Skip to main content

Table 3 Frequency distribution and relative percentages of each feeding guild of waterbirds in relation to abundance and residential status (above)

From: War zone refugia? Establishing a baseline for protected waterbirds in a wildlife refuge flanked by agriculture and militarization

 

Feeding guild

χ2

P

Carnivore

Herbivore

Insectivore

Omnivore

Abundance

 Common

4 (26.7%)

4 (26.7%)

4 (26.7%)

3 (20%)

4.40

> 0.5

 Rare

10 (35.7%)

10 (35.7%)

5 (17.8%)

3 (10.7%)

 Very common

8 (44.4%)

5 (27.7%)

1 (5.5%)

4 (22.2%)

Resident status

 Resident

7 (50%)

0 (0%)

2 (14.2%)

5 (35.7%)

21.9

< 0.001

 Summer visitor

1 (33.3%)

1 (33.3%)

0 (0%)

1 (33.3%)

 Vagrants

2 (40%)

0 (0%)

3 (60%)

0 (0%)

 Winter visitor

12 (30.7%)

18 (46.1%)

5 (12.8%)

4 (10.2%)

 

Abundance

P

 

Common

Rare

Very common

χ2

 

Resident status

 

 Resident

3 (21.4%)

1 (7.1%)

10 (71.4%)

23.6

< 0.001

 

 Summer visitor

2 (66.7%)

1 (33.3%)

0 (0%)

 

 Vagrants

0 (0%)

5 (100%)

0 (0%)

 

 Winter visitor

10 (25.6%)

21 (53.8%)

8 (20.5%)

   
  1. Frequency distribution and relative percentages of each resident status according to abundance (below)