Fig. 2
From: Nutritional prospects of jackfruit and its potential for improving dietary diversity in Uganda
a Plot of the first (PC1) and second (PC2) principal component for jackfruit samples based on the nutritional composition of the flakes. PC1 explained 21.91% and PC2 explained 18.23% of the variation, b the biplot showing calcium and magnesium as the strongest predictors of the variation at PC1 and PC2, c Average loadings of PC3 differentiating the orange and white varieties. Different letters adjacent to the plot indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the varieties based on the least significant difference with Bonferroni adjustments. Average loadings of PC1 differentiating the orange and white varieties. Different letters adjacent to the plot indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the varieties based on the least significant difference with Bonferroni adjustments, d Average amount of total phenolics in the leaves of the different jackfruit varieties. Different letters adjacent to the plot indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the varieties based on the least significant difference with Bonferroni adjustments