From: The impacts of faecal subsampling on microbial compositional profiling
Sub-sample 1 | Sub-sample 2 | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Diversity metrics | |||
OTU count | 243 ± 75 (243; 140–362) | 237 ± 71 (235; 135–360) | 0.32 |
Shannon Index | 4.69 ± 0.69 (4.83; 3.71–5.50) | 4.77 ± 0.69 (4.88; 3.70–5.75) | 0.29 |
Phyla (relative abundance) | |||
Actinobacteria | 0.41 ± 0.25 (0.41; 0.02–0.81) | 0.42 ± 0.32 (0.29; 0.01–0.98) | 0.80 |
Bacteroidetes | 30.9 ± 12.1 (29.8; 15.4–49.0) | 29.7 ± 11.2 (28.3; 16.8–47.1) | 0.51 |
Firmicutes | 63.2 ± 11.3 (58.8; 50.0–81.3) | 65.7 ± 10.5 (65.7; 52.0–81.2) | 0.35 |
Proteobacteria | 1.78 ± 1.85 (1.03; 0.19–6.20) | 1.22 ± 0.80 (0.99; 0.24–2.62) | 0.92a |
Verrucomicrobia | 3.57 ± 5.83 (1.37; 0–18.0) | 2.78 ± 4.14 (1.06; 0.0–12.6) | 0.59a |