Skip to main content

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics and occupational data of the respondents

From: Evaluation of sleep quality and anxiety in Italian pediatric healthcare workers during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic

 

All (N = 175)

Primary care staff (N = 47)

Secondary care staff (N = 128)

p value

Choose your occupation among the following options?

    

 Hospital pediatrician

58 (33.1)

   

 Pediatric Resident

55 (31.4)

   

 Pediatric Nurse

15 (8.6)

   

 Family pediatrician

47 (28.9)

   

What is your age?

   

< 0.001

 

37.0 (55.5–31.0)

60.0 (58.0–63.5)

33.0 (29.0–40.0)

 

Are you a male or a female?

   

0.027

 Male

41 (23.4)

17 (36.2)

24 (18.7)

 

 Female

134 (76.6)

30 (63.8)

104 (81.3)

 

Do you have any son or daughter?

   

 < 0.001

 No

97 (55.4)

6 (12.8)

91 (71,1)

 

 Yes

78 (44.6)

41 (87.2)

37 (28.9)

 

In which macro-area of Italy do you work?

   

NS

 North

19 (10.8)

8 (17.0)

11 (8.6)

 

 Center

141 (80.6)

35 (74.5)

106 (82.8)

 

 South

12 (6.9)

4 (8.5)

8 (6.3)

 

 Islands

3 (1.7)

0 (0.0)

3 (2.3)

 

Do you have any flatmate older than 60 years?

   

 < 0.001

 No

132 (75.4)

24 (51.1)

108 (84.4)

 

 Yes

43 (24.6)

23 (48.9)

20 (15.6)

 

Do you have any SARS-CoV-2 infected relative/friend?

   

NS

 No

115 (65.7)

33 (70.2)

82 (64.1)

 

 Yes

60 (34.3)

14 (29.8)

46 (35.9)

 

How many COVID-19 patients did you visit or manage by phone?

   

NS

 0

76 (43.4)

17 (36.2)

59 (46.1)

 

 1–5

87 (49.7)

26 (55.3)

61 (47.7)

 

 6–15

8 (4.6)

4 (8.5)

4 (3.1)

 

  > 15

4 (2.3)

0 (0.0)

4 (3.1)

 

How many patients with suspected COVID-19 symptoms did you visit or manage by phone?

   

NS

 0

9 (5.1)

1 (2.1)

8 (6.2)

 

  < 10

109 (61.6)

33 (70.2)

76 (59.4)

 

 10–30

35 (19.8)

12 (25.6)

23 (18.0)

 

 31–50

11 (6.2)

0 (0.0)

11 (8.6)

 

 51–100

10 (5.7)

1 (2.1)

9 (7.0)

 

  > 100

1 (0.6)

0 (0.0)

1 (0.8)

 

How do you judge the adequacy of personal protective equipment in your workplace?

   

 < 0.001

 Absent

19 (10.9)

17 (36.2)

2 (1.6)

*Abs-exc 0.001

*Abs-poor < 0,001

*Abs-suff. < 0,001

 Poor

87(49.7)

0(0.0)

7(5.5)

*Poor-suff. < 0,001

 Sufficient

62 (35.4)

29 (61.7)

58 (45.3)

 

 Excellent

7 (4.0)

1 (2.1)

61 (47.6)

 

Did you perform rhino-pharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2?

   

 < 0.001

 No

79 (45.1)

33 (70.2)

46 (35.9)

 

 Yes

96 (54.9)

14 (29.8)

82 (64.1)

 

If Yes, which was the result?

   

NS

 Negative

95 (98.9)

14 (100)

81 (98.8)

 

 Positive

1 (1.1)

0 (0.0)

1 (1.2)

 

Did you perform serologic test for SARS-CoV-2?

   

0.006

 No

128 (73.1)

42 (89.4)

86 (67.2)

 

 Yes

47 (26.9)

5 (10.6)

42 (32.8)

 

If Yes, which was the result?

   

NS

 Negative IgG and IgM

45 (95.8)

4 (80.0)

41 (97.6)

 

 Negative IgG and positive IgM

1 (2.1)

1 (20.0)

0 (0.0)

 

 Positive IgG and negative IgM

1 (2.1)

0 (0.0)

1 (2.4)

 

 Positive IgG and IgM

0 (0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

 
  1. Values are absolute numbers (percentages) for categorical data and median (range) for continuous variables. N numbers, NS not significant;
  2. Pediatric primary care staff consisted offamily pediatricians; pediatric secondary care staff consisted of hospital pediatricians, residents in Pediatrics and pediatric nurses; COVID-19 novel coronavirus 19 disease, SARS-CoV-2 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome—Coronavirus–2; Ig immunoglobulin
  3. p value from Mann Whitney U test
  4. p value from Pearson’s Chi squared test
  5. Bold formatting to values where the p-value is < 0.05
  6. *adjusted p value from post-hoc test (Bonferroni test) for pairwise Chi-squared test comparisons