.70 | 0.82 | 0.55g | 0.68 (0.52–0.80) |
11. Dignity considered (27) | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.44g | 0.57 (0.39–0.70) |
12. Offered to discuss emotional needs (26)f | – | – | – | – |
13. Perceived safety of care (28) | 0.76 | 0.85 | 0.34g | 0.88 (0.82–0.92) |
14. Treated unfairly (30) | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.28g | 0.44 (0.24–0.61) |
Stand-alone items | – |  |  |  |
15. Global rating (34) | – | – |  | 0.85 (0.77–0.90) |