Skip to main content

Table 2 Risk (ORs) distribution of the different histological types of mesothelioma in construction workers by exposure length, latency period and age at diagnosis

From: Malignant mesothelioma in construction workers: the Apulia regional mesothelioma register, Southern Italy

Histological type

Variables

Levels (years)

Case

Controls

Odds ratios (LCL–UCL*)

p**

Epithelioid

Exposure length

≤ 6

20

20

1.00 (0.00–0.00)

 

7–32

47

30

1.56 (0.73–3.37)

 

> 32

30

12

2.50 (1.01–6.17)

0.04

Latency period

≤ 34

24

13

1.00 (0.00–0.00)

 

35–53

45

35

0.69 (0.31–1.54)

 

> 53

28

14

1.08 (0.43–2.42)

0.82

Age at diagnosis

< 57

24

15

1.00 (0.00–0.00)

 

57–70

46

29

0.99 (0.45–2.18)

 

> 70

27

18

0.93 (0.39–2.23)

0.88

NOS

Exposure length

≤ 6

4

36

1.00 (0.00–0.00)

 

7–32

4

73

0.49 (0.12–1.91)

 

> 32

1

41

0.21 (0.00–1.55)

0.13

Latency period

≤ 34

3

34

1.00 (0.00–0.00)

 

35–53

5

75

0.75 (0.18–3.02)

 

> 53

1

41

0.27 (0.00–2.05)

0.26

Age at diagnosis

< 57

3

36

1.00 (0.00–0.00)

 

57–70

4

71

0.68 (0.15–2.03)

 

> 70

2

43

0.55 (0.10–1.80)

0.52

Biphasic

Exposure length

≤ 6

5

35

1.00 (0.00–0.00)

 

7–32

9

68

0.92 (0.30–2.83)

 

> 32

4

38

0.73 (0.19–2.76)

0.67

Latency period

≤ 34

4

33

1.00 (0.00–0.00)

 

35–53

9

71

1.04 (0.31–3.43)

 

> 53

5

37

1.11 (0.29–4.17)

0.87

Age at diagnosis

< 57

4

35

1.00 (0.00–0.00)

 

57–70

9

66

1.19 (0.36–3.91)

 

> 70

5

40

1.09 (0.29–4.07)

0.91

Fibrous

Exposure length

≤ 6

3

37

1.00 (0.00–0.00)

 

7–32

5

72

0.85 (0.21–3.42)

 

> 32

2

40

0.61 (0.11–3.28)

0.60

Latency period

≤ 34

2

35

1.00 (0.00–0.00)

 

35–53

6

74

1.41 (0.30–2.20)

 

> 53

2

40

0.87 (0.14–1.80)

0.88

Age at diagnosis

< 57

1

38

1.00 (0.00–0.00)

 

57–70

5

70

2.71 (0.39–4.45)

 

> 70

4

41

3.70 (0.52–5.45)

0.23

  1. *Lower and Upper 95% Cornefield confidence levels
  2. **Probability of Test Chi square2 for trend