Table 1 Descriptive statistics and results from two-level binary logistic regressions of high life satisfaction by exposure to sexual jokes and proportion of students in class who have been exposed to sexual jokes
Descriptives | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
High life satisfaction | 3148 | 84.9 | ||||
Student level | ||||||
Exposed to sexual jokes | ||||||
No (ref.) | 3519 | 94.8 | 1.00 | – | 1.00 | |
Yes | 191 | 5.2 | 0.38*** | 0.27–0.53 | 0.43*** | 0.30–0.61 |
Gender | ||||||
Boy (ref.) | 1810 | 48.8 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
Girl | 1900 | 51.2 | 0.52*** | 0.43–0.63 | 0.52*** | 0.43–0.63 |
Grade | ||||||
5 (ref.) | 1000 | 27.0 | 1.00 | – | 1.00 | – |
7 | 1237 | 33.3 | 0.60*** | 0.45–0.80 | 0.62** | 0.46–0.82 |
9 | 1473 | 39.7 | 0.43*** | 0.33–0.56 | 0.45*** | 0.34–0.60 |
Family structure | ||||||
Two parents (ref.) | 2685 | 72.4 | 1.00 | – | 1.00 | – |
Other | 1025 | 27.6 | 0.62*** | 0.51–0.76 | 0.62*** | 0.51–0.75 |
Mean | s.d | |||||
Family affluence | 9.4 | 2.0 | 1.21*** | 1.15–1.26 | 1.20*** | 1.15–1.26 |
Class level | ||||||
% students in class exposed to sexual jokes | 5.2 | 6.6 | 0.98* | 0.97–0.9994 | ||
Empty model | ||||||
ICC | 7.3% | 2.2% | 1.9% | |||