Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of age-period-cohort analysis for pleural mesothelioma incidence in four selected gender/age groups

From: Longevity and pleural mesothelioma: age-period-cohort analysis of incidence data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, 1973–2013

APC parameters

Males, age 0–74

Males, age 75+

Females, age 0–74

Females, age 75+

Period effect: peak PM

 Incidence years

1978–1982

2008–2012

1973–1977

2008–2012

 Net drift (95% CI)

− 1.8% (− 2.3%, − 1 3%)

+4.0% (3.2%, 4.7%)

− 1.5% (− 3.3%, 0.3%)

+3.7% (1.7%, 5.7%)

 p value

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

0.11

0.0002

 Period RRs different from 1988 to 1992?

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

 p value

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

0.67

0.02

 Period deviation is non-linear?

Yes

Yes

No

No

 p value

0.03

0.05

0.89

0.81

Cohort effect: peak PM

 Birth cohort years

1928–1932

1928–1932

1931–1935

1921–1925

 Local drifts = net drift for all age groups?

No

No

No

Yes

 p value

< 0.0001

0.0002

0.02

0.58

 Cohort RRs different from referent cohort?

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

 p value

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

0.16

0.01

 Cohort deviation is nonlinear?

Yes

Yes

No

No

 p value

<0.0001

<0.0001

0.16

0.91

Cross-sectional age trend (95% CI)

12.5% (11.8, 13.2%)

2.2% (0.9, 3.5%)

7.2% (5.9, 8.4%)

− 0.1% (− 4.1, 3.9%)

Longitudinal age trend (95% CI)

10.7% (9.9, 11.4%)

− 1.7% (− 3.1, − 0.4%)

8.7% (6.7, 10.6%)

− 3.7% (− 7.8, 0.4%)

Longitudinal vs. cross-sectional RR trend

Negative

Positive

Negative

Positive/flat

Age deviation is non-linear?

No

Yes

No

No

p value

0.41

0.0002

0.46

0.07