Skip to main content

Table 1 Sensitivity and specificity analysis (clinical study; n = 635 [Sierra Leone])—logistic model

From: Overcoming the challenges of iris scanning to identify minors (1–4 years) in the real-world setting

Age

Estimate (95% CI)

p value vs infant identification using parent/guardian performance accuracy

p value vs adult performance accuracy

Sensitivity in matching population

 1 year

0.896 (0.834–0.936)

0.0028

< 0.0001

 2 years

0.932 (0.886–0.960)

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

 3 years

1.0000 (0.961–1.000)

< 0.0001

1.0000a

 4 years

0.988 (0.921–0.998)

0.0013

< 0.0001

Specificity in matching population

 1 year

0.993 (0.952–0.999)

0.0002

< 0.0001

 2 years

0.948 (0.905–0.972)

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

 3 years

0.946 (0.876–0.977)

0.0007

<0.0001

 4 years

0.918 (0.837–0.960)

0.0050

< 0.0001

Sensitivity in enrolled participants (instances in which the matching procedure could not be performed included as failures)

 1 year

0.563 (0.498–0.626)

1.0000

< 0.0001

 2 years

0.802 (0.744–0.849)

0.4955

< 0.0001

 3 years

0.939 (0.870–0.972)

0.0008

< 0.0001

 4 years

0.977 (0.912–0.994)

0.0005

< 0.0001

Specificity in enrolled participants (instances in which the matching procedure could not be performed included as failures)

 1 year

0.624 (0.560–0.685)

1.0000

< 0.0001

 2 years

0.815 (0.759–0.861)

0.3030

< 0.0001

 3 years

0.888 (0.809–0.937)

0.0178

< 0.0001

 4 years

0.907 (0.825–0.953)

0.0088

< 0.0001

  1. Analysis based on logistic models for sensitivity and specificity with age as covariate
  2. aExact testing was performed for sensitivity in 3-year-olds