Table 3 Regression analysis of factors associated with non-accidental trauma in the upper Midwest
From: Rural versus urban pediatric non-accidental trauma: different patients, similar outcomes
OR (CI) | P valuea | OR (CI) | P valueb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | 0.66 (0.59, 0.72) | < 0.001 | 0.67 (0.60, 0.73) | < 0.001 |
Sex male | 0.69 (0.47, 1.05) | 0.078 | – | |
Rural | 1.63 (1.03, 2.58) | 0.038 | 1.55 (0.93, 2.59) | 0.094 |
Mechanism of injury penetrating, N (%) | 0.14 (0.02, 1.04) | 0.055 | – | |
Payer group, N (%) | ||||
Government | 2.08 (1.32, 3.29) | 0.002 | 1.37 (0.82, 2.29) | 0.230 |
Commercial | Ref | Ref | ||
Uninsured | 1.45 (0.54, 3.89) | 0.455 | 1.08 (0.37, 3.14) | 0.885 |