Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of participants

From: Prevalence and determinants of comprehensive eye care in a group of patients with diabetes: a cross-sectional study in a sub-Saharan African setting

 

Overall (N = 52)

Male (n = 31)

Female (n = 21)

P value

Mean age (years)

55.9 ± 10.9

54 ± 9.8

58.7 ± 12

0.128

Type 2 diabetes, %

92.3

96.8

85.7

0.144

Mean duration of diabetes (years)

9.5 ± 7.7

10.6 ± 8.6

7.8 ± 5.8

0.199

Level of education, %

 None

7.7

3.2

14.3

0.144

 Primary

30.8

25.8

38.1

0.350

 Secondary

38.5

41.9

33.3

0.536

 University

23.1

29

14.3

0.221

Health insurance, yes, %

17.3

19.4

14.3

0.637

Sector of activity, %

 Primary

44.2

22.6

76.2

< 0.001*

 Secondary

11.6

19.4

0

0.034*

 Tertiary

44.2

58

23.8

0.016*

Treating physician, %

 Diabetologist

53.9

45.2

66.7

0.131

 General practitioner

28.9

41.9

9.5

0.012*

 Others

17.3

12.9

23.8

0.313

Reference to eye clinic, %

 Treating physician

53.9

41.9

71.2

0.040

 Ophthalmologist

23.1

35.5

4.8

0.011*

 Advised to consult

9.6

12.9

4.8

0.336

 Self-consultation

13.5

9.7

19.1

0.335

Eye care counselling (yes), %

51.9

48.4

57.1

0.542

Dilated fundoscopy (yes), %

61.5

67.7

52.4

0.271

Number of fundoscopy, %

 None

38.5

32.3

47.6

0.271

 One

19.2

22.6

14.3

0.461

 Two

15.4

16.1

14.3

0.861

 More than two

26.9

29

23.8

0.681

Referral time to actual consultation (weeks), %

 < 2

80.8

87.1

71.4

0.163

 > 2

11.5

9.7

14.3

0.614

 Unknown

7.7

3.2

14.3

0.144

Reaction to risk of blindness, %

 Worried

36.5

38.7

33.3

0.694

 Indifferent

48.1

48.4

47.6

0.995

 Can’t tell

15.4

12.9

19.1

0.547

Low visual acuity (VA < 3/10), %

42.3

41.9

42.9

0.944

  1. Data are mean ± standard deviation, level of significance set at p < 0.05
  2. * Significant difference