Skip to main content

Table 2 Cognitive test performance

From: The impact of expectancy on cognitive performance during alcohol hangover

 

All subjects

AHS > 0 only

Expectancy group

Control group

p-value

Expectancy group

Control group

p-value

Stroop test

Mean RT—congruent items (ms)

1184.0 (188.5)

1300.5 (270.2)

.55

1193.8 (198.0)

1304.2 (273.8)

.18

Mean RT—incongruent items (ms)

1617.1 (343.0)

1680.7 (323.9)

.12

1649.2 (363.7)

1655.6 (329.1)

.96

Interference (ms)

433.2 (232.0)

380.2 (256.6)

.50

455.3 (242.0)

351.4 (219.8)

.19

Number of errors

5.5 (2.0)

5.5 (1.9)

1.00

5.5 (2.1)

5.5 (2.0)

.97

Eriksen’s Flanker test

Compatibility RT (ms)

16.4 (60.1)

11.8 (35.6)

.77

15.7 (64.9)

11.8 (33.1)

.82

Distance RT (ms)

21.9 (32.7)

19.5 (50.6)

.86

23.0 (35.1)

17.5 (52.8)

.72

Number of errors

2.2 (1.4)

1.5 (1.7)

.16

2.20 (1.2)

1.6 (1.7)

.44

Divided attention test

Mean RT—central stimuli (ms)

696.6 (190.7)

698.8 (178.0)

.97

702.6 (206.3)

671.3 (162.1)

.63

Mean RT—peripheral stimuli (ms)

774.0 (182.9)

768.8 (182.9)

.92

745.7 (178.6)

761.5 (111.6)

.76

Number of errors

3.4 (4.4)

3.1 (2.3)

.80

3.3 (4.3)

2.8 (2.3)

.70

CANTAB—Intra-extra dimensional set shifting test

Extra-dimensional number of errors

13.9 (10.3)

11.4 (9.6)

.43

13.7 (10.7)

11.4 (9.9)

.52

Intra-dimensional number of errors

6.6 (2.5)

6.0 (4.3)

.56

6.1 (1.7)

6.0 (4.5)

.92

CANTAB—spatial working memory test

Number of errors

21.6 (19.2)

22.5 (17.0)

.88

21.5 (18.1)

24.2 (17.2)

.67

Strategy score

30.3 (5.8)

28.3 (9.6)

.45

30.8 (5.7)

29.6 (6.6)

.58

Free recall test

Number of correctly recalled words

8.2 (2.9)

6.9 (2.5)

.15

7.6 (2.7)

7.1 (2.5)

.55

  1. RT response time, AHS Acute Hangover Scale
  2. Significant differences (p < .05) are indicated by *