Skip to main content

Table 2 Balance performance during free compared to restricted arm movement conditions by group

From: Effect of arm movement on balance performance in children: role of expertise in gymnastics

Test/outcome

Gymnasts (n = 18)

Controls (n = 18)

Free

Restricted

Free

Restricted

OLS

 OLS time; EC, FI [sec]

29.8 ± 20.2

26.9 ± 18.0

31.1 ± 23.4

33.6 ± 24.9

 OLS time; EO, FO [sec]

43.1 ± 19.1

39.9 ± 22.6

39.2 ± 22.9

33.2 ± 22.5

 OLS time; EC, FO [sec]

12.7 ± 15.9

7.1 ± 9.2

7.9 ± 5.6

5.1 ± 5.1

3-m beam walk

 6.0-cm beam walk [steps]

14.8 ± 2.7

14.9 ± 2.6

13.7 ± 4.0

12.0 ± 4.3

 4.5-cm beam walk [steps]

12.9 ± 4.9

11.3 ± 4.0

12.9 ± 4.0

10.2 ± 3.9

 3.0-cm beam walk [steps]

9.8 ± 4.9

5.6 ± 2.8

7.7 ± 3.5

5.3 ± 3.3

YBT-LQ

 YBT-LQ: AT reach [% LL]

110.7 ± 20.7

102.4 ± 20.0

78.8 ± 9.2

75.3 ± 8.9

 YBT-LQ: PM reach [% LL]

140.7 ± 18.1

139.3 ± 16.5

111.5 ± 16.5

105.7 ± 11.5

 YBT-LQ: PL reach [% LL]

134.4 ± 18.6

129.8 ± 15.7

108.7 ± 14.2

103.5 ± 12.4

 YBT-LQ: CS [% LL]

128.6 ± 15.8

123.8 ± 13.5

99.7 ± 12.3

94.9 ± 9.7

  1. Data are presented as group mean values ± standard deviations
  2. AT   Anterior; CS Composite score; EC Eyes closed; EO Eyes opened; FI Firm ground; FO Foam ground; LL Leg length; OLS One-Legged Stance test; PL posterolateral; PM Posteromedial; YBT-LQ Lower Quarter Y Balance test