Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of univariate regression for loss to follow up

From: Factors related to dropout in integrative oncology clinical trials: interim analysis of an ongoing comparative effectiveness trial of mindfulness-based cancer recovery and Tai chi/Qigong for cancer health (The MATCH study)

Variable LTFU post-randomization LTFU post-Intervention LTFU 6 month FU
Age
 < 45 1 1 1
 46–60 1.22 (0.51–2.91); p = 0.65 1.38 (0.71–2.68); p = 0.34 1.54 (0.73–3.22); p = 0.26
 61–75 1.23 (0.51–2.97); p = 0.65 1.27 (0.65–2.49); p = 0.49 1.05 (0.49–2.25); p = 0.89
 > 75 2.46 (0.74–8.18); p = 0.14 1.54 (0.54– 4.41); p = 0.42 1.68 (0.51–5.51); p = 0.39
Sex
 Males (ref) 1 1 1
 Females 1.32 (0.62–2.81); p = 0.48 1.31 (0.73–2.32); p = 0.36 1.09 (0.59–2.04); p = 0.76
Education 0.95 (0.88–1.02); p = 0.17 0.97 (0.92–1.03); p = 0.33 0.94 (0.87–1.01); p = 0.08
Marital status
 Married/cohabiting 1 1 1
 Single/divorced/widowed 0.86 (0.37–1.98); p = 0.73 1.08 (0.58–2.00); p = 0.80 1.42 (0.74–2.73); p = 0.29
Employment status
 Unemployed/disabled 1 1 1
 Retired 0.73 (0.20–2.59); p = 0.63 1.42 (0.51–3.99); p = 0.51 2.60 (0.79–8.56); p = 0.12
 Employed (PT/FT) 1.14 (0.35–3.700; p = 0.83 2.14 (0.79–5.76); p = 0.13 3.94 (1.24–12.55); p = 0.02
Baseline distress 1.04 (0.84–1.29); p = 0.72 1.07 (0.89–1.270; p = 0.45 1.06 (0.87–1.28)
Program type
 MBCR 1.39 (0.74–2.58); p = 0.30 1.32 (0.81–2.16); p = 0.26 1.12 (0.66–1.90); p = 0.68
 TCQ (ref) 1 1 1
Program preference
 Randomized 1.18 (0.58–2.39); p = 0.65 1.08 (0.62–1.90); p = 0.78 .64 (0.34–1.21); p = 0.17
 Preference (ref) 1 1 1
Program timing
 IM (ref) 1 1 1
 WL 4.08 (2.16–7.71); p < 0.005 2.23 (1.34–3.70); p = 0.002 2.56 (1.44–4.54); p = 0.001
Adherence N/A   
 LL (CA = low, HPL = low)   8.29 (4.12–16.66); p < 0.005 5.84 (2.71–12.59); p < 0.005
 LH (CA = low, HPL = high)   6.15(2.15–17.63); p = 0.001 3.94 (1.23–12.59); p = 0.02
 HL (CA = high, HPL = low)   1.12 (0.57–2.47); p = 0.64 1.82 (0.89–3.63); p = 0.09
 HH (CA = high, HPL = high) (ref)   1 1