Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparing fit statistics among models (N = 90)

From: Construct validity, test–retest reliability and internal consistency of the Thai version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH-TH) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome

Fit indices

Hypothesized-5 factora

Six-factor

Five-factor

Four-factor

Three-factor

Two-factor

One-factor

Chi square

976.995

390.704

518.185

685.468

840.903

1228.741

1266.713

Df

395

270

295

321

348

376

405

RMSEA

0.128 (0.118 0.138)

0.070 (0.054 0.085)

0.092 (0.079 0.105)

0.112 (0.101 0.124)

0.125 (0.115 0.136)

0.159 (0.115 0.169)

0.206 (0.193 0.219)

CFI

0.967

0.993

0.987

0.979

0.972

0.952

0.840

TLI

0.964

0.989

0.981

0.972

0.965

0.944

0.828

SRMR/WRMR

0.968b

0.042

0.049

0.059

0.068

0.090

0.152

  1. Df degree of freedom, RMSEA root-mean-square error of approximation, CFI comparative fit index, SRMR standardized root-mean-square residual, TLI Tucker–Lewis index, WRMR weighted root mean square residual
  2. aCFA 5 domain: factor 1, 1–16; factor 2, 17–21; factor 3, 22–23; factor 4, 24–28; factor 5, 29–30
  3. bThis value was calculated by WRMR